Wednesday, 5 March 2025

Where's your career? It's behind you! Oh no it's not! Oh yes it is... A new idea to transform the business or kill it!

So here's a little story for you. How my business changed our advertising strategy, saved £3-6K a year and got some brilliant customer engagement and how businesses are missing an open goal! It all started when the Pandemic nearly killed our business.

In hindsight, I massively screwed up my finances between 2012 and 2022. I invested a huge sum in my business, Mill Hill Music Complex, the plan being to get it to a point that I could sit back and let my team do the work, whilst sitting back, working part time as an executive director. We had big plans for expansion. It was all going swimmingly.  Then the pandemic hit. Just keeping the business going turned a highly profitable business into one on life support. Cash reserves built up for expansion were used to keep the show on the road. As they say, Man makes plans and God laughs. God certainly laughed at our plans.

We are now five years on from the pandemic descending. The pandemic destroyed our core business of old, fat blokes turning up with all their mates to play rock and roll and drink lager. Some died, some moved away, some just got out of a the 30 year habit and became hermits! In 2022, as we emerged from the pandemic, my assumption was that this core business would come back. It didn't. Of course we have plenty of the old customers, but whereas it was 75% of our turnover pre pandemic, now it is nearer 25%, we needed to build a completely new customer base, to replace the one we'd spent 40 years developing that melted away during Covid. It was clear that  our marketing strategy and growth plans had gone the way of the dinosaurs.  At the start of last year, we took a long hard look at the business and what we found was quite shocking. Everything was wrong. Nothing was working properly. Our website was out of date, our pricing policy didn't work for the post covid world. Our marketing budget was all being wasted. We'd lost four years. It is hard to spot such trends, without the data, but by early 2024, it was clear and the data was there, not least in the bank balance. 

So where to start? Well the first thing we needed to do was upgrade our website. This had been built in 2013 and was old hat. There is no point chasing new business when it doesn't work properly and is not fit for purpose. We wanted something that new customers would see and think "Yeah, this is looks like a pretty good studio". That took six months to get right. The next thing was our pricing policy. If you get this wrong, you lose customers. You have to tread carefully. We pride ourselves on being economical and good value. We could charge our premium customers a lot more and make more money, but that was never why we started the business. We want to take our customers with us. We did a lot of research and worked out how to restructure our charges whilst keeping our existing customer onside. When we put our prices up in January, we emailed our customers to explain why some would see a huge hike in costs. The response. Almost all were understanding and none complained. Having addressed the two biggest issues, we are now looking at our marketing budget. We have spent almost nothing on marketing since last March. 

We'd been spending around £3-6K a year with Google on Adwords since we rebuilt our website in 2013. We had got lazy and whilst it was bringing in customers, was it the best way to spend the money? This was a fascinating question. When it comes to advertising and actually working out whether things like social media engagement actually works, it is a very difficult thing to do. I sat down with the team and we came up with a radical idea. What is our biggest asset as a business? Our customers. We had a radical idea. Rather than give the likes of google our marketing cash, why not give it to our customers? Let them spread the message and pay them for their efforts? Having hit them with a big increase in some of our charges, we can give some of it back. Musicians have friends, many of whom are musicians, so why not give them a discount if they plug us on their own social networks. It is a great way to get highly targetted advertising. We did our first campaign in February and it was a success. Like everything, it needs some refinement, but it caused a buzz, got a good response and we are seeing more customers coming through the door. 

So how has it worked? Well for the period in question, we saw around a 20% increase in new customers registering on the system. We need around 25 new customers a week to keep the business stable. We have been well in excess of this for the period. It got me thinking, how many other businesses are switched on to this fact. It is a win/win. We cut the hit on our cashflow from paying multinationals, we generate goodwill with our customers and we get new business. Most businesses who have their customer details bombard them with offers, but far fewer actually get their customers to advertise their businesses for them. Let me give you an example. We are members of the Virgin Gym in Mill Hill. They are always bombarding us with offers, asking us to introduce a friend and giving us a free month if they do. But they haven't switched on to the fact that getting members to post on Instagram and TikTok how good they gym has been for them is worth a reward. Our little campaign in February was an experiment. It worked way beyond our expectations. This time last year, I was seriously considering joining my friends on the beach. At sixty two I am feeling re-energised. Maybe I should start a new, part time career advertising designing campaigns for other companies that are based on customer engagement. I have a great team here and it works. 

