Sunday, 26 July 2015

Are you alright, Jack?

Let me share a few words with you. If I read something that delivers a tad of inspiration, it is only fair to share it.
Regrettfully as a result of excessive exploitation of natural resource by wealthy nations, those who are poor experience poverty, lack of access to clean water, hunger and disease. We are one human family and we have the responsibility to eradicate this abuse and to protect, cherish and care for the Earth and to ensure a true and viable home for all people for future generations.
These are words which strike a chord with me. In the wealthy nations, we live a priveliged life. What is strange though is just how far we are from meeting even this rather humble aspiration. Even on our own doorstep we have poverty. These fine words were written by Fr Kevin O'Shea in the Sacred Heart Church newsletter today. If you turn it over, you see just how far we are with the following notice
Foodbank dates
Next foodbank dates August st & 2nd and September 5th and 6th.

The following items are needed. 
UHT Milk or powdered
Fruit Juice (long life carton)
Soup
Sponge Pudding (tinned)
Tomatoes (tinned)
Cereals
Rice pudding (tinned)
Instant Mash potatoes
Tinned meat and fish
Tinned Vegetables
Tinned fruit
Jam
Biscuits or snack bars
There is also a need for toiletries and babies nappies size 3, 4 and 5
Currently they do not need pasta or teabags.

 This collection is held monthly at the church for the Colindale foodbank. It is non denominational, the church is simply the Mill Hill drop off point. If even in a wealthy nation, we need such collections, it shows just how far we are from even meeting the basic aspiration above.  I for one think that a society that can afford nuclear weapons can afford to pay for clean water and a basic diet for people in impoverished countries. Is it any wonder so many citizens of the planet hate and resent the West?

There is much talk in the right wing press saying "charity begins at home" and calling out the injustice in this country. We are a rich nation and if we wanted to we could fix the issues in our nation and the worst privations in the third world. The 1.7% of GDP is to me a low target. The right wing press gives numerous examples of where this is not well spent. Strangely there are no examples of where it saves lives and mends broken societies. This is not because there are not numerous examples, it is because they don't fit the politcal narrative of the billionaire owners of the papers who print the stories. These are people who'd rather see their spare millions spent on new yatches and cars rather than helping those who have nothing to eat and polluted water to drink.

We will never fix all the injustice in the world, but is that really any sort of excuse to not even bother trying?

The Tweets of the week in the London Borough of Barnet - 26/7/2015

Here it is again, our most popular regular feature.

1. Seems like Nat West is abandoning Burnt Oak. There used to be two branches back in the 1980's when banks seemed to care a bit more about the people they served. Sad really


NatWest bank to close in Burnt Oak

2. Totally Jewish reports that there are "problems" with the Edgware ERUV and its implementation has been delayed


Setback For Edgware Eruv


3. Hendon FC paying tribute to a legend. He deserves your support


Come support a Hendon legend! Please RT

Embedded image permalink


4. Joe Grove is rather taken with the street names in Colindale!


Spotted in Colindale, London. Scientist street names! Mainly famous for their !

Embedded image permalink

5. Tim Singleton is rather taken with Avenue House


Lovely stroll around Avenue House in Finchley today.

Embedded image permalink


6. Edgware Ward Panel are rather worried by an exploding car in Mill Hill


With regards to the incident this morning where a car exploded in Mill Hill...... Car blown up in Mill Hill...

Photo published for Car blown up in Mill Hill following carjacking and robbery in Bushey


7. Mr Reasonable is getting hot and bothered about how much Barnet Council executives are paying themselves


Senior salaries at Barnet Council make interesting reading.


Embedded image permalink


8. Thanks to Christopher T. George for this great pic of Bram Stokers grave in Golders Green


Bram Stoker's remains rest at Golders Green Crematorium, Barnet, London, UK.









9. Aussie Born Mill Hill Based singer Lauren Lucille is at Womad and Hannah Worrall is suitably impressed.


Australian-born Mill Hill singer set to perform at WOMAD festival

Embedded image permalink


10. A cautionary warning from Mill Hill Music Complex for all their customers heading on holiday

  1. For all our customers about to go on holiday. Just remember - be careful!

Embedded image permalink


Saturday, 25 July 2015

The Saturday List #80 - Ten reasons I hope Jeremy Corbyn wins the Labour Leadership race (or why we need an old beardy)

