-----
From: Tatlow, David
Sent: 18 December 2018 07:23:10
To: N******** D****; Tsangari, George
Cc: Charlwood, Andrew; Gaudin, Fabien; Hooton, John; Cornelius, Cllr Richard
Subject: Re: 3 Sunny Gardens Road, Hendon, NW4
Sent: 18 December 2018 07:23:10
To: N******** D****; Tsangari, George
Cc: Charlwood, Andrew; Gaudin, Fabien; Hooton, John; Cornelius, Cllr Richard
Subject: Re: 3 Sunny Gardens Road, Hendon, NW4
Please do not respond as advised previously. His complaint is closed.
David.
-----
I have blanked out the name of the recepient for privacy reasons. What is 100% clear is that the leader and the CEO of the Council have been copied so will have seen this crass act of rudeness. Most interestingly, I recently emailed the leader and CEO of the Council about a matter of utmost urgency.
From: ROGER TICHBORNE
To:
John.hooton@barnet.gov.uk ; Richard
Cornelius ; Cllr Daniel Thomas
; Cllr Anthony Finn
Cc: John Dix; Derek Dishman ; Theresa Musgrove ; John Burgess;
Sent: Thursday, 13 December 2018, 11:05:52 GMT
Subject: Urgent - Capita Response to Grant Thornton reportr
Dear Sirs,
I
read in disbelief the response from Capita to the Grant Thornton
report. This response, in effect calls Grant Thornton incompetent and
unprofessional. (Financial controls - barnet.gov.uk)
The response states
Capita wholeheartedly refutes the conclusions of this highly caveated and limited report, which Grant Thornton themselves admit is not a comprehensive formal audit.
The report’s conclusions regarding financial controls across the council and Capita’s CSG and DRS contracts have not been independently verified, are not underpinned by clear evidence, and in many instances seem to be based on opinion and hearsay.
Capita accepts that this case
highlighted failings, which we have worked in partnership with the
council to overcome. All the actions raised as a result have already
been delivered by Capita and are in the process of being audited. We are
committed to continue working with the London Borough of Barnet to
deliver all of the activities in its rectification plans to achieve
improved financial controls across Re, CSG and the Council. "
1. Grant Thornton are incompetent and Barnet Council should commission a new report from a company that is recognised as capable of doing the job and not presenting "opinions and hearsay" as fact. If this is the case, Capita should demand that a new report is commissioned by a company that can be deemed "independent". If this report exhonorates Capita, Grant Thornton should pick up the tab. If it confirms Grant Thorntons findings, then Capita should issue an apology and pick up the tab.
2. Capita have issued a defamatory statement that is both misleading and libellous. If this is the case, then presumably Grant Thornton will sue Capita (and possibly Barnet Council) for publishing it. No potential customers of Grant Thornton could possibly consider working with a company that has such serious doubt cast on its professional integrity. In this case, the Council should call time on the Capita Contract in short order.
3. Both Grant Thornton and Capita are equally culpable. Capita have failed to deliver the services that they were commissioned to provide and Grant Thornton have failed to provide a competent assessment of the failings. The only way that this can be proven would be to commission a new, independent report. Should this be proven, then both Grant Thornton and Capita should pick the tab up between them.
It
is clear that Barnet Council need to take this accusation seriously.
Unless Grant Thornton seek a retraction and apology in short order, a
new report is required that is beyond reproach. At a recent Audit
meeting the chair assurred me that Grant Thornton were a professional
company with great integrity. Given that Barnet Councils chosen partner
and procurement agent have issued such a scathing assessment of their
work, this assessment has clearly been called into question. I seek your
assurance, as council tax and business rates payer that Barnet Council
will take immediate action to ensure that residents can have confidence
in the management of the Capita account. Following this statement,
there can be none until either Grant Thornton are exhonourated or a new
report has been published.
Regards
Roger Tichborne
-------
I can only assume that the recepient of the email from David Tatlow was never supposed to see the response and was sent due to gross incompetence. The only other possible explanation was Mr Tatlow simply wanted to be rude. Either is inexcusable. This leads to the question as to whether there is a blanket policy of not responding to residents. This morning, prior to receiving a copy of this email, I'd actually emailed Leader and Ceo of the Council asking for an explanation as to why my communication had been completely ignored. I assumed that this was probably just down to workload, but in light of this latest development, I must now conclude that there could be a far more sinister reason.
At a recent Council meeting, a Council officer told a blogger that asking questions was a waste of everyones time. It now seems that the Council no longer feel that they are accountable to us. I believe that this is a result of the Barnet Conservatives receiving a massive majority in the May Council Elections. They no longer think they need to bother about us, the voters. I had previously believed the Council Leader to be a basically decent and affable chap with impeccable manners. There is now evidence that his administration holds the general public in contempt.
I would suggest to Mr Cornelius and his cohorts that this is an exceptionally bad policy. There is likely to be General election sometime soon. Whilst I am sure he believes that the local Tory MP's are unassailable, that is often what happens just before out of touch political structures are toppled. As a blogger, this only inspires me to shout about what I see on a daily basis even louder than I would otherwise.
Earlier this year, I made a short movie about how Barnet Council are more interested in serving the shareholders of Capita than the general public. Many of these comments resonate even more loudly in light of this latest revealation. The Current regime is totally uninterested in ordinary residents. The executive are purely interested in their own jobs and making sure no one rocks the boat. They are no longer even bothering to conceal their contempt. I wonder how many other residents are on Mr Tatlows blacklist.
The Leader and the officers are a law unto themselves.
ReplyDeleteIf they decide to help you, they will leave no stone unturned.
If they decide not to fight for your cause,rights or issues, you will firstly be placated, then roundly ignored if you do not agree with their actions or reasons.
Deplorable and inexcusable way to run whole departments and the council.