Here are a few examples of our customers great work!





.


Tuesday, 4 March 2025

Education and why we should teach young people to think

Young people today are absolutely swamped with information. If the president of Chile break wind at an inappropriate moment, it will become a meme and a billion people will see it within half an hour, as it goes viral on TikTok. When I was a teenager, the first time I heard about global warming was when my elder brother Laurie gave me a copy of Scientific American magazine and said "read this, it is really worrying". As there was nothing on telly, I read the article, written by an eminent professor. It was well researched and backed up with data. I was convinced by his argument and I have yet to hear a reasoned argument that refutes a word of it. Most of my Son's Generation Z clan, would have heard about the issue from the likes of Nigel Farage, Elon Musk and Donald Trump on Twitter. They "don't have time" to read long, boring articles in worth scientific journals. If you can't win an argument in a shouty tweet, then your opinions don't matter. 

Somewhere between 1980 and today, we decided that thinking was old hat and getting triggered and shouting is the way forward. The likes of Trump and Farage do not write long, well researched arguments for worthy magazines like Scientific American or New Scientist. When most people research a subject, they go to Youtube and watch videos that are invariably made to shock and are always short on facts and data. 

When I was at school, I was a thicko. I couldn't read effectively until I was eleven. I didn't read any  books until I was twelve. I would deliberately get thrown out of lessons at St Vincents so I could sit outside in the Sun and imagine I was somewhere else. I'd even bring in pieces of bread to feed the sparrows whilst I was standing outside the classroom. I hated learning and being educated. It was only when I got into Punk Rock that I realised that you had to educate yourself. When I was about fourteen, I re-engaged with education. What I soon realised though, was that our schools do not want you to think for yourself. I was constantly getting into trouble for arguing with teachers and telling them they were wrong. This was what got me slung out of FCHS. In hindsight, I was a pain in the arse, but the fact that some of the teachers refused to discuss the points I raised made me deeply sceptical of the way we educate children. I didn't understand that the teachers were teaching a formal curriculum so we could simply answer bog standard questions and pass exams. If we started to think we'd not learn to parrot the information and we'd fail all of the tests. I was never particularly interested in passing tests. I am endebted to John Shuttler at FCHS who explained to me that if I wanted to learn about physics, I'd have to play the game, pass the exams and then if you are clever enough, you actually get to learn to think about the subject at University. That was when I realised that school isn't designed to make you think. When I was aty FCHS, 4% of the population went to University. They went on to become the elite that ruled the country and had all the best jobs. In a world where learning was something driven by books and classrooms and we had a huge manufacturing base as a nation, keeping us all dumb worked well. Now, we are battered with information. We are not taught to think, so we cannot properly process the information. We just get triggered and react stupidly. It is all rather stupid. Let me give you an example.

 Yesterday, I was triggered. I was at work and listening to Mr Eddie Nestor on BBC Radio London on the mid morning show. He made a statement that "White, Middle Class men don't clean the toilets at the BBC". This infuriated me. I am a white, middle class male, I run my own business and when the toilets get blocked, I put the rubber gloves on. I took Eddies comment as a blanket statement that white, middle class men were privileged, lazy and unprepared to get their hands dirty. I found that quite insulting and I sent an angry email, which he read out. His riposte was that I'd completely misinterpreted and misrepresented what he had said. His point was that it is those at the bottom of the pile, recent immigrants usually, who do dirty, low paid jobs. They do this to pay the bills and build a better life for their families. Having slept on the matter, I have reached two conclusions. The first is that his general point is correct. The second is that his use of language was awful. As he actually conceded, award winning presenters of colour, such as himself, don't clean the loos either. It is not something the middle classes do in professional jobs (as opposed to small business owhers). Bringing colour into it was unhelpful and completely undermind what was a good point. 

