Showing posts with label Barnet Tories. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Barnet Tories. Show all posts

Wednesday, 2 July 2025

The Barnet Tories - Imploding and scraping the barrel at the same time!

Just when I thought Barnet politics couldn't get anymore depressing, the Barnet Tories prove me well and truly wrong. The Finchley and Golders Green Conservatives have just announced that they've elected disgraced, convicted woman beater Brian Coleman as their deputy chairman.



Coleman was thrown out of the Tories over a decade ago for vicious assault on local cafe owner Helen Michael, on Finchley High Street. Coleman was then a senior member of the Barnet Tory administration. Helen Michael had noticed he was illegally parked and using the ATM and started filming him. Coleman attacked her, injuring her wrist and bruising her breasts. Coleman denied the assault, claiming he was "set up". However, when the CCTV footage was played in court, he was damned both as a thug and a liar. He said at the time "That is not how I remember the events" when confronted with the evidence. He changed his innocent plea to guilty shortly before the start of the trial, in the hope of getting a lighter sentence in the face of incontrovertable evidence. He was convicted of "Assault with beating".  Helen Michael suffered anxiety attacks after the attack and eventually moved he business to Oakleigh Park Station, where she felt more safe and secure. Helen called me immediately after the assault and I was absolutely mortified to see the state she was in. Immediately after the assault, Coleman drove to Barnet Police station and claimed she had assaulted him. Luckily there was a CCTV camera that exposed his lies. This is all a matter of public record.

The CCTV footage is here. Is this really a man who demostrates the standards we want to see in public life?


Of course, it is up to the Barnet Tories to elect who they like as their deputy chair, but for the rest of us, seeing a man who is happy to assault women in the street and then lie about it, to try and get himself off the hook, being afforded a senior role in a local political party is sickening.

I have no idea whether it is connected with Colemans elevation, but yesterday, Coleman posted the following tweet.



It seems the former leader of the Barnet Tories and council leader between 2018 and 2022 has defected to Reform. Councillor Dan Thomas sits for the Tories in Church End. There was no love lost between Coleman and Thomas. After Coleman was convicted of assaulting Helen Michael, Thomas privately phoned me to express his utter disgust with Coleman and to assure me that Coleman was finished in the Barnet Tories. He revealed that he'd actually made a complaint to Barnet Council's standards body about Colemans behaviour. Myself and Dan Thomas were not on good terms and I was quite surprised to receive a call, but it became clear to me that he was actually pleased that the Tories had an excucse to boot Coleman out. 

There are a new generation of Tory Councillors and other wannabees, who probably don't know the full story about Brian Coleman. They are probably unaware of the scale of the assault. He has probably told them that she was a lefty agitator. She is not. She was a staunch Conservative until Brian Coleman's tenure as Borough Parking Officer. Coleman abolished pay and display completely. This lead to a huge drop in takings for many local high street businesses (and was reversed once Coleman was booted out). After Coleman was booted out, Helen returned to the Tory fold and was a keen advocate for Boris Johnson. If you check out Helen's twitter, you will see that she is anything but a lefty!

The Barnet Tories have now lost their former leader Dan Thomas and former Mayor Mark Shooter to Reform. It is pretty clear that the party is imploding. I cannot see how scraping the barrel and bringing convicted felons in to run the party will help this. But hey ho, what do I know. When Coleman stepped away from public life, this blog forgot about him. He's back and his actions will be under intense scrutiny and we will use our platform (which is massive) to ensure that the people of Barnet know what the Tories think is acceptable. 

I suppose I should say a few words about Dan Thomas. Firstly here is what his colleague Mark Shooter, a fellow Barnet Tory defector to reform said......

Dan Thomas organised a palace coup in the Barnet Tories shortly after former leader Richard Cornelius won a stunning victory in the 2018 council elections. Barnet had been tipped by all to swing to Labour, but the Tories made huge gains and had one of the largest Tory majorities ever. The thanks Richard, who was a very decent man, got from Dan Thomas was a knife in the back. Thomas came in with a plan. He wanted to make Barnet the place where big property developments happen. In 2020, he launched huge plans for redevelopments in various areas. His pet project was the Edgware Redevelopment, which was enable by the SPD passed under his regime in 2021, which gave Ballymore the green light for the current plans. Thomas was politically inept. To ensure his coup worked. he ousted long time, hard working councillors such as Joan Scannell in Edgware and replaced them with development friendly lackies. The inevitable happened. In 2022, Labour swept the board. Thomas stepped down and has moved to the West Country, still claiming his juicy councillor allowance. 

Mark Shooter may well welcome Dan Thomas into Reform. All I can really say is that I hope Thomas does for Reform's electoral prospects, what he did for The Barnet Tories. If he gets in anywhere, they can expect monster developments to start appearing. I am sure that there are plenty of nice leafy streets in the west country that will benefit from 32 storey skyscrapers!

Wednesday, 18 June 2025

Barnet Council Cabinet review Edgware Redevelopment and give the Barnet Tories a does of reality

 It's been an odd week for me, as regular readers will know. Digging up ancient memories from long ago. Monday, visiting the hospital where my Mum was treated for cancer, yesterday visiting a Barnet Council Cabinet meeting, where I made my name as a blogger, attracting national interest from press, TV and all sorts of other social media. I stopped going a decade ago, as the then Leader, Tory Richard Cornelius agreed with me that the Cabinet system did not work in local government, and abolished it. Labour had brought it in, under their previous administration in 1999. Whenthe Tories were run by Maoist style leaders sucha s Mike Freer, they loved it as it avoided public and council scrutiny. When Cornelius took over, he went back to a committee system. Whatever you may think of Cornelius, he was by far the most open and reasonable leader of Barnet Council. He believed in transparency and openness and would attend public meetings to put forward his case. As a result, he was shafted after he won a stunning victory, when Labour thought they had it in the bag, in 2018 and Dan Thomas, who was more in the Freer mold came in. The dodgy, secretive ways of time gone by started to come back. The first act, when Labour won, was to bring back the Cabinet system.

Since I last attended one of these, there's now a big row of tables, stuffed with council officers, all looking bored, playing with pencils and presumably getting overtime. This space used to be reserved for the public. You can see them all looking bored, behind me in this crafty selfie!

I've had np cause to visit the Cabinet since, but last night I had a question on the arts strategy. I turned up and the public gallery was full. The Edgware redevelopment was being discussed. The room was packed, I was eyed suspiciously by a security guard who challenged me as to my motives. When I explained, he opened the door. After the usual pleasantries, we had opposition questions. Three Tories made their way to the front. These were the Leader Peter Zinkin, The deputy Lucy Wakely and a third one, who I must confess I didn't know. Now I have to say that I actually like Peter and Lucy. They are decent people. Unlike the old guard of Freer, Thomas, Rams, Coleman, etc all have only ever been reasonable and decent to me. On the night when Labour won, in 2022 at the count, I saw Peter Zinkin looking dejected at loosing his seat. I bought him a cup of tea and we had a chat. Despite what people say, most councillors are actually decent people, who want to do well for their community. It is sad that the Barnet Tories became a repository for people with dodgy agendas after they won the council in 2002. The like of Coleman had a very bloated idea of their own self worth. A (long) spell in opposition will hopefully cure the local Tories of this tendancy. 

