Friday, 28 February 2025

Friday fun 28 February 2025

 Lets start with a good old Dad joke from the rather wonderful Mr Robert Wilkinson (check his profile for details of his Dad joke books)

And on to this weeks gigs and music

If you want a good night out in Town, Niall Logue, a brilliant up and coming local artists, signed to Marquee records is performing at a showcase night at The Waterrats on Saturday night 8.45pm

One of the best nights out in town this weekend.

There are plent of amazing local gigs on as well, so if you don't want to go into town, then support local music by coming along to one!


Friday 28th
Butchers Arms 9pm – 11.30pm
Beyond Retro (Rock & Roll)
The Lord Kitchener 8.30pm – late
Ela (Covers/Solo artist)
Barrington 8.30-midnight
Karaoke with Johno
Ye Olde Monken Holt 9.30 pm – late
DJ Sadie (DJ)

~MARCH~
Saturday 1st

The Faith Stealers gig at The Barrington - gig details / share
The Faith Stealers (Mod Covers, 4 piece) at The Barrington, New Barnet 
info icon9pm - 11pmFREE!


Ripple Effect gig at Three Hammers - gig details / share
Ripple Effect (Pop / Rock, 4 piece) at Three Hammers, Mill Hill 2.7 miles
info icon9pm - 11.15pmFREE!


Dusk Til Dawn gig at The Three Wishes - gig details / share
NewDusk Til Dawn (Classic Rock, 5 piece) at The Three Wishes, Edgware 4.5 miles
info icon9.30pm - 11pmFREE!
The Builders Arms 8pm – 11pm Tim Leffman (Acoustic original and covers)
Butchers Arms 9pm – 11.30pm Horizon (Rock covers and original)
East Barnet RBLegion 9.30pm – 11.30pm £5 The Soul Enforcement Bureau (Soul and Motown Covers)
The Barrington 9pm – 11pm The Faith Stealers (Mod Covers)
Maddens 9pm – 11.30pm The Bear Pit Band (Pop/rock covers)
Ye Olde Monken Holt 9.30pm - midnight Nially (Acoustic)
The Cavalier 8pm – late DJ Reccie (Old skool soul and reggae)

Sunday 2nd
Butchers 8.30pm – 11.30pm Pauls Jam
Maddens 7pm The Cruisin Mooses

Monday 3rd
Ye Olde Mitre Inn, High Street 8pm – 11pm (stables room) Barnet Acoustics Sessions

Tuesday 4th
Black Horse 7.30pm – 11pm Open Mic Night
Maddens Bar 8pm Open Mic Jam hosted by Jeff and band

Wednesday 5th
Ye Olde Monken Holt 8.30pm – 11pm Open Mic Night

Thursday 6th
Ye Olde Monken Holt 8.30pm – 10.30pm Traditional Irish Session (Irish Folk)

Thursday, 27 February 2025

Rock and Roll Stories #25 - A manifesto for Rock and Roll? You're Wrong!

In the past couple of weeks, I've been to a couple of gigs that made me cast my mind back to the earliest days of The False Dots. The first of these gigs was the bands 46th Birthday party bash at the Dublin Castle and the second was the Band Up 1st birthday bash, at the Mean Fiddler. At the Dots Birthday bash, we played a song called Wrong! which was one of the first songs we wrote, before we even had a band. It was the first song we ever played at our first ever rehearsal. We had never played it live before. It was one of many songs we junked as we improved to the point that we felt we were ready to gig. I co wrote it with Pete Conway. With most songs, one of us would write the man body of lyrics and the other would tear it apart and then we'd go through line by line until we were happy. Wrong was different. We decided that before we started the band, we should write a band manifesto. The idea was rather pompous. We'd have a manifesto and anyone who joined the band or followed us would have to sign up to it. It was inspired by the political stance of the early Clash music and later by Anarcho pop band Crass.