What is my takeaway from this silly exchange? I broke one of my own rules. I try not to get triggered. As a general rule, before I respond to anything I try and consider three things. 1. What has been said. 2. What did they mean. 3. Why did they say it. I simply reacted angrily to the first part of this. If I'd thought about it properly, I'd have considered points two and three and sent a very different email, if I'd actually bothered at all. What Eddie meant and why he said it were sentiments I agree with. If I'd sent any email, I'd probably have said something along the lines "Eddie, you made a good point, why did you need to take a swipe at white, middle class males, when none of the executives, presenters, prdoucers or researchers of any colour or creed clean the bogs at the BBC. It devalued the point about recent immigrants having to take horrible jobs to build a future".

I am actually disappointed by my response to Eddie. Why? Because I have spent thirty years learning not to get triggered and react. The one thing I've learned is that when you get angry, your brain functions in a sub optimal manner if you are trying to win arguments. When I was 33 years old, I undertook anger management counselling. As my wife was pregnant with my daughter, I felt I needed to address my issues with anger and flying off the handle, when people said the wrong thing to me. This was one of the best things I have done. That was where I learned the principles of analysing What has been said, What did they mean, Why did they say it. In hindight, what shocks me most is that it took me until I was 33 before anyone told me that you have to consider the things that annoy you properly before you react. 

In a world where we are battered with all manner of social media provocations, learning to think is the key to mental stability. We can't keep our young people away from social media and being triggered. What we can do, is teach them to look beyond the "what did they say". When we get to the why are they saying it and what do they really mean, we may find that they react in a completely different way.  When we see provocative videos from the likes of Stephen Yaxley-Lennon (who likes to call himself Tommy Robinson to sound less posh), rather than react to the inflammatory statements, when we ask "why is he saying this" generally it is to get a reaction and trigger people into reacting, which amplifies the post and also generates cash for him. When we get to the "what did he really mean", it gets more complicated. Often, when I analyse the most inflammatory statements, I actually conclude that they mean nothing at all. The posters haven't actually bothered to think through what they are saying.

Lets take the news that yesterday, we saw more small boats cross the channel than any day this year has triggered a storm of angry tweets. Lets think about it. The sun is shining, the winds are low, the weather is warmer. Of course there will be more boats than if there are storms and gale force winds. The boat crossings have been going on for years. Every year, the gangs get better at it, because there is a huge profit to be made. Of course the government should do more. But getting cross because the sun is shining, Is that really logical.?

And consider how Twitter now works. If you pay for a blue tick, Elon Musk pays you for engagements with your followers. It can be quite lucrative, but to get good engagement, you need to be provocative. The more outrageous and triggering you are, the more dosh you make. Add to that an education system, where we are not taught to think, and it is easy to see why we have the idocracy that we have found ourselves lumbered with. If the UK really wants a population fit for the information age, we need to educate young people to cope with it and process information rationally, rather than just getting triggered. But then, if we all started to think about our situation, we might actually see some sort of change.  Back in 1976, Richard Hell wrote a song called "Liars Beware". The opening lyrics were "Look out liars and you highlife scum, Who gotta keep your victims poor and dumb"

Not much has changed, has it?

Monday, 3 March 2025

Environment Monday - Is net zero dead?

"Drill Baby, Drill!" - This is the clarion call of the Leader of the Western World. The highly prestigious and always accurate Daily Express reports that Sir Keir Starmer is going to sack his Net Zero minister Ed Miliband, as Starmer abandons green policies. One may conclude that "Net Zero is dead". Are they right? It certainly seems like this may be the case. The question is, has the whole global warming thing been a scam to impoverish us? Are all the sceintists, supercomputer models etc wrong? Does Bert down the pub, who has done hours of research on Youtube and thinks Laurence Fox and Nigel Farage are the way forward, have it right? Well, in the short term, if you only are concerned with economic prosperity, yes. Abandoning net zero will be good for the economy. The GDP will rise and we will feel better off. I am not qualified to know what effect this will have and when or even if we will see the downside, but personally, I do trust the people who are qualified. When I had cancer and needed my prostate removed, I went to the best surgeon I could find. Thus far, it seems that was a very sensible decision. Likewise with climate change. I would trust the person who is best qualified to plan the future of the world.

When it comes to experts, I think of something my Dad taught me. We were discussing racial prejudice. He posed a problem to me. When he was flying Wellington bombers for the RAF in 1944, he relied on the engineers who serviced the planes. He asked me a question. There are three engineers, one is English, one is Indian and one is African. Which one would I choose to service the plane? The answer? The best engineer. When your life and your future depends on it, you want someone who you have absolute faith in. Now with climate change, are we listening to the best qualified people, who have scientific data to back their views up? Or are we listening to ignorant loudmouths, who have opinions that are not supported by data? 

