This bloke is seen as being dangerous for the UK by the press (largely owned by foreign millionaires), because he wants a to protect the poorest in society from austerity and wants the richest 2% to pay a bit more money, which they can easily afford without any impact on their lifestyle.
Wheras this bloke, who has enacted policies which have forced destituion on millions, given a huge tax cut to millionaires and who has presided over a system where foreign multinationals pay minimal tax in the UK is seen as a "safe pair of hands"
Am I missing something?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated and will not appear immediately. I moderate once per day. Comments of a personal, abusive, spam or unrelated to the topic will not appear and will be deleted.
Only comments from Registered users allowed