Music, football, Dyslexia, Cancer and all things London Borough of Barnet. Please note we have a two comments per person per blog rule.
Thursday, 30 June 2016
Andrea Leadsome - The Conservative Corbyn
Wednesday, 29 June 2016
the filth and the fury as the Labour Party impodes
1. The right wing stirred up resentment of immigrants and blamed the EU.
2. The UK electorate felt that the EU threatened the sovereignty of the UK.
3. UK workers were scared of losing jobs to migrant workers.
4. The Leave campaign managed to convince the UK electorate that Camerons deal was bogus and that Cameron and Osborne were lying to them.
5. UK voters were lead to believe there would be more moeny for the NHS if we left the EU.
Over the course of the campaign, I heard these themes repeated time and time again. It seemed to me that the more Remain politicians campaigned, the less the public trusted them. I suspect that if the Remain campaign had banned all politicians from campaigning and simply got economists, professors and business leaders to spell the case, Remain would have won. I may be wrong, just my hunch, but I truly believe that the input of politicians was massively counter productive.
And what two UK Politicians did more to undermine the trust of the British public than any other in living memory? Well in my opinion Tony Blair and Peter Mandelson. I believe that these two have done more damage to the trust of the British people than the rest of them put together. Blair will forever be remembered for the dodgy dossier. Whilst many politicians tell lies, few in our lifetime have told lies with such disasterous consequences as Blair. I've no idea how many people died as a result of Blairs porkies, but a whole region of the world is in flames as a result. It is my firm belief that without Blair's lies, the US would not have embarked on the second gulf war. If this had been avoided, then we wouldn't be seeing ISIS terrorising hundreds of thoiusands. As for Mandelson, has anyone ever been less trusted by the public? Mandelson was kicked out of the cabinet for dodgy dealing, but Tony brought him back as soon as was possible. What message did this send?
I was a Labour party member from 1980 until 2009. I stood by the party through thick and thin, but in September 2009, I could stand no more. The final straw was the behaviour of Alan Johnson on Sky news, when the Sangatte refugee camp in France was cleared by French riot police. There were many things I had unforgivably excused, but the sight of Alan Johnson praising the French riot police for beating up innocent women and children in the process of clearing the camp was too much for me. Whatever the Labour party was or wasn't , when a senior member praised violenceby a paramilitary force against women and children, it was the end.
Many people (especially on the Leave side), seem to see refugees as in some way inferior to us. I don't. We are all human beings, we all bleed the same red blood. We all hurt when we are hit. As far as I am concerned I am no better than anyone and probably a lot worse than many. I was born and raised and in a rich country, into a stable family life, with well off parents. I've never wanted for anything. I've never had to go hungry, sleep rough or sell my ass for my next meal. I've made my own choices. Anyone who has ever worked with refugees knows that horror stories abound. Refugees deserve our compassion. Given that the actions of our government has created the situations they find themselves in, we really should bear some degree of responsibility, but sadly the last Labour government took none and showed zero compassion.
As far as I am concerned, the last Labour administration was morally bankrupt. That was not what I wanted to say, I spent years in denial. But it was the truth. At the end of 2009, I joined the Lib Dems, for the simple reason that I felt their principled stand against the Iraq war was something I wished to associate myself with. My politics are centre left. I felt comfortable with many of the policies of the Lib Dems. Sadly the 2010 coalition with the Tories ended that relationship, almost before it had really started.The abandonment of the student loans pledge convinced me I'd made a mistake in joining the party.
After the 2015 election, I realised I'd made a mistake. I have spent the last year agonising over where I should hang my political hat. It is 100% clear to everyone who is not a complete basket case, that for all their faults the Lib Dems prevented the Tories from destroying the country. Labour were a different proposition. I have met Jeremy Corbyn on several occasions. He has always supported the people of Barnet. He joined us on marches in the snow. He truned up to screenings of our films in the Commons. He gave me faith that Labour hadn't lost its soul or its integrity. I don't agree with Corbyn on macro economics. I do however think he is decent and honest. I recognised exactly why he was needed in British politics. With his massive mandate from Labour members, I felt that if the party rallied around him and united, then Labour would have a chance. I believed Corbyn had given Labour a chance to re-establish its credentials as a party of honesty and integrity.
