Wednesday, 20 March 2024

70 YEARS OF THE MILL HILL MUSICAL THEATRE COMPANY


A Guest blog by Claire Shah - MHMTC Chair

As Mill Hill Musical Theatre Company gears up to mark its 70th anniversary in 2024, we look to pay tribute to our operatic past, celebrate a present based in musical theatre sorely tested during lockdown, and strive to forge an exciting future that hopefully will see us around for another 70 years. 

We are lucky that we have an archive of material to review and are able to tap the memories of our President Grant Graves. His parents, Richard and Margery, formed Mill Hill Amateur Operatic Society (as it was originally known) in 1954, riding the crest of a post-war wave for live entertainment. Professional theatre had been decimated during the war, and there wasn’t much competition from other forms of leisure, with just one TV channel (ITV would come in 1955), three radio stations and, if you could afford it, cinema.  

 

Our first production, Gilbert & Sullivan’s satirical operetta The Gondoliers, was then itself 65 years old. A great success it was followed by Lilac Time and My Lady Jennifer, a mix of other G&S favourites, and the likes of The Merry Widow, La Vie Parisienne, Die Fledermaus and La Belle Helene.  Featuring large casts and bolstered by sell-out performances, the classics of the genre would form the backbone of the society.  

 


The full-blown productions were graced with amazing costumes and hand-made scenery and props constructed by Richard Graves and his talented team, including a collapsible grand piano for Bitter Sweet and a grand curving staircase for Perchance To Dream.  In the late 1950s, we began organising smaller social gatherings, accompanied by cheese and wine, which gave everyone a chance to do some more singing, and especially allowing chorus members to take centre stage. It also provided an additional opportunity to build our Patron numbers. 
 

 

Little did we know that these informal spring “Patrons’ Parties” would morph into somewhat bigger and more involved affairs, serving as a huge thank you to our Patrons for their invaluable support. They do, however, retain an intimate quality, which the cast enjoy as much as the larger shows. In addition, these revues encourage the less experienced or anxious member to build up confidence and enjoyment by taking on anything from a couple of solo lines to verses and even songs. We’ve had many young members go on after these Patrons’ Parties to audition for – and secure – parts in a main show. 

 

Moving into the 1960s, the focus – and the bulk of the budget – was still very much on the main shows. The group now used an orchestra rather than two pianos as at the outset with a young cast – some of whom are still with the Company to this day. The audiences were mainly from Mill Hill, and there were many groups who would block book performances in those days, notably the Church Women’s Guild, the WI, The Townswomen’s Guild, the Rotary Club, the Cottage Homes groups and the Anglo-American Club (though the latter were a noticeable no show on the night JKF was shot).  

 

One of the most crucial aspects of MHAOS that helped keep cast, Patrons and audiences committed was that the productions were excellently staged and performed. In the 1970s Orpheus And The Underworld, Princess Ida and Merrie England were staged for the first time. We would regularly get double-page spreads in the local press, which, added to excellent word of mouth, ensured shows were well attended. There was also always a rush by the cast to read the reviews garnered in the likes of Mill Hill Times.  

 


As the 1980s approached, there seemed to be a pervasive shift in attitude from supporting amateur theatre to wanting to watch the professionals – either on screen or in the West End.  Andrew Lloyd Webber and Tim Rice were foremost in reinvigorating musical theatre. As a result, and during the relatively short and forward-thinking chairmanship of Sue Graves, we began sampling the likes of The Boy Friend and Salad Days within our Patrons’ Parties. It’s fair to say, that this was a seismic shift for MHAOS. 
 

 

However, within the Society, operettas remained a firm favourite, with stalwarts Gipsy Baron, Veronique, Tom Jones and the G&S hits getting repeated airings. Having the multi-talented Margaret Dewar as our accompanist was a big bonus (she also taught some of the casts tap dances routine on occasion). However, even the most popular and grand operettas suffered from casting difficulties – even for well-known Strauss’ Die Fledermaus, finding a strong tenor for the main role was becoming increasingly difficult (a recurring theme!).  

 

Turning into the Noughties, the committee continued to weigh up casting and audience appeal when choosing main shows – something that is still the case to this day. With a large and supportive group of Patrons, operettas remained our stock in trade. Musically we were still strong, with the baton having been handed to another group of engaging younger principals, although as is the case for lots of societies, these were mostly women, with the men still being in short supply. We were still satisfying our Patrons and our core audiences, but numbers were contracting, including on stage, with older members retiring and some younger cast settling down to  family life.  