And what what about the other event? Band Up is an alliance of Independent bands. Members of around 100 bands attended. I went with our drummer Graham Ramsey and our combined age seemed greater than everyone else put together. We are in our 60's, they were all young and upcoming musicians full of hope. We chatted to quite a few of the bands. I was really struck by the way bands have changed since Pete and I first got the Dots together. For us, it was more about being a band thabn music. It seems almost inexplicable to todays younger musicians. We wrote our manifesto, chose a band name and designed a logo before we learned to play or had any songs. We were absolute rubbish musicians, but brimming with an absolute conviction that, with our punk rock ethos, we were right about everything and all of the 'boring old fart' bands who had shaped the music industry were going to be blown away in a tidal wave of punk energy. We were sixteen years old and we were deeply suspicious of anyone over 26 and dismissive of any bands from the hippy and rock and roll era. The only bands we listened to, who preceded 1976 were The Velvet Underground, MC5, T Rex, Bowie and anything Reggae or Ska (who we gave a free pass to). Had Band Up been formed in 1978 rather than 2024, I doubt Graham and I would have been welcome. I jumped up and jammed with a few other younger musicians. I doubt any of us would have been seen dead on stage with such old farts as we are now,  when we started. Of course, within a couple of years, as we learned to play, widened our tastes and realised what it took to be in a band, such foolish adolescent snobbery had passed. When Hank Marvin's son Paul joined the band, I was thrilled Hank jammed with us in the studio and offered tips on guitar playing, even gifting me the opening riff of Not all She Seems. He seemed incredibly ancient in 1978 when Paul was in the band. Hank was 37 at the time! Pete was more hardline than me about punk ideals. He was less than thrilled that Hank jammed with us and was actually quite rude to him. As we were in Hanks private studio, I was upset with his boorish attitude. I believe that if you are being given hospitality, then you should be gracious. Pete thought Hank was part of a corrupt music establishment, that needed to be torn down. 

I would imagine that if Hank Marvin turned up for a jam at Band Up, there would be universal delight. Todays generation of musicians are far more open and receptive than us '77 punks. It got me thinking about the punk era. Pete Conway was totally committed at the time to hardcore punk values. To him, music and the band was just a vehicle for social change. It was all about giving us a platform to challenge the establishment. I've not met a musician for decades who has said such a thing. But for the False Dots, it was absolutely central to what we were doing in 1979. For Pete, sorting the manifesto out was far more important than anything else. We started planning the band in late 1977 and probably spent the best part of a year arguing about the manifesto, the name, the image, the trousers we'd wear, how low we'd wear our guitar straps and what our logo would look like. We had no instruments and no songs, but we had a clear idea of what trousers we'd wear!

And the manifesto. Sadly, I don't have a copy of it. But I did have a 'brilliant' idea back then. We'd set it to music. It would be the first song we played at every gig we did. We'd tell the audience that if they didn't agree they could F**k off! We naively imagined that thousands of people we didn't know would turn up for our first gig and we could pick and chose who stayed and who we asked to leave! I've learned that gigs don't work like that. We, rather pretentiously, decided that our first gig would be our 'Manifesto launch' before we even had instruments! Like so many ideas kids have, before they discover the harsh realities of life, it soon fell away. The clunky, worthy words of the manifesto sounded ridiculous set to music. 

But it was so important to us that we we persisted, long after any sensible band would have given up. We decided that we'd change the manifesto into something that resembled a song. I believe, and I may be wrong about this, that Pete excitedly told Steve Ignorant of Crass ( a band that Pete avidly followed for a few months) about his idea and Steve Ignorant shot him down, saying "If you have a manifesto, you are just like all the other politicians. (This is my recollection of what Pete said over a bottle of cider in my shed as we were writing songs. He was prone to embellishing stories, but I have no reason to not believe this happened) "What do you want to be? Prime Minister? Anarchists believe everyone should make their own minds up". Pete turned up for our next songwriting session a bit deflated. This was our big idea and Pete's hero had blown it out of the water. Pete was very deflated. We had a chat about it. The "Falsedots manifesto" morphed into a musical anarchist rant called "Wrong". 

The Dots original line up
The opening lyrics "Do you consider yourself a thinking person, or an object for others to manipulate, nobody's immortal, nobody's irreplacable" were the opening lines of the manifesto. We set them over a repeating C/// A/// F/// D/// pattern. It may no longer be a manifesto, but it was our statement of what we were. It was the first song we played at our first rehearsal. By the time we actually had a properly functional band together properly, we'd moved on. Pete and I had largely stopped going to gigs together, as our tastes had diverged. The band pictured right was our line up from February to September, which was the only line up to play Wrong! My sister took this on a Kodak Instamatic camera in our back garden. The black guitar slung around my neck was actually her Kimbara Les Paul copy, that played like a cheese grater and wouldn't stay in tune!

