Friday, 16 September 2016

The Friday Joke - 16/9/2016

Have a great weekend.....

Little Johnny asks his mum, “Mum, do all fairy tales begin with ‘Once upon a time in a faraway land’?” 
“No darling,” says his mother, somewhat distressed, “Sometimes, they can begin with ‘I’ve got too much work in the office tonight, I’ll come home later’.”

Thursday, 15 September 2016

Barnet Council residents satisfaction survey

                     Click for a readable version                                 
I was amazed to see the chutzpah of Barnet Council's response to the results of a residents survey - https://www.barnet.gov.uk/citizen-home/news/Resident-satisfaction-remains-high0.html - which is perhaps the worst bit of spin I've seen since I started writing this blog. The Press release is titled "Resident Satisfaction Remains High". I personally can't see how an honest council with integrity could make such a claim based on this survey. It is quite clear that there are significant levels of dissatisfaction within residents in the Borough, just look at the slide on the left



Here are a few damning highlight. Do these sound like residents who are happy with the services the council is providing.

Click for a readable version
Just over half of residents (56 per cent) who have contacted the council in the last 12 months were satisfied with the service they received. This is in line with spring 2015 and has remained static for the last six years.

Yes that is right, 44% of people (just under half) did not say they were satisfied. Can you think of a commercial business anywhere that would survive would survive with such low ratings. Just for comparison, the much derided Thameslink rail network set their target for customer satisfaction in 2016 as 80% (although they miserably failed to meet this target in 2015).

Another even more worrying trend is how many people don't think the streets are safe

The survey also showed that 73 per cent of people feel safe in their local area after dark

So more than a quarter of residents didn't feel able to say they feel safe at night. This is shocking. Given that this is not broken down, one has to ask if they'd broken it down into elderly people and females, doubtless it would be very shocking (although this is speculation).

Another rather damning statistic is that more than a quarter of people are not satisfied with the way the council is being run.

The results of the Spring 2016 Residents’ Perception Survey show that 74 per cent of residents are satisfied with the way the council runs things, significantly above the outer London average of 70 per cent.

The council are making a big play of the fact that they are 4% above the London average, but Barnet is a wealthy outer London Borough and has nowhere near the sort of problems that inner London boroughs have.

They also report that 40% of residents did not say they were satisfied with how the council is spending Council tax and that this hasn't improved at all in the last year.

Sixty per cent of residents agree that the council provides value for money for the council tax they pay which is in line with when this question was last asked in spring 2015

How do you think the Leader of the Council has responded to these rather poor figures?

Barnet Council Leader, Councillor Richard Cornelius, said: “I am very pleased that our residents are satisfied with the way the council is running things.

Quite astonishing really.


Time for proper food labelling

Do you worry about your health? When you select your lunch or dinner, is the impact on your health of the food you will eat a consideration or do you simply think 'that's tasty, yum yum'?

I like to think I have a balance. I try and go for tasty options at the healthy end of the spectrum (most of the time).

But the problem we all have is that for the average Joe, we really have little idea of what is healthy and what is bad for us.

None of us know what pesticides are used on the vegetables we eat, what drugs are used on the animals and fish we consume or even what the animals we ate were fed.

It is time all of this stuff was published on the labels. There was a scandal a few years back when it was revealed cows were being fed excrement. Don't you think a consumer should know all of this. If you still choose to eat it, fine, but let's be informed.


Wednesday, 14 September 2016

Why don't politicians ever point out just how much we owe immigrants

Am I alone in being sick and tired of the constant denigration of immigrants in the press and by politicians who should know better. I thought I'd just take five minutes to list a few of the great things immigrants have done for me, my family, our community and our nation. 

1. My Dad was an immigrant from the Commonwealth. He came to the UK as a volunteer to fly Wellington Bombers for 40 squadron in World War 2, defending our freedom. His crew included an Irishman, a Kiwi, a Newfoundlander and another Aussie. All fought for our freedom, along with Poles, Czechs, Fre French, Indians, Gurkas, Fijians, Canadians, West Indians, Africans and even Pacific Islanders. After the war, my father settled in Mill Hill, founded a business that employed 18 people in its heyday and even had its own football team.

2. My Grandfather was an immigrant from Ireland, who fought for our freedom in WW1. He was gassed for his troubles and died young.