 

I joined the Society in 2001, keen to get back on stage after a short break following my time in my university’s G&S Society. Coincidentally, my first show with MHAOS was The Gondoliers – our debut back in 1954 – and somehow, I was persuaded to direct the Patrons’ Party the very next year. In double-quick time, the group became a very big part of my life.  

 

While Grant was Chairman, the focus had turned to MHAOS being financially secure enough to withstand at least one financial failure if necessary. Thankfully, that never transpired, helped in part by having prudent treasurers. This cushion stood us in good stead, allowing us to make some bold decisions in the difficult years ahead. 

 

Audience numbers were dwindling. Primarily filled with our Patrons, the Gala performances, on Fridays and Saturdays, were always well attended and had a festive atmosphere with a light supper served during the interval. Those performances were always amazing, with a warm audience always appreciative of our efforts. The other nights were hit and miss – and when only 16 people attended opening night one cold Tuesday in October, it was clear to the committee, led by Chairman Chris Hubbard, that a shake-up was required.  

 

In 2008, the Tuesday night show was axed in favour of a Saturday matinee. However, in 2011, to improve audience numbers and to help with casting shows from within our membership, we made our first major foray into musical theatre.  

 

Our first show of that genre was an easy pick – Guys And Dolls, an iconic smash hit from a different era with a contrasting, more vibrant feel – a huge move away from operetta. Originally planned for autumn of 2010, it was moved to April 2011 due to a licensing issue: another break with tradition as our main shows had always taken place in the autumn half-term because many of our founding members were teachers.  

 

For the first time the Society advertised externally for a director and MD. We hit the jackpot with Robin Scarborough as director and music student James Murray as MD. We also threw a launch night, through which we secured some new members. It was a huge success – every performance sold out.  

 

It was a new era in more ways than one, as it was also our final production in the old Hartley Hall, which had been our much-loved home for 57 years. It was idiosyncratic, draughty and aged, but had a great stage, decent rehearsal rooms and loads of storage for our sets and props. We were also blessed that we could use it to build and paint our sets, a team effort lead by our clever stage manager Dave Smith, with Jill Kelly lending her artistic talents on painting. However, our noble Edwardian stalwart was to be replaced by a new community hub, complete with modern amenities and performance space.  

 

We therefore had the problem of locating a new base to rehearse and perform in for an estimated three years on a very limited budget. We found a temporary home at John Keble Church, slightly outside of Mill Hill – and, although we managed to stage three Patrons’ Parties there, it was not possible to perform a main show there in the autumn due to its arrangements with other long-standing users.  

 

In 2012, St Michael and All Angels Church, Mill Hill, played host for our spring event – a semi-staged production of HMS Pinafore which benefitted hugely from the building’s wonderful acoustics. Upbeat Broadway classic Kiss Me, Kate was to be our next autumn show, and after much searching, Copthall School (our half-term show dates working in our favour) in Mill Hill East was chosen as the venue.  

 

Our main issue with the loss of Hartley Hall, was not having a space to construct a set. Long-term member Angus Henney generously gave the use of his garage and driveway, where our set designer, Rob Barker (also our lighting director for many years), devised an ingenious set of reversible backdrops and flats. However, as Rob was in New York for much of this period, most of the work was carried out by cast and committee. Following his hand-written instructions was a challenge to say the least, with calls going back and forth to the US for clarification – plus, the weather definitely wasn’t on our side! Luckily everything came together and Kiss Me, Kate did very well – we were delighted to receive some lovely feedback from our Patrons about how enjoyable it was.  

 

Not having a proper base at this time made us very aware how lucky we had been in Hartley Hall and long for its return! We made the difficult decision not to find another venue to perform a main show in 2013 and opted to come back with a bang in the new Hartley Hall for our 60th anniversary in 2014.  

 

In 2013, we had made official our intention to move away from operetta clear by changing our name to Mill Hill Musical Theatre Company, and also updated our ancient website. While most people were supportive for this update, sadly we couldn’t hang on to some long-term members, who only wanted to sing the more classical songs. 

 

Wanting to celebrate our birthday with a real crowd-pleaser and mark our return to full strength with a vengeance, we chose Oliver! – including children in the cast would mean lots of their families and friends in the audience! It did throw up a lot of new and interesting issues, however, with the need for chaperones and extra rehearsals.   

