Everyone hates a cheapskate! But how can you spot them? Here are a few tell tale signs.
1. When vistors come, they put low quality toilet paper in the loo!
2. When they are at the pub, they have the premium lager when it's everyone elses round and the cooking lager when its their turn to pay.
3. When they phone your mobile, they let it ring once, then ring off, knowing you will call them straight back.
4. If you go out for a meal, if they have the most expensive items and you have cheap ones, they suggest splitting the bill, but if they have the cheapo stuff, they want a separate bill.
5. If their kids attend your kids party, they conveniently "forget" the present, in the knoweldge that by the time the party is over, you'll have forgotten all about it.
6. If they are parking in a car park which does all day tickets, they will circle around, waiting for someone to leave, so they can park next to them and get their ticket.
7. If they have a dinner party and you bring a top dollar bottle of wine, they put it in the cupboard for later, then dish out the awful cheap plonk they have been waiting to get rid of for years.
8. If you smoke and you see them in the pub, they've always "just run out of fags" and they are waiting until tomorrow when their mate comes with the cheap duty free ones.
9. If you take their kids for a day out, they don't give them any spending cash, knowing you'll feel sorry for the poor mites and stump up, so they don't miss out.
10. If you have to go on a long journey, they will pick up the metro, then as soon as they've read it after 10 minutes, ask for the bits of your decent newspaper, that you are not reading
We all hate a cheapskate, don't we? But if we hate this sort of behaviour in individuals, why should we tolerate it when our council indulges in Cheapskate behaviour with the disabled, the elderly and the vulnerable.
In Barnet, under the current Tory regime sadly we have a cheapskate local authority. Here are a few examples of their cheapskate policies, which sadly cause much grief.
1. Using "ALMO" organisations to cut wages for staff, so councillors don't get the blame, resulting in plummetting care standards for the disabled and the vulnerable.
2. Cutting transport for the disabled to care centres, so they can't attend and then they can claim day centres are underused and shut them.
3. Increasing the cost of teas and coffees etc at facilities for disabled way beyond the rate of inflation or the cost of the ingredients.
4. Outsourcing meals on wheels services to lowest bidder contractors, who have scant regard for taste and nutritional value of the food supplied to our elderly citizens, and are solely interested in maximising profits.
5. Replacing experienced staff who know client needs with low paid replacements, short term agency staff and totally unsuitable contractors, some of whom lack basic security checks and accreditation.
We can all laugh about the sad individuals who indulge in cheapskatery after the event, sadly when it is peoples care, it just aint funny is it?
Music, football, Dyslexia, Cancer and all things London Borough of Barnet. Please note we have a two comments per person per blog rule.
Showing posts with label Your Choice Barnet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Your Choice Barnet. Show all posts
Monday, 16 March 2015
10 ways to spot a cheapskate!
Click on Labels for related posts:
Barnet Council,
cheapskates,
Your Choice Barnet
Monday, 3 February 2014
A brick and a kick in the nuts for the people who care for the disabled in Barnet
'A martial arts instructor once told me "you can know all the disciplines, all
the forms but a half-brick at ten paces followed by a kick in the nuts tends to
win most times" ' - This comment was left on my studio business facebook page yesterday.
I was reminded of an email I was sent about the current situation at Your Choice Barnet. To quote the email
----------------------
I was reminded of an email I was sent about the current situation at Your Choice Barnet. To quote the email
----------------------
Your Choice Barnet (YCB) Propose a10% Wage Cut For All! In a meeting today this is
what the unions were told was the leading suggestion for YCB to remain
financially viable. Unions were told that the
restructuring and docking of enhancements for YCB staff had already provided YCB
with approx£1million savings last year. Some staff have seen their
pay reduce by around 20% already.
However, in spite of being
told last year that a cut to the costs of YCB
of £1million was needed and has been achieved, unions are now to
understand that YCB must cut its costs by another£400K and this
can be done by everyone taking a 10% wage cut.
----------------------
So the first question I asked was whether the salary cuts applied to senior management. I was rather shocked to find that the answer is apparently "No it doesn't". No unllike some, I don't subscribe to a viewpoint where staff terms and conditions can never be cut, regardless of the economic situation. Sometimes a cut is the only way to keep a company afloat. I've run a business for coming up to 35 years. Sometimes I've taken nothing out of the business for months on end, when the circumstances warrant it. I've done second jobs and sometimes even third jobs. I've always tried to keep the effects of my decisions for the business (I am the boss, so I take responsibility) away from the staff. When pay has had to be affected, they know that I am suffering too. We are all in it together and so we work to see out the bad times.
It seems that in Your Choice Barnet, the senior management take a different view. They have protected their terms and conditions. Who has taken the blame for the massive shortfall in funds? I can't find anything anywhere which says who made the cock up when the YCB business case was put together. All I know is that the people taking the brunt of the financial hardship are not the ones facing a cut.
These wage cuts are being enacted to fund a policy in Barnet where Council taxes are being cut by 1p. The leader of the Council stated on national TV that the cut is purely symbolic and he accepts the savings will not materially affect anyones standard of living. That is apart from the care workers helping the disabled of Barnet to try and achieve a decent quality of life and the people they look after, who will find that it is impossible to find decent people to provide the care they deserve on such poor wages. A parent of one of the people reliant on YCB Barnet for care emailed me with the following comment about the situation
"I do not for one second believe the people of Barnet would accept is is
either justifiable or acceptable to agree to a 1 p per week tax cut, that will
lead to perhaps a wage cut of up to £30 per week for people at the coalface of caring for the disabled, already low paid workers
who protect and care for the most vulnerable folks in our community. Which will
undermine their sense of worth and commitment to their task, and in turn the
quality of life of those they care for."
The quote at the start of this blog reminded me of what seems to be the election tactics of the Barnet Conservatives. They are not interested in learning the arguments, they know that the equivalent of a brick and a kick in the nuts is far more effective when dealing with your opponents at elections. That is exactly what this tax cut will feel like to the disabled of Barnet and those that care for them. When we talk about cuts in social care, there are always losers. The losers are always the most vulnerable, those with no voice and no one to speak up for them. That is why they are always the first to get mugged when the tap runs dry.
Click on Labels for related posts:
Barnet Council,
Your Choice Barnet
Thursday, 9 January 2014
Your cup of coffee or a day centre place for a disabled person - Your Choice?
There has been a lot of talk about Your Choice Barnet. This is the private company set up by Barnet Council to manage care for disabled adults in Barnet, by Barnet Council. This organisation is implementing savage cuts to services such as day centres for disabled people. Senior managers are on arge salaries, and the orgasation needed a £1 million taxpayer bale out as its business case was flawed last year.