By 1980, Pete had replaced Crass with The Birthday Party as his favourite band. We weren't spending five nights a week writing songs and working out ideas in my shed. I was getting more and more into other genres and influences. In January 1980, following a three month break, we slung all of the old songs out, including Wrong. 


The songs we wrote between January and June 1980 were some of the best Dots songs of any incarnation. We realised that it was better to have a set way of writing. One of us would write it, the other would critique it, we'd then present it to the band. If it didn't sound good immediately we'd not persevere. It had probably taken us six months to develop the idea for Wrong, only for us to abandon it as soon as we could play a bit better. We learned that you have to be ruthless in how you approach songs. You can't be wedded to songs that don't work. There is a certain irony that a song that was so wrong headed was called Wrong! You'll see from the 1979 setlist (left) that we'd developed by the middle of the year, that the band wasn't a barrel of laughs at that stage. 

When we were recently planning our 46th anniversary, I couldn't get out of my head the memory of those early days. I came up with the idea of giving Wrong a debut play, 47 years after we first wrote it. I asked our trumpeter Tom Hammond to sing it, in whatever way he wanted. This was a nod to Steve Ignorants advice, "everyone should think for themselves". When we rehearsed it, I was shocked. I thought it sounded great. It sort of sounded like Blur on amphetamine sulphate. Tom is a generation or two younger than Graham and I. He brings a fresh feel to a lot of the songs. It has emboldened us as a band musically, which is a great thing, but also it has given me a lot of pause for thought on many things, not least how you can transform a piece of music by being open minded. Our early Dots line up was hamstrung by a rigid orthodox musicality, that was totally at odds with the Anarchist ideals that we were supposedly singing about. 

The other thing I got thinking about was the idea of a Manifesto for The False Dots. Sadly I've learned that you are lucky to have an audience, so telling people to F@@k Off if they don't like your manifesto is the height of stupidity. In fact, the opposite should be true. You should make everyone feel welcome.  So 47 years after we spent six months writing a manifesto, here is the resurrected False Dots manifesto! It is rather different to the 1978/9 version which seemed to be a hundred pages long at it's peak.

1. Our primary goal as a band is to make the people who listen to our music happy. 

2. The band will commit to work as hard as humanly possible to give you a good night out if you come to one of our gigs.

3. The band will always be there for a chat before/after we play and we will try and make time to have a chat if you want. Of course when we are breaking down gear etc after we play, give us ten minutes, if we are clearing up.

4.  Everyone is welcome at a False Dots gig, on condition they want to have fun and not bother other people.

5. We will do everything in our power, as a band, to support other musicians, bands, artists and creative people. If you follow us on social media, we will endeavour to follow you, if you come and see us, we will try and get down to see you, if you plug us, we will plug you as best we can.

6. The world can seem a harsh and scary place. We believe that music is a force for universal good and whilst we can still breath, still play and people still want to see us, we will do our best to make it just a bit better. We can't change lives, make anyone rich, solve housiong problems etc, but maybe, just maybe, we can put a smile on your face and that is a start.

And finally. here's a little video I spliced together with the desk mix and some pics/clips from mates of the debut performance of Wrong. I wonder, has there ever been a song that has waited 47 years for it's debut live before?




Wednesday, 26 February 2025

How Much? Barnet Council wasting money on staff to post pointless tweets & Facebook posts

Doge for Barnet!

Yesterday, I wrote this blog about how Barnet Council, who have just had a £55 Million baleout from the Government are wasting your money. I didn't post it as Tuesday is food blog day. Today, just as I was about to post it. To my amazement, I saw this post

Now, for once, it was a useful, sensible tweet, with an important message that directly affects Barnet voters in the forthcoming Barnet By Election. All good? Well not really. Anyone who knows anything about Social media (such as Barnet Council's paid staff) should know that a single post is nowhere near enough. They should have been tweeting this message out ever since the Byelection was announced. They should have been asking us to retweet it and let our friends know. I would have amplified this message more if I'd seen it earlier. What is shocking is that our local parties have not retweeted it. Anyway, on with the text I'd written. I think this rather amplifies the point though........