The last week has shown just how dishonest and untrustworthy the Labour Party is. As I mentioned at the start of this blog there are numerous reasons that the electorate voted to keave the EU. No one has said it was because Jeremy Corbyn didn't campaign hard enough. Whilst some said that Blair and Mandelson had put them off, none said the same of Corbyn. But the last few days has seen a clearly stage managed procession of disloyal Shadow cabinet minister resigning,. Only a fool would believe this wasn't planned for months. Whilst politicians constantly lecture us on the need to respect democracy, it seems that Labour MP's don't see the need to apply this rule to themselves in respect to the leadership of the their own party.
I can understand that Labour MP's don't like Corbyn. I can understand that they may wish for one of the "in crowd" to be leader. I am no fool and I realise that as soon as a new leader is elected, ambitious MP's start thinking about the next leader. What I can't understand is how they blame Corbyn for all Labours ills, when they have done everything to undermine him. Never has a Labour Leader had less support from his own MP's. Sadly the civil war they are starting, on completely spurious grounds, will rip the Labour Party apart. The members who flocked to Corbyn, in unprecendented numbers will be completely disenchanted with the party and I can only see a civil war, which only the Tories will win.
No wonder David Cameron was keen to knife Corbyn at PMQ's. He knows that a Labour civil war will guarantee the Tories at the ballot box. The sad truth is that Labour lost the trust of its own members and the public through the lies and poor conduct of Blair and Mandelson. Now the Blairites have the audacity to blame Corbyn for the lack of public trust in politicians. The horrible truth is that the biggest losers in all of this are the weak, the vulnerable and the disabled. The thing that terrifies me is that this will give the Tory hard right encouragement. They will see this as a green light to replace Cameron with a true hard right figure. Such a figure would normally be electoral poison, but with a fragmented Labour party, they will see a unique window of opportunity. If such a nighmare scenario emerges, it will be the fault of the disloyal Labour MP's who have put their own personal vanity before the democratic will of the party. I don't think Corbyn was perfect, but how can anyone have expected him to succeed if he spent all his time looking over his shoulder, waiting for the knfe in the back. What shocks me most is that all of the Blairites I've spoken to think what has happened is bloody marvellous. Personally it makes me sick,
Tuesday, 28 June 2016
Don't blame Roy Hodgson, blame The FA for Englands years of failure
If this was an isolated incident and the FA had a strong track record, we may put it down to a one off aberration. But the truth is that it is 50 years since England won a major tournament. No country has a God given right to win anything, but England has the richest league in the world. If anywhere on the planet should have the resources to develop players, it should be the UK. But look at the England team. How many world class players were there in it? I was discussing before the tournament and I pointed this oit to friends. They felt that this "young crop" would have the team spirit and the desire to compensate. When I pointed out the flakyness of the defence, I was told that our attacking options would compensate. Sadly we saw the true limitations of Kane, Vardy, Rooney et all last night. The sad truth is that whilst we were playing a team from a country with the population of Leicester, we couldn't manage a single moment of true inspiration or invention.
Over the years, England has produced a long line of world class midfielders. Hoddle, Robson, Gerrard, to name but a few. Sadly though, the money has rolled in, but the talent has dried up. This season, the outstanding midfielder in the Premiership was Mahrez. There was no one in any way comparable of English extraction. Have you ever wondered why? My son played youth football from the age of 7. How much support did his team, one of the best established and most successful in the Borough or Barnet get from the FA? The sad answer is none at all. How often did the FA send anyone along to see how clubs were doing with coaching? Never. How often did the FA offer places to our club for talented youngsters? Never. In truth, the FA does nothing. There are good,successful youth clubs, but they get no support at all from the FA. Young players get absolutely nothing from the millions that football generates.