 

It was a nervous time, as we awaited news of Hartley Hall’s reopening, even going as far as to pencilling in dates at an alternate venue. Thankfully, Hartley Hall was ready a few weeks before curtain up. While vastly different from the old hall – no wings and a much lower stage than previously – it looked great. We did, however, have a steep learning curve getting used to the new hall and using a hired set – we no longer had space to build or store one – and using microphones for the first time. 

 

Calamity Jane followed in 2015 and, although successful, some members wanted to return to the occasional operetta – the saving in not needing a performance licence was a definite bonus. In 2016, we staged The Pirates Of Penzance but, despite the cast having a great time, ticket sales were sluggish, and we had to reduce prices, including a two-for-one deal. The first night was notably problematic, as some of the cast and half the orchestra got caught up in a terrible traffic jam around north-west London and didn’t make it for curtain-up!  

 

Financially disappointed with our return to operetta, Sister Act was chosen as our 2017 production. An ambitious musical, there was plenty to keep the committee busy, but it did attract lots of new members – most of whom are still with us today. We were also lucky in finding the perfect and most simple set ever, from A1 Staging – giving us wings at long last!!  

 

The biggest difficulty we had, though, was getting an MD. With such a complicated score, it took a while to find someone willing and able to help. Thankfully everything worked out and the show was a total joy. The cast thoroughly enjoyed every minute, we sold out every performance well in advance of show week and received standing ovations every night. It was a big turning point for us.  

However, we still had people living in Mill Hill who said they didn’t know we existed. We decided to take a serious look at how we promoted ourselves, and make use of social media, etc, going forward. We know it is vital in raising our profile – attracting not just audiences but fresh blood to join the mix of more experience cast stalwarts who are the backbone of the Company. 

 

Moving to 2018, Fiddler On The Roof proved another huge hit, with every performance sold out, helped by the large Jewish community in Mill Hill. Through David Rose, who played Tevye, we secured the directing talents of David Coleman, who is now a great friend and supporter of MHMTC, having helmed two other shows for us. The production issues, however, included negotiating another massive set. Getting the cottage roof down a flight of stairs (it wouldn’t fit through the narrow stage hatch), was no mean feat – taking eight of us to ease it around several tight corners, avoiding various fire alarms, light fittings and a slanted ceiling! Pivot!

 

With a view to keeping our more traditional supporters happy, we staged Oklahoma! in 2019. At this stage, we were in a comfortable position financially and with our membership. But then things changed for us dramatically, as indeed they did for the entire country in March 2020, when we cancelled our spring Patrons’ Party weeks away from curtain up and went into lockdown. 

 

We had decided to postpone the week before lockdown was announced due to great concern from our audience, and some of the cast, regarding the spread of the virus. Little did we know at this point that the restrictions would last as long as they did, or that the pandemic would impact everyone’s lives for such a long time. We did, however, want to ensure that the Company stayed part of people’s live and routines during these unusual times. We therefore continued to meet each week on our rehearsal nights – through the miracle of Zoom – and staged play readings, bingo nights and quizzes. Eventually, we met up in the park when allowed to do so – socially distanced, of course! 

 

Prior to lockdown, we had chosen Made In Dagenham as our next main show. During that period, it became clear casting (unsurprisingly the male roles) would be problematic. We felt it was important to choose a well-known and loved show to encourage members to take part and audiences to come and watch! The obvious choice was Guys And Dolls – and proved to be an incredibly pragmatic and fortuitous decision. Still under heavy constraints, with the rule of six, etc, we held auditions without practising, staggered rehearsals with cast waiting outside rooms until they could go in, wore masks in the hall for the note-bashing, and taught choreography over Zoom – thankfully people had missed it so much, they were willing to endure these rules. 

 

We were also hugely fortunate to have the support of our Mill Hill community, both at Hartley Hall and the Sacred Heart church opposite. The latter was especially useful in that we had access to a large screen and projector which we could use for people isolating to join/lead rehearsals – this was especially vital when a month before the show, three of the lead principals (one of whom was also choreographer) all tested positive. As we wanted to make our audience feel as safe as possible, we reduced the capacity in the hall to allow for distancing. We were delighted that we sold out every performance and the atmosphere in the hall every night was electric. 

 

Kiss Me, Kate in 2022 was also a winner for us, playing out to packed houses, and garnering overwhelmingly positive feedback. We didn’t believe it was the right time to push a very modern show, or something we didn’t know would work. We felt we were building our brand and the audience’s trust that they would get a good night out, even if we put on something riskier.  