For the record, I'm not a Labour Party Member. I can't vote. I would quite like to cast a vote, but I can't because I am banned from membership of the party until September. By the time my ban ends, the vote will be done and dusted. I formally resigned from the party in September 2009. This is the first time since I resigned from the Party that I've actually felt any urge to rejoin. It was clear to me in 2009 that Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and their respective acolytes had stripped the party of any semblance of an organisation I would want to be a member of. For me the final straw came one day when I was in the gym at lunchtime on a running machine. The news showed French riot police closing a camp housing "asylum seekers" (I hate that term) in the most brutal fashion, dragging a woman screaming by her hair, as her young child looked on screaming. I was mortified that such brutal treatment could be dished out to such a vulnerable person. I wondered what scars the trauma would have on the child? As I watched, the then home secretary, Alan Johnson came on. He applauded the french for their actions and said they needed to be tougher still. At that moment I realised that I no longer wanted to be a member of such an organisation. I immediately wrote to the local Labour Party and resigned. I received a response from the then local MP, Andrew Dismore asking me to reconsider. Correspondence followed, I explained that whilst I wished Andrew well and hoped he won in Hendon, I couldn't remain in the party.

I then joined the Lib Dems. At the time it never ocurred to me that they may form a coalition with the Tories. I joined as they seemed to represent my politics more than Labour. Under Charles Kennedy, they had opposed the Iraq war. They signed a pledge committing to protecting students from rises in tuition fees (remember that?). They were not in hock to rich billionaires as Labour were. They seemed reasonable, decent and fair. Unbeknown to me, the local Labour Party didn't bother to process my resignation. In September 2010, I got a letter stating that I'd been expelled for standing for a rival politcal party, whilst being a Labour member. I immediately contacted the Labour party, attaching the full email trail and the email confirming that  I'd resigned. The response I got was quite amazing. They said none of this mattered as I was still registered as a member. I'd broken the rules and I was welcome to rejoin in September 2015. As I had zero interest in rejoining, I really couldn't be bothered to argue. Until last week, I hadn't even considered the possibility of rejoining. I had toyed with the concept of rejoining the Lib Dems after the election. I quite like Tim Farron. He seems to be a decent guy and I really think we need some sort of political force in Barnet that isn't Tory or Labour, as both parties are completely useless on a local level.

Then Jeremy Corbyn threw his hat into the leadership race.  I've met him a couple of times as a result of his support for the local Trades Unions in the fight against One Barnet. I've shaken his hand and thanked him for his support. In fact Jeremy and John McDonald are the two biggest supporters of the fight against outsourcing. In Barnet, Labour had a massive opportunity to blow a hard right council out of the water. The policies and competence of the Barnet Tories had been ripped to shreds by scandal after scandal. All Labour had to do was be an effective opposition and One Barnet could have been halted and the failure of outsourcing exposed. Sadly Barnet Labour is run by Blairites who love outsourcing. Even when "Your Choice Barnet", a private company set up by the council, with taxpayers money, suffered financial meltdown, Barry Rawlings, the Labour lead on social services agreed with the Tories and signed up to a paper agreeing that an in house solution was not an option.

Rawlings sold the workers and the users of the service down the line. My disgust and contempt for this cabal that have hijacked the Labour movement had been festering, but this action of betrayal was the final straw. In the 2012 GLA campaign, I threw myself heart and soul into trying to get Andrew Dismore elected for Labour. My work was repaid by a stitch up. That is why I've been a vocal opponent of Barnet Labour ever since. I support the decent individuals, such as Amy Trevethan, Paul Edwards and Sarah Sackman, but for the rest of them are a bunch of snakes, in my opinion.

Which brings us to my little list. Here's the ten reasons why I hope Jeremy Corbyn wins.

1. Jeremy Corbyn opposed the Iraq war. History has proven him right. Jeremy saw through the lies of dodgy dossiers. He also was one of the few Labour MP's who seems to realise that International Law is a good thing and should apply to the UK.

2. Jeremy Corbyn wants to see student loans abolished and a return to grants. The UK needs to have a high quality work force. One that isn't saddled with debt. I have three teenage children, two are starting University in September. Many of my childrens friends are intilligent young people who are shunning University because they don't want to spend their lives in debt.

3. Jeremy Corbyn is not in hock to billionaire businessmen. In todays Times a "wealthy Labour donor (or should that be Donut)" says that if Corbyn wins, the cash from billionaires will dry up. If this means that the country is run for the benefit of the less well off, rather than rich vested interests, this can only be a good thing.

4. Jeremy Corbyn has been a steadfast supporter of public sector workers in Barnet. When local Union rep John Burgess had his car vandalised and a homophobic note stuck on his windscreen, Jeremy Corbyn signed the letter of support. Sadly none of the local Labour Party bigwigs could be bothered to follow suit.

5. Jeremy Corbyn is capable of effectively arguing his case. The other three contenders seem incapable of stringing two sentences together without contradicting themselves. Take Andy Burnham. Does anyone know whether he actually agreed with Harriet Harman on supporting the governments welfare bill? No one can say we don't know what Jeremy's position is.

