Monday, 16 May 2011

Robert Ramsbottom Special - 1 + 4 = 4

As Councillor Robert Ramsbottom refuses to post any comments I leave on his blog, I guess I'll have to post them myself. Now if any of you look at Bobby Sheepsjacksie's blog about Dexter Whitfield, you will see that there are four comments. I, however, can see a mysterious fifth comment left by me. What is so special about this post? Well it has been awaiting moderation since the 13th May. Poor little Bobby doesn't know what to do? Maybe he's waiting till monday, so he can ask his boss and PR guru Brian Coleman? He does give me such fun. Anyway, I've decided to set up a fan club page for young Bobby -

http://robertramsbottom.blogspot.com/2011/05/welcome-to-robert-ramsbottoms-fan-page.html

Here's his real blog -

http://robertrams.wordpress.com/2011/05/09/who-is-professor-dexter-whitfield/#respond

Anyway here's what I see on his blog (with my comment awaiting modding at the Ramsbottom of the page) :-

4 Responses to Who is Professor Dexter Whitfield?

  1. Mrs Angry, Broken Barnet blog says:
    Oh dear, Robert. Does it not occur to you that it is a good thing to read widely on any given subject, and to make the effort to include material that opposes, as well as that which supports, your own position on a subject? This is the reason I try to read books, newspapers, blogs etc of all political persuasions, in order to reach a better perspective: I recommend this approach to you and all your Tory colleagues, and then perhaps you might feel inclined to moderate some of your group’s more extreme ideological policies. If you had read Prof Whitfield’s writings before committing yourselves to the One Barnet nonsense, Barnet might not be facing the same inevitable conclusion reached by your fellow Tories on Suffolk County Council, ie that massive outsourcing is dangerous, unworkable and benefits only the private companies receiving contracts.
  2. John Dix says:
    Robert,
    Dexter Whitfield isn’t the only one critical of the One Barnet Outsourcing programme. An independent review of the DRS business case by Adrian Waite, a former Local Authority Finance Director (Section 151 Officer), stated:
    “During the thirty years that I have worked in local government finance as a local government officer and management consultant, including some time as Finance Director of a Borough Council, I have seen and written many business cases, business plans and options appraisals. This business case is remarkable for the apparent lack of robust evidence to support its main conclusions that £28 million of savings and increased income is achievable and that this can only be delivered through outsourcing”.
    Southwest One is an example where outsourcing has gone horribly wrong. Ken Maddock, Conservative Leader of Somerset County council recently stated in an interview with the BBC that if they could tear up the contract today they would save £58 million.
    Outsourcing is not the panacea it is made out to be. Without robust evidence that savings will be achieved it just seems a reckless approach.
  3. Julia Hines says:
    Robert, with respect, exactly what savings have been achieved? I would be fascinated to know. I thought that so far there has only been huge cost and some small savings which would have been achieved in any event. Having looked at some of his reports, my understanding is not that he has ignored savings as you say, but that they do not exist and there is no empirical evidence they will ever exist in the future.
  4. robertrams says:
    My understanding is that former Chief Executive Leo Boland and former Leader Mike Freer agreed to give the unions a sum of money so they could hire consultants and fully participate in the dialogue around the ‘Future Shape’ of the council.
    The unions decided to use this money to bring Professor Whitfield onboard. They chose their own independent expert; the council did not suggest Professor Whitfield or anyone else. So indirectly the council paid for his initial reports, since then, the reports have been paid for by the unions.
    I have no problem with an independent assessment of the programme, I just wonder whether these reports are truly objective.
    It is important to remember that One Barnet isn’t just about outsourcing, it is a council transformation programme. It is about reassessing how services are provided and creating a citizen-centred council. This kind of transformation programme will inevitably be front loaded with costs but that doesn’t mean it won’t deliver savings.
    It is vital that the team managing these projects and contracts has the right capabilities and experience to ensure we avoid the pitfalls experienced by some other councils.
    As mentioned previously, the council needs to operate with a far smaller budget. The One Barnet programme is our solution, a solution that doesn’t reply on the widespread redundancies and cuts to frontline services that are proposed by other councils.
    I understand that the outsourcing projects are not popular with everyone, but how popular would the alternative be?
  5. Rog T says:
    Your comment is awaiting moderation.
    Robert, is your failure to post my previous comments an admission of intellectual inferiority?