In effect, by allowing CO2 levels to rise in an uncontrolled manner, Trump et all are conducting a massive experiment on a planetary level. Is this wise? It doesn't strike me as the most sensible way to proceed. I get that the UK produces a tiny amount of the worlds CO2 and if the USA decides to go hell fo leather for a petrol based economy, theres not much we can do. I do wonder about Elon Musk though. He made his name developing electric cars and efficient batteries. Trump's stance will be bad for business. I simply cannot believe Musk is a climate denier. Has he sold his soul for a seat at the table? 

The world can act like ostriches and bury our heads in the sand. That won't make the problems go away. It just means that when we do address it, the pain will be far worse. By then, the likes of Trump will not be around to pay the price.

Sunday, 2 March 2025

The Sunday Reflection #44 - Don't despair, this will pass

On Friday, as I mentioned yesterday, I had a lovely day. This was brought to an absolute juddering halt, when I returned home, put on the telly and Sky news appeared with the news that Donald Trump had sent President Zelenskyy packing from the White House. I was in an absolute state of shock as it unfolded in front of me. I've never seen anything like it, ever. The footage of Trump and Vance attempting to bully and belittle the Ukrainian president reminded me of a bad gangster movie, where the Mafia bosses are putting a lackey in their place. The total lack of respect Trump and Vance clearly have for Zelenskyy was paraded in front of the whole world. I have watched the footage a few times to try and understand and make sense of it. The more I watch, the more it appears to me that Zelenskyy was ambushed by Vice President Vance. I suspect that if it had just been Trump and Zelenskyy, the meeting would have been reasonably cordial and the deal would have been done. Vance had a different agenda. He clearly wanted to put Zelenskyy in his place. This triggered Trump. I suspect that Trump is less than happy with how it all went. He wanted a juicy deal and to be able to boast he'd ended the war. The deal disappeared before his eyes. The right wing in the USA were thrilled to see this display, but any sane person should be deeply worried. 

The first thing that occurred to me is that Trump has forced Europe to step up. One of the reasons that the USA is far more economically powerful than Europe is because historically Europe is divided and cannot get its act together. It is clear that Starmer and Macron have realised that they simply cannot bury their heads in the sand. Trump may have done the pair of them a massive favour. Forcing Europe to get its act together will make two leaders, who had looked as effective as a melting jelly, look like effective and assertive statesman in a way most of us couldn't  have imagined. Starmer has taken a lot of criticism for his attempts to snuggle up to Trump. The narrative is that Zelenskyy showed Starmer how its done. The opposite is true. Starmer simply tried to develop a sane, grown up relationship with a very unpredictable man. The realities of global realpolitik dictate that this is how it's done. Whatever you think of Trump, he was legitimately elected and whether we like him or not, God willing, he'll be in the job for the next three years and ten months. If he drops dead, we'll have Vance, who seems to me to be even worse. So careful what you wish for. 

If things carry on the path that seems to be emerging, when the next President walks into the White House, the USA will be a very different place. It is clear that Trump sees foreign policy only as a business transaction. My view is that the end result of this will be a Europe which is far stronger. We really have no choice in this matter. I suspect that this will have the opposite effect to the one Trump wants. Whilst Trump plans to stick massive tariffs on EU goods, to reign the EU in, it seems to me that this will be another driver for the EU to get its act together. One interesting development that the Musk/Trump bromance has seen, is a collapse in sales of Tesla cars in Europe. It is all very well having deals, tariffs, etc, but if your brand is tainted, it will cost you money. If people don't want to buy your products, then it will damage your business. I am not sure that having the stars and stripes on US products will help sales around the world at the moment. If I were the CEO of a US company operating in Europe, I would be concerned. When sales slump, CEO's get the sack, even when it is the policies of an idiot that have caused the collapse. When the bottom line of US corporations start to feel the pinch, I fully expect to see the narrative change. Trump is banking on loosening regulation, increasing oil production and savings on Federal budgets to get the economy booming. I think there are two problems with this approach. The first is that any oil company making large, long term investment decisions will have to gamble on the post Trump administration sticking with these policies. I don't think that's a slam dunk and if the mid term elections see a swing to the democrats, then the bubble may be popped before it's inflated. The second is that stripping down the federal infrastructure might save tax, but it may also badly effect the ability of Trumps administration to govern. I've worked in companies where there have been mass redundancies. People down tools and some sabotage things. It is awful for morale. For any organisation to work, you need goodwill from the staff. Painting your own staff as the bad guys is insanity. 