Youth football clubs in England are judged by their success in winning trophies. Players at the best clubs are schooled in the arts of winning trophies, rather than developing strong core skills. As a result, other countries are light years ahead of us. Roy Hodgson is simply reaping the crop that was sown 15-20 years ago in youth leagues up and down the country. We see young players with promise emerge, only to be shut out of the best teams by the expensive imports teams need to win trophies. Take Marcus Rashford. Everyone I know thinks he was the player of the tournament for England, playing without fear and terrifying defenders. What chance has he got with Mourinho at Manchester United when an older more experienced player to the new managers liking is brought in. Two years ago, Raheem Stirling was in the same boat, but the press and fans have ganged up on him, destroying his confidence. We hear all this talk of "overpaid superstars". This is most unfair. Footballers get paid the going rate for the job. Unlike bankers and newspaper owners, they are pubicly accountable to the people who pay their wages. If you dislike the headlines that appear in The Sun, you can't get to shout at Rupert Murdoch. Footballers have to face the fans every week.
Whilst we can't prevent fans venting their displeasure, the FA could take issue with the newspapers that demonise young players. I believe a newspaper code of conduct should be drawn up and those papers that go over the top should be refused access to press conferences and players. I am not against criticism, but when attacks are unrelenting and personal, designed purely to undermine players, the FA should step in. An example of this was the papers reporting on a crowdfunding page to bring Raheem Stirling home. How do you think a young man with a crisis of confidence would feel about this? What support did FA bosses give him?
Roy Hodgson was just one of a long line of England managers given lukewarm support by an FA which is only interested in its own importance. Perish the thought that anyone criticise the FA and blame them, when they have a nice convenient scapegoat like Hodsgon. The FA has a long history of choosing managers who don't rock the boat. The most successful English manager of the last 40 years was Brian Clough, winning the European cup twice. The FA interviewed him for the job, but decided he was a "loose canon". Every appointment seems to be either be made in a panic or to be the safest possible choice. When was the last manager to be appointed, who had a track record of winning trophies with English players? Sadly, we seem to have even stopped producing successful club managers. This season, the trophy winners were Pelligrini, Ranieri and Van Gaal. What have the FA done to encourage English managers? Of course we hear about the "free movement of labour" and football being an international commodity, but if we are not developing the players and we are not developing the managers, we will never be anything other than an embarrassment.
I don't believe that the English are incapable of playing creative football or developing first class managers. I do however believe that with the FA in its current structure, we never will acheive anything on the international stage. We need root and branch reform, starting with youth football and with proper development for young managers. I think that we need an FA that comes clean and say "This is year zero and it will take us 20 years to develop a proper structure for developing a team that can win international championships". And we need a plan to get us there. If you look at the structure of the FA, there's no one who has been a successful player or manager at the top table. The CEO joined the FA from United Biscuits. Where are the Glenn Hoddle's. the Trevor Brookings and the Kevin Keegans? I'd love to see Roy Hodgson on the board. He is a football man and he knows the pressures on the next manager. I believe Roy was set up to fail and I rather suspect he knows it as well. When Roy needed unity and harmony in the camp, Greg Dyke, the FA chairman, who gave us Roland Rat, gave him a knife in the back. When players should have been concentrating on the next game, they were doubtless speculating about the next manager. Our most reliable players, such as Hart and Rooney looked like bags of nerves last night. These are players who have played with distinction at the highest level with their clubs. Last night they looked like novices. I believe the blame lies at the door of the FA. I hope that the English FA wakes up to the truth that this is their failure. To blame Roy Hodgson is dishonest and unfair.
2016 - The Worst year ever?
I think we collectively all need to start thinking how we can collectively improve our national Karma! Can I suggest we all commit to do three things before Sunday to make a start. I'll leave it up to you to find three things within your own belief system to make a small difference. My paramaters are 1. It must make a difference to someone else in a positive way. 2. It must involve a degree of effort. 3. Don't crow or brag about it. Just do it.
Whether or not you believe such things make a difference to the bigger picture is a matter for you, but if you do something that helps someone else, it can only be for the good of our great nation.
Monday, 27 June 2016
Communication from Andrew Dismore regarding EU referendum result
From Barnet & Camden London Assembly Member Andrew Dismore,
I wanted to write to you, post the EU referendum, to give my initial reaction and thoughts.
As I hope you know, I campaigned for a ‘Remain’ vote, and I am deeply disappointed by the result. I know many residents in Barnet and Camden, and indeed London as a whole, are also profoundly disappointed.