6. Jeremy Corbyn is the only leadership contender who seems to understand that the reason for the economic issues in the UK is not because the weakest and most vulnerable members of society are getting too much in benefits. We are in a mess because under the Tories and Blairites, we had too much banking deregulation. The global economy crashed and the cost of the bale out crippled the UK economy. Sadly it is not the bank executives who had a paycut, it is people on invalidity benefit and victims of the bedroom tax.

7. Jeremy Corbyn doesn't need a spin doctor or focus group to decide what is wrong and what is right. Under the Blairite regime, every policy was tested by focus groups and every statement spun by spin doctors. The Blairites believe that this is the way you win elections. Many people disagree. In 1997 when Blair won, many people expected great things. Sadly most of those hopes turned to dust. Things change and I believe that the electors have grown tired of bland leaders who believe in nothing and stand for nothing. It will be a very tough ask for Corbyn to win an election, but I believe he has a better chance than any of his opponents. This is because all they stand for is a Tory Lite manifesto. By 2020 people may well be heartily sick of there harsh policies. A party with a coherent and attractive alternative will, I beleive, stand a far better chance. Blairites and Tories are desperate,ly trying to commission opinion polls that show voters think Corbyn is Satans Spawn. My view is that he has five years to build a program and so these mean nothing.

8.  Jeremy Corbyn will pose a real challenge to David Cameron at question time. For too long Cameron has had an easy ride. Corbyn knows his subject and doesn't need spin doctors to brief him. He's spent decades forming his views and he is an intelligent man who can put them across. Cameron got away with murder at the despatch box against Miliband. As Miliband lacked the gravity to repel these attacks, Cameron used this to his advantage mercilessly. This simply won't work against Corbyn as it is clear that he isn't stupid and he will not be bullied.

9. Jeremy Corbyn will force the Tories to be more honest about the effects of theiir policies. Miliband never was able to demonstrate just how damaging the attacks on social welfare budgets were. Corbyn knows his facts and cares about the people who are affected. Cameron will try and paint Corbyn as a deluded ideologue who hasn't a clue what he's talking about. This will fail, because Corbyn has spent his life talking to people who are at the sharp end of the Cameron cuts. As Cameron clearly has a compassion defecit, we could find that suddenly "cuddly Cameron" is a thing of the past. As for Osborne, he seems to fancy himself as an intellectual. It will be interesting to see how he copes when he is actually up against one.

10. This is a purely personal reason. At the start of this blog I detailed how I fell out of love with the Labour Party. If Jeremy Corbyn is elected, it will wipe the smug grin off the face of everyone one of the two faced, deceitful and dishionest scumbags who poisoned the Labour Party.

I don't think Corbyn is the answer to all our ills. There are many issues I don't agree with him on, some I srongly disagree on. He is however the only one of the four contenders who I feel has any credibility. I heard someone say "How on earth can we have an old beardy as a Prime Minister?" In my experience, we don't have enough old beardies in politics. During the course of my life, I've tended to find that if I have a real problem or dilemma and "old beardy" will offer far better advice and counsel than a used car salesman type in a sharp suit.

Thursday, 23 July 2015

The Press Lie machine in full swing against Jeremy Corbyn

I was disgusted to read the Evening Standards coverage of Jeremy Corbyn on the train home today. It is clear that there is a massive campaign of dishonesty being deployed to scare people into backing a less radical candidate. Nothing disgusts me more than lies, so I sincerely hope it fails.

There was an article claiming that least people thought Corbyn  "has what it takes to be a good PM" out of  a poll of voters. This stinks. Until recently Corbyn was a relatively unknown backbencher. The other candidates have had far more public exposure so it would be incredible if he topped the poll. What is clear is that he's the only one to make his case coherently.

Even more disgusting was the leader column. This stated :-
In this context the success of Jeremy Corbyn, the Leftist candidate, is less surprising than first appeared. He has a strong, distinctive message, even though his policies would make Labour unelectable, resembling a British Syriza.
This is not only highly dishonest, but if you think about it factually incorrect. Syriza are far from unelectable. In fact they won the election in Greece. Not only that but the standard  are reporting that Syriza are actually getting closer to sorting the problems out. Of course none of this gets in the way of  a good lie.

The reason Corbyn is ahead in the polls is because he is the only Labour contender who seems capable of stringing two politically coherent sentences together. He is the only one has managed to make any sort of case at all as to why someone may actually vote Labour. If people want a Tory government, they vote Tory. The Labour party has to have a distinct platform. If the Blairites can put together a credible platform and find a candidate who can actually articulate it, they wouldn't be in this mess.

As they can't, all we can expect is press baorns filling their papers foll of the worst type of complete BS.