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    message to Bobby - You really could save us all a sackload of laughs at your expense by just putting the comments up on your blog and using your stunning wit and intellect to put us in our places. How hard can that be? Hope you like your fanclub. I will be looking for lots of lovely pictures to post on it.

Sunday, 15 May 2011

Sylvia Anderson at the Hendon RAF Museum

Having watched Manchester City win the FA cup at Wembley, I had a rather different evening planned. My old mate Boz Boorer (Polecat & Morrissey guitarist) had rang me earlier in the week to ask if I'd seen that Thunderbirds producer Sylvia Anderson was speaking at the Hendon RAF museum. I hadn't. As both Boz & myself grew up loving the work of the Andersons, it was a must see. Boz noted on his Facebook page that the ticket stated that if Sylvia couldn't make it, they could substitute her with someone else. We speculated. Maybe it would be Laurie Anderson? or even worse Arthur Anderson.

We turned up shortly before the scheduled start time. We were greeted with a display case with various Anderson memorabilia and a couple of Anderson experts observing "That one's not original". Ten minutes after the scheduled start time, a rather official looking figure who appeared and said "Sylvia is in the building, but she's adjusting her dress". Given our earlier speculation, we chortled. Sadly no talk on financial planning from Arthur. Then Sylvia arrived.

A short preamble was given. A rundown of her post Gerry era work, including boxing for HBO.  Then a clip of the highlights of her work. It's fair to say that whenever I hear the opening sequence of Thunderbirds, I always feel a tingle of excitement. As a boy, Thunderbirds had everything. Rockets, explosions, actions, humour. The goodies always won and the day was always saved. I often speculated what the relationship between Jeff Tracey and Lady Penelope. Perhaps my favourite character was Parker, lady Penelope's butler. In one episode, he saves the day by picking the lock of a safe at the Bank of England, to release some trapped officials, just before the oxygen ran out. The bank decide to revert to the old safe, because it took Parker 2 hours to crack it, rather than the 30 seconds it took to crack the new one. Parker wryly observes to Lady Penelope that the other one only took 2 hours, because he was "putting on a show".

Sylvia talked us through how she joined the company to earn some spare cash, whilst studying at the LSE. She explained how they'd got into puppetry by accident. They had got some work because they were cheap. She explained how each series was a progression from the previous. Clips were shown of the early work, such as Supercar and fireball XL5. She explained how Stingray became the first colour TV show on UK television, as Lou Grade wanted to sell it to the USA.

She explained that to her, Thunderbirds was the pinnacle of the Anderson work. She told how Barry Gray, the composer of the music, lived at home with his mum and used to compose the scores in his head. I'd say that the music from the Anderson series were probably the finest theme music of all. She explained how they improved the process of puppetry, by installing a TV monitor, so the puppeteers could watch their work.

She then went on to discuss Captain Scarlett and Joe 90. She clearly didn't hold them in quite the same affection as Thunderbirds. She did make the point that one of the groundbreaking points in Captain Scarlett was that the Angles (fighter pilots) were all women. She also stated that they always had a multi racial aspect to the casts, as they wanted a global appeal.

Then onto the later series with actors. Some clips were shown of UFO. Sylvia commented that the costumes were very dated looking. She also noted that Ed Bishop (who played Commander Ed Straker) had to wear a blond wig and make up. She said he'd play his role, whip off the wig, scrub off the make up and no one would recognise him. She told how Lou Grade got her to dispense with the services of Peter Gordeno (original Skydiver pilot) because he didn't think it was right to have a dancer playing the role. She also explained how Michael Billington got the role as Gordino's replacement.

She then went on to discuss Space 1999. She commented that Michael Landau and Barbera Bain were at times "difficult", noting that they required  a chauffeur to drive them the 5 minute walk from their trailers to the film sets.

Then there was a Q&A session. One punter asked if there was any reason why so many characters in Anderson series were single parent families "No, you are reading too much into it". One member of the audience told how they'd hired a pay as you go colour telly from Rediffusion, purely to watch Stingray in colour. Half way through, the money ran out and no one had another thruppence.