3. My father in Laws career was Nigerian and brought fun, care and happiness to my Father in Law in his final years.

4. My mother had a carer of Indian origin in her final years. The team who delivered her meals on wheels, allowing her to live independently were immigrants.

5. The doctor who performed the procedure to address my Prostate cancer earlier this year is an immigrant.

6. The railway I travelled to work on this morning was mainly constructed by Immigrants.

7. The curry I eat tonight will be cooked by an immigrant.

8. My friend, who is employing my daughter currently, comes from refugee stock, who fled pogroms in Poland.

9. The bass player in my band is an immigrant from Portugal.

10. The surveyor who oversaw the construction of our studio complex was a German immigrant.

I could go on, but I think you've probably got my point. Every insult about immigrants is an insult to all of these people and to me, my family and my friends. The UK would be poorer, less well educated and less healthy without immigrants, we'd struggle to even feed ourselves. The challenge we all have is to make this great nation work for the people who live here and the people who come here. I don't know of any sensible solution that starts with ignorance and insults. Rant over.

Chorizo May - Is the Prime Minister really a sausage?

Am I the only person who has noticed just how many broadcasters cannot pronounce the name of the Prime Minister? Whist I'd have thought Theresa is a fairly easy name to pronounce, it seems that more and more replace the 'Th' with a 'Ch', transforming her into a rather tasty sausage. Whilst I find it reasonably amusing, I do tend to think that if your job is to be a broadcaster, you should at least be able to pronounce the name of the Prime Minister of the day. If I was Emily Thornberry, I may be tempted to cry sexism as Tony Blair and David Cameron never had their name transformed into sausages, but I doubt that is really the case in this instance. Of course it isn't just broadcasters. Manchester United had a manager for a couple of decades who couldn't pronounce the name of his own club. Sir Alex Ferguson always refers to the club as "ManchesKnighted". Jack Charlton also had a few problems with names, famously not dropping the silent J from Johan Cruyff's name when acting as a BBC pundit. Of course both were employed for football knowledge so we can excuse them, but people who's only job is to talk on telly and radio? If the BBC want a bit of ethnic diversity or regional accents fine, but surely a bit of vocal coaching wouldn't go amiss. Whilst we understand who Choriso May is, how often do we find we haven't a clue what they are on about?

Tuesday, 13 September 2016

Barnet Constituencies - the big carve up

The new constuencies have been announced following the boundary review. These have produced a very different political map. We will do some number crunching later, to work out how this will affect the likely political affiliation of each of them and give a bit of commentary, but as I'm sure you are interested here are the constituency by ward.


As a Mill Hillian I am none too chuffed to have been moved into leafy Barnet. We've always been associated with Hendon as part of Hendon County Council. If I leave my house by the back door and cross the road (albeit the M1), I'll still be in Hendon, as Hale has not moved. In fact my road was part of Hale ward until the last boundary redraw. Does all of this matter? I believe it does. An MP represents all of the people in the ward.

One small example is rail services. Many Mill Hill residents are users of Thameslink.  At present as part of Hendon our MP has three stations in his catchment area on the same rail line. He therefore has a strong incentive to lobby for good services on this line. Under the new arrangement, Mill Hill will be represented by an MP with far more interest in the Barnet Branch of the Northern line. The Mill Hill Thameslink service will be a small sideshow.  It seems to me that new boundaries have simply been drawn as post colonial borders in Asia and Africa were, with no regards for the local demographics or interests. Splitting Mill Hill from the Hale will massively disenfranchise voters in both parts of NW7, as their interests will become very low down the list of MP priorities in the new world.

This is being repeated all over London and I suspect I'm not the only one to see problems arising.


Feeding the 5,000 - Helping Londons homeless as winter approaches

Image result for feeding the 5000
Not something we should only do every 2,000 years
It costs £1.42 to give a homeless person in London a meal. Since 2012, I've been volunteering at The Passage, A Homeless day centre in Central London. I've also volunteered for the Mill Hill Churches night shelter homelessness (which works with Homeless Action Barnet to provide shelter for our local homeless in winter months) project since its inception. There are two great charities that musicians I know support, these are Punks 4 The Homeless and Musicians against Homelessness. I was thinking about all of this and also the story of Jesus feeding the 5,000 (also the title of a Crass album). 