Barnet Council - The big cemetary scandal

Sadly I've had to attend two funerals in the last two weeks. Whilst these were by nature sad events, the worst aspect for me is having to bury loved ones in a cemetary that is being let go to rack and ruin. Hendon Cemetary has fallen into a disgraceful condition under Capita management. The Tory councillors who sold out our loved ones should hang their heads in shame.

Wednesday, 22 July 2015

Corbyn takes a clear lead

I woke up this morning to the news on BBC London that Jeremy Corbyn has taken a clear lead in the Labour Leadership race. What is more interesting is the fact that he has actually made people take an interest in the issue. The rather sad thing is that the three political pygmies who face him have not responded by upping their game, but have simply resorted to saying "if Corbyn wins the world will end". Perhaps even more disturbing is the fact that some Labour MP's are talking about plans to defy the democratic will of the party and oust Corbyn if he wins, using a clause in the constitution designed to get rid of a failing leader, not one they don't like who has just been elected. They claim Corbyn will destroy the Labour party, but I suspect that if they pull this stunt, it will be them who re the assassins.

As I watch the car crash which the Labour leadership election is increasingly looking like becoming, I can only wonder if maybe Tim Farron has chosen a very good time to take over at the Lib Dems. George Osborne and the Tories seem to be showing us that the Lib Dems actually did quite a good job calming down the rampant right wing bash the poor ideology of George and his mates. It seems that the Labour old school cannot stomach a leader who refutes this. We are in for some "intersting times".

Tuesday, 21 July 2015

#SaveLondonMusic – So you think it’s easy to run a music studio?