 

I became chair in 2021, taking over from Chris Hubbard, who had steered the Company through the rockiest time in our history, overseeing many changes with a steady hand. We all admire and acknowledge the diligent, unwavering work she did.  

 

I knew MHMTC still had a lot of work to do in attracting young cast members, changing perceptions, and making it a modern, slick outfit. We drew up a three-year-plan to take us a step closer to reaching that goal each year. Kiss Me, Kate was the launch point, with 9 To 5 the second step in 2023. We are hopeful that the iconic title track and the movie, plus the redoubtable Dolly Parton will attract a younger crowd, while keeping older audiences happy. 

 


For our 70th anniversary year, I was keen to stage a musical that would repeat the Sister Act effect for both our membership and audience. Calendar Girls: The Musical is that show! It’s definitely a leap into the unknown for us – and quite a test logistically – but the story is truly uplifting.
 We are delighted that Robin Scarborough is returning as director, working with our super-talented resident MD Ricardo Fernandes (who joined us in 2019). We can’t wait to get started! 

 

Our 2024 Patrons’ Party, Our Platinum Years, will be a chance to celebrate 70 years of the good songs and the wonderful shows we’ve done, while a special one-off performance in June of G&S staple Ruddigore will allow us to show old and current members where it all started.

 

Staging three shows in one year will be a challenge, with rehearsals for Calendar Girls and Ruddigore running at the same time – and not forgetting our quizzes and bingo and some festive social events for cast and Patrons. We are under no illusions that it is going to be a huge amount of hard work for the committee (and the cast), but we are also convinced that our MHMTC family and its future is worth every moment.  

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Guest blogs are always welcome, especially when they support local arts and culture.

Wellbeing Wednesday #3 - Fasting for Lent - Does it work?

Today's subject is Lent and giving things up for lent, but first a little review of where I am in my own personal struggle to get fit.

In Junuary we started a new, occasional series called Wellbeing Wednesday. I started with some plans to get fit and lose weight. So lets start with a review of how I've done?

Exercise

I've managed to just about stick to my targets for February and March

Cycling - Minimum 50km a month, Target for year 600km

Rowing - Minimum to June 10km a month,  July to December 40Km per month - Annual total 300km

Cross Trainer Jan - June. 1.5km per week 


A bit under for the cycling, ahead on the rowing and cross trainer.

Weight/BMI

My target was to get down under a BMI of 30 by the end of February. I've missed this by a bit. I think this may be as much due to putting on muscle as losing fat. I am definitely a fair bit thinner. I was 32.2 at the start of the year and 31.1 at the end of January, so it is still going in the right direction. The weight is down from 111 at the start of the year and 107 at the end of January



Alcohol

The plan was to not drink for 4 days a week. I've stuck to this pretty much. Last week I had 5 days off, the week before 2 days, I think it is averaging 4 pretty much. 

Mental Health wellbeing

I said that when I started this series, I'd keep a food and wellbeing diary. I failed miserably, doing it for two weeks. I sort of concluded that it was too much hassle. In truth that was as much being too disorganised and lazy to do it properly.

Fasting for Lent - Does it work?

Being from a traditional Catholic background, I always try and give something up for Lent, which is a 40 day period leading up to Easter, which is Sunday week. I try and do something that is healthy. This year, it has been red wine. I didn't want to completely give up alcohol, as we had quite a few events etc. I allowed myself last Saturday off. I chose wine, as I enjoy it a bit too much and if I over indulge in any drink it's wine.  I've noticed that the less I drink, the better my fitbit says my cardio health is. It seems to work!

I've given up all manner of things over the years for Lent. This has included sugar in tea, alcohol, meat, red meat, non organic meat, sweets, chocolate and other things I can't quite recall. It generally reflects how I feel at the time and what changes I think I need to make in my life. Some of the changes have been permanent or semi permanent. Sugar became permanent, meat became semi permanent (I gave it up for 16 years, but concluded  a non meat diet is unhealthy after I developed a vitamin b12 deficiency and associated symptoms). I have always stuck to the rules I've set, except when I have not gone into it seriously and prepared myself.

There are three rules that I always set myself. The first is that the change has to have what I perceive as a positive benefit for my health in some way. The second is that it is a change I wish to make and I am not doing it begrudgingly and the third is that whatever I give up, I have to miss in some way (that is the good Catholic in me). 