Business thrives when there is certainty and a stable economic environment. When there is chaos, you really don't want to start investing in long term developments. There may be short term tactical wins (selling bullets and bombs), but ultimately for a vibrant world economy, chaos is the last thing you need. Just about everyone on the planet expected Zelenskyy to sign the deal with Trump, the war to be wound down and a degree of stability to return. Trump's hissy fit showed that nothing can be taken for granted. All leaders who are invited into the Oval office will now be aware that it can go tits up in a spectacular manner. After the cordial meetings between Trump and Starmer/Macron, many leaders who were a bit wary of Trump probably thought "Maybe he's not so bad". The brutal truth is that they cannot escape the fact that a meeting with Trump and Vance is like playing catch with a live hand grenade.

And one last observation on the world scene. Don't overrate the capabilities of Putin. He invaded Ukraine because he thought Ukraine would collapse. It didn't. He's had to shore up his army with North Korean conscripts. His biggest Middle Eastern ally in Syria got booted out. He is reliant on China to shore him up. Putin desperately wants a way out. He had hoped that Trump would strike a dea with Zelenskyy, so that the war could end, he could nick some territory and claim a victory and the sanctions would be lifted. What happened was not a victory for him. If Europe does get its act together and shore up Ukraine without the US, then that is a real disaster for Putin. The idea that an army who couldn't beat Ukraine is a threat to the rest of us is lunacy.  

The only real solace for me, is that this will pass. The Trump era will not last forever. So long as Tangoman's ineptitude doesn't blow us all up, I am pretty convinced that this will eventually come to be seen as a rather odd interlude in history, when people wonder how the hell we ever got into this mess. 

Tangoman's behaviour inspired me to put this together, it uses a live track from The False Dots recent gig.


Saturday, 1 March 2025

The Saturday List #474 - My Mum and Dad's top ten 1970's TV shows!

Mum and Dad in the early 1970's (at front)
I think we all need some sort of cheer up this morning. I had a truly bizarre day yesterday. We had a family day out. I went with the Mrs and the kids to see Reverb at The Vinyl Factory. It is a brilliant, immersive, multi media set of 17 installations. As a musician and artist I found this fascinating. We then had a lovely dinner at Prix Fixe in Dean St (great value pre Theatre dinners). The kids went on their way and we went to see The Last Laugh at the Noël Coward Theatre. This show imagined a dressing room meet up with Tommy Cooper, Eric Morcombe and Bob Monkhouse. As we waited for the curtain to rise, Clare asked me who my parents favourite 70's comedians were. My mum was a bit prudish and hated vulgarity. This ruled out most of the top comedians of the day, Bernard Manning, Jim Davidson etc. We had a bit of a discussion and I thought "This would make a great Saturday list". When we emerged and got home, the TV was on Sky News and it was the massive fallout between Donald Trump and Zelenskyy. It put a bit of a dampener for me on the evening. I simply hate bullies and what I saw turned my stomach. This morning, my debate was "shall we do a Trump blog or shall we do a positive fun one". It was really no choice, there is nothing I can add about Trump, so I thought "Lets cheer up the readers"

1. Morcombe and Wise. As I mentioned, my Mum was a bit of a prude. She hated vulgarity, but she loved intelligent wit. She always said that Morecombe and Wise were incredibly clever in their humour. Their show was always watched in our house.

2. Coronation Street. My Mum was raised in Oldham, Lancs, in a road just like Coronation St. When she wasn't putting on her posh accent, she'd sometimes lapse into her thick Lancashire brogue. You knew she was cross if this happened. She loved the Coronation Street of the era. I think she identified with a few of the characters. .I think she particularly identified with Betty Turpin, who she thought was sound and sensible, the actor who played her, Betty Driver had been a glamourous film star in the 1940's who'd morphed into the old, sensible barmaid.  As they made it more edgy in the 1980's she fell a bit out of love with it. My Dad hated it. He'd have a bath when it was on!