Mill Hill Music Complex has been running since 1979, in various guises.  We started in one room in a derelict caretakers cottage, progressed to what is now studio 2, opened the recording studio (studio 1) in 1990, studios 3-10 between 1994 and 2001. We then had a little break until April 2012, when we opened our new studio complex, in the big blue building, with studios 14-19 in. You may wonder what happened to studios 11-13? Well studios 11 & 12 were temporary studios in the caretakers cottage between 2004- 2008 when it was demolished and studio 13 is the hire store! This originally was going to be another drum room, but we needed an easy to access PA store, so we used it for that instead!
Many of our regular customers, seeing our fantastic facilities and reception area, comment that it must be a great business to be in. We thoroughly agree, but if anyone thinks it is an easy job, then think again! The upside is meeting all the fantastic artists who frequent our premises. Many of these have become firm friends over the years. Often we get a free Xmas party because bands like The Damned invite us to their Xmas shows, when they’ve been rehearsing. That is always a privilege. It is also great to see talented young musicians start by hiring out a rehearsal room and then go on to international stardom. Perhaps Amy Winehouse and Kate Nash are two artist who spring to mind.
That is the good side of the deal. There is however another side. In London it is getting ever more expensive to run a studio. Our new building cost over £1 million to put up.  The regulations are often prohibitively expensive for studios. The rules around noise are ridiculous. We had to prove that our nearest neighbours, over 500m away, wouldn’t be able to hear bands rehearsing. This was a highly expensive exercise. Given that we are next to the M1 with an ambient background noise of 75db and we had fully soundproof rooms, it was ridiculous. We still had to scientifically prove it. This was complicated by the fact that the background noise from the M1 was too high to satisfy the criteria.
This was just one example. Another one was the long debates with the council as to what activities were allowable. In the end, they accepted our arguments, but this took two years of discussion and cost. Then the building regulations queries about what we were doing. We needed flashing fire alarms, as they were worried metal bands wouldn’t hear the alarms. These were just a few of the hurdles we faced, it seemed to go on forever. Eventually we managed to sort out the finance, the planning and get the building built. We had targetted September 2011. This is always the busiest time. We knew that 2012 would be a difficult year, with football tournaments, Royal weddings and annivesaries and the Olympics. Anything which stops a band member from playing, affects  studio turnover. Bank Holidays are times people go away. Due to delays in building, we eventually got the keys in May 2012, the worst possible time. Higher rents and rates, just as the summer slump hit.
There were other issues. We had wanted to launch our new website and online booking system, but this proved more problematical than we’d anticipated. In short, we didn’t get the new operation running smoothly until March 2013.  We also lost a couple of stalwart members of staff in this period, who had been with us a long time. Tony, our shop manager moved to south London and Mario, who kept the studios running moved to Italy. When you have a small dedicated staff, it is hard to replace good crew. So we had a complete reorganisation of how we’d been running things. Finding good staff to run a studio is difficult.  Manning the desk is either frantic or mindnumbingly boring. We have 17 studios now, so studio changeover is manic, then when are all the bands settle in, nothing at all happens. You just wait for the phone to ring. We need a minimum of two staff at busy times. One to manage the rooms and one to man the phone. During the day, we also have a cleaner and a studio tech, as well as a shop/studio manager who manages the finances, chases up debts, orders the equipment and handles mail enquiries etc.
blog-featured-img-844x350-reception-1Then there are the problems and emergencies. All manner of crazy things happen. Perhaps the worst is when bands come in and are drunk. 99% of customers are great, but 1% can be difficult and if they are drunk, it can be a problem. We have a zero tolerance policy towards abuse of staff. If someone has a genuine complaint, then we bend over backwards to help. If they are simply drunk and obnoxious, then that is a different manner. We also have the odd emergency. Recently we had someone taken seriously ill and we had to call an ambulance.
Then there are the comical events. We had one band call to say that they had to cancel a rehearsal. As we have a 72 hour cancellation policy, bands sometimes try and play on our better nature. This band rang and said they couldn’t rehearse as the drummers Grandma had died (it is strange how often drummers have family mishaps). We were suitably saddened. Shortly after, the drummer turned up. Sadly the rest of the band had neglected to tell him that the rehearsal had been cancelled, or that his Grandma had passed away.  Even more sadly, he had to stump up the cancellation fee for his band mates. For most studios the cancellation policy is the most contentious issue. For many years MHMC didn’t have a policy. It got to the point that bands would book sessions when they “might turn up”.  It got to the point where we had to address the issue or close, as we were finding we weren’t covering the bills. When we brought the policy in, we lost several regulars, who didn’t turn up and got quite abusive when told they couldn’t come back until they paid. Eventually they all came back, when they realised that other studios had the same policies. With the online booking system, everyone gets the terms and conditions in the booking email. It makes it an easier conversation as all bands know the rules.
Another difficult matter is breakages. Our policy is that we will charge for repairs/cleaning if there is clear abuse. One of the most annoying acts of vandalism is when bands let off powder fire extinguishers in the rooms. These make the rooms unusable. We charge £150 if this happens. Typically it is teenage bands. The sequence of events is always the same. The band leaves without paying, we check the room and find it is covered in powder. We ring the band who claim the extinguisher fell off the wall. We tell them that is not physically possible and that if they don’t pay, we’ll report them to the police for vandalism. They then get their parents to ring up. We ask the parents to come down and inspect the room. When they say powder sprayed all over the walls and that the construction of the extinguisher makes the story impossible, they sheepishly pay up. Generally the bands disappear for six months and when they come back, they are perfectly behaved.
The final thing which can make the job difficult is “band politics”. Sometimes bands decide to kick out a member, but don’t tell them. This can lead to all manner of embarrassing situations. Perhaps, the most difficult was when a customer came down to buy some strings and bumped into his bandmates coming down for a “secret” rehearsal with a new guitarist. As he was the guy who’d put the band together, he was mightily put out and demanded that we ban the band. We of course cannot get involved. Another more recent episode was almost comical. A band booked a session by phone and as the person being kicked out was the contact, they gave his name. They clearly didn’t realise that he would get a confirmation email. He immediately rang up to say he hadn’t booked and it was a mistake. We told him that another member had booked and asked for his name to be used. Ten minutes later, he rang back and furiously told us to under no circumstances take bookings from anyone else in his name. The other band member then rang up and demanded to know why we’d “grassed them up”. What can yo do?
When you think of studios, you think of great bands, interesting people and great music. For many customers though, the key things are equipment that works, clean toilets, an easy system for booking, easy access and friendly, helpful faces. Making sure all of these things happen is not an accident. London has some great music studios. We don’t see good studios as opposition, as London has more musicians than studio space. We see them as a source of inspiration. We regularly look at their websites to see if they are doing things we should be doing. I sometimes bump into other studio owners and they tell a similar story. Generally good studios survive for years, bad ones last a couple of years then fold. I overheard a couple of new customers talking. One said “That’s the trouble with studios, they are great when they open, then they go down hill and after a couple of years shut”. The other guy said “yeah, they all do that”. Then the first one turned and asked me “how long have you guys been here?”. I said “Since 1979″. The problem for most start ups is they don’t have spare gear, so when things break, the operation stops. We have spares for just about everything, so we don’t have those sort of problems. Another problem for start ups is that it takes years to get decent staff. We’ve been lucky but we have had problems.  Often you only realise when people leave.
Many people start studios thinking it will be a blast. They then find that they work unsociable hours, for bad money and simply end up hoovering rooms after other people have been enjoying themselves. It takes years to get established and it can be very hard work. I’ve spent many a Christmas day bricklaying, plastering and painting studios as this is the only time we can afford to shut. But then it all becomes worthwhile when you hear an Amy Winehouse or a Kate Nash come down and become a superstar. Perhaps for me, as an ageing punk, the finest moment was listening to The Damned rehearsing “New Rose” in Studio 7 on their first visit, many moons ago. Their album “Damned Damned Damned” was one of the first albums I bought and as New Rose was the first UK Punk single, it is very special for me. Things like that, you cannot buy.