As I mentioned, on Saturday I gave myself a night off the abstinance. A friend was having a birthday party at a lovely hotel in Whitstable and paid for a fabulous meal. I just felt I'd not be properly participating if I didn't have a glass or two. I ended up overdoing it, which is why you see a big spike on the heart rate chart on the left. 

I have Muslim friendswho observe the Ramadan fast, which is a very different beast. The Ramadan fast means that you cannot drink or eat anything from sunrise to sunset and it is seen as a religious duty to do this. They find the concept of elective fasting quite bizarre and rather too easy for their liking. They feel that the strict regime of Ramadan really tests your mettle. For me, this is not a consideration. I admire the commitment of anyone who does it, but for me, it isn't really a religious thing as much as a reminder to review what you are doing and seek change. It is not compulsory for Catholics to give up things for Lent. I used to do it for the period of my life where I did not consider myself a Catholic. It is good to look at what you do and try and change things that could work better. I have always found Lenten abstinance to be a good thing. It gives you a chance to break self destructive patterns and test things out (only eating organic meat, as a treat). A few years ago, I was spendingtoo much time in the pub, so I gave up beer. Recently I've been drinking too much red wine at home, going to the pub hasn't been a problem. Things change.

So does it work? I works pretty well for me. I am no holier than I have ever been, but a bit of reflection on what changes you need to make is not a bad thing. Like many things in life, if it works for you, it works.





.

Tuesday, 19 March 2024

What do you do when you find out someone you like, respect and admire hates your guts?

I thought long and hard about whether I should write this and if so what should I say, but I think it is a really important subject and I genuinely feel that it is a subject worthy of discussion. I started writing this blog a couple of years ago, but when I read it back, I realised that I didn't answer the question I'd asked in the title. I wanted to say this, but it has taken four drafts and I think I've got it right! In fact the answer is the answer to all life's problems (for me at least).

 I don't want to delve too much into the background to this, in truth because to this day I don't really understand it. But in a very concise summary, about 20 years ago I was having a drink with someone and they became very serious and said to me, completely out of the blue, do you know that XXXXX absolutely hates you?

I was completely taken aback. I had no idea at all. They then told me that they felt they had to tell me, as without realising the ill will born towards me, I could be laying myself open to situations that would be very bad for me. In truth, I didn't believe it. In my own mind, there was no reason for it and no inkling of the ill will. I asked why this was and they said that the person had a raging hatred but hadn't actually explained the reason why, beyond the fact that they thought I was the devil incarnate. 

I am always someone who seeks to get to the bottom of the matter. I assumed that there had been a misunderstanding, so I confronted the person in question. I expected them to say "Oh sorry about that, it was about this" and we'd sort it out. Their response was shocking to me. They said "That was a private conversation and I didn't intend for you to be told". My response was "So it's true". They said "yes". I asked why. I expected to be told of something I'd done that had been misinterpreted. What I got was a complete character assassination, listing all of my worst personality traits and explaining why this made me a despicable human being. I listened, but was rather confused. I am far from perfect, but in my own mind at least, I'd always been very onside with said person and it seemed a bit bizarre. I pushed and said "I'm not perfect, who is, I simply don't understand why you are saying this". They then said "You told such and such XXXXXX". I hadn't and we both knew the person was a habitual liar and a trouble maker. I said "How can you possibly believe that?".  They replied "It has the ring of truth". I realised that there really wasn't any point arguing. When someone makes up their mind, you are not going to change it. I said "When you realise that's a load of old B****** we can discuss this further" and walked off. To this day they haven't.

The truth is that it really upset me. If it was someone, I didn't like, I'd not have cared a jot, but I liked, respected and admired the person in question and they clearly hated my guts. What was worse was the fact that I knew they were highly intelligent, but they seemed to be totally unable to provide a rational reason. The more I thought about it, the more I realised that this wasn't a new thing. Things I'd laughed off years before, I now realised were calculated micro-aggressions, designed to rile me. I also realised that this explained why certain mutual acquantainces had suddenly and for reasons I could not understand, also become hostile. 

The most difficult thing of all was that I couldn't disengage from seeing the person in question. They would be around and creating issues, whether or not I liked it or not. I realised that they would be dripping poison about me behind my back. For a while, this caused me a big problem. Initially, I wanted to fix the problem, assuming it must be my fault and that it was down to me to sort it out. When I found out I had cancer in 2011, I thought it was an ideal opportunity. To my surprise, my overtures were met with the response "It's Karma mate, you deserve it" or words to that effect. I was so taken back that all I could respond was "I didn't realise that you were into new age stuff".