On Monday,  Barnet Council posted this tweet. A council that has just applied for a £55 Bale out wants to give away money for a Festival of Architecture. I am sorry to say, but if I was going to pick any London Borough to celebrate in the London Festival of Architecture, Barnet would be the last one. The list of buildings of note that we've lost in the last 20 years is something beyond comprehension. A few iconic ones? The National Institute for Medical Research (replaced with a bad Barratts knock off copy). The National Newspaper Library in Mill Hill. Countless interesting pubs,  houses, shops etc have been gutted, demolished and ruined. And the new buildings. Anonymous, dull structures in Colindale, etc. 

So this is what they tweeted. 

This was also posted to Facebook. .

It's bad enough that they are doling money out, but they are paying staff to do this. As best I could see, this was the only social media post on Monday. 

I've been monitoring Barnet Council tweets etc for a while. I was interested to find out how much effort they were putting into their tweeting and what sort of response they were getting. FYI when I looked on Monday, the tweet above had around 300 views and no engagement. I sent an FoI request and got this answer

Thank you for your request received on 9 January 2025, for the following information: 1. Details of the number of members of staff engaged on maintaining Barnet Council social media accounts 2. The average number of hours that these members of staff spend per day on social media accounts for the last month where figures are readily available 3. If available, the time spent by platform 4. Any targets etc that staff may have for numbers of posts etc We have processed this request under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. 

Response I am writing to inform you that we have searched our records and although we hold some of the information requested, some of the information you requested is not held by London Borough of Barnet. We have provided answers to your request below. 

1. Details of the number of members of staff engaged on maintaining Barnet Council social media accounts 1 X News & Social Media Manager, 2 X News & Social Media Officers 

2. The average number of hours that these members of staff spend per day on social media accounts for the last month where figures are readily available Rotates between the team 2-3 hours per working day for the individual on duty 

3. If available, the time spent by platform Information not recorded 

4. Any targets etc that staff may have for numbers of posts etc No targets for posts; annual evaluation assesses posts' performance with reach and engagement metrics

So to produce these tweets etc takes 2-3 hours a day. There is no monitoring of what the staff do and no targets. I wrote to Barry Rawlings, leader of the council and the Tory opposition leader, Peter Zinkin. I got no response from Cllr Rawlings. 

Here is the email I sent.

Dear Councillors

 

FYI  - Do you think this is a sensible usage of council resources? Are you happy with the way the success of engagement is being evaluated.

A few observations. The council's twitter feed has a following of approx 35K accounts. Many will be news organisations etc. This represents less than 10% of Barnets population. As best I can tell, posts get an average of around 300 view, which is less than 0.1 of the population. The recent Holocaust memorial being an outlier with 11K views, but still only acheived 11 likes and 4 retweets. 

 

To me, this looks like a very ineffective use of resources.

Here is Councillor Zinkins response (that i it in it's entirity)

as you say almost a complete waste of time
Regards


Cllr Peter Zinkin

I have long found Councillor Zinkin to be one of the more sensible and approachable Tory members. Although brief, his response does seem to confirm this assessment. 

These officers also post on the Barnet Council website. The news section has 1-2 posts a week on average. They also produce a weekly newsletter called Barnet First, which allededly has 45,000 subscribers. This means approx 15% of the people who live in the Borough subscribe. Most of the stories appear in several editions and are generally a rehash of the stories in the news section. You can see the newsletters here and sign up (I'd urge all Barnet residents to do this, you are paying for it!).

Given that there are a full time team of two staff and a manager doing all this, I can only say that it is appalling. The home page is as bland and dull as possible. There are no previews of what is in the newsletters on the homepage, which is also difficult to find. The actual Newsletters are laid out in the most boring way possible. There is no attempt at all to engage with the audience, no "What's in this edition" at the top. No thought given to what might encourage readers to read the whole thing. 

To sum up. I'm all for engagement with the public. I'm all for putting information out there on social media. What I am not all for is wasting taxpayers money in a totally incompetent way. Do it properly or don't do it. On Monday, I wrote a slightly tongue in cheek blog about Elon Musk and DOGE. I am sure Mr Musk would have something to say about this, if he were interested in Barnet.