(This article was originally published on the Mill Hill Music Complex website
https://www.millhillmusiccomplex.co.uk/savelondonmusic-think-easy-run-music-studio/ )

Monday, 20 July 2015

Can Jeremy Corbyn win? Ask Margaret Thatcher

Image result for margaret thatcher wins election 1979

Firstly, let me start by saying I'm not a Labour Party member, so I won't be voting in the forthcoming leadership election. That said, I do have an opinion on the outcome. Personally, I see the only twwo credible candidates as Liz Kendall and Jeremy Corbyn. Cooper and Burnham lost any shred of credibility by going along with collective "head in the sand" strategy to the clear fact that Ed Miliband was taking the bus off the edge of the cliff. Unlike Cooper and Burnham, Kendall at least appears to have some understanding of the fact that you don't win elections if the voters haven't got a clue what you stand for.

Of the four, she's perhaps the nearest thing to an electoral banker, as she's a Blairite and whatever you think of Blair, he clearly knew how to win elections. She isn't perfect, but I suspect that with five years of practicing and with all the heavyweight support from business and the luvvies a Blairite can come to expect, she'd win. It was clear that Cameron won because he was able to scare the hell out of floaters, who didn't trust Miliband and didn't really know what they'd get. This wouldn't work with Kendall. We all know what we get with a Blairite. It isn't really my idea of Labour politics, but it is a damn sight better than a Cameron/Osborne full frontal attack on the welfare state and the weakest people in the country.

But what about the fourth candidate, Jeremy Corbyn. Labours Blairite flunkies have been queueing up to denounce him. They've been saying he'd make the party unelectable and that voters would run a mile from Labour if ever he became Leader. They say he is an extremist and he'd keep Labour out of power for a generation. The problem, as they explain it is that Corbyn is not in the centre and he is a man of conviction. They say that to win an election in the UK, you have to be in the centre. Corbyn is lodged firmly on the left.

So are these siren voices right? Perhaps the only example we can look at, of a leader who was a conviction politician, far from the centre was Margaret Thatcher. when she took over the Tory party, many of the old Tory Grandees fell into a state of shock. A new term was coined for what we may now consider the likes of Cameron. They were "The Wets". Those who allowed the concept of appealing to the voters to get in the way of hard right ideology. Thatcher had little trck with these, although she had to accomodate them in her cabinet, to ensure that she had the support of the party. The likes of Ken Clark, are the last of the old guard of wets. So how did the populace respond to Thatcher? Well they all knew where she stood. In 1979, she won  a small but workable majority. She embarked on the most radicle program of reforms our society had ever seen. By 1981, the economy was in virtual meltdown and the Tories looked to be heading for the door, at the first go. Then she got lucky. In 1982 General Galtieri in Argentina decided to invade the Falklands, Thatcher rallied and by the following year, the myth of the Iron Lady was secure and she won a landslide. Thatcher won three election. The siren Blairite voices site the failure of Michael Foot as the proof that a lefty can't win. However they overlook several factors. The 1979 crop of Blairite equivalents defected and formed the SDP. This ensured that Foot couldn't win. In the aftermath of the Falklands, Foot was on a hiding to nothing anyway, but the fact that his own party was at war finished his chances off. Had the likes of Williams, Owen and Jenkins stayed and fought and not split the Left vote, who knows what the reslt may have been. The only thing we could be sure of is that Thatchers majority would not have been bigger if the SDP rump hadn't split.

What Thatcher proved was that the British can elect a conviction politician who is not from the centre ground. If the electorate gets fed up with centrist conformity and fudging, then sooner or later they want someone to bring in a fresh approach and to shake things up. Could Corbyn do this? Well his announcement that he'd abolish student loans and go back to the old system of grants is one policy which is a definate vote winner. I don't know of a single parent who likes the system of loans. I hate the concept of my children being burdened for decades with debt. I also wonder how Cameron would deal at the despatch box with someone who actually believes what he says and has spent decades forming his opinions and researching them. I suspect that Cameron would find it a totally different sort of experience, than the current situation, where both leaders are given a short briefing on current issues and affairs.

Corbyn would energise the parts of the Labour movement that work hard, such as the Trades Unions and the local activists. There are many things we can't be sure about, but it is a safe bet that the one potential Labour Leader the SNP fear is Corbyn, as he is the type of Labour Leader who could see their huge victory in Scotland turn into a one parliament aberration.

The right wing press is seemingly licking its lips at the prospect of Corbyn vs Cameron at the despatch box. I am not so sure that this will work out quite how they expect. We've had 25 years of people facing each other off, trying to say what they think voters want to hear. All of a sudden, we'll have someone saying what they believe - something which hasn't happened since Thatcher was in charge. How will this work out? I think two things will happen. Firstly Cameron will start to apper very shallow and weak. Secondly people will start to take an interest, in a way they haven't for a long time.

