Showing posts with label The Conservative Party. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Conservative Party. Show all posts

Tuesday, 7 October 2025

The Tories announce an excellent policy at their conference

 I daresay that most of my readers will be rather surprised to hear that I have something good to say about Kemi Badenoch and the Conservative party. However as someone who takes blogging seriously and also believes in fairness, I have to say that today they have released a policy that might actually work and has the potential to save the UK hospitality trade. As someone who runs a small business, I have felt we are under attack by all parties since 2008, when the credit crunch hit. 2007 was the year when my studio didn't have to take measures to save money to maintain our business as a profitable entity. This enabled us to give our less well off customers extremely cheap rehearsals, pay our staff significantly more than the minimum wage, invest in formal training for all staff, and do our job properly. We were able to regularly renew our studio equipment, ensuring our customers generally had equipment that was under three years old, and we sold the old gear in good condition.

All of these things helped generate economic activity in the UK. Everything is substantially more expensive now. VAT is 20%, energy prices have been an absolute roller coaster, things like employer NI have been hiked substantially. Minimum wage rates have meant that we simply cannot afford to maintain the differentials that we used to have with other businesses. We simply cannot afford to send staff on external courses. And then there are business rates. These clobber us. Following the slashing of government support, we have had to hike prices this year and cancel equipment upgrades.

Today the Tories have announced that they intend to abolish business rates for certain types of businesses. This would make a huge difference to us. I know many restaurant owners and pub landlords who this will return struggling businesses to profit. Once businesses are profitable, they start planning for expanson, that increases tax income generally. If the UK wants to be a successful economy, we need to make running small businesses viable. This measure is a huge, real and practical step. I genuinely hope Labour has the common sense to shoot the Tories fox and nick this policy. 

There is lots of hype in the press about Reform replacing the Tories. I am not a Tory, have never voted for them, but the truth is that, unlike Reform, they are a grown up party that is capable of developing sensible economic policies. I've seen no evidence that Reform are anything but shouty loudmouths, who are actually rather thin skinned when challenged. This was perfectly demonstrated by the news that Reform run Kent council is to raise Council tax by 5%, the maximum allowed, because they 'discovered' that all the waste and savings they imagined did not exist. The real problem with Reform is that Nigel Farage is a political fantasist. The stories he spins and the tales he tells are attractive to some. But the problem is we live in the real world, not a fantasy world. In the real world, the big bad wolf eats Grandma and Little Red Riding Hood. And our trading competetors and national adversaries are licking their lips at the concept of a Reform government, as it will open up all sorts of opportunities as Britain descends into economic mayhem. Liz Truss showed us what happens when a fantasist takes over. It was telling that the Tories turned to Jeremy Hunt to sort the mess out as Chancellor. He was the most left wing senior Tory left after the Boris purges. That is the problem with the real world for extremists. It always ends in chaos when  extremists get the opportunity to actually get their hands on the wheels of power. 


Wednesday, 26 June 2024

Spotlight on Hendon Constituency - Shocking revelation from local Conservative big wig

I met one of our local Conservative bigwigs for a chat about the forthcoming election. Whilst they were more than happy for me to blog this, they did so on the basis of strict anonymity. We had a nice cup of tea and a chat, and they gave me a very interesting, if very disturbing insight into what is going on in the minds of sensible Tories up and down the country. They started by saying "I'm sure all of my colleagues will guess who briefed you, but I'll just deny it". One thing I've learned over the last sixteen years of writing this blog is that the Torys will give you stories in the way that Labour never do. Labour are far more controlled in their interaction with local bloggers. 

So what did they have to say? Well first of all, they told me that the Tories have no hope at all of retaining Hendon. They said that whilst this was mostly down to the national mood, there are three local factors that have scuppered them completely.

1. Incumbent Matthew Offord  has stepped down. Despite having a reputation of not being too busy on the casework, Offord has built a strong personal following amongst several local religious communities, that his views on same sex marriage etc appeal to. They have been very staunch in support of these communities in regional issues that are prime concerns of members of these faith groups. They have bolstered Offords vote a previous elections, taking him from having London's most marginal seat, to having a previously unassailable looking majority. With Offord gone, his replacement Ameet Jogia has been trying to butter up these groups, but seemingly this has not been quite as successful as Offord and many are not really sure where they stand. 

2. Offords replacement Ameet Jogia was not a Barnet councillor previously and was unknown to most people in the constituency. His leaflets painting him as "The Local Candidate" have baffled many, who's response has been "If you are local, why have I never heard of you and why were you a councillor in Harrow?". 

3. Ameet Jogia has been working for No 10, and is close to Rishi Sunak. As Sunak's star has fallen, the expected stardust that was supposed to have rubbed off on Jogia when he was selected has disappeared. The expected visits from Rishi to massed crowds have not materialised 

When I last spoke to my Tory friend, just after the election was called, they were baffled by the timing but still planning to "do their bit". Apparently this has changed and they are not the only Tory who has  decided to stay in and watch the Footy rather than knock on doors (that's a figure of speech BTW). 

We got on to discussing the state of the Conservative party. This is when I got a shocking insight into how local Tories really feel. "Rishi Sunak is destroying the party and the election can't come soon enough" They added "Many of our local supporters are either not voting, voting Reform or even voting Labour". We are not talking about random members of the general public, we are talking about committed Conservative supporters. I asked for a percentage. The response? "Maybe 5% are switching to Labour, 10% to reform and another 15% are simply not bothering to vote" We are talking about people who turn out rain or shine. I suspect many may change their mind on the day as does my confidant, but if you are losing 30% of your absolute core vote, then you really are in trouble. 

What has caused this? There are three main reasons.

1) Many think that the party has simply lost the plot and needs to regroup in opposition. Of the non voters, many are ashamed to say they won't vote, believing in the democratic process, but cannot support another party and cannot support Sunak's Tories. 

2) The betting scandal and the snub to veterans persuaded many wavering Tories that the party has lost the plot and is no longer representing Conservative values.

3) The candidate is appalling. Even staunch Tories such as Brian Coleman have criticised his campaign. Coleman put the boot in recently on Twitter of Jogia's promise to try and abolish ULEZ. Coleman correctly pointed out that this is not in an MP's remit and the matter was decided conclusively at the Mayoral Election. 