The name Your Choice is a myth. No one has a choice. No one was asked whether they wanted Your Choice, no one has been given a choice when services have been cut. The frontline workers (those who don't sit in the comfy head office) have been informed they have to take a pay cut, they weren't given a choice.
As a result local disabled people have seen a massive deterioration in their quality of life. Maybe you begrudge disabled people a little bit of social life and a little bit of enjoyment, courtesy of your taxes, but if you do, I believe you are in the minority. I happen to think that most people, given the "choice", would happily pay a couple of pounds extra a week to preserve front line services for people who need them to have any quality of life. What does a couple of pounds buy? Not even a coffee at Starbucks. Does it change your life. If you have one every day of the week, would you begrudge those in need in Barnet the one you would have had on Wednesday afternoon to protect services?
In May you have the choice to vote in the Council elections. The choice, "Your Choice", is simple. You can either vote for that couple of pounds to buy you a coffee on a Wednesday afternoon by voting Conservative or you can vote for that couple of pounds to pay towards a disabled person having some quality of life and vote for another party.
Shortly after the last Council election, the then Leader of the Barnet Conservatives announced that "we are all in this together". The next thing they did was announce plans for a 50% increase in alloawances for senior members of the Conservative administration. That was the first major policy decision they made. Allowances for Councillors (there are 63 in Barnet and most do absolutely nothing) costs over £1 million a year. They all get free phones and computers, yet some of them have regularly deleted emails I have sent them, marked as urgent, without even reading them.
I have to say with a heavy heart, I don't believe Labour will do a significantly better job than the Tories if they get in. They have done a poor job of being an opposition, but at least they will not be completely self centred in the way this greedy administration have shown themselves to be. If I was a Tory, I would abstain at this election, simply because the local Party needs a good kick up the backside for its total mismanagement of the Boroughs finances, as exposed by the Barnet Eye last week (revealing the Barnet Council risk register). If we don't punish politicians when they fail, they never learn. I left the Labour Party in 2009 because I thought they'd lost their way under Gordon Brown. I am not sure they have improved at all, but in the Council elections, if nothing else, they offer a change from a failed administration.
Democracy only works if we all get engaged and we all think about the decisions we make. Not a single Tory has offered me a shred of evidence that this administration has a grip on the issues. It is time for someone else to have a go.
The name Your Choice is a myth. No one has a choice. No one was asked whether they wanted Your Choice, no one has been given a choice when services have been cut. The frontline workers (those who don't sit in the comfy head office) have been informed they have to take a pay cut, they weren't given a choice.
As a result local disabled people have seen a massive deterioration in their quality of life. Maybe you begrudge disabled people a little bit of social life and a little bit of enjoyment, courtesy of your taxes, but if you do, I believe you are in the minority. I happen to think that most people, given the "choice", would happily pay a couple of pounds extra a week to preserve front line services for people who need them to have any quality of life. What does a couple of pounds buy? Not even a coffee at Starbucks. Does it change your life. If you have one every day of the week, would you begrudge those in need in Barnet the one you would have had on Wednesday afternoon to protect services?
In May you have the choice to vote in the Council elections. The choice, "Your Choice", is simple. You can either vote for that couple of pounds to buy you a coffee on a Wednesday afternoon by voting Conservative or you can vote for that couple of pounds to pay towards a disabled person having some quality of life and vote for another party.
Shortly after the last Council election, the then Leader of the Barnet Conservatives announced that "we are all in this together". The next thing they did was announce plans for a 50% increase in alloawances for senior members of the Conservative administration. That was the first major policy decision they made. Allowances for Councillors (there are 63 in Barnet and most do absolutely nothing) costs over £1 million a year. They all get free phones and computers, yet some of them have regularly deleted emails I have sent them, marked as urgent, without even reading them.
I have to say with a heavy heart, I don't believe Labour will do a significantly better job than the Tories if they get in. They have done a poor job of being an opposition, but at least they will not be completely self centred in the way this greedy administration have shown themselves to be. If I was a Tory, I would abstain at this election, simply because the local Party needs a good kick up the backside for its total mismanagement of the Boroughs finances, as exposed by the Barnet Eye last week (revealing the Barnet Council risk register). If we don't punish politicians when they fail, they never learn. I left the Labour Party in 2009 because I thought they'd lost their way under Gordon Brown. I am not sure they have improved at all, but in the Council elections, if nothing else, they offer a change from a failed administration.
Democracy only works if we all get engaged and we all think about the decisions we make. Not a single Tory has offered me a shred of evidence that this administration has a grip on the issues. It is time for someone else to have a go.
Click on Labels for related posts:
Barnet Council,
Your Choice Barnet
Sunday, 22 December 2013
Has this Barnet Troll got a conscience?
Since I started writing this blog in 2008, I've come across all manner of people. There are some people I have the highest admiration for. Some people humble me with their commitment and passion to do the right thing in the face of adversity. Sadly I have also come across some despicable people, people who sometimes undermine my strong faith in human nature.
I try my very hardest never to hold feelings of bitterness, hatred and resentment towards my fellow man, because these are negative and will always do you far more damage than the person who you feel these feelings towards. There are times when I am nearly pushed to the absolute edge. As we approach the Christmas season, it is vital we put these feelings aside and concentrate on what is good in the world. It is a time when we should fight for justice. Whatever your beliefs and whatever your religion, the sad truth about the Christmas story (whether you believe it or think it is a fantasy) is that the baby we remember did not have a happy ending. His life was taken by a brutal state as a result of lies, injustice and jealousy. Whatever else you may or may not believe, there are millions of innocent babies born in our history, who have died as the result of lies, jealousy and injustice for holding views that people have sought to suppress. Ultimately the way to a better world is through all of us learning mutual respect and learning to consider other peoples thoughts and feelings and circumstances before we act.
So what has that got to do with a particularly nasty cyber bully in Barnet? Well the papers are full of stories of teenagers driven over the edge by cyberbullies. Sadly many teenagers are unaware of the impact of their actions. They lack the life experience to understand the consequences of saying nasty things and making things up on the internet.
As I mentioned above, I have met some people through my blog that I am in awe of. One such person is John Sullivan. John is a septugenarian in very poor health. Him and his wife have a daughter called Susan, who is 50 and has downs syndrome. I also have a cousin called Theresa who has downs syndrome, so I am only too aware of the challenges faced by the families of people in Johns situation. I try and take my cousin on holiday every year and as a result, I see the challenges John faces every day at first hand. Susan and Theresa were friends and used to attend a centre in Mill Hill for many years. Theresa moved to Barnet and so now goes elsewhere.