Peter Zinkin strode up and did his best to channel his inner anger at the beastlyness of Labour, who are " ignoring local people in Edgware and not consulting". Peter's trouble is he is a reasonable man. When greeted with reasonable replies from the likes of Ross Houston and Barry the Boss, he reverted to type and was reasonable and sensible. Lucy Wakely had a go and did no better. Ultimately, the redevelopment was the Tories baby under Dan Thomas. They know they are chancing their arm and I suspect that they didn't want to push their luck in front of a bunch of residents who were keen supporters. Labour made perfectly reasonable responses (something that never happened when the Tories had a cabinet, they were obnoxious to all, especially bloggers, so we wound them up no end. The meetings had packed public galleries, that would howl with derision). It all felt rather odd to me. 

I tweeted about the Tories Chutzpah in claiming they were good at consultations, Cllr Zinkin replied


The main beef seemed to be that the public hadn't had a chance to comment or ask questions. I found this rather odd, as there was a committee item and a competent opposition would have tipped the Save Edgware Campaign off and given them a hand drafting some killer questions, had they been doing their job properly. It seemed a bit strange to me listening to the leader of the Barnet Tories moaning about the way public questions are handled, when they brought the rules in that made it difficult for the public to ask questions. I remember the good old days, when there were dozens. At one time, us bloggers would liaise and share our questions, just to make sure we got everything covered. It did us no good at all, the Tories took no notice, but it was jolly good fun watching them embarrass themselves, as they thought their clever antics in giving non answers were mightily clever. 

Another beef of Councillor Zinkin was lack of consultation. Barry the Boss pointed out that this process didn't begin until planning applications were being debated. Until that point there was 'nothing to debate' Councillor Zinkin stated that in the good old days of the Tories, consultations were done properly. For anyone familiar with One Barnet, this was hilarious. The judge found that Barnet hadn't consulted properly, but that we, the people, could do nothing about it, becase we'd been too late submitting our legal objection. The formula used to calculate the date meant that a perfectly good legal challenge to a very bad administration, failed as The Tories had, by luck or design, managed to string us all along so that we'd missed the date. Our contention that it was impossible to have submitted in the alloted period as it was not clear at the time that the consultation had been botched, sadly was ruled inadmissible. And here we were, ten years later, with the Tory Leader lecturing Labour on how to do good consultations. 

The Tories did make a couple of good point, perhaps the best was that putting a garage for electric buses, that have the habit of catching fire and exploding, under massive blocks of residential flats was a bad idea. Labour seemed to agree, which rather took the wind out of Cllr Zinkins sails. The current big bugbear of the Tories is that Labour are planning to give the developers £41 Million back from the Community Infrastructure levy.  Tory Hale Councillor Gurung posted this on Facebook earlier yesterday.

Barnet Labour Backs Developers Not Residents
Tonight, Barnet Council is being asked to approve a shocking proposal: to hand back £41 million of Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) funds to developers Ballymore and TfL money meant for local infrastructure, schools, and services.
Even more alarming, Ballymore admitted their Broadwalk development was financially unviable yet instead of holding them to account, Barnet’s Labour-run Council is working hand-in-hand with them to return money they were obliged to pay.
This is £41 million that should be invested in our community
not handed back to developers to meet infrastructure obligations they always had.
From the start, Barnet Labour has been on Ballymore’s side. This latest move proves it once again.
We deserve a council that stands up for residents not developers. As your local councillors in Edgware and Edgwarebury we will always stand up for our residents.

I had a word with my mole in the Labour Cabinet before the meeting. I asked about this. They told me they couldn't possibly discuss the matter,given its commercially sensitive nature. I then explained that the Tories were giving them a public pasting and they really should, maybe not to me right now, but as soon as they possibly could. To my surprise, I got a full answer at this point. There are strict rules that govern such things, and the council legally has to repay the money. Keeping it and telling Ballymore to sod off, would simply mean Ballymore would sue Barnet, who would lose, have to pay the £41 million, as well as compensation and damages. Oh yes, and the Tories know this (or they should if they have done their job) and are simply making mischief. As to the development being 'not financially viable', this was simply the fault of the Tories who'd done such a rubbish job drawing up the SPD and now Labour were having to sort it all out and Edgware residents were truly lucky to have such a wonderful Labour Council, even though they'd elected useless Tory Councillors. I was then told all of this was priviliged information and if I said I word of this to anyone, I'd be locked up in Gaol for six months for breaking the local government act.

After three seconds deliberation, I decided to share this with you all. If I get sent to the slammer, I expect protest on the streets of Barnet. A free pot noodle for the first reader to guess which cabinet member broke the rules of the Papal Conclave The Local Government Act. 

They say that history repeats itself. Once as tragedy and once as farce. That certainly seems true of the Cabinet system at Barnet Council. If ever you've wondered how I feel blogging about Barnet Council, Tories and Labour, read the Greek myth of Sisiphyus

Tuesday, 22 October 2024

Why Barnet will turn blue in May 2026

 Back in May 2022 there was a massive, seismic shift in the London Borough of Barnet. The Tories, who had governed the Borough for 20 years, were uncermoniously and most devservedly booted out. The Labour party took control of the Borough for the first time in it's history (they governed in coalition with the Barnet Lib Dems from 1994-2002). They got a record majority and the Conservatives were stripped back to their absoluet core base, in the pleasant, leafy wards across the Borough. 

Having known the key players in Barnet Labour, I was not exactly convinced that they would be a stunning success, but it was pretty clear what they needed to do to get things back on track and having watched the Tories in action, it was also clear that they would be hard pressed to make a bigger mess of running the Borough. 

So here we are, well over half way through their administration. The finances in Barnet Council are in a full blown crisis. Although things were difficult, there were some easy wins. Barnet under both Tory and Labour regimes have somehow managed to make Barnet the most bureacratic and least accountable Borough in London. This has lead to massive inefficiency. Whereas most boroughs have one CEO running the show, Barnet has had three since 2020. Each one of these is on a massive salary. These are as follows.

Barnet Council Chief Executive - This is the CEO who runs the council and has a salary of £201,456 £212,685 (Source: https://www.barnet.gov.uk/sites/default/files/pay_policy_statement_2024_2025.pdf

The Barnet Group Chief Executive - This is the CEO who runs the Council owned housing stock, for the wholly owned company caled "The Barnet Group" which was set up to ensure that democratic oversight of Council housing was difficult, if not impossibe, and they are on a  salary of £218,643 (Source: https://thebarnetgroup.org/download/the-barnet-group-financial-statements-2023-24/

The Barnet Group was originally set up as Barnet Homes. This is what they say about themselves - In 2004 Barnet Homes was established as an Arm’s Length Management Organisation (ALMO) for the London Borough of Barnet (LBB) to manage approximately 15,000 council-owned properties within Barnet. In 2012 Your Choice (Barnet) was created to receive the transfer of Adult Social Care services from LBB, and The Barnet Group, a Local Authority Trading Company (LATC) was created as the parent company to both Barnet Homes and Your Choice (Barnet). Later in 2012 the Council’s Homelessness service, Housing Options, transferred to Barnet Homes.

This was done to receive government grants to refurbish the housing stock, over two decades ago, under the Blair government. For some reason, they believed that a private company could manage council housing more effectively than councils and offered bungs to councils to do this sort of thing. In short, it hasn't worked. I know a lot of people who live in housing managed by the Barnet Group and what they have shown me is truly shocking ( a theme we will be returning to later this week).