Then we got around to my confidant's own vote.  Their position was that they were finding it very hard to commit to voting for Jogia and supporting Sunak. Sunak has nearly destroyed the party. The Parliamentary party looks set to become a rump of MP's in ultra safe seats. Many of these have been around for years, which will prevent any real prospects of the party addressing the issues besetting it and becoming relevant again. Would they be voting Reform? No chance. Like me, they see Farage's support for Putin and saying the way Putin had consolidated power was admirable was simply beyond the pale for someone who was supposed to lead a democratic party. A Lib Dem was a wasted vote in Hendon, in their opinion. The only real reason to vote Tory was to try and keep Reform in their box and keep the Tories as the only choice to beat Labour. If Reform starts to come second in seats, then they may well threaten the Tories position as the party of the Centre Right in the UK. The doorstep conversations on the doorstep with formerly loyal Tories is emphasising this. If Reform comes second in more than a dozen or so seats, this election may well be the beginning of an extinction even for the Tories. 

Now we get to the real dilemma for decent Tories. Do they move to the right to try and win back Reform waverers or do they move to the centre to head off the Yellow peril from the Lib Dems. This decision will be taken after the election, by whoever replaces Sunak. They will be able to see just how dangerous (or not) Reform and The Lib Dems are. 

We got on to the betting scandal. Who would they be betting on, if they were to do such a thing. Their prediction. Labour to get a 4-5000 majority in Hendon, which is nearly 10,000 shifting from Tories to Labour. They predict this will be on a much lower turnout than in 2019. I asked for some sort of evidence to back this up. "Have you seen any evidence of Conservatives doing any real work to win in Hendon". The answer is no. I've had a few rather shoddy leaflets though the door. That is about it.

And my friend, that is just about it. The election no one wants has eight days left. The odds at Paddy Power are as follows:-

Most Seats 
Labour 1/200
Reform UK  66/1
Conservative 80/1
Liberal Democrat 200/1
Greens 500/1

Although this may just mean that Reform supporters gamble more than Tories or Lib Dems, it does rather back up what my friend seemed to be saying. Labour are 1/16 to win at Hendon at BET365


Wednesday, 5 July 2023

What happened to all of the Conservatives in the Conservative party

 One of the major disagreements I had with my father over the years was about politics. He was a staunch Conservative. I was a staunch Labour supporter. He would get very heated when we discussed such matters, feeling that I should accept that he knew more about the world and agree with him. To complicate matters even further my mum was a socialist. As my father found it difficult to debate the matter with me for more than two minutes without losing his rag, I found it hard to fully understand his viewpoint. 

After he died, I asked my mother what his political philosophy was and why he was a Tory. She explained that as my father had been raised in the outback of Australia, he believed in self sufficiency. He believed that Conservatives were sensible, moderate people, who ran businesses, became officers in the armed forces, ran institutions. They were solid, sound and paternal. He felt that socialists wanted handouts and something for nothing. He believed that the world was fundamentally unfair and pretending otherwise benefitted no one. 

I have been thinking about this a lot recently. In my fathers day, the local Conservative party was made up of butchers, bakers, bank managers, headmasters, retired colonels etc. Most were also members of local golf clubs, Rotary clubs and Masonic lodges. None were at all ideological. They joined such organisations as they felt it was good for business and also because the organisations would do good work for local charities. The local MP would be involved with much of this. My Dad was on good terms with John Gorst, who was the long standing MP for Hendon North. On a couple of occasions, I got to spend time with Gorst. He was a proper old school Tory. I once asked him how he got on with his Labour colleagues at Westminster. His answer somewhat surprised me. He said that he got on really well with most of the Northern Labour MP's and felt they were good, honest, hard working people who were doing their best for the people they represented. He then said that in London, there were a few who were 'loony lefties" who were only interested in ideological purity. He also told me that if he wanted something sensible doing in Parliament, he'd make sure he got the support of sensible Labour MP's and work across party lines. He also told me that there were plenty of back channels that sensible MP's and Lords used to ensure the UK stayed on the straight and narrow. Gorst lost his seat to Andrew Dismore in 1997 and I never saw him again, my father had died a decade earlier. Much of the advice he gave me, I used to try and use my blog to build cross party support against the loony right of Barnet Council, as they tried to re-invent the council under Mike Freer. Many of the staunchest supporters of our campaign to oppose the abolition of pay and display parking were staunch Tories and we got them on board for other campaigns as well. This helped Barnet kick out Brian Coleman, who was the author of the Pay and Display policy, during the GLA elections of 2012. 

It became clear to me then that the sensible, old school Tories of my Dad's era were in full retreat. A new generation were on the rise. They were far more ideoloically motivated. Many have never done a days hard slog (what may be called by some a proper job). They are graduates, management consultants, lawyers, political assistants. The days when Butchers and Bakers were part of the club seems long gone. When you read their profiles, they "have interests in" rather than jobs on their profiles. If you look at the Hendon Conservatives website, the councillors don't list their jobs. I find this strange. 

As for our MP's. When I watch #BBCQT and other shows, I am struck by how rare it is, these days, to see a solid, old school style Tory, who can string two coherent sentences together. The cabinet seems to be stacked full of people who seem to be both incompetent and overwhelmed. The current mess with Suella Braverman and the Rwanda policy is a prime example. It may well be that eventually a few people are sent to Rwanda. It won't stop the problem and will cost an absolute fortune. If I was launching a policy, I'd have the legal position sorted out before I submitted it to Parliament. The likes of Braverman rant about 'Lefty Lawyers', but if you've done your homework, then they would have no legal basis to challenge the legislation and if they have, there is no point enacting it. 

Much as simplistic solutions may seem appealling, if they are unworkable all they do is cost money. I've long thought the only way to stop the boats is to pay the French and make payment contingent on actually stopping the boats. Once you hav effective policing in place, the problem will stop.

You can see the same incompetence in the governments dealings with rail unions, nurses and public workers. These disputes will eventually be settled, but we have a government that seems more interested in shouting than talking. When your own policies have caused rampant inflation, expecting workers to take a massive hit in the pocket is the height of stupidity. 

It was not always like this. I remember when Tory education minister Kenneth Baker brought in inset days for training (originally called 'Baker days'), to try and improve teaching standards. Michael Heseltine responded to riots in Liverpool by sorting out aid and doing something to address the social issues in the city. He is probably the only Tory who is reasonably well thought of there. 