John has fought passionately for the rights of disabled people in Barnet. He organised the Your Choice Barnet week. He arranged for many of his friends, fellow carers, disabled people and other campaigners to write blogs highlighting the challenges faced by the Barnet disabled community. When I speak about such issues, I can only scratch the surface and speculate. The people who wrote these blogs are at the coal face of social care. A little appreciated fact is that these family carers save the Barnet taxpayer a fortune. If they were heartless and simply handed the people they care for to the Council to look after, the council would have a legal responsibility to assume the role of carer and the social budget would have to increase massively. This could only be paid for by a hike in taxes. So when John Sullivan and his fellow campaigners call for better transport and better facilities for the disabled, he is not asking out of a selfish desire to fleece the taxpayer. He is asking so that him and his fellow carers can cope. When Susan is at a daycentre, John and his wife can do the things that you or I can take for granted. When Susan is happy, she is joy to be with and her care is easy. When she is upset, she is a different proposition. That is why it is vital that people like John are supported.
John is not a saint. Over the years, I've got to know him. He's a working class boy from Burnt Oak who has done well for himself. When he was a lad, he went to Watling Boys club. His regular watering hole was the Bald Faced Stag in Burnt Oak, a pub well known for its raucous atmosphere. His family are steeped in army traditions and recently John was telling me of the experiences of his nephews in the various theaters of war that the army has found itself in. John has a very close and protective family network and is lucky that like many such families, he has plenty of support. I don't see eye to eye with John on many issues. John calls a spade a spade and if he disagrees, he says "You are talking b*ll*cks". Unlike me, he can't afford to take a theoritical view of the situation in Barnet. As he has pointed out on numerous occasions "while you lot are holding meetings and waffling, there are people out there at their wits end". When he sent me one guest blog for submission, I suggested that describing one particular councillor as "sick and evil" was a tad strong. John replied "can you suggest another way of describing behaviour that causes vulnerable and disabled people distress". John doesn't beat about the bush. He calls things how he sees them and expects other people to be equally straightforward. When I discussed what he had to say in his blogs, he said "look, what you've got to realise is that everything I say is the truth and I can back it up. If you simply tell the truth, then you have nothing to fear". Mr Sullivan is not a left wing subversive. He speaks with enormous pride of his hephews service in the armed forces and the their efforts on our behalf in the various combat areas. He is looking forward to seeing them over Christmas, to catch up on their latest news and the latest stories. That is the sort of man John Sullivan is. That is why I respect him.
Your Choice Barnet week came about because John felt that the disabled were a forgotten underclass in Barnet. When Barnet Council sought to fleece motorists, by hiking prices of CPZ permits, the law came down on the side of the motorists and the hike were reversed. When the Council hiked parking prices in the High Streets, Helen Michael led a rebellion and the council backed down. The Tories in the Town hall realised that the traders were there core voters, so the Councillors may lose their jobs. Parking prices were slashed and the meters have returned. Sadly for the disabled, it is a different matter. At the task and finish group, Councillor Brian Salinger, a former Tory leader of Barnet Council stated that he had no problem with "making a profit out of services for the disabled". So motorists and businesses are protected, but the disabled are up to be fleeced. When Brian Salinger was Leader of the Council, his right hand man and enforcer was ex Councillor Daniel Hope. Hope represented Brunswick Park ward. Sadly for Mr Salinger, Mr Hope was not very good at this role. His local ward tired of Hope and replaced him with the lovely Lisa Rutter, Hope was banished to an unwinnable ward for the 2006 election. The role of the chief whip is to maintain order, but sadly for Brian Salinger, Hope had missed the fact that his colleagues were plotting and the day after the 2006 election, Salinger was sacked by the Tories as leader and replaced by Mike Freer, now MP for Finchley.
Since then, Hope has set up a succession of blogs and twitter accounts. The latest of these is the http://www.barnetconservatives.com/ website and the https://twitter.com/BarnetGrassCons website. Interestingly, the majority of the 18 followers of Mr Hope on this twitter account are actually local bloggers, and other people on the left. Mr Hope has had a steady stream of juicy tip offs from his former allies in the Tory ranks in Barnet, which have often been unhelpful to the Freer regime. Mr Hope has been a useful way for the anti Freer faction of the Conservatives to get their views across, without getting their hands dirty.
In his recent blogs, John Sullivan and his fellow carers have been less than complimentary about Mr Salinger and his comments. They feel badly let down by the local politicians, over the cuts to services being enacted by Your Choice Barnet. As many people will realise, there is a council election next year, and the last thing that councillors want is bad press, especially from a group such as the disabled which attracts widespread sympathy. One of the tactics that is tried and trusted for unscrupulous people to dismiss genuine concerns, is to pretend that criticisms are not genuine and are simply part of some other campaign, orchestrated by people merely seeking political gains. Of course anyone who actually bothered to read the guest blogs would realise that Mr Sullivan and his fellow bloggers were simply seeking a better life for their loved ones.
On Friday, Mr Hope used his BarnetGrassCons twitter account to mount such an attack on John Sullivan and his campaign for disabled rights in Barnet (the comment at the bottom was first). As you can see this clearly implies that this blog was "bought" and written by "cranks" . The second tweet implies(completely without any evidence) that the campaign was orchestrated by the Barnet Alliance. The third tweet calls the Barnet Alliance Cranks. Clearly when Hope posted the first tweet, he was referring to Your Choice Barnet Week and the posts of Mr Sullivan and the other YCB week bloggers.
When John Sullivan saw these comments hewas livid. John Sullivan contacted Hope. Hope admitted that he hadn't bothered to read the Your Choice Barnet week blogs. Here is this admission in an email to Mr Sullivan
So Mr Hope launched an attack on John Sullivan and his fellow campaigners, having not even read their blogs. To me this a staggering admission. These comments were posted on Friday, the day John posted his second YCB week. It had John Sullivans name and picture on the title (Your Choice Barnet Week - Thank you for listening ...).
.
Mr Sullivan sought a meeting with Daniel Hope to explain to him why he was mistaken (a not unreasonable request). Mr Sullivan had hoped that Mr Hope might realise he'd made a mistake and correct his misleading tweets. For the absence of doubt, the Barnet Alliance for Public Services were not in any way associated with the Your Choice Barnet week. John Sullivan is not a member and he is not on their executive. In actual fact, as Mr Hope knows well, Mr Sullivan is not at all well. He is in his seventees and is undergoing treatment for a serious illness. He was so unwell that he could not address a recent council meeting and asked a friend to read a prepared speech, by agreement with the committee chair. This was featured in his first blog
So how did Mr Hope respond to Mr Sullivans request to meet him? Sadly rather than realise he'd made a mistake and apologise, he responded by claiming Mr Sullivan was threatening him and he was worried for his own safety. He suggested that unless Mr Sullivan stopped harrassing him, he would contact the authorities. To me, the concept that Mr Hope would be scared of a man who is in his seventies and so ill that he can't speak at a council meeting is ridiculous. It was clear to me that the intention of Mr Hope's email was to intimidate Mr Sullivan. One has to ask, what sort of a man threatens a man in his seventies, with a life threatening illness, five days before Christmas.