I am quite taken aback by some of the vitriol and some of the dishonesty poured on the Corbyn campaign. I can give a couple of examples. One comment was that Corbyn would have the same disasterous effect on the UK economy as Syriza has had on Greece. This is completely dishonest. The problems of Greece are nothing to do with Syriza which has been in power only for a matter of months. The country has been mismanaged by governments of the left and right for decades. Syriza is just a desparate outpouring of anger at the fact that billionaires pay no tax, whilst ordinary people are forced into poverty by austerity. I've yet to see anyone suggest anything which could actually help the people in Greece suffering from austerity, so why is everyone saying Syriza has been a disaster. Anything would have been a disaster for Greek voters. The only difference is that Syriza have attempted to share some of the pain with EU financiers.

Another highly dishonest charge made against Corbyn is that Labour will go into meltdown and collapse. This is a myth Tory bloggers at the Spectator are keen to circulate. We can only speculate as to why.  Corbyn as Leader would pose a huge challenge to the Blairite faction of the Labour Party, but there are two reasons they will not immediately jump ship. The first is that they will think a Corbyn Leadership is likely to implode and leave the floor clear for a Blairite. If Corbyn doesn't work out, they will surely have won the argument for years as to the future direction of the party. As soon as Corbyn takes the keys to the bus, they will be in the back seat plotting. Whilst many recognise that at the moment a Blairite manifesto is a bridge too far for man, a Corbyn disaster may open the gates in a matter of months or years for a full scale coup. The second is that if Corbyn doesn't collapse and does catch the public imagination, they may get the old ministerial limo's back if they play ball. They will also at least get some sort of opportunity to shape the manifesto of a party of government.

Living in the London Borough of Barnet, there is one issue that cannot be ignored. Corbyn stated that he views Hizbollah and Hamas as friend and this has caused uproar in the local Jewish community. There is a feeling that a Corbyn leadership would destroy Labour locally. My view is that unless they elect a full on Blairite, this damage is already done. I personally find such statements to be ridiculous. I would have thought  that appeasement of such extremists would have long ago been discredited as a strategy for dealing with such organisations. Whatever you may think of Israel, I cannot see how fundamental Islam can be viewed as a positive force in finding a apeace settlement. Hamas and Hizbollah are commited by constitution to the complete annihiliation of Israel and its Jewish residents. I can't see how such a stance can be anything other than destructive.

However The London Borough of Barnet is not the UK and whilst such statements play badly with the local electors, in 99% of seats it will have no effect at all. Had Labour had Corbyn as Leader, I am certain Labour would have more seats than it has now, even if only because they would not have faced Scottish wipeout. I cannot see any circumstances Labour will win a majority in 2020 without a radical rethinl of what they are, who they appeal to and how they conduct their campaigns. In the election in May, most people saw them as irrelevant. They failed to connect with even their core voters. No one knew what Miliband really stood for and he made no case for any policies. At least Corbyn with his policy of abolition of Student loans has shown that he understands that you can't all sing from the same song sheet. It seems we only get a leader who is unafraid to break with a failing consensus once in a blue moon. Will Corbyn be the next Thatcher, a conviction politician, loved and loathed in equal part? I have no idea, but I for one think that any Tories who celebrate should Corbyn win, will live to bitterly regret it, just as all of the Labour Mp's who saw the election of Thatcher as Tory leader in the 70's saw here as "Keith Josephs puppet" and an abberation bitterly lived to regret the fact that they didn't realise people actually trust people who speak their mind and stand up for what they believe.








Sunday, 19 July 2015

Donald Trump deserves a smack in the mouth!

There are many reasons I write blogs. Todays has perhaps the strangest reason of all. My Dad passed away in January 1987. He would be 100 years old on April 1st 2017. I often think about him and miss him dearly. They say time heals, but in some ways I'm not altogether sure I've  ever gotten over his death completely. He was 69 years old and died suddenly of a heart attack. I was 24 at the time and it knocked me for six. I had mistakenly believed him to be invincible. I thought I had good reason.

My Dad was an Ex RAF bomber pilot. Whilst the RAF had 55,000 casualties, my father completed 40 operational missions. On the last f his tour of duty, he was shot down whilst conducting a bombing raid on the Ploesti Oil Fields in Romania. He was attached to 40 squadron, flying by then obsolete Wellington Bombers. His squadron was the last to fly Wellingtons operationally. They were being replaced by the more modern Liberator Bombers. After he was shot down, he was captured and imprisoned in a POW camp in Bucharest. He was a POW for 68 days, before leading a mass breakout of Allied prisoners and being repatirated to Italy by the US Air Force.