Small businesses used to be the bedrock of the local Conservative party. They expected Conservative governments and councils to not do stupit things that mucked your business up. They expected taxes to be at a level that businesses could sustain. The Tories have raised VAT to 20%, the highest rate ever and one that is the bain of the life of most small businesses. I raised this with our Conservative MP. He said that as 'we could reclaim most of it back, it's broadly neutral'. As a services company, we claim little of our turnover back and we pass the costs directly to customers who are generally are not VAT registered businesses. Rates have soared, minimum wages have also shot up. I am all for paying people fairly, but when you've come through a pandemic and your levels of business have not recovered, being forced to raise wages puts a huge strain on a business. This is reflected inthe fact that my business has lost 30% of our workforce, in an attempt to manage costs. I find myself working twice as hard and having less in my wallet at the end of the week.

When I talk to other small businesses, they all say the same thing. We watch politicians like the Chancellor Jeremy Hunt delivering budgets, claiming to be business friendly, only to discover that we are even worse off than before. Most of the small business people I know do not think the Conservative government is looking after them. I am sure that many will think "why should any government look after businesses, if you go into business, you should be prepared to graft to earn a living". The answer is that small businesses provide innovation, jobs and keep the economy on track.If you have an economy where small businesses can thrive, you have a strong economy and you can afford the things such as social care. Unlike multi national corporations, small businesses can't offshore profits to avoid tax. All of the money we generate stays in the local economy. Anyone involved in the sector knows this, but we have a government that simply hasn't got a clue. It seems to me that there are plenty of senior Conservatives who have an opinion on everything but experience of nothing.

I do wonder what my father would have made of it all?

Thursday, 9 March 2023

The 'Small boats crisis' is a manufactured scam to distract voters from the real econmic crisis working people are facing

 Nothing disgusts me more than politicians who talk about 'patriotic duty' whilst they work to shaft vast swathes of the population they are supposed to care about. Today we have seen the worst example of this in my lifetime. The language of Rishi Sunak and Suella Braverman has been deliberately inflammatory and many working people, who consider loyalty to their country to be fundamental to their being have been taking to Twitter and Facebook to speak about how pleased they are that finally 'something will be done'. The sad truth is that by any measure, they have been mislead by the Conservative government. Not only this, but the timing has been cynically designed to distract from the absolute failure of their economic policies, which has seen massive inflation, shortages in shops and record breaking high energy bills.

The first point to note is that the 'Small boats crisis' is completely a result of the policy of the Conservatives, who have been in power for almost 13 years. If you believe it is the fault of 'lefty lawyers' such as Sir Keir Starmer, you really need to look at the facts. The government has a huge civil service and even Suella Braverman has described the resources at her disposal as 'an army of lawyers'. It is the governments job to make laws. The truth is that over 13 years, they have not used this 'army of lawyers' to address the issue of illegal immigration. Every year, we have a new initiative and the facts and figures prove none have worked. If you had a mechanic who fixed your car five times and each time, it broke down on the journey home, you'd get a new mechanic. You may well hate Starmer and his team, but it is simply untrue to blame them. 

I don't blame people who see the headlines in our press or the stories on the TV for being horrified by what they see. What sane person would think that people crossing the channel, managed by people traffickers is a good thing. I spoke to a leading expert on the subject. I asked how you fix the problem. What they told me was quite interesting. The first thing they said we need to do is have proper international co-operation. This does not mean French policemen on beaches. It means serious, cross border action to sieze the assets and cash of people smugglers. Interpol was set up to prevent cross border crime, so it needs a massive revamp. The second thing, is we need to process applications in France and other third countries. If there are genuine refugees, who have a genuine reason to come to the UK, it should be easy and safe for them to get here. This should never involve perilous journeys across the channel. If they know that starting the process abroad will make it easier and cheaper, this will remove them and the profits of their passage from unscrupulous trafficers. The third thing we need to do is to employ far more people to process applications. We need to process people who have no right to stay here quickly. If someone is shown to have entered illegally, with no good reason, then they should be deported to the country of origin and forbidden from re-entry for five years. If they do re-enter, they should be immediately deported.  Schemes such as the Rwanda scheme are a complete waste of resources. If the cash had been spent on more staff to process applications, that would have been a far more sensible way forward. As it is, millions has been spent on legal fees, with nothing achieved.

The truth is that this is not about small boats, or immigration. It is about making decent people feel threatened, so they re-elect a Conservative government that does not have their interests at heart. Any sane person would conclude that had they really wanted to fix the problem, they would have done so long ago. The current government is measurably corrupt. The money spent on dodgy schemes such as track and trace and dodgy PPE, with big name donors to the Conservative party has clobbered public finances. My learned friend said something rather amusing and very true. In times gone by, local villains would give cash bungs to the local bent coppers to look the other way, when they were up to no good. These days, you bung the Conservative party a million pounds, and you get all manner of dodgy deals passed your way, with a peerage thrown in for good luck. If you want to see an end to illegal immigration, I'd suggest that re-electing the mob who got us to the situation is the last way to fix it. Given that Sir Keir Starmer is meant to be such a clever chap, I struggle to understand how he's managed to fall into the Conservatives trap on this. 


Thursday, 26 January 2023

If all you do is look backwards, you'll walk into a lampost - What would my Tory Dad have made of the failure of Conservative Britain

 My Dad, who was a WWII RAF pilot was not someone who was sentimental about the past. He once explained to me that when you were involved in an armed conflict, you soon realised that every improvement to your plane, be it an engine upgrade, better radar, a better plane, etc meant that your chances of making it home from your tour of duty was better. He loved innovation. He was a brillaint photographer and had a stack of old, manual, top notch cameras. We'd have slide shows after holidays etc. Many of the pictures of the 50's and 60's I use are ones he took. When automated cameras came out, with autofocus, inbuilt flashes and light meters, he bought them and never used the old, manual ones again. He explained that you took better pictures, as you didn't have to muck about. As a business owner, he embraced progress, realising that new innovations meant you could do jobs quicker and make more money. Dad was a Conservative, in the 1960's/70's Conservative tradition. He beleived that the Tories were a forward thinking party, who would pull Britian forward and keep us at the centre of innovation. He believe Labour were luddites, wedded to Trades Unions who resisted change. One of his sayings was "If all you do is look backwards, you'll walk into a lampost".