In truth, I was really hurt by this, but it was the best thing that they could have said. It made me realise that there wasn't much point trying to reconcile. If they can be nasty about getting cancer, then they are just nasty and that is that. I spent years trying to analyse what the whole thing was about, how I could have been so unaware for so long and missed all of the signs. In truth, the more I thought about it, the clearer it should have been. But I still found it all rather upsetting. It bothered me that this person I liked and admired could feel so vitriolic about me. During lockdown, I had time out. I got a lot of things straight in my head. Of all the situations in my life, this was for me the one that I understood least and that bothered me most.

I came to realise that the main problem I had was that I was letting the situation upset me. If I thought about it in a rational manner, it was quite easy to resolve. Firstly, I had to accept that the person had made their mind up. I can't change that. There is no point at all expending emotional capital on people who don't like you. Then there was the issue of the people who knew both of us. I try not to badmouth people, but I knew for a fact that this was not reciprocated. This was perhaps what bothered me most. I then realised that this wasn't really an issue at all. As any friendship we had was disengaged, there was little that could be said that was damaging. A couple of years ago, a mutual friend, who clearly had been upset by something that had been said, asked "What is the problem between you two". The honest answer is "they hate my guts and I am not at all sure why, I could guess but they've never actually told me anything that satisfactorily explains it". What did I say? "What can you do when people lack a sense of humour". They roared with laughter and asked if I'd been winding them up. My response "Well it certainly seems that way". Their response "You do realise that not everyone gets your sense of humour".

Quite by accident, maybe I'd actually found out, after nearly 20 years what the problem was. Could it be that all this angst was just because someone didn't appreciate my sense of humour? It is the best answer I have. But in truth, it doesn't really matter. Sometimes people just decide they don't like you. If it is casual acquantances, it doesn't matter. When they are work colleagues or family it is more problematic. But ultimately the solution is the same. You are not psychic, you never really know what anyone is thinking. If the only way you can keep the peace is by not being yourself, then it is unsustainable for more than a short time. My solution is to keep as much distance as possible without being visibly rude. Just be neutral, don't make an effort, but don't pick arguments. Life is too short to worry about people who don't like you.  When circumstances force you to be in the same room, just take practical measures to try to not get irritated by them or give them reason to snipe.

Then there is how I feel about them now. Just because someone hates my guts, doesn't mean I have to hate them. Why bother? During one of the arguments we had when this first started, the statement was made "I know you hate me". I replied that I had no reason to and just because someone was being irrational, I wasn't going to waste any emotional energy at all on them. This actually infuriated them, possibly more than if I'd said I did. But it was true. Apart from saying a few things behind my back, they've not really done anything that warrants such an action. You can't control what other people think of you, but you can control your own emotions and being swamped in negativity will never make you happy.

This doesn't mean that I am totally immune from getting upset by such things in the short term, but once any intial shock and anger that there may be has passed, I have a simple strategy. If we are in the pub, sit as far away as possible. If they make digs, smile and laugh and ignore it. If mutual friends tell you things that are upsetting, just say "Ah well, you know what it's like".  People can only hurt your feelings if you let them. Life is too short for that. I just whack on the Ramones, have a cup of tea and think to myself "I can either listen to the greatest band in the world and smile or I can think about comments from someone who no longer matters to me and feel miserable, easy choice". 

Whilst the music of The Ramones is around, and no one is physically hurting me or my family, everything else is just noise. This is what keeps me smiling it works for me.



Saturday, 16 March 2024

The Saturday List #433 - My top five St Patricks day memories

 St Patricks day is a massive day in the calendar for everyone of Irish ancestory. My Grandad was born in Dublin a couple of centuries ago and came to the UK to work and to avoid the heat on his family from the British establishment, as they were staunch republicans. Growing up as a Roman Catholic in North London, Irish culture was all around. I went to St Vincents RC Primary and then Finchley Catholic High School. On Paddy's day, everyone would come in with Shamrock and put on Irish accents and talk about how terrible all things British were. There was usually some sort of do in the Church, with a diddly band playing songs like The Wild Rover and Danny Boy. For me, it was lemonades and crisps.

As I grew up and I got into the Pogues, I started to appreciate the music. Here are a few of my best memories of Paddies day over the years.

1. 1981 - The Galtymore in Cricklewood. I was going out with a lovely Irish lass from Kilburn. Being into punk, I'd never been there before. Her elder brothers had the air of gangsters, but when I told them of my Irish heritage, they were fine. They were very into the Republican movement. There were collections for the cause, but mostly there was a lot of Guinness drunk. It was a fun night. The family moved back to Ireland suddenly a week later and I never saw them again.


2. 2016 - The Pogue Traders at The Water Rats -  A mate of mine was playing tin whistle in the band. I love the Pogues and I love the Traders as they carry on the musical legacy. It was a grand old day. Lots of Guinness consumed. They are playing at The Half Moon this year.Go if you can it will be great, sadly I can't

3. 2014 - The Sacred Heart Parish St Patricks night do. I was part of the Parish Council and we decided to do a Paddy's day do. When we were discussing food, we decided to invite everyone to bring their 'signature Irish dish'. The feast that the lovely parishioners put together was out of this world. I still get hungry thinking about it. I had the job of DJ'ing for the event as we couldn't get a band. Much fun was had. 

4. 1969 - St Patricks night party at The Annunciation in Burnt Oak. I was only eight at the time. My parents had been married at The Annunciation Church and knew the long time Parish Priest Fr Fred Smythe well. There was a vibrant social club, which had a 99% Irish membership. The party was always a blast. My brothers took their guitars down and lead a big sing song. My sister Valerie commented that this was "The last St Patricks day of the 1960's" which seemed really important at the time. 

5. 1979 - The False Dots St Patricks Day party. The band had been going a month. Pete Conway was very into Irish culture and decided that we'd have a St Patricks day party. We decided to write a song to mark the event. Pete was really into the Republican cause and wanted to write a song highlighting the injustice of British policies over the years towards Ireland. We were quite prolific and Pete was a great poet. When he announced that he was writing a song,  I was quite excited. Three days before the party, he turned up at my house and was distraught.  He said "Rog, I've got real writers block on this, every time I try and write anything about Ireland, it just comes out as a load of old rubbish". Pete was a bit of a perfectionist. It was important to him and he wanted to do it right. We got a bottle of cider and decided we would not move until we'd written a classic. After three hours we gave up. We had the party anyway, which was actually quite a laugh. It was the first time I drank too much Guinness, but not the last time. Dave the drummer quizzed Pete as to why he hadn't written the song. Pete said "If I can't write a better Irish song that the Dubliners, I'm not going to write one at all". That always stuck in my mind. I've not seen Pete since 1984. I wonder if he ever did?

Friday, 15 March 2024

Friday Fun - We all love a party! This weeks gig round up in the Borough of Barnet

 As is the tradition amongst us Barnet blogger, we love to start the weekend with a little bit of humour!

As part of our new health regime, my wife told me this morning that we are no longer allowed to bring unhealthy snacks into the house. This is fine because I always eat them on the way home from the shops anyway. 

Also, why not put a date in your diary for the fabulous East Barnet Festival that returns this year 28th - 30th June. The music lineup will be announced soon, so keep an eye on this space. There are some really exciting artists who have provisionally agreed to appear. It should be the highlight of the Barnet music year.

Do you love a party? We do? We love party's so much that we've not only written a song by that name, we're also making a video. It will be The False Dots new single, coming out in April! Here is our sneak preview trailer! Make sure you come down to see us next Saturday 23rd March at The Beehive in  Bow.


And finally, our round up of the weekends gigs


£TBC


FREE!


FREE!


FREE!




A fine selection, I'm sure you'll agree!



Thursday, 14 March 2024

The Thursday Album #5 - LAMF by The Heartbreakers

 


What is the perfect album? What album in your collection do you think could not possibly be improved? Would it be one that is so badly mixed, that it was reissued several years later with an alternative mix? Would it be one that there is no discussion amongst fans that doesn't speculate on 'the good mixes'. Of all the 1977 punk bands and all of the albums, in some ways LAMF by the Heartbreakers is the most interesting of all. The band were at the very heart of the emergence of the New Yourk punk scene. Johnny Thunders and Jerry Nolan were members of the New York Dolls, who gave Malcolm McClaren the blueprint for the Pistols. Original bassplayer Richard Hell is credited with inventing the punk look. By the time LAMF came out, Hell was long gone. 


