22 January, 2009
My expenses
Jimmy, a regular commentator on this blog, makes a valid request. In my last post I wrote about MPs expenses and he feels it only fair that I'm open about mine. Fair point.
Before I reveal the figure I think it only fair to explain that Assembly Members and MPs expenses work in very different ways.
Firstly because London is a physically tight area none of us need second homes. All our staff, IT equipment and office equipment is paid for centrally rather than being paid by or bought by the MP, as is the case in Westminster. I also get an annual travel card so I can get around London for meetings, visits etc. This all keeps our expenses lower and more simple than MPs.
Now here is the good bit. Based on my expenses since being elected in May of last year I calculate my annual expense claim for the municipal year 2008/9 will be £0.00
I can't promise it will always be this low but I'll do my best.
Well Done James. Another Tory who's style I quite like is Roger Evans. I suspect that he's very close to Brian Coleman politically, but he can make his point without coming over as being arrogant or offensive. Wheras Coleman dismissed the Brent Cross Railway as "A bonkers scheme devised by men with train sets in their attics" (or words to that effect, Evans puts his opposition to Cross London Tram in far more measured and sensible terms in a reply to a question I asked him on HIS BLOG. He says :-
One of these was Brian Coleman who made his presence felt by objecting to the tram proposal, to the extent that his efforts were - I believe - reported by some of the pro tram bloggers, after the meeting. I was also present and I raised an objection on the grounds of cost. I can think of many better ways to spend £1.3 billion...
I don't agree with Roger Evans at all on this subject, but it seems to me that his approach is far more sensible. There even seems to be a tacit acknowledgement in his comment that the Brian Coleman approach doesn't really help move the debate forward.
I don't expect Colemans fellow assembly members to go public with open criticism, but it certainly seems to me as if they have realised that his approach does more harm than good. The James Cleverly attitude towards his expenses is a breath of fresh air and there are many politicians of all parties who could take a leaf out of his book.
3 comments:
Rog
I find it very interesting that the same people who call on me to quit the Conservative Party (or want to have me thrown out) because I dare to criticise Mike Freer, do not make the same call on Brian Coleman who quite often opposes official party policy - runway 3 being a prime example. Is it that some people are allowed to criticise and others are not?
The Conservative Party has survived internal differences of opinion throughout its history. The differences between Ted Heath and Margaret Thatcher were legendary!
I think Brian is his own worst enemy with his habit of engaging mouth before putting brain into gear, but I will defend his right to talk rubbish!
David,
Brian Coleman can say what he likes as far as I'm concerned. I think it causes no end of damage to the reputation of the Conservative party, which I guess isn't top of my list of worries (and is also why I suspect Labour don't go after him to the extent I would).
I strongly object to his attitude to taxpayers money. Thats why I applaud James Cleverly.
I see my job as a blogger to expose to scrutiny behaviour which I disagree with. I think that ultimately, a few years down the line, it will become unacceptable and we'll get cleaner, more efficient administration.
The bloke who started all of this was Mark Thomas. I hope it ends with full disclosure and a beefed up FOI bill.
Roger and friends with a sense of humour,
I can't help inviting you to view my latest blog, complete with Brian Coleman Wordle. It's silly but immensely enjoyable.
http://vickim57.blogspot.com/
Post a Comment