Dad passed away in 1987. Thatcherism and the 'Loads of money '80's, were at their height. Many of the guys who worked for him at his car business, were buying their own council houses in Burnt Oak and Edgware. Dad probably went to his deathbed believing he was politically vindicated. Dad was a major influence on me. I was diametrically opposed to his politics, but I fully understood that many of the the arguments he made were reasonable and well argued. Last night, I had a dream about Dad. It was very vivid. I still dream about him quite a lot. I always wake up, almost in tears, realising that he's not here and we can't continue the conversation. So what did he have to say? Well, as ever, he was putting me right. You may have noticed that I've had nothing much to say about the current woes of the Tory Party.  There are two reasons for this. The first is that I have always tried to keep the focus of the blog on local and London issues. The second is that I felt I have little insight into National politics and other people can do it far better.  Well, Dad was not too impressed. He said "The country is going to the dogs at the moment, people read your blog, why are you sitting on your hands". He went on to say that "Don't you care that a man appointed Chancellor of the Exchequor had fiddled his taxes, what sort of message does this send out". He then said "I always supported the Tories Conservatives because they were forward looking and good for business, but you run a business and you know how they are killing it. You know that Brexit is a backward looking concept and you know that it is damaging the country. Why aren't you shouting this from the hilltops". He finished off by saying that there are always dodgy spivs in politics on all sides, the difference now is that they are not being slung out of office. That is the politics of a banana republic, not the UK.  I asked him if he was still a Conservative, he said that unless they sort themselves out, nobody should vote for them, until they rediscoved a degree of morality and have some sort of vision for Britian to take us forward. 

At that point, Clare woke me up with a cup of tea and the morning papers. As usually happens when I dream about my Dad lecturing me, it takes me 20 minutes to get my head around what I was dreaming. Was I just projecting my left wing prejudices onto Dad? What would he say? I have no doubt at all that he'd be appalled by Mr Zaawi's dodgy behaviour. I am sure that he would have had a good rant about a bloke being let off evasion payment of millions of pounds of non payment of tax with no more than a slapped wrist. I have no doubt that as someone who lost mates fighting to end division in Europe and someone who hated bureacracy at borders (he worked as a commercial pilot after the war, he had his fill of paperwork), he'd be horrified at how Brexit is panning out. I had a meeting on Saturday with the group leaders of the charity I volunteer for, that takes people living with disablities to France. We were told that new regulations coming in to place in May, will mean that everyone entering the EU will have to have their biometric profile taken, with fingerprint and retinal scans. This could add up to 90 minute to our journey through passport control, as most people are likely to be passing through an EU border for the first time on our flight. When you have a large group of people who are in wheelchairs, etc this will be, shall we say difficult. I believe he'd have been completely unimpressed with the weakness of the PM, who should have sacked Mr Zahawi. The facts are not in dispute. If you need an 'Ethics advisor" to tell you to sack a tax dodger, then you shouldn't be in the job. 

When I woke up, I read the papers. The front page of the Daily Express was a story about an old lady freezing to death and how Ambulance workers are regularly taking other OAP's to A&E with hypothermia. This is the Express, a Tory backing paper. On their website is a story that business leaders are slating the governments handling of Brexit. There is a poll on the Express website asking whether Rishi Sunak is a weak PM. At present 94% of people say yes. If Express readers are saying this, the game is up


Dad was a Daily Express reader, so I can only assume that his message from beyond the grave was spot on. I think the Tory party needs to get it's act together and quick. Much as I disagree with them, if they are wiped out at the next election, we will have no effective opposition and we all know that is not a great thing. The only senior Tory at the moment with any credibility at all seems to be Jeremy Hunt. He has experience and is a safe pair of hands. I genuinely don't know whether the public would accept another Tory coronation, but I am starting to think that if they don't do something radical, they might find that there are none of them left after the next election.

By the way, at the start of the year, I made the following predictions for January. From what I am seeing, the thermals I've had to wear and watching PMQ's yesterday, I can only think I should put a tenner on the 5,15 at Kempton Park if you know what I mean

The year starts as the year ended. We have the funeral of Pope Benedict. In some ways, this draws a perfect line under a terrible few years. The Weather starts mild, but by the 21st we are back to freezing temperatures, snow, ice and train strikes. Normal politics returns with Labour leader clobbering Rishi Sunak at PMQ's on a weekly basis. Tory MP's, especially those on the right start making noises. We see the start of Nigel Farage's return to front line politics, with his land grab for that area formerly known as UKIP.

All I can really think is that I'm more psychic than I could have predicted (forgive the pun)

Monday, 4 July 2022

Christopher Pincher Scandal - How Boris Johnson ignored the Elliot Johnson suicide report into sexual misconduct and bullying

I must say that I am disgusted by the press coverage of the Christopher Pincher scandal. There has not been a single mention of the Elliot Johnson scandal. You may not recall the name Elliot Johnson. He was a a bright young man, who was an intern for the Conservative party. Back in 2015, he took his own life, following allegations of bullying and possible sexual misconduct by a senior officer in the Conservative party. Mark Clark was slung out of the Conservative party as a result.

To quote the Guardian article

In the days following Elliott’s death, more and more allegations emerged about the behaviour of Clarke, a consultant with Unilever. About 25 people have made official complaints against Clarke over the past year, yet no official action was taken by the Conservative party until Clarke was suspended nine days after Elliott’s death and banned for life from the party last week. The complainants were largely young Tory activists who had been involved in RoadTrip2015 , which by then was regarded as a huge success. David Cameron was due to hold a reception that Clarke was invited to at Chequers in the autumn to celebrate the work of volunteers; this was later cancelled

Yet it has now emerged that the complaints against Clarke included allegations of sexual harassment, intimidation and plotting blackmail.

In the aftermath of the scandal, The Conservative party promised to mend it's ways and ensure that the Party HQ was a safe environment for young people. In 2021, it was clear that the Conservatives had renenged on their commitment to change their ways. An investigation was concluded and Elliots family issued a statement expressing their dissatisfaction, through their solicitors. To quote Elliot's father

The party has recognised there are failings but they are also saying they’ve done nothing wrong.