Afterwards, Boz & myself bumped into another ex Polecat, Tim, who is also an Anderson nut. Tim lives in the USA, but had noticed the event at the last minute. Tim is into film production and was made up to meet Sylvia. We had a drink at the museum bar and did a quick tour of the exhibits. As both Boz and myself had dad's who were in the RAF in the second world war, we have a special affection for the museum. Both our Dads were shot down & Boz's spent five days in a liferaft (which there is an example of in the museum). Sadly my Dad's old plane, the Wellington, is away for repairs.

The idea of such events at the museum is brilliant. After we bought Sylvia's book and got them signed by Sylvia, we adjourned to the pub. It was a very different way to spend a Saturday evening. I have a confession to make. UFO by Gerry and Sylvia Anderson, is my favourite ever TV series. It was made in 1969, the year Manchester City last won the FA Cup. As a City fan, I really couldn't think of a more perfect way to celebrate the success of the team. Gerry and Sylvia Anderson were a massive part of my childhood. I cannot imagine growing up without series such as Thunderbirds. When Sylvia signed my book, I forgot to thank her for that, so if you are reading Sylvia, thanks.

One final note : The RAF museum is one of the worlds greatest museums and it's on our doorstep. I urge everyone to support it and oppose any attempts to charge an entrance fee. In our efforts to support and promote the museum, the Mill Hill Music Festival organising committee have booked Jacqui Dankworth to play at the museum on Friday 1st July. Please click the link in the sidebar for more details.

Saturday, 14 May 2011

The FA - aptly named

As I am off to the cup final, I thought I'd just say a few words about the FA (never a more aptly named organisation has existed). Football is our national game. Teams like Manchester United, City, Arsenal etc have multi million pound turnovers. At Wembley, I'll have to fork out nearly a tenner for a pint of beer and a coke for my son. Replica tops cost 10 times what they would if they weren't "Official" merchandising. In short, the whole thing is a rip off fleecing hard up parents.

The other side of the coin is Youth Football. How many of the gazillion pounds generated by the Premiership comes back to local teams, to encourage youngsters to take up football? How much of it is used to save playing fields? How often do Premiership Superstars visit schools to pass on ther skills?

David Cameron and Nick Clegg could do us all a favour and put a levy of 1% on premiership clubs turnover, to be put back into grass roots football. The one thing I would insist on. That the FA didn't get a penny of it.

Anyway, I hope it's a good game. Despite being a Manchester City fan, I've always had a soft spot for Stoke City FC. When I was  a lad, my hero was Gordon Banks - I wanted to be the England goalie. They also had the mercurial talents of Tony Currie. I hope they win something soon (just not today).

Brian Coleman - A clarification

Some Barnet Eye readers may have got the impression from the previous post, that I'd like to see Brian Coleman killed by a speeding truck. The Barnet Eye wishes to make clear that this is not the case. In fact we hope Brian Coleman lives to a ripe old age. We hope that he manages to spend a good few years of his dotage in full possession of his faculties, enjoying the best quality care the privatised social care system, courtesy of Barnet Council, can provide, enjoying the fruits of his career. Nothing makes me smile more than the thought of our Brian saying to one of the lovely staff on minimum wages "I used to be the Mayor of Barnet, you know" as they reply "Yes dear, now eat up your boiled egg and cabbage".

Friday, 13 May 2011

The Friday the 13th Joke

As is our tradition in Barnet (as started by VickiM), here is the Friday joke. Following criticism from Richard Dawkins and his band of militant secularist Athiests, we've issued two versions of this joke. One for believers and one for Athiests


Friday Joke For Believers


While walking down the street one day promenant London Assembly Member, Brian Coleman is tragically hit by a truck and dies. His soul arrives in heaven and is met by St. Peter at the entrance.

'Welcome to heaven,' says St. Peter. 'Before you settle in, it seems there is a problem. We seldom see a high official around these parts, you see, so we're not sure what to do with you.'

'No problem, just let me in, 'says the Brian.

'Well, I'd like to, but I have orders from higher up. What we'll do is have you spend one day in hell and one in heaven. Then you can choose where to spend eternity'.