3. Parkinson. This was another must watch. He had everyone on who was anyone, most notably Muhammed Ali. Perhaps the moment we all remember best was when Rod Hull and Emu were on. Mum and Dad always reckoned he was the best interviewer. Often the best guests were quite surprising. I recall Lord Soper, The Methodist minister being fascinating. It was a mark of his quality that even a 12 year old me recognised his brilliance.

4. News at Ten. This was my Dad's favourite programme. He always said ITV did news far better than BBC. We had to sit in total silence when this was on. I got a detention and my Mum got a telling off from the Nuns at St Vincents when I was nine, as I was whistling the theme tune to News at Ten and they heard me. The nuns felt all good children should be in bed by 10pm. I've never needed much sleep. Much to my sisters annoyance, they'd send her to bed and let me stay up. I was four years younger. My Dad reckoned I needed to know what was going on in the world as a boy. I sometimes wish he hadn't.

5. Live Cricket. Dad loved the John Player Sunday League Cricket. This was compulsory watching on a Sunday afternoon. Dad would give a running commentary. It rather put me off cricket, I got bored after an hour. I was quite fascinated though by South African Cricketer Mike Proctor, who played for Gloucestershire. Dad reckoned he was the best cricketer in the world, but due to the boycott of South African cricket, he never featured on the world stage. I recall a commentator saying that he could hit the ball so hard he might break the windows in Worcester Cathedral, when Gloucestershire played them. I didn't understand that this was a figure of speech at the time. I was glued to the telly!

6. The Naked Civil Servant. The life story of Quentin Crisp. This was probably the first programme on British TV that was sympathetic to an out gay man. My Mum was fascinated and insisted we all watch it. My Dad was an ex RAF veteran. He was a man with views of his time and I would not have expected him to watch it, let alone like it. However, he thought it was brilliant. A couple of weeks later, I asked my Dad why. He said "God made Quentin Crisp like that. It is a good thing that people get to see the struggles people have. People just want to be happy, whoever they are. If they are not hurting anyone, who are we to judge them". The prevailing mood at FCHS, where I was a pupil in 1975 was rabidly homophobic, so I kept very quiet about watching it and my parents liking it. I was quite shocked when I learned John Hurt was not gay. I asked my Mum, she said "He's an actor. That's his job and he's the best at it". 

7. Tommy Cooper. My parents thought Cooper was the funniest man on the planet and last nights show reminded me why. Tommy Cooper was the only person I've ever seen who could simply stand still, say nothing and have people crying with laughter. My parents went to see him in a one man show. He did a sketch where he said "You know I can do magic tricks, properly, watch" He then did three tricks perfectly. He got a mild round of applause. He then said "That's why I always bugger them up, no one wants to see that. I'd be broke!" to rapturous applause.

8. Whickers World. Probably the first proper travel show on TV. Given that Dad had worked as a commercial pilot after the war and my parents had travelled widely, they loved it. My mum would watch it and made a list of places to visit, which they did once they retired. Fiji, Sri Lanka, etc. My mum said that every place they went that was a paradise, suffered a coup within a couple of years. My Dad told me he liked Whicker, because the shows were intelligent and weren't like a glossy travel brochure. 

9. The Undersea world of Jacques Cousteau. There are so many nature series on TV, these days we think of David Attenborough as the man, but in the 1970's it was Jacques Cousteau. It sparked a lifelong fascination for me with the sea and marine life. I've snorkled twice off the Great Barrier Reef and once in Belize, the two best reefs in the world. I have my parents making me watch Jacques Cousteau for this. I can remember begging my Dad to take me snorkling and him reply "Son, it's bloody freezing swimming in Britain, but I promise that if I win the pools, I'll take you swimming on the Great Barrier Reef". He never won the pools!

10. The World at War. This was a huge series. 26 parts. The definitive series on the Second World War. As my Dad was ex RAF, we had no choice, we had to watch it. I lapped it up. Dad would explain to me why every episode was so important. We'd debate afterwards what had been shown and he'd put me right about some things I'd misunderstood. Dad said to me "One day, this will be shown to every child on the planet at school, so we learn why war is a terrible thing". I just wish he'd been right. 