As has become 100% clear, the death of Elliot was something the Conservative party should have learned from and didn't.  The summary of findings by Clifford Chance is shocking. These were released in 2021, on Boris Johnson's watch. He must have read this and clearly did nothing. 

Here are just a few excepts. 

16. A complaint was made by email to Mr. Abbott about the general conduct of unidentified persons on RoadTrip events. This complaint also included allegations of sexual assault on a third party (not the complainant) by a third party unconnected with Mr. Clarke or RoadTrip. Mr. Abbott responded to the complainant and forwarded the complaint to Mr. Stephen Phillips (Secretary to the Board and Secretary to the Disciplinary Sub-Committee of the Board). It did not prove possible to arrange a meeting between Mr. Phillips and the complainant. The complaint concerning RoadTrip was not investigated.

69. With one exception, there is no suggestion that Mr. Abbott knew of the allegations of sexually inappropriate behaviour by Mr. Clarke whilst Mr. Abbott was at CCHQ. One activist told the Party’s preliminary investigation that Mr. Clarke acted inappropriately towards young female activists and bragged that he got females drunk in order to sleep with them. The activist said that this was reported to Mr. Abbott and Ms. Harris in July 2014. Neither Mr. Abbott nor Ms. Harris could recall this, although they recalled other concerns reported by this activist.

77. The complaint referred to at paragraph 16 above included allegations about unidentified persons on RoadTrip events. It also included an allegation of sexual assault involving two people unconnected to Mr. Clarke, RoadTrip or this investigation. Mr Phillips said that he discussed this particular issue with Ms. Harris. They agreed that it was best for the author of the email to come to CCHQ to speak to Mr. Phillips in person. In his view, this was necessary to establish the correct approach for dealing with the complaint. Mr. Phillips invited them to a meeting to discuss the email. The meeting did not take place, because they were unable to meet during weekday office hours and Mr. Phillips was unable to meet after hours. He also preferred to meet face to face. As a consequence no meeting took place and the complaint was not investigated by Mr. Phillips or his team. However, Ms. Harris had taken steps to investigate the allegation of sexual assault and encouraged the alleged victim to make a formal complaint to CCHQ, although in the event no formal complaint was made. 
 
I can find no evidence that there was any effort made to fix the broken safeguarding processes. Let's just hope that the Pincher affair actually results in the Conservatives looking after it's staff and volunteers properly. There is a pattern and it is one that Boris Johnson, as leader of the Conservative party must be aware of and clearly doesn't care about. 

If the sad death of Elliott Johnson had been taken seriously by the Tories, then they wouldn't be inthis mess now. I can only wonder what Mr Johnsons parents are thinking right now. The truly sad thing for me is that I know one of Elliott Johnson's friends. He was working with him at the Conservative Party. He now has nothing at all to do with the Party. 

Sunday, 3 May 2015

Have the Conservative Party let convicted woman beater Brian Coleman back in? *** Updated 3/5/2015

Of all the local Politicians in our neighbourhood, none is more infamous than disgraced former Conservative Mayor Brian Coleman. Less than two years ago, he was expelled from the Conservative Party after being convicted of a vicious, unprovoked assault of Cafe owner Helen Michael at Tally Ho Corner. Coleman received a large fine for the assault and his disgrace was completed last year when he lost his seat on Barnet Council, receiving a mere 265 votes when standing as an independent councillor in the elections. Despite the fact that Coleman was exposed as a complete liar at the trial, having spent six months telling all manner of porkies to the Police and denying the assault, until the CCTV footage showed the vicious assault. Coleman eventually pleaded guilty to the "assault by beating" of Ms Michael, having wasted months of Police time.

You may think that Coleman would be a bit repentant having gone from being one of the leading Tories in London to a shamed convict. You would be wrong. Only this week, Coleman stated on Twitter that he should have been given the freedom of the Borough for his attack on Ms Michael. Here is the exchange. Steve Ciobo tweeted his disgust at the execution of prisoners in Indonesia. See what you make of Colemans response


There are few greater displays of abuse of State power and regressive thinking than the death penalty.


complete rubbish , well done Gov of Indonesia for standing up to pathetic liberals like you


Brian, just out of interest, what is an appropriate punishment for a man attacking a women in the street


The Freedom of the Borough in my case clearly !


As you can see Mr Coleman thinks his attack was clever. The Barnet Eye believes that there is no place in public life for such a person. We happen to think that assaulting women is something which only a coward would do and only a complete idiot would boast about. Sadly though, Colemans Tory friends such as Mike Freer, the Tory candidate in Finchley and Golders Green take a rather different view. Despite Coleman admitting his guilt, Freer has never spoken out about Coleman. The two are good friends and go back a long way. Coleman engineered the palace coup at Barnet Council which made Freer council leader, propelling him into the position where he was elected MP for Finchley and Golders Green. Whilst Freer has been very vocal about issues such as same sex marriage, where he personally has benefitted from the legislation, he has been far less vocal on the subject of violence against women, something his friend  seems to think is a laughing matter. 

To my complete amazement, yesterday Brian Coleman tweeted that he's been readmitted to the Conservative Party.  Helen Michael, who had been a Tory voter until Brian Colemans parking policies wrecked her business and then assualted her, was paid a visit by the Labour candidate Sarah Sackman, with Labour front bencher Ed Balls. Unlike Mike Freer, Sarah Sackman takes the issue of  violence against women seriously. Ed Balls told Helen he wanted to show that not all high profile male politicians are thugs who beat women up and some actually want to put a complete stop to such horrible behaviour. 

Barnet Blogger Mrs Angry tweeted a picture of Helen receiving flowers from Mr Balls. Coleman, as is his want, immediately started taunting his victim Ms Michael. What followed was an exchange of tweets between myself, who was disgusted at Colemans continual harrassment of Ms Michael and Coleman, where he suggested the Tories have let him back in

Flowers for from ed balls


Embedded image permalink


well , well , well ........people will draw their own conclusions


Brian you may be a cock but unlike Helen you have no Balls & dont use your Ed!





cleverest thing the Tories did was kick you out of the party


and indeed readmit me


I was completely amazed by Brian Colemans claim. Could the Torys really want to be associated with Coleman? Are they so desperate for members that they would let such a complete pariah back in? We immediately started making enquiries. We sent messages to friendly sources in the local Tories, who usually are pleased to confirm the truth of stories or set the record straight. None replied. We tweeted to Mike Freer. No reply. We contacted friendly sources in the press to see if they could find out. They contacted the Tory CCHQ, who promised to get straight back to them. As of now, none of these sources have got back. In fact our press sources seemed to suggest a certain world weariness at the request, indicating that they realised the car was going over the cliff. Given that Coleman launched a scathing attack on all his Tory Council chums when he was kicked out, we are completely amazed that they would consider readmitting such a nasty, convicted felon to the party. Of course Coleman may be lying, if he could lie to the police about assaulting Ms Michael, he can clearly lie about anything. Surely though if this was the case Freer and the Tories would have denied it immediately.