'Really, I've made up my mind. I want to be in heaven,' says Brian.

'I'm sorry, but we have our rules.'

And with that, St. Peter puts him in a taxi (on heavan's expense account) and he goes down, down, down to hell. He finds himself in the middle of a green golf course. In the distance is a the Hell Town Hall and standing in front of it are all his friends and other politicians who had worked with him.

Everyone is very happy and in evening dress. They run to greet him, shake his hand, and reminisce about the good times they had while getting rich at the expense of the taxpayer.
Brian is lead off to the most magnificent buffet he has ever seen and dines on lobster, caviar and champagne.

Also present is the devil, who really is a very friendly & nice guy who has a good time dancing and telling jokes. They are having such a good time that before he realizes it, it is time to go.

Everyone gives him a hearty farewell and pack him off into a Hellcabs taxi . The Taxigoes up, up, up and the door opens at heaven where St. Peter is waiting for him.

'Now it's time to visit heaven.'

So, 24 hours pass with Brian joining a group of contented souls moving from cloud to cloud, playing the harp and singing. They have a good time and, before he realises it, the 24 hours have gone by and St. Peter returns.

'Well, then, you've spent a day in hell and another in heaven. Now choose your eternity'.

Brian reflects for a minute, then he answers: 'Well, I would never have said it before, I mean heaven has been delightful, but I think I would be better off in hell. '

So St. Peter escorts him back to his Hellcab (waiting with the meter running) and he goes down, down, down to hell.

When he arrives, he's in the middle of a barren land covered with waste and rubbish.  He sees all his friends, dressed in rags, picking up the trash and putting it in black bags as more rubbish falls from above. The devil comes over to him and puts his arm around his shoulder. 'I don't understand,' stammers the Brian. 'Yesterday I was here and there was a beautiful Town Hall and we ate lobster and caviar, drank champagne, and danced and had a great time. Now there's just a wasteland full of rubbish and my friends look miserable. What happened? '

The devil looks at him, smiles and says, ' Yesterday we were campaigning ...

Today you voted.'

Friday Joke For Secularists and Athiests as approved by Richard Dawkins



While walking down the street one day promanant London Assembly Member, Brian Coleman is tragically hit by a truck and dies.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Strangely they both sort of work, don't they - Enjoy your weekend, whatever you get up to and mind those trucks

Brian Coleman LFEPA expenses update

On Wednesday, we posted a blog detailing outrageous expenses claims by the Barnet and Camden GLA Member and Barnet Councillor Brian Coleman. Brian Colemans colleague at the GLA, John Biggs, clearly a sensible chap and avid Barnet Eye reader, immediately twittered this :-

----------------
John Biggs
@

Wednesday, 11 May 2011

Political Expenses special - Brian Coleman LFEPA expenses scandal

London Assembly member Brian Coleman, is allowed to claim expenses to cover his costs a member of the LFEPA (London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority).

Details for April 2010 to March 2011 are here :-

http://www.london-fire.gov.uk/mem_exp_10_11.asp

You may be interested to see how much he claims compared to his colleagues


Brian Coleman April 2010 to March 2011 £3,480.20
Darren Johnson April 2010 to March 2011 £0.00
Gareth Bacon April 2010 to March 2011 £0.00
Mike Tuffrey April 2010 to March 2011 £0.00
Murad Qureshi April 2010 to March 2011 £0.00
Navin Shah April 2010 to March 2011 £0.00
Richard Tracey April 2010 to March 2011 £23.96
Tony Arbour April 2010 to March 2011 £378.86

You may wonder what costs so much. Well amongst the other entries, it seems that the Taxpayer is picking up the bill for Conservative members away days :-


6/11/2010 Travel Members' car mileage - London Councils Conservative Group Away Day at Westminster City Hall, SW1 £11.44
26/11/2010 Travel Congestion Charge - London Councils Conservative Group Away Day at Westminster City Hall, SW1 £8.00

There are plenty of other interesting items here :-

http://www.london-fire.gov.uk/Brian_Coleman_2010_2011.asp

I don't see why the London Taxpayer should subsidise Tory Away Days. Interestingly his Tory Colleagues haven't claimed for this