This is born out by their own website which says this about "stage 2 complaints" 

Stage 2 complaints 

Most of the Stage 2 complaints were about service failure, quality and customer care. In Quarter 1, 19% of complaints were escalated to Stage 2. Our Repairs service received the most Stage 2 complaints with 23, and we also received 6 about Housing Management, 6 about Housing Options, 6 about Gas and 1 about Property. Our performance in time declined compared to the previous quarter and did not meet our target of answering Stage 2 complaints within 20 working days. This remains an area of focus for improvement.

Barnet Education and Learning Skills Chief Executive. For some bizarre reason, the last Tory administration also set up another CEO post with a salary of £138,303 + other benefits of £33,368 (Source: https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/12724128/filing-history)

Barnet Education and Learning Service (BELS) is a limited company wholly owned by Barnet council. They are in a strategic partnership with the council to provide its education services. This is what they say about themselves "Educational progress and achievement have improved consistently in recent years in Barnet.  97% of Barnet schools are good or outstanding and Barnet is now in the top 10% for almost all measures of achievement in schools and the top 5% for many of the measures. Barnet Education and Learning Service delivers the council’s statutory education services, including school improvement, special educational needs, admissions, school place planning, post-16 education and skills.  BELS also provides traded services to schools and settings in Barnet, equipping them with the latest tools, training, and programmes to improve school standards and pupil outcomes."

In short though, it just does what Barnet Council always used to do with one less CEO.

There are too many examples of such wasteful bureacracy in Barnet to list in a short blog, having three CEO's and all of the infrastructure to support them is just one example. The scandalous aounts of money that are still being payed to Capita by Barnet Council as they try and extracate themselves from the contracts is truly staggering. A recent post on the Barnet Unison website laid this bare

1. Capita spend.

In 2023 one of the big, outsourced Capita contracts ended (Re)  with staff returning to Barnet Council on 1 April 2023.

In September 2023 Capita Estates service came back in-house.

The few remaining services delivered by Capita for Barnet Council are as follows:

  • IT services
  • Customer Services
  • Revs and Bens

Barnet UNISON understands that all the above services will cease to be provided by Capita by March 2026.

Barnet UNISON was shocked to discover that Barnet Council paid Capita in one financial year £24 million. That works out as £2million in payments to Capita every month.

As you can see from the table provided by Barnet resident and local Blogger Mr Reasonable, Capita has received £670 million from Barnet Council since payments first began in 2013.

What is disturbing about the £24 million is that Capita is only being paid to deliver three services.

The sad truth is that Labour administration has not got to grips with the financial crisis. It had the opportunity to end this madness two and a half hears ago to get rid of the bureacracy and waste.  

Labour swept into power on a wave of disgust at the shenanigans of Boris Johnson in Downing Street and chaotic government. The local Tories were in disarray and completely botched their campaign. The wind will be blowing in a very different direction in May 2026. The only weapon in their armoury will be their record and how they've run the Borough of Barnet. The sad truth is that they've botched the running of the Borough for the last two and a half years and they've only got eighteen months to get their act together. Sadly for Labour, they wasted the goodwill they had to take tough decisions and fiddled whilst Rome burned, as the saying goes. Now they have to make harsh choices and they probably won't be around to reap the benefit even if they do,


Wednesday, 16 August 2023

The Tories destroyed the Borough of Barnet, Labour are burying it

 When I started writing the Barnet Eye, I was not really aware of what Barnet Council did, how important their work was or the impact they have on people's lives. A year before the birth of this blog, I started to realise. My mother, who was housebound and frail, relied on meals on wheels for her main meal. She lived independently, despite having suffered a major stroke and not being very mobile. This was how she chose to live. She could afford a daily carer to help her get up in the morning. Once she was up, she could make a cup of tea, read, watch telly and tend for herself. Due to the stroke, cooking was an issue, so she paid the council for the meals on wheels service. These were good quality. healthy and nutritious and prepared in house. They would turn up, like clockwork at noon. If she didn't answer, the delivery driver would call us. She'd have a chat with "The nice lady" and she was improving. In 2007, the council announced the service was being outsourced. The nice lady was sacked. The meals became cheap to the point of being inedible. Mum, hating waste, would ring Clare, who would get her a sandwich and our dog would get the slop for dinner. Worst of all, the dinners were often late or didn't come at all. Being a stroppy person, I made a massive fuss, engaged councillors, wrote letters. This was the moment the blg was conceived. The stress this caused my mother was, I believe, responsible for her death. She was 83 and not in good health, but it rammed home that her independence was an illusion. She was angry for the nice lady. She lost weight. She became depressed. 

I did some research. The company, a French conglomorate, that won the contract, had set up a delivery round where 40 dinners were supposed to be delivered in 3 hours. That was 4.5 minutes per meal delivery. bear in mind, some times, it took my mum a minute or two to open the door. She was deaf and moved slowly. Sometimes meals were left on the doorstep. We weren't told. It was horrific for my mother. In short, to save money, they had taken a cheap bid that simply didn't work. The round took no account for traffic. My road, where my mum also lived, is Millway. Some days you can wait 4.5 minutes to get onto the Broadway at lunchtime. At that moment, I realised that outsourcing of vital services to save cash did not work. In the end, it cost the council a fortune to fix the problem. When I blogged about it, anonymous bloggers, who later turned out to be young, ambitious Tory councillors, set up accounts to slag me off. Why should the council help my mum? Why didn't I make her lunch? Why was my mother 'poncing off the council'? I was quite shocked. The reason was that my Mum had paid tax all her life. She wanted to live independently after she completed her rehabilitation and arranged the service with her care team as part of her discharge from Finchley Memorial Hospital. 

I realised that if you put your head above the parapet, you get shot. Many back down. I started a war and the Barnet Eye was born. One of my key themes was that outsourcing of key services was a threat to the quality of council services. What I found was horrific. The Barnet Conservatives had plans to outsource the whole council. Parking, Planning, HR, Revenue collection, everything. They had a policy called "future shape". What I found was that every service they had outsourced had ended up in disaster. The meals on wheels was just one instance, where the service had failed. They had ourtsourced care homes to a company called Catalyst/Freemantle. The homes had become ridden with Legionella disease. The contractors sued the council as they weren't making as much money as they hoped and won millions of pounds of compensation. Did Barnet Council learn? No. The Tories brought in Capita to run the council. Future Shape became Easycouncil, that became One Barnet. Guess what? It failed. By 2020, even the Tories were admitting this. Services were being brought in house, at huge costs as all of the capabilities had gone. 

Of all the aspects of Future Shape/One Barnet, the most destructive was the outsourcing of planning. As the council sought to shore up it's failing finances, planning became a cash cow. Barnet Council realised that mega developments offered a short term cash boost to the coffers. The planning system in the UK was already dysfunctional, but One Barnet meant that the only view that really mattered was the view of the developers with deep pockets, who could pay the fees. The Tories were not stupid. They realised that big schemes in Tory wards, such as the NIMR in Mill Hill would be unpopular. They also knew they'd bring in huge sums of cash. So they launched a very crafty ruse. They'd let officers develop plans that would be awful for locals, but roughly conform to the London plan. They picked a huge fight with the Mayor Sadiq Khan, declaring him an enemy of the people (I kid you not). Then they rejected their own plans, which were referred to the Mayor, who gleefully passed them. The Tory council got the cash and Khan got the blame. Once passed, the Council didn't bother to enforce any of the planning conditions. Locals had years of misery. Dust, parking and congestion and noise complaints were simply ignored. The po faced Tory Councillors, who had made such impassioned speeches against Khan's plans to pass the schemes, ignored the pleas of locals to enforce the rules that were supposed to ensure that locals were not impacted. This blog made videos, complained to enforcement, produced irrefutable evidence, but nothing was done. No fines were imposed. After a couple of years, the penny dropped for me. The Barnet Tories were always on board with the developers. 

In May 2022, there was a tectonic shift in Barnet politics. The Tories were booted out. Labour formed a new administration. It seemed like the Tories had finally received their comeuppance for the destruction of Barnet. They took over a council that had seen every aspect of it's business trashed.  They announced that they would get rid of Capita, for once and for all. Sadly though, there seemed to be no great hurry. They simply carried on with the plans the Tories had enacted in their dying days, to gradually unwind the relationship. What is clear is that Capita will squeeze every last penny from Barnet taxpayers. You may wonder what the real relationship is between the Labour Party and Capita? What is the Labour parties key policy in London? Unless you have been in a coma for the last two years, you will know it is ULEZ. Who runs ULEZ for Mayor Khan? It may surprise anyone familiar with Barnet to know that it is Capita. It seems that despite standing on the barricades, wearing #KickOutCapita T-Shirts, our Labour Councillors are far keener on the company than they've previously let on. I spoke to one about this a while back "Oh, this is different, Capita are experts in this field" I was told. This was exactly the argument that Tory Councillors made when they brought Capita in to run the council. 

So what have we learned about Barnet Labour in the last 15 months? I have a degree of sympathy with them. The scenario at Barnet when they arrived was nigh on apocalyptic. They'd lost expertise, the finances were a mess and they were bequeathed a stack of unpopular development schemes, such as Hendon Hub, Edgware SPD and Brent Cross. What I had hoped would happen would be that we'd see a new regime that sought to get the people of Barnet on board. Barnet is screaming out for new, good quality social housing. We need proper council housing, not lxury flats. We need better infrastructure to support it. If you've used Barnet General hopsital in the last few years, you will know that it is overloaded and overrun.

Sadly, Barnet Labour are not talking about a radical new plan to fix the housing crisis.  We are just seeing big developers running riot. There are social housing elements in the scheme. These involve different doors for the poorer tenants, can't have the premium residents mixing with the riff raff. A scandalously small number of dwellings will be for the people who need them most. They will not have gardens for families and they will be excluded from the plush gyms that come with the scheme. 

Barnet is being buried in concrete. This is the policy of Barnet Labour. The Tories may have destroyed Barnet but it is Barnet Labour that is laying it to rest. The tombstone will be 27 story tower blocks, with side entrances for the poorer residents. 

If anyone can tell me it is not so, feel free, I'll publish any guest blog that demonstrates that Barnet LAbour have a coherant pln to fix the housing crisis in Barnet. I'd stomach the towers of Edgware if this was what they are being erected for, but they are simply a money making scheme for a very large property developer. That is the truth



Thursday, 25 May 2023

Does the Pot Hole plague mean that Labour failed Barnet's taxpayers

 Last year, Labour promised to get to grips with Pot Holes in the Borough, as part of their manifesto. The Barnet Tories have picked on the fact that there seems to be more pot holes than ever after a year of Labour. They recently posted this tweet



But is this fair? Is this a new phenominum, or is it just "business as usual" in Barnet? Well back in April 2018, I posted the following tweets. I counted every pot hole on the 1/4 mile walk between my house on Millway and the polling station in Hartley Avenue. I called it Pothole bingo. How many do you reckon I counted?

Between 2002 and 2022, the Conservatives ran the council. I have lived in the Borough all of my life and before this time, pot holes were a rare occurrance. Roads were properly maintained and issues were dealt with. When the Tories got in, one of their flagship policies was to remove the road humps that Labour had installed between 1994 and 2002. A huge swathe of the roads maintenance budget was gobbled up removing road humps. It seems Ironic that their plan to increase road speeds has ended with even lower speeds as drivers weave through the dangers. My road, Millway, was resurfaced in 2011 when they took the humps out. 

According to the Precision Civils website, an asphalt surface should last 13 years. The Surface in Millway lasted around six years before it started to fall apart. As far as I can see, this means that the work was not done properly. You can see this from the 7th tweet in the series of tweets above. It has got far worse. 

Once a road surface starts to deteriorate like this, the only proper solution is to resurface the road. The hump removal programme wrecked many of the Borough's roads and is the reason we are where we are. Potholes are caused by water and ice. The water freezes and damages and cracks the surface and substrate. This allows more water to get in. Once the substrate is damaged, then the only real fix is to start again. The Barnet Tories left a skint council with wrecked roads. The problems are 100% down to them. 

However, Labour did come in with a pledge to fix the roads. I sympathise with their situation, but they now need a plan to deal with it. The simple answer is to borrow the money to do the job properly. As ongoing maintenance bills will be far lower, ultimately the council will save money. The only caveat is that Labour must not make the mistake the Conservatives made, which was to let dodgy contractors do sub standard work. Without doubt, the Conservatives will then scream that Labour are "piling up debt for future generations". This will be inaccurate as there will be a massive benefit and the long term maintenance costs will be far lower. As someone who runs a business, I am all for investment backed by debt when there is a clear financial return. 

There are many other smaller measures that could be done. Last May, when I stood for the Lib Dems in Mill Hill, we outlined a few. Sadly, we didn't get in and the new Labour council have adopted none of these ideas.


Monday, 24 October 2022

Time for the Barnet Tories to get a new leader as well!

 Back in 2011, I made a video of outsourcing expert Professor Dexter Whitfield addressing a meeting of the Barnet Alliance for Public Services. He explained how the One Barnet Outsourcing strategy was a high risk strategy and how private companies did not understand the concept of public services. John Dix (aka Mr Reasonable), in his most recent blog HIGHLIGHTED JUST HOW TRUE THIS STATEMENT WAS

Given the complete cock up that was One Barnet under the Barnet Tories, you may have thought a period of silence from the former leader of the Council Daniel Thomas would be sensible. Sadly Mr Thomas has been spouting off to the local paper, making the simply outrageous statement 

“During this cost-of-living crisis, the people of Barnet should have an administration committed to protecting their money.
Barnet Council has nearly been destroyed by the Barnet Tories. This didn't just happen overnight. They systematically did it from 2006, when Mike Freer, now MP for Finchley deposed former Tory Leader Brian Salinger shortly after Salinger won the Council elections.Freer tore up Salingers manifesto and brought in a massive lurch to the right. Unlike Liz Truss, this bonkers right wing ideology took sixteen years to push the cart over the cliff. It took the best part of eight years for the Tories actually get the One Barnet project up and rolling. It took another eight years for it to unravel. 

Myself and other local bloggers such as Mr Reasonable chronicled the whole sorry debacle. Try as he may, Councillor Daniel Thomas cannot hide from the truth. He failed his party in allowing this to continue under his term. He failed the taxpayers of Barnet. Worst of all he has completely refused to face up to the cock up he presided over.

Nationally, the Tories have elected a new leader to take them forward from the chaos of Boris and Truss. It is high time that the Barnet Tories brought out a new broom and moved away from their own version of Trussenomics and the failed leaders who inflicted it on Barnet.  The only words I want to hear from Thomas is an apology for the fiasco he presided over.

Here's a short video of Dr Whitfield predicting the mess that Thomas and his crew would inflict.

 

.

Wednesday, 27 July 2022

A few signs of the stunning lies and hypocrisy of the Barnet Tories

 I'd pretty much decided to lay off political blogging about Barnet, following Labours landslide, but I simply cannot ignore crass hypocrisy. The Barnet Tories have been pumping out complete rubbish at a huge rate of late. Maybe they are hoping for a few by-elections in the hope that Liz Truss will resurrect their election fortunes. I rather hope local voters see through this. I'm all for proper opposition, but this is nothing of the sort. It is just spouting of cobblers.

Here are a few examples. 

ULEZ

Who was it who originally planned the ULEZ extension? None other than Boris Johnson.  This is rather conveniently forgotten by the local Tories, who are simply trying a little bit of populist rabble rousing. 

Climate Change

The Barnet Tories know very well that Barnet Labour are organising a public consultation on Climate Change. They did nothing to make Barnet more Eco Friendly. I emailed councillors on numerous occasions and never got a reply on a whole host of issues. They are now grubbing around for any little thing they can find to snipe. The Tories had a massive majority until May and could have passed rules explicitly making the Council Paper Free and banning single use plastic. It is worth mentioning that on the election night, that I attended as a candidate, there were no options for water apart from plastic bottles. Clearly it's only a priority in opposition. 

FGG Tories.

Now this is a strange one indeed. The local Tory MP for Finchley and Golders Green is Mike Freer. Normally Local associations are proud of their MP. Check out their profile (preserved here for posterity). 

As for their website, it has the biggest porkie of the lot. There is a recent post that says "Let's stop Labour strikes and build a better railway". Oddly, when I read the article there is not a single mention of Labour apart from the headline. There are many things that are simply not true in the article, but one statement directly affects air quality in Barnet so I will specifically mention that. The article states

That’s why over the next 3 years, we want to spend £35 billion maintaining and growing the network. We want to expand the rail map, with trains returning to places axed from the timetable after the Beeching cuts, with new stations from Northumberland to Devon, with electrification to get rid of slow and dirty diesels.

Now I follow transport as one of my key areas of interest. The Midland Mainline runs through the Borough. Dozens of 'Dirty Diesel' trains hurtle through every day. Why? Because the Conservatives halted the project to electrify the Midland Mainline, requiring retention of 'dirty diesel trains'. Specifically " On 27 July 2017 a further briefing paper was issued and the Midland Main Line had a section of its own.[18] This document, and the subsequent announcement by the new Secretary of State for Transport Chris Grayling said the electrification scheme north of Kettering to Derby, Nottingham and Sheffield had been cancelled and that bi-mode trains would be used."

Sadly, there are no bi-mode trains, so even though the electrification was completed as far as Kettering and Corby, trains travelling beyond these destinations run on diesel all of the way. This was nothing to do with Labour or the Unions. This was the Conservatives dropping a key project to improve the UK's infrastructure and lower pollution. It would have seen the end of diesel engines running through Mill Hill to St Pancras. Much as I'd love to ignore all this and enjoy the summer, in truth I find it sickening and I sincerely hope no one is taken in. 

If you think about it logically, the Tories posted a tweet opposing ULEZ and Tweet berating the Labour Council for not being greener. They face both ways on climate change, but when the facts are examined, they don't care. If they did, we'd see electric trains running to Sheffield on the Midland Mainline as we speak.  It seems to me that Grant Shapps is on a mission to be an even worse transport secretary than Chris Grayling (who cancelled the MML upgrade). That would take some doing.

I wrote a track with my Band, the False Dots discussing the state of Britains Railways, with some recent footage of 1960's vintage diesel engines passing through Mill Hill. Says it all really!

Friday, 6 May 2022

Barnet Council Election Analysis - Why Labour won in Barnet and what happened at the count

 I spent last night at the election count for Barnet. It was fascinating night. I spoke to many of the key players as the night unfolded. On a personal level, I am friendly with many Conservative and Labour Councillors and candidates. Indeed my neice was a Labour candidate and on a personal level I was delighted she put in a very good show. 

Let me start by doing a quick round up of some of the key conversations I had with some of the candidates. Lets start with the victorious Labour leader Barry Rawlings. I generally get on pretty well with Barry. He is nice guy, always courteous. I have to confess, I've got very frustrated with him in the past as Labour had, in my opinion missed golden opportunities to take the council in 2014 and 2018 and the reasons were quite clear for anyone who bothered to look to see. This time, Barry has had the last laugh. Labour have a huge majority in seats. Far more than any Conservative leader I can recall. 

There are many reasons Labour won. Barry was honest enough to say publicly that it was as much to do with public disenchantment with Boris as anything else. Boris has replaced Jeremy Corbyn as the Barnet bogeyman, without Corbyn to scare voters and with Boris being a liability, the Tories tried to pretend Boris didn't exist. That worked as well for them as Labour pretending Corbyn didn't exist last time. I'd agree with Barry that this was the biggest reason. I'll go into the other reasons later. When the result became clear, I had a chat with Barry and congratulated him. I'd say he was genuinely shocked at the extent of Labours victory. Barry has been around the block a few times and I don't think he could quite believe it. So what would you expect a victorious Labour Leader, who has swept all before him, to say to a badly performing Lib Dem, who has been a bit of an irritant? This may shock you. Barry said he hoped that I would not give the Labour party an easy ride on my blog and would continue to hold him to account. Furthermore, he said that he'd love to have a chat with me in a couple of weeks to start to get a proper art and creative media strategy together for Barnet, as he's been appalled by the lack of one. I 100% agree and told Barry we should have a coffeee in a couple of weeks. This is something I've been campaigning about for years. The fact Barry mentioned it in a moment of victory says a hell of a lot about him. I had a suggestion for him. I said that the best thing he could do would be to co-opt Mr Reasonable onto the Audit Committee. I've no idea if John Dix would even consider it, but if he would, I am convinced that Barnet would be run far better. Barry said that it was something he'd certainly consider very seriously. He was not fobbing me off. I'm very pleased Barry has had this moment. He deserves it. He's been a councillor in a very hostile environment for a long time.

What about the Tories? Regular readers will know that I've been very complimentary of former Childs Hill Tory Peter Zinkin. I was buying a coffee and Peter was in the queue looking crestfallen. It had not been announced, but he'd just been told he'd lost in Childs Hill. I bought him a tea. It was the least I could do. Peter had made a personal effort to meet me at Hendon Cemetary last year, following my comments about the appalling state of it. Peter introduced me to the Capita official responsible for running the cemetary and as a result, many of the worst problems were sorted out. I don't agree with his politics, but he is a decent man and I was sad to see him looking so deflated. I also chatted to my Mill Hill opponents. Elliot Simberg and Val Duschinsky. I like Elliot a lot. He is a nice bloke and if I had to lose to anyone, I don't mind losing to him. He's got a good sense of humour and does the job of a councillor for all of the right reasons. He said to me "I'm gutted we lost the council". I replied "You should try being a Lib Dem", to which he roared with laughter. We've shared such banter a good few times. Val was more serious. She's clearly taken the defeat of the Tories badly. We agreed to work together on projects that are good for Mill Hill, notably step free access. I suspect that Mill Hill will not be a priority for the incoming Labour Council. I think it will be tough for the likes of Val and Elliot.

I also had a chat with former Tory Leader Richard Cornelius. Richard is another Tory I like on a personal level. He was shafted by Dan Thomas and deposed after the 2018 elections. I am very pleased that it was Dan rather than Richard who presided over the demise of the Tories. Dan has been a devisive leader and many Tory activists have downed tools since 2018. I suspect that had Richard not been shafted, they would have performed better in a few key seats. I always felt Richard had a very keen political sense of judgement, whilst Dan Thomas always struck me as arrogant and aloof. That works when you are on top, but I suspect that he is not flavour of the month with many of the defeated candidates. I had a bit of a laugh and joke with Richard. I'd not realised before, but he is a master of the art of gallows humour. 

I chatted to quite a few other candidates. I spent a lot of time chatting to my niece Pascale Fanning-Tichborne, who like me was a candidate in Mill Hill. This was her first election as a candidate and her first time at a count. For a Labour activist, it must have been a brilliant experience. She had a great night. She was quite surprised when I was chatting with her and another Labour Councillor, talking about how awful the 2010 election was. Labour were soundly stuffed and the organisation of the count was appalling, being in tents in the freezing cold. Saracens StoneX venue is luxury in comparison. 

As for my fellow Lib Dems. It was truly depressing and frustrating night. Some, especially in Finchley had high hopes. It is hard watching months of hard work crushed. Mill Hill wasn't a target, so my expectations were lower, but in Finchley seats, they genuinely believe a year of hard campaigning would pay of. I had the same experience in 2010 and it is humbling. I just hope that they do not get too depressed and demoralised. As I told Peter Zinkin, in politics, the tide comes in and the tide goes out and only a fool thinks they can stand against it. Will the tide ever come in for the Barnet Lib Dems? I believe it will, but it was very firmly out this time.

So why did Labour achieve such a spectacular result, apart from the sheer disgust at Boris? As a Lib Dem candidate, I've been constrained by what it was appropriate to say and not say. There are several key factors that no one has mentioned. The small things that swing wards and turn a slim win into a Landslide.

The first is that Labour appointed a professional campaign organiser. Previously, their campaigns were a little bit ramshackle and silly mistakes were made. Having a full time person doing the job has made a difference. Planning and organisation is key and I could see that they had their act together.

The second is that they were beneficiaries of the Lib Dems strategy and campaign problems. If I'd have been setting out the strategy, I'd have prioritised Finchley Church End, Mill Hill and the new Childs Hill ward, rather than the three Finchley Seats. The Lib Dems had held the old Childs Hill until 2014, and Jack Cohen had been a councillor until 2018. Not targetting it meant Labour picked up three seats that they were not expecting. A strong Lib Dem campaign may have won, or it may have let the Tories in. As it is, I suspect that the Childs Hill Lib Dem legacy is probably gone forever now. I also believe that the Lib Dems problems in Edgwarebury did Labour a huge favour, even though they lost the ward. Due to covid, we couldn't get a candidate to stand. This meant it was almost a straight fight between the Tories and Labour. The Tories threw the kitchen sink at Edgwarebury. I had come to the conclusion a week or two ago that the Tories would win, but they put so much effort into winning two seats, they failed to shore up other winnable seats. In Mill Hill, our campaign rattled the Tories, they divered resources into a campaign that they were always likely to win, which also damaged other seats where their support was wavering. These things are intangible and hard to quantify, but I was chatting with a former Labour election agent last week, who told me he expected Labour to pick up a few very unexpected seats as the Tories had a shambolic campaign, with a whack a mole strategy putting out fires, rather than working out what they really needed to do. 

The third was that the boundary changes forced Labour to tear up the old plan that won the 1998 election, that involved winning targets such as Hale, that was ultimately an elusive dream. The refocus meant that their strategy worked better than the Tory one, which was a rerun of the 2018 campaign, when they had the Jeremy Corbyn factor.

The fourth was that the 2018 campaign persuaded the Tories that Barnet was obsessed with bin collections. It is not. The only people who mentioned it were ultra hard Tory voters, who had memorised their leaflets. 

The fifth was that Labour was disciplined this time and stuck to it's strategy. In 2018, there were Momentum supporters doing freelance campaigning. In Mill Hill some were knocking on the doors of Jewish residents and picking arguments about Israel. This time, that simply didn't happen. 

The final reason and this is one that no one else seems to have picked up on at all, was the weather. Yesterday was a glorious day. When the sun shines, the Labour vote comes out. The Tories tend to turn up come rain or shine. Many Labour voters have to walk or get the bus, far more than the Tories. If the rain is hacking down, many simply stay in. The weather couldn't have been better for Labour.

It will be interesting to see what Labour do now. They haven't been involved in running the Council for 20 years. None of the old guard who were senior councillors then are still around. There are lots of new Labour councillors with no experience at all. They will have a real job to hit the ground running. There are many things they should do, but will they? It's my job as a blogger to try and make sure they do.

I will finish off with a few words about the Barnet Tories. This is devastating and a total humiliation. They thoroughly deserve it for a number of reasons. Here are a few reasons they deserve little sympathy

1, They shafted former leader Richard Cornelius who defied expectations to win in 2018. His reward was to get the boot.

2. They treated the public with utter contempt. The changes to the rules on public scrutiny at council meetings were appalling. I sincerely hope Labour will change this. Barry assured me that this was a priority yesterday.

3.  They have mismanaged the Capita contract and hidden the mess from public scrutiny, costing tens of millions of pounds.

4. They disposed of the old convention of making an opposition councillor chair of Audit, to ensure fair play, so one of their own could get a fat allowance. Although this will be a hard sell, I'd urge Barry to bring this back. I'm not sure any Tories deserve a fat allowance, but it will show that they are decent and serious about scrutiny.

5. In his speech on losing, Tory leader Dan Thomas completely failed to take any responsibility for their defeat. It was all someone else's fault. I suspect that the Tories would have lost anyway this time, but a canny leader like Cornelius would have made sure they didn't fall apart and let Labour have such a huge majority.

This morning Thomas will be waking up to the fact that many of his senior colleagues who survived will be losing their juicy allowances as commitee chair's. The local MP's will know that their campaign base has been decimated and is disgruntled. The local MP's were pretty invisible during the campaign. It seemed MP's from far and wide turned up, but where were Offord, Freer and Villiers? I am sure that those defeated councillors and those that have lost their allowances will remember this when, at some point in the next couple of years, they are asked to campaign in the next general election.

Many things will happen between now and then, but just as the loss of the Council in 1994 cost the Tories two MP's in Barnet, I suspect that they will pay the price big time. Offord, Villiers and Freer are not loved locally. They will now have to pay the price for not putting a shift in for the people who got them elected, the local Tory campaigners. Barnet just got very interesting.

As for me? When I started this blog, it was because I thought the people in charge of local Tories were beyond the pale. The likes of Brian Coleman, Mike Freer and Matthew Offord were the embodyment of what I consider the worst of Conservative Politicians. The only surprise for me about them losing the council is that they got away with it for so long. It will be very interesting to see what happens next. The biggest problem for the Barnet Tories is that there are so few of them left and they are nearly all the old guard in ultra safe seats, so there will be little opportunity to actually do anything differently. 

Wednesday, 4 May 2022

If the Barnet Tories can't get this right, why would anyone cast a vote for them

 Yesterday we had a leaflet, the first, through the door from the local Conservatives. If elections were not a serious matter, it would be hilarious. It seems that despite having untold cash for paid delivery services etc, they can'teven get the simple basics right. They haven't even mastered the art of basic ''cut and paste" document writing. I don't know if any of the candidates bothered to check the document, but they completely forgot to add the words 'Mill Hill' in the box which says "ACTION FOR AREA/COUNCIL NAME". As I was walking home from work, a neighbour collared me and showed me. They thought it was hilarious. 

They then asked for my reaction to their claim. This was where it got rally amusing.

Each of the candidates made a serious of highly dubious claims. Lets start with the redoubtable Val Duschinsky, the only Mill Hill Councillor to stand again (John Hart was put out to pasture as he's in his nineties and I've no idea why they shafted Golnar Bokai, who at least used to pay for the Xmas tree in the Town Square).

Lets start with her claim that she lives in Mill Hill ward. She doesn't, she lives in Hale Ward. She claims she's deliverd step free access to Mill Hill Broadway. She hasn't. It is due to be installed in 2024. but I have been told this may not happen due to lack of funds. You simply cannot claim you've done something that may never be delivered. It is like the cheese shop Matthew Offord MP promised Mill Hill in 2010. One day it may turn up, but it will be no thanks to him. 

Val claims she is working with local groups to deliver a new community centre and library for Daws Lane. She's been working on this since she was first elected eight years ago and sadly it has hardly progressed at all. I've been involved in the groups she's worked with and know just how hard it is to get her local conservative association to do anything. 

Then we have Elliot Simberg. Elliot is a nice guy, he is the only Mill Hill Tory that lives in the ward and I'm not going to say nasty things. I like the sound of the pollution barrier he's pushing for and if the Lib Dems get elected in Mill Hill, this is something we will push strongly for. There is nothing wrong with nicking your opponents best ideas. I've actually discussed it with Elliot and we've agreed we will support each others efforts whatever the outcome. As to him pushing the Mayor of London to improve Mill Hill Circus. I was surprised by this. Most locals would prefer the Mayor to sort out Apex Corner roundabout, which is a nightmare and should be a priority. This would be far more popular in Mill Hill.

We move on to Laithe Jajeh. I am quite appalled by what he's saying. Laithe and Elliot are both Hale Councillors. Elliot has worked on the pollution barrier as this is on the Hale/Mill Hill border. For Laithe to claim he's sorted out Burtonhole Lane is totally bizarre. This is not in his ward. Why haven't the existing Mill Hill Councillors been doing this? Has Laithe been working in another ward in a cynical attempt to curry favour to secure what he thought was a safe seat? Why has he neglected the voters who elected him in 2018. These improvements will come as news to locals. I've been in constant contact with the Council over issues on Burtonhole Lane, attempting to get the council to enforce the law on parked vehicles on the pavement etc. Here are just some of the pictures I've shared with the council. I've had no support from any councillor, despite having copied the Mill Hill Councillors in on numerous occasions. I've sent over 100 emails on matters around the lack of enforcement at the NIMR site. For a Councillor from Hale to claim he's sorted things out is quite disingenious



I think any reasonable person will take his other claims with a pinch of salt. 

As to some of their other claims. I was intrigued by their claim they would 'prevent speeding on Millway'. This is my road. I suspect that their method is by constant roadworks, pot holes and utilities works. Millway used to have road humps that were installed by the Lib Dems when we ran the ward. The Barnet Tories ripped them out. That is why there  is a problem with speeding. 

The Tories also claim they are against 'inappropriate developments". They have controlled the Council since 2002. You only have to walk around Mill Hill to see how successful they've been. They claim they've opposed all green belt development. This is simply untrue, having supported Saracens redevelopment and Hasmonean School. They claim 'these are special exceptions', but you cannot claim you oppose all developments then support the ones you like. 

As to their claims about securing funding for Mill Hill. Mill Hill is one of the largest, most populous wards in the Borough. By default it should receive a larger amount of funding than other wards. There have also been some long term projects etc that have come to fruition. It has more roads etc than smaller wards, so will see more money spent on them. The concept that this is because the local councillors have done a good job is absurd. In actual fact, one reason they have spent so much money on roads is because they are so bad at managing them. The Lib Dems three point plan explaions how you could spend less and get more. If I am elected, I will not boast about how much I've spent on roads. I will boast about how much I've saved on repairs and how much more I've delivered. Watch our short film that explains our plan (and if I don't get in, I give Elliot Simberg full permission to nick the plan, just as I'll nick his pollution barrier!).

If you want to know how competent and trustworthy the Tories are you can do two things. You can look at their Leader, Boris Johnson or you can read their leaflet. 









Tuesday, 26 April 2022

The Daily Mail is supporting Tory misogynists rather than common decency

Misogyny is rife right across the Tory party and has been for years. The latest outbreak is truly disgusting. The fact that 'unnamed MP's' have briefed in such a revolting way about Labours MP Angela Rayner is something that in this day and age is totally unacceptable. What makes me sick is the fact that there is a massive story here. It is nothing to do with Angela Rayner. It is the fact that Tory MP's are prepared to come out with such vile crap to national papers and that they are prepared to print it. 

If the Daily Mail had any principles at all, they would have named and shamed the MP's who tried to plant the story. It is clearly in the public interest. I would not want to vote for such vile individuals and I doubt that too many Tories would. If the Mail had a shred of decency, they could nip this in the bud by putting the MP's on the front page. Then we'd get a grovelling apology and voters would be given the opportunity at the next election to cast their verdict. By witholding the names, the Mail is simply serving a bunch of sexist, male chauvanist pigs. 

Then there is the Tory Party. It is beyond belief that the whips don't know who did it. Anyone who knows the workings of Westminster, knows that any Tory MP thick enough to say such a thing would not do so without the nod from the whips. There are only really two possible explanations. One is the whips knew and are now trying to shut it down. The other is that they've lost their grip on both the Tory party and their common sense. If I was them, I'd be making it my business to know. Of course they will try and cover it up, but no sane person should think they don't know. If Boris was good to his word, he'd call them in, find the culprits and make them apologise. Of course he won't.

Earlier today, I wrote a blog concerning former Conservative West Hendon Councillor, who recently joined the Lib Dems. It is pretty clear to anyone that she wasn't 'one of the boys' and fell victim to the well known misogyny in the Barnet Tories, that saw other former female councillors humiliated by their male colleagues, Kate Salinger springing to mind as a prime example. Make no mistake, the party is riddled with this from top to bottom. What Angela Rayner has had to put up with happens at every level of the Tory Party. Over recent months, we've had the vile spectacle of Tory Bigwig Brian Coleman attacking Labour GLA rep Anne Clarke. I was so revolted that I made the unusual step of supporting a political opponent on Twitter.