If Coleman is telling the truth, we can only speculate as to why Freer would take such a risk. Being associated with Brian Coleman is election poison. One has to assume that Freer understands the risks, so what would make such a risk worth while? Given that Coleman clearly has no base of support following his Totteridge Council debacle, what benefits could Freer possibly get? Well Mike owes Brian big time, for his patronage. When Freer was council leader, he protected Coleman when he was found guilty of breaking the councils code of conduct.  Despite this only being the first of a whole string of breaches, Freer never said a dickybird. When Coleman launched the crazy parking policies that lost him his seat on the GLA, Freer defended him and his policies. Even after Coleman assualted Helen Michael and was arrested, the local Conservative party did not suspend him. It was only when the national party stepped in that his membership was revoked.

The  situation is quite clear. The Conservative Party have to come clean about Brian Coleman. Have they let him rejoin. If this is simply another example of Coleman telling porkies, why has it taken so long for anyone to say?
Does Mike Freer think violence against women is funny?

As the picture in this weeks Jewish News shows, Mike clearly is not too concerned with sensitivity around this issue. One would rather hope that such prehistoric attitudes had been buried in the past. The blog was started by a tweet from local blogger Mrs Angry. I will give her the last word as well. I think it is 100% clear how the local Tories should have reacted to the whole Brian Coleman issue. It is time for them to bring their attitudes into the 21st Century







I wait to see what the Tories have to say about Colemans comments. I trust the good sense of the people of Finchley and Golders Green to consider what sort of party they want to see representing them.

Regardless of all of this, it is clear that a vote for the Conservatives in Finchley and Golders Green is an endorsement of Brian Coleman and his behaviour. Mike Freer has had many opportunities to take a stand and say that violence against women is unacceptable. He also had many opportunities to set the record straight regarding his views on Brian Coleman and his attack on Helen Michael. I googled Mike Freer to see if he'd made any parliamentary interventions about violence against women. The only thing I could turn up was where he contribiuted to a debate on the subject of domestic abuse to remind everyone that it can occur in same sex relationships as well..







Such silence speaks for itself: & if it is true that it is even possible for the Tories to readmit him..

this says everything you need to know about the innate moral vaccum & misogny of the party.
 
*************** Updated 3/5/2015 *************
The Plot thickens. Yesterday a whole bevvy of local local Conservatives privately and publicly contacted me to say Brian Coleman had not been readmitted. The most categorical of these was from Gabriel Rozenberg who is a Conservative Councillor for Hampstead Garden Suburb. I believe Gabriel to be a honest and trustworthy guy so I pretty much took this tweet at face value and was preparing to update this blog saying as much. Here is what Gabriel had to say

OK, I can confirm that Brian Coleman has not been re-admitted to any local Conservative party. AFAIK he hasn't asked; if he did we'd refuse.

So that seemed to be that. As I was out last night, I got up preparing to update the blog when I noticed this tweet from Brian Coleman in response to Gabriel

you are of course misinformed

As I said above, Mike Freer is a friend of Brian Coleman. He could settle this matter for once and for all by speaking to Brian and clarifying the matter with a public statement. The matter is quite clear. Either @RozGab is "misinformed" or Brian Coleman is telling outright porkies to damage the local Conservative party, who clearly want us to believe they want nothing to do with him. Brian Coleman has put Gabriel in a difficult position. Mike Freer must either back Gabriel and expose this as a Coleman porkie or make sure Gabriel is given "accurate information". 

What is it to be Mike?

********* Updated 14.30 **********

 Brian Coleman just tweeted this. Seems like our local Tories have mislead us. We look forward to seeing what the Tories have to say, having assurred us he wasn't a member. I feel rather mislead

    1. apologies please from with promise never to tweet about me again as for you are just a silly boy 



      Embedded image permalink

Sunday, 10 August 2014

10 reasons why Tories should think twice about Boris as leader

It is pretty clear that Boris Johnson has his eyes firmly set on a serious run for leadership of the Conservative Party and to become Prime Minister. Many of the Tory chattering class in London are hugely excited at this prospect. The Barnet Eye was pondering whether Boris has what it takes to be Prime Minister and whether or not he'd do a good job. In many ways his run as London Mayor has been successful and his supporters are saying "If he can run London, he can run the country". I suppose that if we apply the Boris supporters logic, then Ken Livingstone would be the best man for Labour PM. Like Boris, Livingstone did a good job of running London and much of the success of Boris has been built on the foundations Ken set up. We all accredit Boris with the huge success of the Olympics and it would be foolish to deny that he did a great job organising them. It was a huge challenge and whatever the legacy Boris leaves when he hangs up the blond toupe (metaphorically speaking), it will surely be his finest hour. It is ironic that it was Ken who did the hard part in winning the bid and many Tories at the time were hugely critical claiming that it was a "waste of money". We must credit Boris with delivering Ken's dream with panache and in the process transforming East London. As to his other successes, perhaps cycling in London is the greatest. The Boris bike scheme has shown that in Central London cycling has a role to play. I also like the Boris bus. The competition to design it was pure genius and as a Londoner I love the sight of them. I think Ken massively screwed up by getting rid of the old Routemasters.

So would Boris be a good choice as Leader of the Tories and possibly Prime Minister? The Barnet Eye believes that Boris has all the characteristics to be a great Mayor and none of the ones required to be Prime Minister. Here are the ten reasons I believe that Tories should think twice before handing him the job.

1. He's a lousy judge of character. The Ray Lewis debacle showed just how poor a judge and how slapdash his recruitment process was. Another example of his poor judgement was his close relationship with discredited criminal Brian Coleman, handing him the plum job of head of London Fire authority. Mr Colemans reign was a total disaster. His unpopularity in the role turned a 20,000 majority at the GLA in Barnet and Camden into a 20,000 loss.