So the thought occurred to me. If Jesus could feed 5,000 hungry people, maybe he was trying to tell us something. A quick bit of math tells me 5,000 meals for Londons homeless costs £7142.86. So I was thinking, I'm blessed to know great musicians and have great contacts. What about launching a series of gigs to feed the 5,000 and raise £7142.87? Can it be done?

So that is my new mission. Between now and Xmas, I'm gonna be setting up a 'Feeding The 5,000' series of gigs so that some great bands, can play some great music and do something useful. I propose to divvy the dosh raised between Homeless Action Barnet, The Passage and Crisis. We will also be holding collections at the gigs for local Foodbanks such as the Colindale Foodbank.

Let me know if you want to get involved in the project.

Over the coming weeks, I'll be releasing more details of the project. We want to make this more than just a charity appeal . I will be setting up a Justgiving page, but ideally we want people to come to the gigs, put money in the collection, bring food for the foodbank and have a great night.


Monday, 12 September 2016

A Tale of Two Barnets - Five Years On

I really can't believe it. Where does the time go? It is five years since we made the film 'A Tale of Two Barnets'. Prior to this, I'd only ever been involved with pop music videos.

The original premise was that on Charles Dickens 100th anniversary, we'd see if his premise that there are two Cities in one was still true. As Barnet was the inspiration for the workhouse in Oliver Twist, it seemed most appropriate.

For nearly six months, the project took over my life. We got hold of some great footage. The then newly appointed Leader of the Council, Richard Cornelius agreed to appear, as did the then CEO Nick Walkley. The local chief of police also pitched in. 

The biggest problem we had was that many of the interviews had poor sound quality. We didn't have the sophisticated technology the BBC use for outdoor interviews. We had to choose whether to use the most interesting footage or the best quality. We went for the most interesting.

I watched the film again at the weekend. I think it is a remarkable snapshot of Barnet in 2012. It isn't perfect, but it was never meant to be. 

The highlight of the whole process for me was the premiere at The Phoenix Cinema in East Finchley. Over 500 people turned up. The biggest problem we had was that despite all of the time we had, the story constantly changed.

I was disappointed but not surprised at the sniping from certain quarters. The local Tory attack dog blog alleged that the film was 'funded by the Unions'. This was nonsense. It personally cost me over £10,000 to make. The local Trades Council paid to rent the Phoenix and UNISON pitched in with some help with a few expenses, but Charles Honderick, the director and myself were both hugely out of pocket. We simply did it because it needed to be made.

We also had a few local activists whinging that it wasn't political enough. This was certainly true. We didn't want a lecture, we wanted a watchable film that made people think. I believe we did that. The film stands the test of time rather well.

I am seriously considering making 'Five years on' to see what happened and where we are now. The only real question is whether Mrs T (my good lady) will sanction me wasting another ten grand! And six months of my life!

Sunday, 11 September 2016

The tweets of the week in the London Borough of Barnet

It's Sunday, so it's time for our regular weekly feature.

1. We like a fine sunrise! Nice pic from one of our regulars
2.  And here's one we couldn't ignore!


3. Fancy a bit of folk in Colindale this coming Monday?

4. It seems we've got some well behaved Police dogs being trained in Hendon!

5. A sad anniversary yesterday

6. Proud congratulations to two Barnet Copthall swimming club Olympians!

7. Seems like we've some exotic livestock in Totteridge!

8. This week we had the regular Federation of Small Business get together at Cafe Buzz

9. Our local Rugby club and league champions have a new pitch!


10. It's not just sport in our neighbourhood! We also have great music facilities, which the lovely Xsara seems to rather like!




Manchester United 1 - 2 Manchester City - The most expensive game in the world

I'm biased. I've supported Manchester City since 1968 and so when it comes down to it, I'm highly chuffed to see such a result. In yesterday mornings Times newspaper, every single pundit predicted a United win or a draw. To see City play United off the park was a pleasure to behold. To me, it seemed like football vs anti football. City tried to make openings through creative play, United tried to lump the ball up to the big men and hope City's new goalkeeper Claudio Brava would make more than one serious mistake. The battle was waged between the two alleged best managers in the world. Both have a stack of medals in their cabinet for various Champions League, Domestic League and cup competitions. Strangely for smeone with such a reputation, Mourinho defied logic by not starting with Markus Rashford, who seems to terrify the living daylights out of opponenents. I suspect that Mourinho's logic was that he was there if he was needed. Within 20 minutes, it was pretty clear he was desperately needed. For such an expensive squad, with such a high profile manager, United seemed to  completely forget how to play football. Jesse Linguard seemed unable to pass or control a ball. Paul Pogba, the most expensive player in the league, seemed to forget what role he was playing or the basic rule that if you are a midfielder and your team hasn't got the ball, you have to chase back and keep your shape. Daley Blind seemed to be intent on doing an impersonation of a traffic cone, as Kevin DeBruyne simply ran past him and scored.