Tuesday, 10 May 2011

Twatman Robert Rams attacks Mike Freer MP

I was amazed to read an attack by Councillor Robert Rams (voted a twat by readers of the Barnet Eye last year) on his former boss at Barnet Council - Mike Freer MP. Of course, being a Twat, it is highly likely that Robert Rams didn't actually realise what he was saying or doing. Today Ramsbottom wrote this blog :-


http://robertrams.wordpress.com/2011/05/09/who-is-professor-dexter-whitfield/

Let me quote the key passage from Ramsbums blog :-
He (Professor Dexter Whitfield) is now the Director of the European Services Strategy Unithttp://www.european-services-strategy.org.uk/contact/. It is from here he has been paid by the Barnet unions to write these reports. But it is interesting that whatever he writes, he always comes to the same conclusion, that outsourcing is a bad idea, ignoring the savings that have been achieved. But would we expect him to write anything else? So in conclusion, he appears to be an anti-outsourcing activist, so it is hard to understand how his reports can be described as an independent critique of our One Barnet process. I would suggest to the Unions that they save their members’ hard earned money and spend it somewhere else!
Well what Mr Sheepsjacksie Rams neglects to mention is that it wasn't the unions who brought Dexter Whitfield in or paid his bills. It was none other than the then Barnet Council Leader Mike Freer. He made a ground breaking decision to pay for the Unions to hire their own consultant (Prof Whitfield) to cast a critical eye over the proposals. Mike Freer told the Barnet Unison Leader, John Burgess, that criticism of the process from an independent source would improve the process. He put his money where his mouth was and the first four reports were paid for by the Barnet Taxpayer on the command of Mike Freer.

I spoke to John Burgess this evening concerning Robert Rams comments. He stated that when Mike Freer first told him about the One Barnet program (then called Future Shape), he insisted that the Unions were a vital part of the process. He suggested getting Dexter Whitfield in to show Burgess his good faith as a partner. He told John that whilst they would probably disagree on many of the ideas, it was vital that the process involved all the stakeholders in Barnet. This was why the name was changed to One Barnet. Mike Freer always insisted to John Burgess that OneBarnet was not "all about outsourcing" but about transforming and modernising Barnet Council, with the help and agreement of the workforce.

In the near two years since Freer left to persue his personal ambition to become an MP, the One Barnet program has changed. It has become a program solely about outsourcing. Whilst the Unions were tasked to come up with suggested efficiencies and competetive in house bids, the joint Leaders of the Council, Lynne Hillan and Andrew Harper have gone back on their commitments and promises to John Burgess, to consider in house bids if they were competetive. Councillor Rams, who is charged with implementing many "One Barnet" programs has not even to read properly the critique's provided by Professor Whitfield. He has never supplier a sensible response to any of his comments. Now he seeks to dismiss someone who is an eminent professor and has spent years studying the subject in a vicious and ill informed blog (based on casual reading of a couple of internet articles).

I spoke to John Burgess and he informed me that he was shocked that a cabinet member of Barnet Council should choose to behave in such a way. John said "I've worked with four Conservative Leaders at Barnet and although we've had our differences, I've never seen them attack the reputation of an independent advisor, who was initially brought in by the Council, in terms such as these".

Whilst Robert Rams may think he's a clever little twat chappie for attacking Professor Whitfield, he clealry hasn't thought this through. Does he really think anyone with any credibility will want to work for Barnet Council, if Cabinet members are going to harangue them and belittle their reputation, should they spell out a few home truths? Does he think Councillors will get decent advice, if experts know that they will be insulted in this way.

The most telling point about Rams attack against Whitfield is that at no point does Rams identify a single error in Whitfields analysis of Barnet Council's One Barnet program.  He cannot find a single criticism of Whitfields reports to demonstrate why he may be wrong. All he does is attack the reputation of the man. This is the second time in two days that a serious and intelligent critic of Barnet Council has been harshly attacked in this way. Yesterday it was the campaigner against the CPZ price hike, David Attfield.