2. He is addicted to vanity projects. The best example of this is the Docklands cable car. This hugely expensive trinket was promoted by Boris as the answer to transport issues in the area. In fact it is simply and underused tourist attraction. Even his fellow Tories squirm at talk of Boris Island.

3. He has a record of being completely ineffectual in Parliament. His previous stint as an MP was a disaster and his Tory colleagues were only too pleased to get shot of him when he stood for Mayor. Most hoped Ken would trounce him and that would be the end of him. He was sacked from his previous front line role by Michael Howard, for telling porkies. Would a man who couldn't hold down a junior front bench role really be able to take the top job.

4. He would be useless at Prime Ministers Questions. As Mayor he has Mayors question time and he is regularly embarrassed, becoming tetchy and irritated. If such inquisitors as Andrew Dismore can rile him so easily, how on earth would he cope with 600 odd MP's, all out to make a name for themselves. Here (courtesy of Barnet Bugle) is just one example of Dismore skewering him. Make no mistake, a bad PMQ performer is doomed (ask Iain Duncan Smith).


Even the Daly Mail has doubts about him. This article sums up many of the concerns - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2298529/Nasty-Not-exactly-But-TV-ambush-Boriss-rise-doesnt-look-quite-irresistible.html - the only positive they could see in a Boris PMship would be that he isn't Ed Millband. Of course if Boris ever ascended to the throne, the Mail would fall in four square behind him, but equally if it subsequently all goes wrong, they clearly would have no problem ditching him.

5. He loves schemes which burn money and deliver nothing. The outer London fund is just one example of the Boris love of wasteful porkbarrel projects. We've seen a couple of examples of this here in Barnet. The £1.4 million spent on North Finchley tart up (spot it if you can) and the £400,000 spent on High Barnet.


6. Boris has a poor record of concern for the health of Londoners. Ken Livingstone was seriously addressing issues of poor air quality in London. These all ground to a halt as soon as Boris took charge. Thousands of Londoners have died as a result of ill health issues related to poor air quality and pollution. If he cares so little about something he could have sorted out, how can he be trusted to run the NHS.

7. He lacks the trust of other senior Tories. It is no secret that Boris doesn't get on with George Osborne. Yesterday we did see one well known Tory come out in favour of him. Maverick MP Nadine Dorries was spouting lyrically over his talents. I rather suspect that Nadine would catch his eye (given his rep and his background) but I am less than sure that her record shows her to be that great a judge of political reality.

8. He is likely to be an embarrassment to the UK when dealing with other countries. Boris has a long CV of putting his foot in it when travelling abroad or discussing issues relating to foreign countries. He seems to have no concept whatsoever of the realities of diplomacy. His recent claim that all of the problems of the EU could be dealt with simply by having an Inter Governmental Conference is just one example of this extraordinary naivity. If it really was that simple, hasn't it occurred to Boris that Margaret Thatcher, who had far more respect on the world stage than he does, couldn't pull off that simple trick. Whilst Boris may feel he is a far better negotiator and a bigger figure on the world stage than Thatcher, the rest of us will need some convincing.

9. He is untrustworthy and a bit of a nasty piece of work who is easily riled and loses his temper. If you don't believe me, watch this - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21916385 - and in this clip he tells a Labour opponent to "Get Stuffed" when he can't answer a question http://news.sky.com/story/1140304/boris-johnson-tells-opponent-to-get-stuffed - His supporters claim he's always charming and lovely. Five minutes research on the web tells a wholly different picture. Even convicted fraudster Conrad Black said he didn't completely trust Boris.

10. He doesn't really seem to take his job seriously. Two years ago when London was engulfed in riots, did our Mayor take the first plane back? Nope he was too busy enjoying his holiday. In effect London had no effective leadership. When you get the big job, you get the big responsibilities and of all his many mistakes, to me that was the most serious. If he was PM and there was a crisis whist he was sunning himself in Barbados, we can't be sure he'd give a stuff.


Of course I am not a Conservative. I'm not a member of any party. Who leads the Conservatives is a matter for them. I was asked who I thought would be the most effective Leader, should they choose to knife Cameron. If we assume the choice is between Theresa May, George Osborne and Boris, I'd say that May seems to me the safest pair of hands. There is an old saying that the Home secretary is the politicians graveyard job, but she has managed to be calm and efficient. Osborne is a more divisive character. I suspect that the public don't really like him. Then there is the current encumbant - David Cameron. I think history will be very kind to Cameron. I am not a Tory, but I think he's done a good job as PM given the hand he was dealt. When we found we had a coalition government, I think few people thought it would last or that it would deal with the deep structural issues which were destroying the economy. I disagree with many of the cuts and the policies of the coalition, but whatever you think of them, the UK economy is in far better shape now than it was when Cameron took over. I doubt Boris could ever have brokered a deal with the Lib Dems, let alone deliver 4 1/2 years of stable government. My advice to Conservatives up and down the country is simple. Be very careful what you wish for. I suspect that all Boris will do is cause a lot of navel gazing when they should be ramping up for an election. It may well be that the first act of the return of Boris is to deliver a Milliband government. But that won't really concern Boris, will it? As that is probably his best chance of getting the top job.

Sunday, 9 February 2014

Proof that Barnets Tory MP's are completely out of touch with the ordinary working man (and woman) - No support for EDM 892

It has long been suspected that Barnets Tories are an elitist bunch who despise the ordinary working man. Despite the wholesale closure of pubs across Barnet, there has been not a squeak of support for this industry, which forms the social hub of the Borough. There has been a community based campaign to save the Bohemia in North Finchley, which Mike Freer MP has publicly disassociated himself with. Lib Dem Councillor Jack Cohen has been campaigning for the preservation of a historic pub in Childs Hil (http://www.times-series.co.uk/news/10961320._There_s_a_ray_of_light____pub_one_step_closer_to_being_listed_as_community_asset/)l, yet local MP's Mike Freer and Matthew Offord  have not said a dickybird on the subject.