For the record, the results in Barnet and Camden (which were far better for ‘Remain’ than was expected):
Barnet: remain 62% ; leave 38%
Camden: remain 75% ; leave 25%
London: remain 60% ; leave 40%
Before I comment on the implications, a few words about the call for a second referendum, supported by millions of outraged people. I fully understand the frustrations of those who back this call, but I think it is the wrong thing at the wrong time, though I do not wish to dissuade anyone from signing the on line petition. In the unlikely event that there were to be a rerun (presumably due to a legal technicality), then the result could be worse - experience tells us that usually when elections are rerun, the result is confirmed more strongly. We have to respect the outcome.
However, there is much still to be decided. I consider the opportunity to examine the detailed implications will come soon. I believe a General Election in the Autumn must follow, after a new Prime Minister has been appointed by the Conservative Party. I hope that our European partners will accept that the formal process (‘Article 50’) should not commence till then, and after such an election has given a new Government a clear mandate on how to address the consequences of the vote. Those consequences are profound: for the cohesion of our society; for our national and London economy; and for our politics.
There is little doubt that the referendum has exposed deep fractures in our society: geographic, inter-generational, class, ethnicity and many others, divisions exploited and exacerbated by demagogues in the campaign. The challenges looking ahead will be to address these social impacts and their causes. I believe the referendum was seen by many as the chance to express their alienation and dissatisfaction. The cause of that alienation I believe has its roots in the fallout from austerity and its impact on public services, and for which immigration became a convenient scapegoat. The consequences we are now seeing include an increase in hate crime against minorities, especially towards migrants both from the EU and elsewhere. I am pleased that Sadiq Khan, Mayor of London, has emphasised to the Metropolitan Police his policy of zero tolerance towards such crimes. I also fully endorse his statement that EU migrants, who make such an important contribution to the life and economy of London, are welcome here.
By the Autumn, the early economic consequences will become increasingly clear and biting: It is not just a case of more expensive foreign travel unless the pound recovers against the dollar and euro (which seems unlikely), but prices will start to rise as the impact of higher fuel prices affect not just motorists at the petrol pump, but feed through into transportation costs for all other goods; and the cost of imports of all types will rise.
The consequences for London’s financial services’ contribution to the economy cannot be underestimated . Lord Hill, the UK’s EU Commissioner who held the financial services portfolio on the EU Commission is resigning, which means we will not have a say in the setting of policy for this sector, which is so vital to London’s jobs and economy, and where we have had to resist changes that would have affected the sector detrimentally.
We have to do all we can, to ensure that the country does not leave the single market, for which the referendum did not give a mandate. Although this is important for the trade in goods, for London it is also vital for the provision of services which is not yet fully covered by the single market. The risk is that any further implementation of the single market for services will not reflect the circumstances of London’s business in services, and will be to our detriment.
This is why Sadiq Khan is right to demand that London has a seat at the ‘EU exit’ negotiating table, to do the best we can to minimise the impact on our capital’s economy and by extension, the nation’s.
Although most of the rest of the country voted the other way to London, they are heavily dependent on the resources generated by and in London. Overall, London provides a net subsidy (money raised in London but spent elsewhere) of 20.3 per cent of GDP, so one pound in every five earned by Londoners is used to fund the rest of the country, according to the Centre for Economics and Business Research (CEBR).
Therefore, in my view, the result makes irresistible the case for much more devolution to London over fiscal powers as well as services, so that we can address the consequences for ourselves, given that the London economy is so different from that of most of the rest of the country - If London were a country, our economy would place us 11th largest among EU countries.
London Government also needs to find common cause with the other ‘Remain voting’ big cities, including Manchester, Liverpool, Leeds and Newcastle, and work, so far as it is London’s interests to do so, with Scotland too.
What of our politics? It is clear that the main parties are in crisis, over the disconnect with the communities they represent. In this I include Barnet, where two of the local ‘Brexit’ supporting Conservative MPs, those for Hendon and Chipping Barnet, were out of step with their ‘Remain’ voting electorates by a large margin. In Finchley, although the MP supported ‘Remain’ he was invisible in the campaign. Almost all of Barnet’s Conservative Councillors (with a small handful of exceptions) also supported Brexit.