The evidence is there for all to see. Rams is quite happy to slag off the Unions for spending their money on the services of Professor Dexter Whitfield. As it was the Barnet Taxpayers money, generously provided by Mike Freer MP  which started the ball rolling, it is quite clear that Rams also thinks Mike Freer has wasted cash big time. Sadly he's too cowardly to tell the people of Barnet the whole truth or to attract the ire of his boss. It is telling that Robert Rams is the GLA bag carrier of Brian "Gordon Brown Stealthtaxman" Coleman, who has made a career of attacking the reputations of all who cross him. It seems Robert "Sheepsjacksie" Ramsbottom is ready to step out of the (rather portly) shadow of his mentoe

Barnet Council - Open letter to all councillors from concerned Barnet residents

Time to pull back from the One Barnet Programme

Dear Councillor

Next Tuesday 17 May is the Council’s Annual General Meeting. As residents we see this as an opportunity for the Council to do some stocktaking and signal a change of direction.

The One Barnet Programme was initially presented as the new and innovative approach to the future of Council services. However, as soon as the first reports were published it became clear that there was little evidence behind many of the exaggerated claims being made by the consultants paid to advise on the programme.

We are aware that many councillors doubt whether the One Barnet Programme can deliver the savings and improved services Barnet residents expect. We share those anxieties.

Last week saw the publication of a number of articles in the mainstream press supporting the view that mass outsourcing does not save money, is high risk, and has a negative impact on staff morale. We hope you will take the time to read the extracts from some of those articles which follow.

The fate of Suffolk County Council

Suffolk County Council last September declared its intention to become the first “virtual council”. The Chief Executive pushing this programme, under the name New Strategic Direction, was being supported by Max Wide, on secondment from BT. As you know, Mr Wide was one of the architects of Future Shape / One Barnet.

Since announcing their intention to outsource most services, Suffolk has been dogged by controversy. In December they were accused of ignoring a £100 million overspend on a deal with BT. (See article: http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/dec/16/suffolk-council-bt-overspend.)

In the last few days there have been big changes in the Conservative Party in Suffolk as a result of concerns about New Strategic Direction, and the scheme has been halted. The Guardian newspaper reports:

The previous council leader, Jeremy Pembroke, who helped oversee the plans... stepped down in April amid concern about the deeply unpopular changes. An inquiry was begun into morale at the council's legal department after an anonymous whistleblowing letter, sent to councillors, and believed to be from an employee, alleged staff there had been put under "unbearable pressure". The letter refers to "the poisonous atmosphere that exists at present" in the council.


The BBC has reported on its website:

MPs were concerned that Suffolk County Council chief executive's policies threatened to "rip the heart out" of local communities. Negotiations are reported to be going on between the council and its chief executive Andrea Hill who has not returned to work after a holiday and is now reported to be on "extended leave". Suffolk Central Conservative MP Dr Dan Poulter said he and fellow MPs had been worried about the direction the council was taking under Ms Hill.

(To see the BBC interview with Poulter visit http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-suffolk-13312597.)

Outsourcing should not be the automatic response to austerity.

The public sector IT managers’ association SOCITM has published a research briefing called Costs of outsourcing: uncovering the real risks.

The report’s author, Martin Greenwood, warns:

Outsourcing should not be considered an inevitable response to austerity. Even smaller organisations that need to gain economies of scale, and struggle to keep up with technological development, should consider collaboration and sharing with other local public services as a genuine alternative. If they do take the plunge into outsourcing, they should make sure they are aware of the pitfalls and know how to avoid them. ...It is a myth that outsourcing is cheaper, across most areas it is more expensive and people outsource for a range of reasons other than cost.

The report reveals that “when comparing the costs for any service, most elements will be more expensive if outsourced. The risks associated with benchmarking begin at the tender stage when suppliers will benefit from being experts at the process of negotiating contract terms, in contrast with the local authority that will go to market only rarely for a major outsourcing.”


The government is rowing back on mass outsourcing of public services.

The BBC reported a recent meeting between the CBI and the minister for the Cabinet Office, Francis Maude, where the minister explained:

...the government is committed to transforming services, but this would not be a return to the 1990s with wholesale outsourcing to the private sector – this would be unpalatable to the present administration. The government was not prepared to run the political risk of fully transferring services to the private sector with the result that they could be accused of being naive or allowing excess profitmaking by private sector firms. [Note of meeting by CBI]


The articles above point to the folly of schemes such as the One Barnet Programme.