As for City, the team seems 100% improved on last year. They have picked up more points from all of the games they've played this season than the corresponding game last year. This fixture was a 0-0 bore draw. Yesterdays game was anything but. Mourinho took the half time break to make subsitutions and reorganise. United came out for the second half with a renewed sense of purpose. They looked to make a game of it and were unlucky not to have a penalty. Mourinho, as his is way, blamed the ref for unjust decisions, omitting to mention that a couple of his players could also have been sent off.

I saw estimates that 900 million people were watching the game and that it was the most watched ever match. It is fair to say that the audience would have seen a cracking game and got value for money. Whilst there is no way you can really justify the ridiculous sums footballers get paid or cost to be transferred, there is no argument that the game commands the money and generates the wealth. Manchester City have been turned around and regenerated by the huge wealth of Arab investors. They have not only put money into players, but into the academy, the club and the area. They are a model of ethical investment. Uniteds owners are Americans with a commercial agenda to generate as much money as possible from the club. The relative lack of investment in United as resulted in a sharp decline since the heady days of Alex Ferguson, with United missing out on the Champions League last season. The owners, realising that they needed to address this, have gambled on Mourinho and big name players to revive their fortunes.

It was rather sad to see United start with only two British players, and that was Luke Shaw, who came via Southampton and Wayne Rooney. Rooney seems to have lost his ability to change the course of big games. In fact, only Markus Rashford, an academy player, seems to scare opponents. It looked to me very much as if Manchester United are playground bullies. They will turn over lesser teams with their physical players and big names, but they are no nearer being the real deal than they have been since Ferguson left. Of course Mourinho has only had four Premiership games and he will have learned a lot about his squad yesterday. I can only really see United improving. I think they'll be back in the Champions League and may also pick up a pot.

As for City, it is also early days. The team seem to be working hard and seem to understand what Guardiola want. Players who looked decidedly iffy last season, such as Ottamendi and Kolarov are thriving. United had a real opportunity yesterday, with Aguero and Kompany out of the team. When these two are back, City can only improve. There is huge debate about the goalkeeper. It is fair to say City fans love Joe Hart and for the fans, the jury is out on Claudio Bravo. Guardiola has no such doubts. His philospohy is that a ball playing goalkeeper gives you an extra man. Anyone who watched the first 40 minutes of the match would have noted that City looked like they had the exta man. The pundits noted that every Premier club manager will have noted that there is a question mark on crosses and City can expect to get bombarded. I suspect that Guardiola is not too concerned about this. His view is that if you have the ball, you won't have to worry about crosses. I suspect that at Christmas, we'll have a clearer picture. Like United, City had 2 English players. Sterling and Stones, both of whom have seemed to flourish under Guardiola. Both are expensive imports from the Merseyside clubs. I suspect that both will continue to consierably improve, which hopefully will be good for England. Both had one of their quieter games, but it is all part of their learning process.

So what have we learned from the most expensive game of football in the world. It would seem that if you get the two best managers in the world and the two most expensive squads, you will get a pretty compelling game of football. Mind you, I've watched my son play for Watling Youth Under 13's in the rain in Cressingham Park and seen some damn fine football there as well. Football is a funny old game. I just hope that in a couple of years time, we see a few more products of the excellent United and City academies on the pitch. Both Rashford and Kelechi Iheanacho are acedemy products and both seem to be able to influence games. My hope is that the best managers can bing more out of the academies best. I suspect that City will buy another centre forward in the next transfer window as this is one area that they seem short in. Lets hope that doesn't freeze Kelechi Iheanacho out in the way that seems to be happening with Rashford. I must say that Rashford does seem to be making a statement, which Mourinho can't ignore for much longer.