On the other hand, I am pleased that the Labour Party in both boroughs- MPs, Councillors, local parties as well as myself as London Assembly member- campaigned for Remain, in accordance with the majority of our constituents’ wishes. Labour carried out the ‘heavy lifting’ of the Remain campaign in Barnet and Camden.
The challenge nationally is how to reconnect with the disaffected voters I referred to at the start of this email, when there are such clear differences between the regions of the country. I believe in due course the answer should lie in party political devolution to London so we can set out own domestic political agenda, in the same way that political devolution has been granted by the parties to Scotland. If this is not granted, then any party manifestos risk alienating one or other part of the country, when there are such disparate aspirations of London, the regions and the other nations.
Finally, for the long term, we are in uncharted waters: the effect on our economy and trade, on savings and pensions, and our political role in the wider world remains to be seen. These consequences will be the subject of my further updates in due course.
Best wishes,
Labour London Assembly Member for Barnet and Camden
Referendums and constitutional change
I am not one who will be signing a petition or calling for a rerun of the last referendum. I do however believe that the UK people should get a vote on whatever the new deal is. At that point we should be given a choice to go for the new deal or stick with the EU. That way whatever happens there is a clear mandate from the people of the UK.You can't ignore a democratic vote, but the alternative was never spelled out. Lets see the alternative and then make a proper informed decision. One where both sides have to tell the truth.
And finally a couple of observations on the process. I beieve that for a referendum, voting should be compulsory with a "none of the above" options. For a vote to be carried, a minimum of 50% of all votes should be carried. I also believe that as it is so fundamental a change that every UK citizen should have a vote. By this I mean that this includes everyone, from newborn babies upwards. Of course a newborn baby can't vote, so the legal guardians of all under 16's should be given the proxy vote. Ultimately the parents will have to answer to their children if they screw it up. It is ridiculous that a 99 year old who may be dead tomorrow has a say, but my son who is 16 and will have to live with this for decades doesn't. If in 30 years a parent has to explain themselves to their children for having cast a vote the child disagreed with, that is surely better than the child having had no say and no chance to shout at someone for being an idiot.
Sunday, 26 June 2016
The Tweets of the Week in the London Borough of Barnet 26/6/2016
1. This woke me up at 7.30 yesterday morning. A sound not heard for a long time in Mill Hill!
2. And on the subject of public transport, there is a new proposal for a Northern Line extension
3.If you still need cheering up Thursday week, keep this in mind.
-
#ResponseTeamB were called to a man at Edgware Bus Station with no trousers or way to get home to Kensington#HelpingHand#DrinkResponsibly
8. There have been some great events at the Finchley Literary festival, including the incredible Allen Ashly, who also happens to be the singer in the False Dots and who is appearing with me at The Chandos Arms for free tonight, please come down.
Saturday, 25 June 2016
The Saturday List #92 - My Top Ten fave garden flowers right now!
Three suicides - feeling low and feeling depressed
Three times I sat in my bedroom and wondered what possible reason there was for going on. Three times the thought of going into school and facing derision, humiliation and physical violence was just too horrible to consider. There were only two things that saved me. One was that, being raised a Roman Catholic, I believed I'd go to Hell. I've always assumed that Hell isn't full of fires and devils. It's full of bullies who strip you of your dignity, undermine yourself confidence and make every second full of pain. I just assumed that in hell, I wouldn't have my bedroom to hide in and my dog to keep me company. It would be like what I was going through, but with no respite. In truth I avoided the bully like the plague. I'd only see him once or twice a week and most of the time, all he did was intimidate me and threaten me. To this day the thought of it turns me cold.
Whenever I read of a teenager who has killed themeselves, I have deep empathy. Had I carried through my feelings I'd never have had all the fantastic times I've had, but when I was 13 I truly believed I'd never have a girlfriend, a job, a band, a career or a blog anyone would read. They say suicide is a permanent solution to a temporary problem. I wholeheartedly concur, but I can 100% empathise with why bullied teenagers feel how they do. In truth, I was simply the victim of what is deemed "low level bullying". The odd insult once or twice a week and the odd slap once or twice a month. The perpetrator was not in my class and was fairly easy to avoid. It only really happened when I was careless or circumstances conspired against me.