Let us remind ourselves that John Sullivan has a wife and a disabled daughter. He should be spending his time preparing for the festive season and keeping Susan happy. Whilst John is committed to the fight for disabled rights, his wife is highly concerned about the effect that Mr Hope's campaign may be having on John. The last thing he needs is stress. Mr Sullivan contacted me yesterday, forwarding the emails he'd exchanged with Mr Hope. I emailed Mr Hope and suggested that given Mr Sullivans age and ill health, maybe he should reconsider his spiteful campaign, especially as he'd clearly got his facts wrong.
Sadly, like all bullies, Mr Hope didn't think "hang on, maybe I've overstepped the mark". Nope, he unashamedly posted another tweet denigrating and taunting an elderly, unwell man.
I wonder whether Mr Hope has any conscience at all. Just to recap, he posted a series of tweets calling guest bloggers campaigning on behalf of their loved ones cranks. He accused Mr Sullivan of being on the executive of an organisation he doesn't belong to. He claimed I'd taken money to publish guest blogs. To compound all of this he admitted that he hadn't read the blogs which he was attacking in his comments.
Now I am quite used to being abused by Mr Hope in his various guises on Twitter. I really don't mind and try and give as good as I get (which has resulted in Mr Hope throwing his toys out of the pram on more than one occasion). It is however a completely different matter when he starts trying to bully a sick man in his seventies into submission. The dilemma I have is whether I should ignore the lies put about by Daniel Hope. If I do, he will say "he didn't deny it, so it must be true". When Mr Hope claims that he's been harrassed and people have threatened to turn up at his home, he doesn't say that the person in question was a sick man who was in his seventies and who simply asked if he could have a chat about some inaccuracies in his comments, so they could be corrected. In his weasel words, he claims that BAPS organised YCB week without a shred of truth. He also calls BAPS cranks, which is itself another slur. People unfamiliar with Barnet Politics should be aware that BAPS organised a very successful Peoples question time last year, which featured the Leader of Barnet Council Richard Cornelius and the other two party leaders. It was packed to the rafters and Mr Cornelius complemented BAPS on their efforts for organising it.Mr Hope was present at this meeting and haas attended many events organised by BAPS. Mr Hope may disagree with the views of individual BAPS members, but to label everyone involved as Cranks is plain ignorant. I disagree with many of the policies of the current Tory administration, but I don't call them cranks as a group. If a specific individual says something ridiculous, then fine say so, but Mr Hope attacks people without even reading what they have to say (as admitted in his letter to Mr Sullivan). What sort of way is that to behave? One has to say that if this is the way Mr Hope conducts his business, it is unsurprising that he got deselected in Chipping Barnet and his Boss Mr Salinger got the sack.
As I said at the start of this blog, I try not to get upset at peoples behaviour and I try and see the good in all people, especially in the season of goodwill. Sometimes this is difficult.
I try my very hardest never to hold feelings of bitterness, hatred and resentment towards my fellow man, because these are negative and will always do you far more damage than the person who you feel these feelings towards. There are times when I am nearly pushed to the absolute edge. As we approach the Christmas season, it is vital we put these feelings aside and concentrate on what is good in the world. It is a time when we should fight for justice. Whatever your beliefs and whatever your religion, the sad truth about the Christmas story (whether you believe it or think it is a fantasy) is that the baby we remember did not have a happy ending. His life was taken by a brutal state as a result of lies, injustice and jealousy. Whatever else you may or may not believe, there are millions of innocent babies born in our history, who have died as the result of lies, jealousy and injustice for holding views that people have sought to suppress. Ultimately the way to a better world is through all of us learning mutual respect and learning to consider other peoples thoughts and feelings and circumstances before we act.
So what has that got to do with a particularly nasty cyber bully in Barnet? Well the papers are full of stories of teenagers driven over the edge by cyberbullies. Sadly many teenagers are unaware of the impact of their actions. They lack the life experience to understand the consequences of saying nasty things and making things up on the internet.
As I mentioned above, I have met some people through my blog that I am in awe of. One such person is John Sullivan. John is a septugenarian in very poor health. Him and his wife have a daughter called Susan, who is 50 and has downs syndrome. I also have a cousin called Theresa who has downs syndrome, so I am only too aware of the challenges faced by the families of people in Johns situation. I try and take my cousin on holiday every year and as a result, I see the challenges John faces every day at first hand. Susan and Theresa were friends and used to attend a centre in Mill Hill for many years. Theresa moved to Barnet and so now goes elsewhere.
![]() |
| John Sullivan with his Daughter Susan in 2011 |
John is not a saint. Over the years, I've got to know him. He's a working class boy from Burnt Oak who has done well for himself. When he was a lad, he went to Watling Boys club. His regular watering hole was the Bald Faced Stag in Burnt Oak, a pub well known for its raucous atmosphere. His family are steeped in army traditions and recently John was telling me of the experiences of his nephews in the various theaters of war that the army has found itself in. John has a very close and protective family network and is lucky that like many such families, he has plenty of support. I don't see eye to eye with John on many issues. John calls a spade a spade and if he disagrees, he says "You are talking b*ll*cks". Unlike me, he can't afford to take a theoritical view of the situation in Barnet. As he has pointed out on numerous occasions "while you lot are holding meetings and waffling, there are people out there at their wits end". When he sent me one guest blog for submission, I suggested that describing one particular councillor as "sick and evil" was a tad strong. John replied "can you suggest another way of describing behaviour that causes vulnerable and disabled people distress". John doesn't beat about the bush. He calls things how he sees them and expects other people to be equally straightforward. When I discussed what he had to say in his blogs, he said "look, what you've got to realise is that everything I say is the truth and I can back it up. If you simply tell the truth, then you have nothing to fear". Mr Sullivan is not a left wing subversive. He speaks with enormous pride of his hephews service in the armed forces and the their efforts on our behalf in the various combat areas. He is looking forward to seeing them over Christmas, to catch up on their latest news and the latest stories. That is the sort of man John Sullivan is. That is why I respect him.