Writing this brought a tear to my eye. I can close my eyes and visualise the scene. Mum and Dad had comfy chairs, us kids sat on the sofa. The telly was a big 24" colour jobbie in a cabinet.  I was the remote control "Roger, turn it to BBC 1". Mum and Dad had a marble table with a chess board on it, between them. There would be an ash tray. Mum would smoke John Player Special cigarettes. Dad would smoke unfiltered Capstan medium ciggies. They'd both have a glass of Guinness. The air would be full of smoke from Dad's relentless smoking. He'd do 60 a day. Mum would do five or six, only in the evening. In winter, we'd put the fire effect electric bar fire on to keep warm. The house would rattle as oil and coal trains rattled past on the Midland Mainline at the bottom of the Garden. Often, Dads best mate, Fr Bernard Traynor, a retired priest who lived up at St Jospehs College would come around. He'd always drink Johnny Walker Black Label Whisky. He'd been a priest in Kenya and was highly intelligent. The conversations were always electric. Both of my parents were also very bright. I'd just listen and lap it up. They'd watch the news and debate the world scene after. I can't help but wonder what on earth they'd have made of News at Ten last night?

And yes, I did choose the picture at the top deliberately. My Dad told me that the Rotary club was started in the USA with the specific aim of making the world a better place. God bless you Mum and Dad.

Friday, 28 February 2025

Friday fun 28 February 2025

 Lets start with a good old Dad joke from the rather wonderful Mr Robert Wilkinson (check his profile for details of his Dad joke books)

And on to this weeks gigs and music

If you want a good night out in Town, Niall Logue, a brilliant up and coming local artists, signed to Marquee records is performing at a showcase night at The Waterrats on Saturday night 8.45pm

One of the best nights out in town this weekend.

There are plent of amazing local gigs on as well, so if you don't want to go into town, then support local music by coming along to one!


Friday 28th
Butchers Arms 9pm – 11.30pm
Beyond Retro (Rock & Roll)
The Lord Kitchener 8.30pm – late
Ela (Covers/Solo artist)
Barrington 8.30-midnight
Karaoke with Johno
Ye Olde Monken Holt 9.30 pm – late
DJ Sadie (DJ)

~MARCH~
Saturday 1st

The Faith Stealers gig at The Barrington - gig details / share
The Faith Stealers (Mod Covers, 4 piece) at The Barrington, New Barnet 
info icon9pm - 11pmFREE!


Ripple Effect gig at Three Hammers - gig details / share
Ripple Effect (Pop / Rock, 4 piece) at Three Hammers, Mill Hill 2.7 miles
info icon9pm - 11.15pmFREE!


Dusk Til Dawn gig at The Three Wishes - gig details / share
NewDusk Til Dawn (Classic Rock, 5 piece) at The Three Wishes, Edgware 4.5 miles
info icon9.30pm - 11pmFREE!
The Builders Arms 8pm – 11pm Tim Leffman (Acoustic original and covers)
Butchers Arms 9pm – 11.30pm Horizon (Rock covers and original)
East Barnet RBLegion 9.30pm – 11.30pm £5 The Soul Enforcement Bureau (Soul and Motown Covers)
The Barrington 9pm – 11pm The Faith Stealers (Mod Covers)
Maddens 9pm – 11.30pm The Bear Pit Band (Pop/rock covers)
Ye Olde Monken Holt 9.30pm - midnight Nially (Acoustic)
The Cavalier 8pm – late DJ Reccie (Old skool soul and reggae)

Sunday 2nd
Butchers 8.30pm – 11.30pm Pauls Jam
Maddens 7pm The Cruisin Mooses

Monday 3rd
Ye Olde Mitre Inn, High Street 8pm – 11pm (stables room) Barnet Acoustics Sessions

Tuesday 4th
Black Horse 7.30pm – 11pm Open Mic Night
Maddens Bar 8pm Open Mic Jam hosted by Jeff and band

Wednesday 5th
Ye Olde Monken Holt 8.30pm – 11pm Open Mic Night

Thursday 6th
Ye Olde Monken Holt 8.30pm – 10.30pm Traditional Irish Session (Irish Folk)