So you may ask, what has all of this got to do with Donald Trump? Well last night I had a rather disturbed nights sleep. My family are a rather superstitious lot and we take such things very seriously. I awoke with a sharp turn at 4am on the dot. I had been sleeping rather soundly and I was having a very pleasant dream that I was having a chat and a guinness with my Dad. All of a sudden, he said "What is it with all this blogging then Rog?". I replied "Oh, I write a blog that a lot of people read, I've never quite figured out why". He then said "Could you do something for me?" I said "Of course". He then said "Can you write a blog with the title Donald Trump deserves a smack in the mouth!". I was a tad taken aback by this as I wasn't aware my Dad had ever expressed an opinion about Donald Trump. So I said "Why would I write that". He replied, rather sarcastically "You fancy yourself as a top blogger, figure it out". With that I woke up. Whilst I usually forget dreams, this was so vivid and so real that I have spent the day feeling a tad uneasy. I racked my brains as to what it could mean, but couldn't quite understand.

In the end, I decided to Google "Donald Trump smack in the mouth". To my horror, on page one it returned "Donald Trump Uses Old Al Franken POW Joke About John ..." I immediately realised that wherever my Dad lurks now, he is a tad pissed off abut something Donald Trump said. As the site was a blog, I thought I'd dig deeper for a more substancial source. I found the Washington Post was also running the story - http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2015/07/18/trump-slams-mccain-for-being-captured-in-vietnam/ - In it I read Trumps comments

“He’s not a war hero,” Trump said. Sarcastically, Trump quipped, “He’s a war hero because he was captured.” Then, he added, “I like people that weren’t captured.”
So basically by Trumps standards, my Dad is not a war hero either. Sadly my Dad is no longer around to defend himself. If he was he'd be 98 years old. The POW camp in Bucharest he was detained at held 1,800 American Airmen. Every single one of those guys had stepped into a plane, flown thousands of miles over enemy territory, to fight a ruthless and evil ideology. Every single one of them had been shot down, and baled out of a crashing airoplane. Every single one of them had lost crewmates, friends and sometimes family in the process. Every soldier, sailor and airman who was taken prisoner serving for the US armed forces was taken prisoner, because they had put themselves in danger. You don't get taken prisoner sitting at a desk in Washington, you get taken prisoner because you are in the front line.  I know little about Trump. I read his Wikipedia entry and it doesnt mention any military service.

It does have a list of awards and honours Mr Trump has received in his "esteemed" career.

Awards and honors


Trump's star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame
I had a quick look at the Wiki page for John McCain. It said of his war record.

On July 29, 1967, McCain, by then a lieutenant commander, was near the epicenter of the USS Forrestal fire. He escaped from his burning jet and was trying to help another pilot escape when a bomb exploded;[28] McCain was struck in the legs and chest by fragments.[29] The ensuing fire killed 134 sailors and took 24 hours to control.[30][31] With the Forrestal out of commission, McCain volunteered for assignment with the USS Oriskany, another aircraft carrier employed in Operation Rolling Thunder.[32] Once there, he would be awarded the Navy Commendation Medal and the Bronze Star for missions flown over North Vietnam.[33]

Prisoner of war

John McCain's capture and subsequent imprisonment began on October 26, 1967. He was flying his 23rd bombing mission over North Vietnam when his A-4E Skyhawk was shot down by a missile over Hanoi.[34][35] McCain fractured both arms and a leg ejecting from the aircraft,[36] and nearly drowned when he parachuted into Trúc Bạch Lake.[34] Some North Vietnamese pulled him ashore, then others crushed his shoulder with a rifle butt and bayoneted him.[34] McCain was then transported to Hanoi's main Hỏa Lò Prison, nicknamed the "Hanoi Hilton".[35]
Although McCain was badly wounded, his captors refused to treat his injuries, beating and interrogating him to get information; he was given medical care only when the North Vietnamese discovered that his father was a top admiral.[37] His status as a prisoner of war (POW) made the front pages of major newspapers.[38][39]

I have no idea whether I really received a "message from beyond the grave, or whether I'd heard the story and only registered it subconsciously. I know for certain that had my Dad been around and had he heard the story, his response would have been exactly as it was in the dream. Trump is clearly a buffoon and clearly completely unfit to be the President of the USA. To question a man such as John McCain over his war record is the work of a complete low life. I suspect that had Mccain ever met my Dad, they would have got on like a house on fire. He loved chatting to other pilots and was totally fascinated by the experiences of POW's. As for how he'd have reacted to Trump, if he'd been in his prime and Trump had said such a thing in his earshot, it wouldn't have ended happily for Mr Trump.

I just hope the Americans have the sense to dump Trump and lets hope that whoever they pick, they are someone of courage, commonsense and wisdom.