This hatred of the common working man and his favourite tipple, a nice pint of beer, can easily be demonstrated by the fact that neither MP has signed Early Day Motion 892. At the last budget, the Chancellor enacted the first cut in duty on beer since 1959, to help the pockets of hard pressed beer drinkers and to try and do something to help the ailing brwery industry. Tory MP Andrew Griffiths (clearly a tad more down to earth than the lot around here) tabled EDM 892 to congratulate the government on this wise move. The text of the EDM states
That this House welcomes the ending of the beer duty escalator and the impact of the Chancellor of the Exchequer's historic beer duty cut in the 2013 Budget, the first such cut since 1959, in supporting the growth of Britain's breweries and underpinning confidence in the UK's pubs; and urges the Government to sustain this momentum by considering the case for a further freeze in beer duty in the 2014 Budget which would secure over 2,000 jobs in pubs up and down the land and help reduce the cost of living for hard-working men and women.
Now the motion has attracted support from all sides of the commons, even veteran Left wing firebrand Dennis Skinner signed, recognising that the main beneficiaries of this cut would be the hard pressed working people of the country who like a pint after a days toil. Sadly neither Freer or Offord saw fit to sign the motion. Bob Blackman, a Tory MP from neighbouring Harrow has signed, so clearly Harrow Tories are a bit more grounded and in touch with the man on the Clapham Omnibus (or even the 114 !).

Here is the full deatils and signatories

http://www.parliament.uk/edm/2013-14/892

You may ask what EDM's they support? Well it seems that Matthew Offord cannot be bothered to support any at all. It seems that Matthew doesn't exactly overwork in the Early Day !

http://www.parliament.uk/edm/2013-14/5616/matthew-offord

What about Mike Freer MP? Again it seems that Mike can't be bothered to support anything.

http://www.parliament.uk/edm/2013-14/5732/mike-freer

What about Theresa Villiers? Again, a big fat zero.

http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/business-papers/commons/early-day-motions/edm-member-detail/?session=2012-13&member=4452

So we have three Tory MP's in Barnet, who between them have not supported a single Early Day Motion.

Next Year, these three will be knocking on your doors, asking for your votes. There is a full list of all the EDM's that they haven't supported here. These are all of the topics that your local MP's couldn't be bothered to support. You can click any of these subjects and see what your MP's are too lazy to get involved with.

A

Administration of justice22
Adult education1
Afghanistan28
Africa28
Age discrimination1
Agriculture9
Agriculture and environment1
Alternatives to prison4
Animal diseases4
Animal experiments8
Animal welfare21
Animals10
Anti-social behaviour2
Armed forces46
Armed forces welfare5
Arms control5
Arts3
Asia45
Asylum7
Aviation9
^Top

B

Ballistic missile defence1
Benefits administration3
Benefits policy11
Biodiversity3
Broadcasting21
Burial and cremation1
Buses2
Business support2
^Top

C

Central government4
Charities27
Child care3
Children and families50
Children's social services12
Civil law2
Civil Service5
Climate change1
Coal6
Common Agricultural Policy1
Communicable diseases1
Community care11
Companies62
Competition1
Constitution1
Construction industry7
Consumers25
Coroners1
Countryside10
Courts10
Crime11
Crimes of violence13
Crown4
Cultural heritage56
Cycling1
^Top

D

Data protection4
Death17
Defence equipment and procurement6
Defence expenditure1
Devolution4
Disability discrimination6
Diseases62
Drugs misuse5
^Top

E

Eastern Europe11
Economic policy5
Economic situation8
Election results : international1
Elections3
Electoral franchise3
Electoral register2
Electoral systems2
Electricity4
Emergency services3
Employment42
Employment schemes2
Energy33
Energy conservation2
Environmental protection13
Equality36
Ethnic groups8
EU enlargement1
EU external relations2
EU law and treaties7
Europe4
^Top

F

Family law3
Farmers3
Financial institutions10
Financial services43
Fire services8
Fisheries3
Flooding6
Food22
Foreign and Commonwealth Office1
Forestry2
Freedom of information7
Fuel poverty2
Further education6
^Top

G

Gambling5
Gender recognition2
Genetics1
^Top

H

Health education and preventive medicine37
Health finance1
Health services70
Health staff and professions10
Higher education10
Homelessness1
House of Commons3
Housing11
Housing benefits6
Housing standards2
Housing supply1
Human rights42
^Top

I

Immigration13
Incomes and poverty27
Industrial health and safety24
Industrial relations28
Industry5
Information technology10
Insolvency2
Intelligence services3
International development8
International law4
International organisations4
International politics and government52
International trade4
Internet and cybercrime14
Iran5
Iraq6
^Top

L

Latin America10
Legal aid6
Legal profession6
Legislative process2
Leisure17
Libraries3
Loans4
Local government19
^Top

M

Manufacturing industries10
Marine environment6
Marriage1
Media12
Medical ethics2
Medicine4
Members of Parliament9
Members of the Lords2
Mental health10
Middle East42
Military operations49
Mortgages2
Museums and galleries7
^Top

N

National Assembly for Wales1
National insurance3
National Lottery1
Nationality4
Nature conservation7
North America12
Northern Ireland Assembly3
Nuclear power7
^Top

O

Obesity9
Oil, petrol and natural gas12
Older people6
Overseas territories3
^Top

P

Parliament23
Parliamentary procedure6
Patient rights and complaints3
Pay19
Pensions15
Performing arts17
Planning9
Police14
Political parties3
Pollution5
Population1
Postal services7
Press10
Prisons10
Public expenditure2
Public inquiries1
Public order offences1
^Top

R

Racial discrimination4
Railways23
Regional planning and development1
Registration of births, deaths and marriages1
Regulation14
Religion and faith communities30
Religious discrimination9
Renewable energy4
Research and innovation8
Roads15
Russia4
^Top

S

Schools33
Science16
Scottish Parliament1
Security industry3
Service industries34
Sex discrimination11
Sexual offences5
Shipping11
Sickness, disability and carers' benefits5
Small businesses10
Smoking3
Social rented housing5
Speaker1
Special educational needs3
Sports and Olympic Games77
Standards3
Students10
^Top

T

Taxation28
Teachers5
Telecommunications4
Terrorism5
Tourism12
Training9
^Top

U

Unemployment5
United Nations1
Utilities23
^Top

V

Vaccination2
Veterans9
Voluntary organisations11
^Top

W

Waste management3
Water industry4
Western Europe24
Wildlife14
Wills and intestacy1
Working age benefits