In the last two months the Council’s poor procurement and contract monitoring capacity has been demonstrated by the MetPro, Catalyst (legionella bacterium) and SAP cases. These have all harmed the Council’s reputation. Yet these are small contracts when compared to what the One Barnet Programme is proposing. With the One Barnet Programme the risks will be much higher.

We are asking the Conservative administration to bring the One Barnet Programme to a close before it is too late.

Millions of pounds of public money has already been spent on consultants, with no discernible savings achieved, and the losses could well be multiplied many fold going forward. Residents and Barnet Council staff are increasingly anxious about the future of Barnet Council services. Councillors should be too.

Last September the Leader said “I would always listen to the community” when she reversed the decision to increase councillors’ allowances. We are asking you to listen now.

There is still time to put the brakes on the One Barnet Programme. We urge you to do so.

Yours sincerely

Derek Dishman
John Dix
Vicki Morris
Theresa Musgrove
Roger Tichborne

Monday, 9 May 2011

Barnet CPZ Special - Brian Coleman is Barnet's very own Gordon Brown

I am truly shocked by the latest revelations concerning the battle between Barnet residents and the Council, who are seeking to impose massive new stealth taxes in the form of a CPZ parking fee hike. Local Conservatives have over the years tried to tell me that Brian Coleman is a "true Tory". Sadly this lie has been exposed as he's the bloke who is championing this HUGE STEALTH TAX INCREASE. The Tories used to mock Gordon Brown for his "addiction to stealth taxes" which he hiked in an attempt to keep down income tax. Well Brian Coleman is quite clearly Barnet Councils very own Gordon Brown. 10% of the population use CPZ parking permits  - Not the richest 10% who have drives and don't need one, just the middle 10% who own smallish homes, with no room for a drive. Typically the type of people who are struggling to get on.

As if clobbering this unfortunate section of the population wasn't bad enough, Barnet Council has now launched a dirty war against them, for having the audacity to complain. The protestors, lead by David Attfield have asked for a judicial review. Barnet Council have responded with bully boy tactics. They have hired a top QC and their defence tactics state the following :-

1. The case only concerns "a limited number of residents of the Borough of Barnet" and, therefore, is not a case of broad importance.
    
2. David is simply opposed to the "extent of spending cuts in Barnet" and his claim is "purely political". His remedy should be the ballot box and not the court.

3. David's case "is solely based on his desire to avoid incurring extra financial expense to park outside his home".         


Regarding the first point. Given the widespread support for David Attfields campaign and the fact that the changes affect 100% of the residents of Barnet (those that don't pay CPZ fees being subsidised by those that do), the first point is plainly a bare faced porkie.

As to the second point. Davids campaign has nothing to do with cuts. It is all about the cost of parking. Surely Barnet Councils defence defies all logic or sense. If David was solely concerned with cuts, he'd be pleased to see extra revenue raised from increased CPZ fees. It is clearly a slur, to try and portray David Attfield as something he isn't.

The third point is also clearly an attempt to besmirch David Attfield. His campaign has received widespread support. Many Conservative Councillors have expressed disquiet at the plan, not least Deputy Council Leader Andrew Harper (see this leaked email on the Future Shape blog)

http://barnetfutureshape.blogspot.com/2011/02/brian-coleman-is-horrified-that-parking.html

In fact the email comprehensively destroys all three of the points Barnet Council are using in their defence. Council Brian "Gordon Brown" Coleman, knows this. The officers know this. Presumably the QC knows this. I hope the Judge reads this email and sends Barnet and their expensive QC (paid for by you, me and Mr Attfield) packing.

It never ceases to amaze me, just how low Barnet Council is sinking. First Brian Coleman launches a campaign of Brownesque daylight robbery, in the form of Stealth Taxes and then the Council go to war with law abiding residents. It really makes me sick.

Read the full story here, I'm off to throw up -
http://barnetcpz.blogspot.com/2011/05/barnet-council-finally-respond-and.html

I have one message for Brian "Gordon Brown" Coleman - Your number is up mate. You have been exposed. You are a typical slimy toad of a politician, who will clobber anyone for taxes, if you think you can get away with it.