Your Choice Barnet week came about because John felt that the disabled were a forgotten underclass in Barnet. When Barnet Council sought to fleece motorists, by hiking prices of CPZ permits, the law came down on the side of the motorists and the hike were reversed. When the Council hiked parking prices in the High Streets, Helen Michael led a rebellion and the council backed down. The Tories in the Town hall realised that the traders were there core voters, so the Councillors may lose their jobs. Parking prices were slashed and the meters have returned. Sadly for the disabled, it is a different matter. At the task and finish group, Councillor Brian Salinger, a former Tory leader of Barnet Council stated that he had no problem with "making a profit out of services for the disabled". So motorists and businesses are protected, but the disabled are up to be fleeced. When Brian Salinger was Leader of the Council, his right hand man and enforcer was ex Councillor Daniel Hope. Hope represented Brunswick Park ward. Sadly for Mr Salinger, Mr Hope was not very good at this role. His local ward tired of Hope and replaced him with the lovely Lisa Rutter, Hope was banished to an unwinnable ward for the 2006 election. The role of the chief whip is to maintain order, but sadly for Brian Salinger, Hope had missed the fact that his colleagues were plotting and the day after the 2006 election, Salinger was sacked by the Tories as leader and replaced by Mike Freer, now MP for Finchley.
Since then, Hope has set up a succession of blogs and twitter accounts. The latest of these is the http://www.barnetconservatives.com/ website and the https://twitter.com/BarnetGrassCons website. Interestingly, the majority of the 18 followers of Mr Hope on this twitter account are actually local bloggers, and other people on the left. Mr Hope has had a steady stream of juicy tip offs from his former allies in the Tory ranks in Barnet, which have often been unhelpful to the Freer regime. Mr Hope has been a useful way for the anti Freer faction of the Conservatives to get their views across, without getting their hands dirty.
In his recent blogs, John Sullivan and his fellow carers have been less than complimentary about Mr Salinger and his comments. They feel badly let down by the local politicians, over the cuts to services being enacted by Your Choice Barnet. As many people will realise, there is a council election next year, and the last thing that councillors want is bad press, especially from a group such as the disabled which attracts widespread sympathy. One of the tactics that is tried and trusted for unscrupulous people to dismiss genuine concerns, is to pretend that criticisms are not genuine and are simply part of some other campaign, orchestrated by people merely seeking political gains. Of course anyone who actually bothered to read the guest blogs would realise that Mr Sullivan and his fellow bloggers were simply seeking a better life for their loved ones.
On Friday, Mr Hope used his BarnetGrassCons twitter account to mount such an attack on John Sullivan and his campaign for disabled rights in Barnet (the comment at the bottom was first). As you can see this clearly implies that this blog was "bought" and written by "cranks" . The second tweet implies(completely without any evidence) that the campaign was orchestrated by the Barnet Alliance. The third tweet calls the Barnet Alliance Cranks. Clearly when Hope posted the first tweet, he was referring to Your Choice Barnet Week and the posts of Mr Sullivan and the other YCB week bloggers.
- @Barneteye @BrokenBarnet Twist and spin all you like, what tabloid gossip bloggers do! @BarnetAlliance are the cranks.
- @Barneteye @BrokenBarnet Clearly been taken over by the cranky 'anti Tory' @barnetalliance this week. Maybe you waive ur fees to SETs?
- @Barneteye @BrokenBarnet So who's bought your blog for next week? Unions? Other cranks? Labour Party?
When John Sullivan saw these comments hewas livid. John Sullivan contacted Hope. Hope admitted that he hadn't bothered to read the Your Choice Barnet week blogs. Here is this admission in an email to Mr Sullivan
Please
ask Mr Tichbourne to provide you with the evidence that I have called you,
specifically, a 'crank' (as opposed to my comments about BAPS writing his blog
for a week). It is clear from your email that your are going on hearsay or you
would have quoted what I had apparently said.
Until he raised your name I was
unaware you had even written something during BAPS week. Are you on their
Executive now?
.
Mr Sullivan sought a meeting with Daniel Hope to explain to him why he was mistaken (a not unreasonable request). Mr Sullivan had hoped that Mr Hope might realise he'd made a mistake and correct his misleading tweets. For the absence of doubt, the Barnet Alliance for Public Services were not in any way associated with the Your Choice Barnet week. John Sullivan is not a member and he is not on their executive. In actual fact, as Mr Hope knows well, Mr Sullivan is not at all well. He is in his seventees and is undergoing treatment for a serious illness. He was so unwell that he could not address a recent council meeting and asked a friend to read a prepared speech, by agreement with the committee chair. This was featured in his first blog
- (Your Choice Barnet Week - Day 1 - The LIE That Is ... ) for YCB week.
Let us remind ourselves that John Sullivan has a wife and a disabled daughter. He should be spending his time preparing for the festive season and keeping Susan happy. Whilst John is committed to the fight for disabled rights, his wife is highly concerned about the effect that Mr Hope's campaign may be having on John. The last thing he needs is stress. Mr Sullivan contacted me yesterday, forwarding the emails he'd exchanged with Mr Hope. I emailed Mr Hope and suggested that given Mr Sullivans age and ill health, maybe he should reconsider his spiteful campaign, especially as he'd clearly got his facts wrong.
Sadly, like all bullies, Mr Hope didn't think "hang on, maybe I've overstepped the mark". Nope, he unashamedly posted another tweet denigrating and taunting an elderly, unwell man.
Just had to block two users following very unsavoury trolling incident involving repeated threats to turn up at my home address.
I wonder whether Mr Hope has any conscience at all. Just to recap, he posted a series of tweets calling guest bloggers campaigning on behalf of their loved ones cranks. He accused Mr Sullivan of being on the executive of an organisation he doesn't belong to. He claimed I'd taken money to publish guest blogs. To compound all of this he admitted that he hadn't read the blogs which he was attacking in his comments.
Now I am quite used to being abused by Mr Hope in his various guises on Twitter. I really don't mind and try and give as good as I get (which has resulted in Mr Hope throwing his toys out of the pram on more than one occasion). It is however a completely different matter when he starts trying to bully a sick man in his seventies into submission. The dilemma I have is whether I should ignore the lies put about by Daniel Hope. If I do, he will say "he didn't deny it, so it must be true". When Mr Hope claims that he's been harrassed and people have threatened to turn up at his home, he doesn't say that the person in question was a sick man who was in his seventies and who simply asked if he could have a chat about some inaccuracies in his comments, so they could be corrected. In his weasel words, he claims that BAPS organised YCB week without a shred of truth. He also calls BAPS cranks, which is itself another slur. People unfamiliar with Barnet Politics should be aware that BAPS organised a very successful Peoples question time last year, which featured the Leader of Barnet Council Richard Cornelius and the other two party leaders. It was packed to the rafters and Mr Cornelius complemented BAPS on their efforts for organising it.Mr Hope was present at this meeting and haas attended many events organised by BAPS. Mr Hope may disagree with the views of individual BAPS members, but to label everyone involved as Cranks is plain ignorant. I disagree with many of the policies of the current Tory administration, but I don't call them cranks as a group. If a specific individual says something ridiculous, then fine say so, but Mr Hope attacks people without even reading what they have to say (as admitted in his letter to Mr Sullivan). What sort of way is that to behave? One has to say that if this is the way Mr Hope conducts his business, it is unsurprising that he got deselected in Chipping Barnet and his Boss Mr Salinger got the sack.