We need some decency in politics and if women can't stand without these revolting attacks, then our councils and parliament will find itself shorn of 50% of the most talented people in the land. The conecpt that this goes with the gig is plain wrong. Stopping this is one reason why I am standing and one reason why I am proud to share a platform with the Donna Pickup who is an excellent candidate and I am sure will do an amazing job for the people of Mill Hill. It will also send a message to these dinosaurs. The council elections in May is an ideal opportunity to send both the local and national Conservatives a strong message that this won't do. And as for the Daily Mail. Don't touch it with a bargepole.

Tuesday, 19 April 2022

Mill Hill Council Election - At least the Mill Hill Conservatives have a sense of humour

Click on image  for a more readable version
 You have to have a sense of humour in local politics. It seems that the Mill Hill Conservatives have a fine one.  As I was canvassing earlier, I was given a copy of the Mill Hill Tories latest leaflet. The resident was quite irate. Their exact words were "They've been running the council for years and now they are trying to get elected with a promise to sort out the mess they've spent the last couple of decades creating". As you can see, they list all the problems they've made and said "What can we help you with?". There's a handy QR code to tell themon the leaflet as well. It is a novel approach. Bugger everything up, then campaign on a platform of listening to their complaints.

So lets see what they've featured. 

Planning issues. The Barnet Tories have outsourced planning to Capita and now it is a 'profit centre' generating huge amounts of cash from big developers. 

Fly Tipping. Before the Tories got in, we had regular street skips. These were left for residents to despose of items in. In what was one of the worst cases of false economies, they abolished the skips. Now dodgy waste disposal companies get paid to take household waste and then fly tip it in our local beauty spots, which the council has to remove anyway, at far greater expenses.

Housing Problems. This is a shameful claim. I know of many people who have had problems with housing. Sadly, this Conservative Council simply isn't interested.

Potholes. This has been an ongoing problem in Barnet. The sad truth is that our roads are simply not maintained properly. There are many false economies in the way repairs are conducted. Often roads have been resurfaced only for utility companies to dig them up a few weeks later and not restore them properly. No one seems to check such work and no effort is put into co-ordinating utility works and getting the utility companies to fix problems they have caused with the road surface. These lead to many of the potholes. 

Parking problems. The council make a healthy profit on parking tickets. They outsourced this to a private company, who are very zealous in enforcement. Has this resolved the issues with parking? No. The council are also making a healthy problem on parking charges. The cost of these have risen considerably in recent years and they have introduced charges at many car parks that were previously free.

Cracked Pavements. This is quite interesting. Many of the pavements have been ripped up and replaced by asphalt. Many of those that have not are in terrible shape. How have they got like this? The Conservative Council has not looked after them properly. But never mind, if you have a problem you can tell them.

Refuse Issues. Remember three years ago when the Tories mucked up bin collections with new rounds that didn't work? Remember your bins not being collected because they'd completely screwed up? Well never mind. After a few months they sorted it out. It seems the Tories think no one has a memory in Barnet.

Council Tax Issues. Got a problem with Council Tax? Need to speak to someone at the Council? Well, you need to ring up and speak to someone,  but sadly the Barnet Tories outsourced all such functions to Capita so good luck with that. There is an SLA between Capita and the Council for calls answered. This has never been met. But the Mill Hill Tories will be very sympathetic if you tell them about your problems.

(please note, I'd recommend you don't click the QR code on the image. If you do I take no responsibility).

Tuesday, 22 March 2022

Council Environment Strategy Q: When do the Barnet Tories listen to The Barnet Eye? A: When there is a Council election around the corner!

 This morning is one where I have to say something positive about Barnet Council. They have announced an initiative to improve energy efficiency in the Council. I would hope that every resident in Barnet will applaud this. It helps on one of the main things that this blog has been campaigning about for well over a decade. In December 2018, we launched our environment Monday series of blogs. I felt that it warranted a dedicated feature. I'd been talking about the issue since the blog started, but felt it would be better to cover it in a specific feature on a specific day of the week. The first blog in the series detailed our aims. On energy efficiency I stated.

Energy management. Back in 2010, I proposed that all libraries and public buildings in Barnet be fitted with solar panels. I made the case that this would have paid for itself in five years and then made a huge profit. Had they done this then, the council would have been £2 million better off and used an untold amount less CO2. Sadly the generous tariffs that applied then have long gone, but there is no reason why the Council should not still invest. The payback would be 8-9 years, but as the recent Saracens deal has shown, money can be borrowed from the public works board at low rates. If this was done over 20 years, the council would see  profit next year on its budget. It is a win-win and one that there is no sane reason not to persue. Every school, library and other public building should do this. When you consider that schools use energy during the day when the sun shines, they would end up paying almost nothing in energy costs for most of the year.

I find the timing interesting. There is an election in six weeks time. The Barnet Tories who run the council know that I've been campaigning on this subject. So what does their rather conveniently times press release say? 

Barnet Council has completed the first phase of its plan to increase the energy efficiency of a number of council-owned buildings. The £1.38million upgrade is part of the council’s wider commitment to becoming ‘carbon net zero’ by 2030 as an organisation.

Phase one of the project has delivered a variety of energy-efficiency measures across Barnet Council buildings, including heat pumps, solar panels, battery storage and building management systems, installed in council offices, libraries, children’s centres and two primary schools.

The Public Sector Decarbonisation Scheme (PSDS) works have been funded by the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, and administered through Salix Finance. The Scheme offers grant funding for capital energy saving projects such as making public buildings more energy efficient and installing low carbon heating measures.

The next phase, which starts this year and is expected to be completed by March 2023, will see the council investing a further £4.9million to retrofit up to 19 of Barnet’s schools to make them more energy efficient.

Leader of the Council, Cllr Dan Thomas, said:

“We are delighted to have secured this funding, and with the progress being made towards building a greener, more sustainable council and borough. The installation of energy efficient measures throughout our building stock means a significant reduction in the reliance on gas, reducing our dependence on fossil fuel.

“More energy efficient buildings will also benefit our communities by reducing carbon emissions. This is a huge step in reducing our carbon footprint, becoming a net zero organisation by 2030 and a more sustainable Barnet that is fit for the future.”

In December 2021, councillors approved Barnet Council’s targets to be carbon net zero as an organisation by 2030, and for Barnet as a place to be net zero as soon as possible after that and by 2050 at the latest.

The council’s forthcoming Sustainability Strategy will set out the actions Barnet Council will continue to take to create a green, clean, and safe place to live now and for generations to come.

Focus groups with residents, businesses, and community and interest groups are underway already, and there will be an opportunity for everyone to help shape the council’s Sustainability Strategy via a full public consultation later in the year.

Find out more about the council’s sustainability initiatives and support available to residents at: www.barnet.gov.uk/sustainability

So yes, The Barnet Eye congratulates the Council for doing this. It is just a shame that they didn't do it over a decade ago, when we first proposed it. If they had, we'd have had a massive payback by now and we'd all be paying less council tax. The question for every resident when they vote is whether they want to vote for a party that is a decade late to the party or whether they want to consider voting for candidates who have been saying this all along, and who would have saved you money if anyone in charge has listened. It is 100% clear to me that this announcement has been rushed out before the election. How do I know? Because there are no details of the cost savings this will deliver and the timescale. Presumably the costs are covered by a long term loan at low interest from the Public works board and we will see a payback immediately. The fact that they can't quantify any projected savings in this press release show that it is rushed out and they have reacted to what people who spoke to us have said on the doorstep.