Unlike British punk bands, the Heartbreakers were never interested in politics, anarchy or chaos. They were a brilliant rock and roll band, who only really lived to inject themselves with smack. Ironically, they signed to Track records. Apparently the recording and mixing process did not go smoothly, and from day 1, it was criticised for it's 'lacklustre mixes'. The album appeared in November 1977. I got off a 221 bus, returning from FCHS and I saw the album in the window of the record shop (where the Bridge Tavern is now). I loved the cover and bought it on the spot. I went home, put it on and was blown away. It didn't occur to me that it was a dodgy mix. I just loved it. I played it five times in a row. I only had four punk albums in my collection. Puremania by Vibrators, The Damned's first album, The Ramones two albums and this. Albums were expensive and my sole source of income was my paper round. I also had to go to gigs. I knew almost nothing of The Heartbreakers and their heroin addled life. I was fifteen years old and knew nothing of the meaning of Chinese rocks, One track mind or any of the other drug references. What I did know was that the band knew how to play rock and roll. They instantly became my favourite band.

As to the album

Side 1

  • "Born to Lose" (as spelled on label)/"Born Too Loose" (as spelled on sleeve)
  • "Baby Talk"
  • "All by Myself" 
  • "I Wanna Be Loved"
  • "It's Not Enough"
  • "Chinese Rocks" 
  • "Get Off the Phone" 

  • Side 2
  • "Pirate Love"
  • "One Track Mind" 
  • "I Love You"
  • "Goin' Steady"
  • "Let Go" 
  • For the previous episodes of this series, I've gone through the tracks and given my thoughts. I am inclined not to do this for LAMF. I think every number is brilliant. There are none where I make the tea or go for a wee during. I don't have a side I prefer. From the opening chords of Born to Lose through to the end of Let Go, where Johnny Thunders says "Is that alright", I always have a sense of ecstacy.


    It is quite odd, I've heard versions that are 'mixed properly' and to me, they just sound wrong, too perfect. It sort of reminds me of when I was on the bus home with my ex bandmate Pete. There was a girl who went to St Michaels that he mentioned he fancied. I commented that she had a lazy eye. Pete replied that he found it sexy and irresistable. He said that girls that were too perfect were never really sexy. That is the secret of LAMF. 

    I don't know how many times I've played LAMF, but it always sounds fresh. It needs to be played loudly, on vinyl, it doesn't work properly in any other setting. When The False Dots started, the drummer in our proto line up let slip that LAMF was his favourite album. That was the moment that he was in. I've always judged people of a punk rock persuasion on their reaction to LAMF. If they say "It's badly mixed", then to me, they are not really punk. If they say it's amazing then I will love and respect them forever. The songs are great, the guitar is great, when Johnny sings, it tugs your heartstrings in a way that no one else can.


    The more I learned about the band, the less empathy I had with them. I'm no fan of junk culture. I saw the Heartbreakers and Johnny Thunders many times. It was always a lottery as to whether they would be brilliant or terrible. They performed some of the very best gigs I ever saw (The Marquee was a highlight), they also performed the worst, The Lyceum where a live album was recorded. Thunders was off his head for the gig and spend half of it slumped on the floor.  I have the live album, it sounds far better than what I recall. There is a video of it somewhere, I've never watched it. Too many lllusions were destroyed. The live album has probably the most offensive song ever recorded on it. It is so offensive that it is cringeworthy.  I could forgive them anything apart from destroying my rock and roll dreams. But LAMF will always be the top of the pile. 

    Perhaps the song that best sums up The Heartbreakers is actually a Ramones song (Johnny and Richard Hell apparently wrote the middle eight). Chinese Rocks has the best middle eight breakdown ever recorded IMHO.  In it Thunders sings

    It's hot as a bitch
    I should've been rich
    But I'm just diggin' a Chinese ditch

    There was never a truer lyric. The baand should have been the biggest rock and roll band in the world. Having seen The Heartbreakers and listened to LAMF, I've always found supposed Rock and Roll bands such as Guns and Roses a bit naff and a bit too stilted. In many ways, they ruined rock and roll for me, by just being a bit too good at the whole thing. They are all dead now. Walter Lure was the last to go. 

    I doubt anyone who wasn't a teenager in 1977 and loved punk would understand any of this. But this album to me is the pinnacle of human development. It has never been surpassed. It never will be. Nothing truly compares. 

    ------

    Without LAMF I don't think I'd have formed a band. Last week, we filmed a video for our new single, "we all love a party" coming out in April. We have a gig on Sat 23rd at The Beehive in Bow. Here is a short trailer for the video, which we will be releasing soon.