There were many things which happened between the age of 13 and 15 that helped me lift myself out of the dark place. Most of the major things, I actually don't feel comfortable sharing publicly just yet. Not for any other reason than, I suspect that for some, my path would have a very tragically different outcome. But letting music into my life, with the advent of Punk Rock in 1976 and suddenly finding a sense of belonging was a big part of the process.
When I think back, perhaps the biggest problem I had was that I felt completely unable to share my feelings and concens with anyone. I pretended I didn't care to my schoolmates. I lied to the doctors about the cause. I lied to my family. Why? I thought they'd alll despise me for my ineptness, my weakness and my inability to deal with difficult situations. I felt that nobody really liked me and that if I told the truth, this would get worse. Of course this was completely wrong, but I 100% believed it.
Now I can deal with things and be honest and coping with periods of feeling low is far easier. I haven't been clinically depressed since. If you are a parent and your child is depressed, don't assume that they are tellinbg you the full story or being honest with you. If they are not, it is because they feel they can't. If you are a suffering depression as a result of bullying (and it isn't just teenagers) please recognise that there is light at the end of the tunnel. It is hard to deal with but these situations pass. If it is at school, get it dealt with or change school. If it is at work, get it sorted or get a new job. If it is where you live, see if you can move if there is no way to resolve it. There is also another way, it is just sometimes difficult to see it. Get help and when you do, be honest. I found writing down my feelings really helped. Write yoursef a letter, if you don't want to write a blog about it.
As someone who has suffered from depression I know how hard it is. The only real solice I can give is that you are not alone and there are people who care and can help you. The hard part is recognising those people and opening up to them.
Friday, 24 June 2016
Britain votes to leave the EU
The Leave Campaign labelled warnings of such things as "Project fear". As the prices in Supermarkets rise as imports cost more, I wonder how many people will start to regret their decision. Many people said to me "my head says remain, my heart says leave". In my experience, when I let my heart rule my head, it usually ends up costing me money and heartache.
No one knows where this ride will take us. As someone who loves the UK and loves London, all I can hope is I am totally wrong and all of the experts are wrong. We will see if those who called to leave and dismissed all arguments against are like drunken braggarts who put their heads in crocodiles mouths.
The truth however is that we are a democracy and in a democracy sometimes you get a result you don't like. The only decent thing to do is to accept the vote and work your socks off to make sure that the damage done is as little as possible. I'm not angry with ordinary Leave voters, taken in by the lies, but I am furious with the Murdoch press and the Leaders of the Leave campaign for duping them. And I am especially sickened by the 25% of people who couldn't be bothered to vote.
Thursday, 23 June 2016
The Referendum nightmare is nearly over
Wednesday, 22 June 2016
Guest Blog - Brexit could spell disaster for UK music by Darren Johnson
A Guest Post from Darren Johnson
Rock Fanatic and former Chair of the London Assembly for the Green Party
Younger voters have been overwhelmingly pro-EU. And in spite of concerns that younger people are less likely to vote, less likely to be registered or be at Glastonbury for the referendum and failed to apply for a postal vote, it seems that younger music fans are pretty much like the rest of their generation when it comes to recognising the benefits of Britain’s membership of the EU. But what of older rock fans? I’ve both heard some pretty alarming sentiments expressed amongst fellow music fans of our generation. In some ways that’s not surprising. Opinion polls are showing that while there is a massive lead for remaining in the EU amongst the 18-39 age group, when it gets to the over 50’s and particularly the over 60’s the tables are turned and there’s a significant lead for leaving the EU.
However, could it be that older rock fans are unwittingly sabotaging one of the things in life they love most. The Musicians Union has sounded alarm bells that a so-called Brexit vote could have serious consequences for musicians, particularly in the area of touring and copyright. A recent official statement argues:
“The effect that Brexit would have on musicians in Britain is not entirely clear and would depend on the terms negotiated. We could, however, expect touring to become more difficult and potentially see British musicians having to apply for visas in order to travel within Europe. Given the cost and difficulty many musicians face in obtaining visas for work in countries such as the U.S, this would be very unwelcome. It is also likely that European legislation which has protected musicians in the areas of copyright, health and safety and workers’ rights would be watered down or removed entirely if Britain were to leave the EU.”