As I said at the start of this blog, I try not to get upset at peoples behaviour and I try and see the good in all people, especially in the season of goodwill. Sometimes this is difficult.
Click on Labels for related posts:
BARNETGRASSCONS,
Dan Hope,
John Sullivan,
Your Choice Barnet,
Your Choice Barnet Week
Friday, 20 December 2013
Your Choice Barnet Week - Thank you for listening - A guest blog by John Sullivan
By John Sullivan,
First I would like to thank the Barnet Eye for ( in the words
of one of our better known right wing cranks) outsourcing the Barnet Eye to us YCB clients
parents and supporters for the past two weeks.
It says a lot for our right wing friends when they have no problem with outsourcing when it suits him, but apparently gets agitated
when outsourcing is being utilised for the benefit of Barnet residents and public servants, rather than to their disadvantage.
Allow me to digress for a moment and point you in the
direction of this Birmingham Post article, that gives us an insight in Barnet
as to what we should expect from the recent outsourcing of our public services
to Capita. Every issue was highlighted by us so called activists, and rubbished
by the likes of our local Tory councillors, which
seriously brings into question any opinions
voiced by these individuals.
Attach Birmingham Post http://www.birminghampost.co.uk/business/business-news/axe-fall-120-million-a-year-service-6428896
To be honest the YCB week response has been phenomenal,
disabled people in Barnet are finally realising they have the human right to be
heard, and they have us so called activists to either help their parents speaker
for them or help them to speak for themselves. We could have continued this YCB
week that became a YCB fortnight by at least another month, there are so many
more horrifying tales to tell of the ill-treatment of disabled Barnet residents
and their families. In fact as was announced in the Barnet Eye recently we are preparing
to release a video/song about Capita, one of the verses of which refers to the
pernicious treatment of disabled people in Barnet and goes like this
If your disabled Barnet's not the place to be.
Your only a market place commodity
Your only a source of profit that why
If you don't make a profit your left high and dry
So let's get back to our " The Lie That Is Your Choice
Barnet Week " , that has exposed
" The Lie That Is The Safeguarding Committee of 27th November",
along with " The Lie That is The Task & Finish Enquiry Into Your
Choice Barnet "
What has also been exposed in the articles posted over this
period by parents family carers and friends of the disabled, is the abject
contempt displayed towards disabled people by in particular our Tory
councillors most specifically at the so
called " Safeguarding Committee Meeting of 27th November ", where
they even stooped as low as to misrepresent the content of a letter presented
by parents of a severely disabled son that has outraged those parents, and I will highlight and point you in the direction
of the blog posted. I personally think we learned a lot about the heartless
contempt the Tory majority on that so called Safeguarding Committee have for
the disabled people of Barnet ,along with their family carers parents and
supporters.
The disabled people
are an easy target for these profit hungry ideologues the profit at any price
brigade no matter the consequences, dogma before dignity for the disabled is
their collective cry. Because they do not have a voice and everything thing was
done at that meeting to distort the truth, and bad mouth the family and friends
that were in attendance to give these disabled folk a voice.
Fortunately you don't have to take my word for it we have it
all on film for you to make the judgement call at the end of this blog. My blog was posted first and like the response
from the Tories regarding the recent investment of £16.1 million pounds of our
money the taxpayers of Barnet in Capita, that Capita were supposed to invest,
there has been silence which suggests there is at the very least some truth in
the content of my Blog ( Your Choice Barnet Week - Day 1 - The LIE That Is ...)
Listen to the pleas of Phillip ( Your Choice Barnet week - How would you feel in my... ) who like many other disabled people
that enjoyed their days at Flight ways but have now been as it says in the song
left high and dry, because there is not enough profit to be made from these
folk. Councillor Salinger can cynically misquote the words of the parents with
a son at Rosa Morrison ( Your Choice Barnet Week - Outraged at being misrep... ). But the funding for these so severely
disabled folk is far greater than for the Phillips of this world, hence the
reason the service albeit possibly temporarily continues to be an excellent
service, cannot if you have any integrity at all be cynically used as an example
of an across the board satisfaction rating for YCB services in general, so cynically implied by Councillor Brian
Salinger. The same councillor claimed " I have no problem with making a
Profit "what he failed to add , was " from the undermining of the future
long term quality of support services and therefore quality of life of disabled people in Barnet ".
Which dishonestly implied YCB were making a profit when in fact they are making
a loss as outlined in my blog, what a very nice chap this Brian Salinger appears
to be to twist the words of people
Although Tony Solomons did not name names, I am assuming I
hope correctly he is referring to the same councillor referred to here in the
Guest blog from Tirza Waisel (Your Choice Barnet Week - The view from the Public... ) which goes on to highlight
the contempt shown for all and sundry trying to protect the rights of disabled
people. A Councillor sleeping then when awakened going into a rant insulting
all and sundry and branding them Trade Union activists or some such nonsense. Parents
family members friends trying to put the case of those without a voice, abused
by this ogre of a man a man that denies anyone else an agenda, whilst foisting
his own agenda on others without consultation or a voice, perhaps Putin should
run for the Tories at the coming local elections, he would fit in nicely. Can
you look at the films from this farcical meeting of the 27th November and with
your hand on your heart no matter your politics say, Phillip or the family
acting for Carl Woolf one of the many potential victims of the planned closure
of Flightways with no plans to replace the facility, that is now denied to
Phillip and many others, came across as
union activists. Can I, as a 71 year old parent with a life threatening illness
and a 50 year old disabled daughter, who had his words read out by his colleague
and friend Barbara Jacobson, be branded a trade union activist because I am concerned
for the welfare of my daughter,and the long term ability of the failed YCB
company to provide her protection in the long term.
Seems to me Councillor Gordon is little more than a rightwing loud mouth, well if he wishes to
test his loud mouth against my loud mouth at any time I will be happy to oblige
him, the utter contempt this man showed for us families and our supporters was
beneath contempt. It is trade unionists that have cared for my daughter and her peers for over 40
years, that are the teachers that taught me and my children in school, that are
the nurses and Drs looking after me in the NHS, that empty my bins and do so
many things that enable our society to function. One thing is for sure the trade
unionists Gordon and his ilk continuously bad mouth, contribute far more to
Barnet society than the likes of Gordon and his fellow Tories. I am not a trade
unionist but if I had to choose between them and the likes of Gordon Salinger
Rayner Rams and Cornelius, I would take the trade unionists every day of the
week, because they contribute and would be a far greater loss to Barnet society
than any of those mentioned above, in fact any Barnet councillor of any
political persuasion.
The chair of the meeting Cllr Perry chatting through most of the
meeting not even bothering to listen to what was being said and even forgetting
there had to be a vote, because it was obvious to all the decision had been
made prior to the commencement of this so called Safeguarding Committee meeting
before the meeting commenced. It further exposed the naivety of the two Labour councils
on the Task & Finish Group who weakly and it would appear unwittingly
supported this farcical dishonest whitewash of an enquiry, and the cynicism of the
Tory Councillor whose name escapes me. Who only chose to have an input into the
meeting in order to point the finger at the labour councillors in question, not
to ask anything about the welfare of the disabled but to play political games.
As another aside I had an exchange with Council Rayner the
so called Chair of the so called scrutiny committee that did not scrutinise the
huge Capita contract we are now lumbered with, he appears not to have
scrutinised the handing over to Capita of £16.1 million of our money to Capita,
although prior to the signing of the Capita contract it was Capita that was
supposed to be providing this finance. He also chose to play political games
again prior to the meeting, the exchanges of which are attached, which further
suggests the decision was made prior to the meeting and the decision had been
made to point the finger at the two naive labour councillors.
Today we had a blog posted by Barbara Jacobson ( Your Choice Barnet Week - Safeguarding? - By Barba...
) that in her professional
manner covers the complete farce the whitewash that was the Task & Finish
Enquiry, an enquiry that was a deliberate cover up yet another action Putin
would have been proud to be involved in.
This enquiry refused to speak to parents and family carers
they refused to speak with support workers, instead they took the word for
everything from YCB. But when you consider that YCB is a Teckal company
controlled by Barnet councillors who make every strategic decision on the
direction of YCB. They were not even talking or listening to YCB, they were
talking and listening to themselves.
There is no possible way you can conduct a transparent and
open and honest enquiry into as complex an issue of the clients of YCB without
consulting with their parents and family carers, it is simply not possible to
arrive at an unbiased conclusion. More importantly if all of these ongoing
changes to YCB services which includes the demoralisation of staff , which
includes massive cuts to their wages and replacing skilled long term staff with
unskilled short tern cheap labour are going to improve things as YCB/LBB claim.
Then why would you refuse to consult with the parents carers and friends of the
YCB clients. The obvious answer being it is a Lie to suggest the services will
not be affected by the proposed further changes , and they know full well they
would lose the argument if they engaged in genuine consultation, because lies
are always exposed when challenged .
Which encourages me to repeat my mantra that YCB is a lie
was conceived on a lie and continues to be supported by lie, a lie that has
spread to the so called safeguarding Committee and the Lie that was the Task
& Finish enquiry is the biggest lie of all.
You have heard and read of the antics of Councillors Gordon,
Brian Salinger . Bridget Parry , Hugh Rayner, along with the silence of Mrs Cornelius
who had nothing to say at all about disabled people, of the councillor the name
of whom escapes me who never bothered to ask a question about the plight of
disabled people but chose to play politics on such a serious issue.
But what of Councillor Alison Salinger who clearly stated
" I think it is true to say that no one sitting around this table failed
to be moved by what we have heard tonight.... And it may be that the Safeguarding
Committee, in my opinion, needs to look further into some of the issues that
have been raised tonight and I would be happy
for future meetings of the safeguarding committee to bring up some of these
issues" end of quote.
Well for starters Cllr Parry could not have been moved
because she was not listening, Cllr B Salinger was obviously not moved because
he sang the praises of the fantasy profits making of YCB, Cllr Gordon was asleep
most f the time , so he was obviously not moved, and as no other Tory
councillor chose to raise any question of any of those presenting the case for
the disabled, one can assume the reality is none of them were moved.
What is even more laughable if it were funny, is having made
those comments Cllr A Salinger voted in support of the whitewash the obvious
Lie that was the Task & Finish Enquiry, knowing full well there remained
serious questions to answer.
We learned that Tory councilors put ideology and dogma and
party loyalty before the plight of their disabled residents, they believe in
profit before people and support entirely the principle if you're not disabled
enough to make a profit ,then you are of no use to them and are left high and
dry.
What we learned about the Labour councillors involved in
this whitewash of a task & Finish Group Enquiry, is they need to grow a
pair and not be rolled over by the right wing heartless ideologues of the Tory
party, and stand up for what they believe in. Not after the event which they
chose to do by not challenging the veracity of this farce of an enquiry from
the outset, and left themselves open to political games on the part of their
Tory opponents, all at the expense of the most vulnerable people in Barnet who
deserve better.
The lie that is Your Choice Barnet will be back in the
headlines soon, and no matter how many lies that are uttered and how many
strokes are pulled to avoid meaningful consultation, the family carers &
parents with the support of our friends at CADDSS, Campaign Against Destruction
of Disabled Support Services, will not give up the fight until these vulnerable
folk are protected from the vagaries of the market place, and their support services
are brought back in House where they will once again be safe, as they were
prior to the formation of the financial car crash that is YCB
I finish on what is probably one of the biggest YCB / LBB lies
of all, the claim that an LATC had to be formed due to the direct payments
legislation the bedrock excuse for the for want of a better word of the
privatisation of adult services . It is suggested by legal minds but yet to be
fully confirmed and perhaps challenged legally, that this claim is and I quote
" in my view this is a misstatement of the law, and they should be asked where
they got their advice from.
So in the new year that is exactly what we will be doing, we
have exposed so many lies to date we will not rest until we can be certain that
the claim an LATC had to be formed ,was based on truth or on yet another Lie.
Please watch the filming for yourself and form your own
views.
1.Your Choice Barnet - Public Questions Part 1
2.Your Choice Barnet- Public Questions Part 2
3.Your Choice Barnet - Public Questions - Part 3
4.Your Choice Barnet - Barnet UNISON - Public Comments
6.Your Choice Barnet - John Sullivan's statement read by Barbara Jacobson
7.Your Choice Barnet - Philip Rackham
8.Your Choice Barnet - Barbara Jacobson
9.Your Choice Barnet - Tirza Waisel
10.Your Choice Barnet - Councillor Arjun Mittra
11.Your Choice Barnet - Report, Councillor Brian Salinger
12.Your Choice Barnet - Final Part
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Sullivan is a Barnet resident and a parent carer. Guest Blogs are always welcome.
Click on Labels for related posts:
Guest Blog,
John Sullivan,
Your Choice Barnet,
Your Choice Barnet Week
Thursday, 19 December 2013
Your Choice Barnet Week - Safeguarding? - By Barbara Jacobson
By Barbara Jacobson,
How
can we believe that services for disabled adults in Barnet will be of the
required quality if the safeguarders are physically or mentally asleep on the
job, embarrassed by trying to defend
the indefensible, and ready to silence criticism even from their colleagues?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Barbara Jacobson is a Barnet resident. Guest Blogs are always welcome at the Barnet Eye
I was
proud to read part of John Sullivan’s statement to the Safeguarding Overviewand Scrutiny Committee on 27 November, and to deliver a comment of my own. John
speaks eloquently for himself and on behalf of his daughter, Susan, and other service
users and carers. I am not disabled nor am I a carer for a disabled person, but
you don’t need to be to be concerned about the way Your Choice Barnet is run
and how it affects service users and their family carers. I listened to their
concerns and I read the Task & Finish Group report, and here is what I said
to the Safeguarding Committee that night.
‘You came here
tonight to scrutinize the Task & Finish Group report on the inquiry into
Your Choice Barnet; the residents sitting behind me have come because they have
done so and found the report wanting. The questions that have been asked
and the comments that have been or will be made make three points crystal clear.
‘1 The Group did
not investigate all the issues it sets out on page 1 of the report; specifically
it did not
consider evidence
• from
parents and service users about their experience of the services
•
or from staff and relevant groups on what impact the proposed restructure is
likely to have on services.
‘2 The report contains no evidence for any
of the assumptions, statements and recommendations it makes. Yes, there are
tables about the financial plan but, crucially, no explanation of how a plan
that failed the first time around will miraculously succeed on repetition.
‘3 The service users and their carers are
worried – some of them literally sick with worry – about the future of adult
social care services, about the future safety and well-being of their loved
ones, and they want those services brought back in house to ensure their
accountability, and the quality and continuity of care.
‘Points 1 and 2 demonstrate that this
report, like the inquiry it represents, is disappointingly unsatisfactory. Its
lack of thoroughness, which would not be acceptable in a sixth-form student’s essay,
exacerbates the worries of the service users and their carers, some of the most
vulnerable people in our society and in our community. These are real
people, with real needs, real hopes and very, very real fears.
‘Our humanity means that each and every one
of us has a responsibility to them. Family members exercise that responsibility
to their disabled relatives by being carers and by fighting to protect the
services their loved ones need. Those of us who are not disabled or carers for
a disabled person exercise our responsibility to them by supporting their
campaign, by coming here to make their voices louder so that you will
hear them.
‘All of us here tonight, representing some
who cannot speak for themselves, are asking you to examine the matter before
you with empathy and the knowledge that it is your responsibility, too, to use
your power to protect adults with disabilities. After all, you are the
‘safeguarding’ committee. While you might not have the power to order, as we
demand, that adult social services are brought back in house, you do have the
power to find that this report is only a first draft and demand further, more
substantial work. And so we ask you to do that.’
After I finished and had
answered the questions from Cllr Kath McGuirk about the need from more
pre-scrutiny of policies, Cllr Kate Salinger made the following statement:
‘I think it is very true to say that no one
sitting around this tabled failed to be moved by what we’ve heard tonight … . And
it may be that the Safeguarding Committee, in my opinion, needs to look further
into some of the issues that have been raised tonight and I would be happy for
future meetings of the Safeguarding Committee to bring up some of those
issues.’
Oh, what hopes were raised in
the public gallery. Here was a Tory councilor, the deputy chair of the
committee, agreeing that at least some of the issues needed further
investigation. It needed only one Tory vote to stop the rubber-stamping
approval of this incomplete report. And
so what disappointment when Cllr Kate Salinger voted the party line to endorse
the report only minutes later.
What are people to think? Can
we believe that councillors were moved by what they heard? Or should we believe
what we see: that they give lip service to our concerns, say how much they
care, and then fail to act accordingly?
Look at the various YouTube
clips from that night and watch the councillors.
1.Your Choice Barnet - Public Questions
Part 1
2.Your Choice Barnet- Public Questions
Part 2
3.Your Choice Barnet - Public Questions
- Part 3
4.Your Choice Barnet - Barnet UNISON -
Public Comments
6.Your Choice Barnet - John Sullivan's
statement read by Barbara Jacobson
7.Your Choice Barnet - Philip Rackham
8.Your Choice Barnet - Barbara Jacobson
9.Your Choice Barnet - Tirza Waisel
10.Your Choice Barnet - Councillor Arjun
Mittra
11.Your Choice Barnet - Report,
Councillor Brian Salinger
12.Your Choice Barnet - Final Part
Why is Cllr Perry, the
chairperson, always in conversation with the officer to her right? She claims
to be listening to the resident speaking but you cannot hold a conversation and
give your full attention to a speaker at the same time. She was so amazed that
the majority of councillors voted to allow a union representative to speak that
she reminded them what the vote was about and made them vote again. Her
patience with democracy was limited: she interrupted Cllr McGuirk in the middle
of asking a question, and she stopped all discussion without letting Cllr
Hutton speak. And she was so sure that the report would be accepted no matter
what issues were raised that she tried to move to the next item of business
without taking a vote.
Look for Cllr Gordon, at the
top right side of the table in the video; does he sometimes appear to be
dozing? He had no questions for the speakers but he was certainly fully awake
when he delivered an angry rant on unions. Should we believe he cares at all
about the disabled when his contribution for the night was to rail against the
union for criticizing the failures of Your Choice Barnet?
What about Cllr Alison
Cornelius? Why did she have nothing – no question, no comment, nothing – to say? Shouldn’t we
expect all councillors on a scrutiny committee to contribute to the scrutiny?
Maybe you can see Cllr Brian
Salinger at the table on the left when he delivers his defense of the report.
It might be difficult because he doesn’t seem to want to look anyone in the
face. Too embarrassing, perhaps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Barbara Jacobson is a Barnet resident. Guest Blogs are always welcome at the Barnet Eye
Click on Labels for related posts:
Barnet Council,
Your Choice Barnet,
Your Choice Barnet Week
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


BarnetGrassCons