Bernie Torme, former Gillan guitarist, still gigging and still releasing albums, spells out the likely extra hassles and expense should we leave. These are not millionaire rock stars. Artists like Bernie have a niche, but dedicated fan-base and every penny matters if the economics of touring and releasing albums are to add up. As Bernie says:
“Leaving is a no-win situation for musicians in my opinion: as the MU points out it will increase the cost and difficulty of European touring, through potential visas and also the probable reintroduction of customs carnets and bonds coupled with the time involved in organising all that. That will make it well nigh impossible to tour and sell merch in Europe unless you are a very big band and have an organisation behind you to back you up. For an independent artist like me who self releases CDs and vinyl it will also be significantly more difficult and expensive: the best quality, cheapest, and quickest pressing plants are all in mainland Europe, so with Brexit there will be customs duty on getting the records in to the UK and also again on selling them back out to Europe. Many other reasons too, from buying equipment at a cheaper price than you can in the UK, to copyright protection and royalty collection (royalty collection from the US is a nightmare), to the problems some bands would have because they have members in various countries. Its not good.”
Indeed, Mark Davyd, Chief Executive of the Music Venue Trust, who are fighting a strong and effective battle to protect Britain’s grassroots music venues, argues that the so-called “heritage” rock acts could be particularly hard hit.
“The impact will be felt hardest by those musicians who need Europe the most; those trying to establish a career, build audiences, or UK musicians who have built a sustainable touring career – heritage bands who aren’t massive but need to tour Europe to make ends meet. In terms of what will happen,; nobody really knows, but the question of immigration and rights to work are not a one way street; if you want to limit the number of EU workers able to work in the UK, that means you accept a limit on the number of UK workers able to work in the EU. The most likely outcome of a Brexit which includes limiting immigration, which seems to be the main driver of the Brexit campaign, will be to limit temporary workers, and that means UK musicians, their technicians and crew. A US Visa takes six months to arrange and costs, including management of taxation, circa $5,000 for the most organised. Even imagining a single EU entry visa, with no further border controls or conditions as UK musicians pass from one EU nation to another, that sum of money and the organisation time is beyond 90% of the UK musicians currently supplementing their income with EU performances.
And that’s just the musicians. UK Music’s report “Wish You Were Here 2016” demonstrates the value of music tourism to the UK, at festivals and in every venue in the UK – even at a grassroots music level, over 135,000 overseas tourists made a visit. We don’t know how many of them will be dissuaded by new border permissions, nor what the impact of a falling pound will be on their ability to travel – currently our EU visitors enjoy reciprocal benefits such as access to health care which makes the UK an ideal holiday destination. Will that continue? Nobody knows.”
From a fan’s perspective Mark Tully, an avid supporter of classic rock bands, backs up the point that leaving the EU could mean lots of extra hassle and expense for the bands and musicians he loves seeing:
“A friend of mine is Brian Cummins who does a Peter Gabriel tribute. Last year he got a telephone call asking if he would do a performance at Rockpalast in Germany. He drove all the way from the Wirral to Germany. He only had to present his passport when he left the UK and when he arrived back. If we leave the European Union it is very likely that this will not be the case.”
There are many, many reasons for Britain to stay in the EU, economically, socially, environmentally and, of course, this referendum is about far, far more than the impact on the British music scene. But amidst all the hollow rhetoric about “getting our country back” and outright lies about straight bananas, it would be a great shame if rock fans do vote to leave the EU on Thursday placing additional burdens and expense on some of the bands they love which may call into question their ability to carry on touring and carry on making music.
Peter points out that artists from Roger Daltrey to Bob Geldof, Billy Bragg and Paloma Faith recently stated their support for the remain campaign. So far it seems that Mick Hucknell of Simply Red is one of few noted stars that has come out against staying in Europe. Peter has analysed this and points out that this decision was foretold in their hit “Something got me started”:
Even David Cameron and Tessa Jowell tried to get in on the act … and Peter does not even think they play the guitar or are members of the Musicians Union …
Finally, Peter also points out that Boris Johnson (not related to Darren) is also not qualified to talk about music and musicians: