Monday, 26 February 2018

Misogyny in the Barnet Conservatives - Would you stand by and let someone abuse your mum or granny?

Councillor Dr Devra Kay
 Dr Devra Kay
Over the years of writing this blog, I've made many friends and met many lovely people. Of all of them,  one of the nicest is veteran West Hendon Councillor Dr Devra Kay. Devra is a genuinely lovely, warm person. She got into politics to try and make her neighbourhood better, help her neighbours who didn't have the breaks in life she had, and to use the wealth of knowledge she has built up over the years. I've never known Devra to be malicious, nasty or unkind. Even when she disagrees with people, she is courteous and tries to be understanding of their viewpoint.

Just before Xmas, Devra invited myself and a group of other friends for dinner at her club in Pall Mall. I arrived early and we had a great chat in the bar before our other friends arrived. Devra told me that she was standing down as a councillor. I was shocked to hear this, as I know she loves helping people. I asked her why and she was reluctant to say at first. Initially she said "At my age, I don't need the hassle and there are many other things I want to do with my time". I didn't really buy this, I know Devra loves working for the community. So I pressed. As Devra is not one to be unkind and maybe sometimes thinks that it is partially "her fault", she was reticent to spell it out, but in short she told me that she was thoroughly sick of the misogynist, sexist atmosphere in the Town Hall at Barnet. She was simply sick and tired of the way that the male Barnet Tory Councillors, who run the authority, treat female councillors with a total lack of respect. I pressed her to name names. Not because I wanted to write a blog, but just so I could know who to keep an eye on. Devra did not want to say. She felt she may be being unfair as they may not even be conscious they are doing it.

Of course, the misogyny of the Barnet Tories is not something I'm unaware of. The cases of it are legion. My fellow blogger Mrs Angry has documented it on numerous occasions.  In 2014 she noted

"The misogyny of the male Tory councillors in Barnet is legendary, but worse still is the schoolboy sniggering that inevitably ensued in their ranks when Cllr Sodha, an older woman of Asian origin, would address a meeting. Her accent was the cause of amusement with the Tories - an atrocious habit which struck Mrs Angry with astonishment in the earliest days of writing this blog, watching them laugh when she pronounced words in a way which they found comical, in the way of someone still living in the era of 'It ain't half hot mum', and the 1970s mind set that is required thinking, if that is the word, for Barnet Tories.…"
Then there was the appalling case of when disgraced Ex Barnet Councillor Brian Coleman assaulted Cafe Owner Helen Michael in North Finchley. The local Tory Party refused to take any action against Coleman, even though he'd been arrested and charged. He was only suspended due to pressure from Central Office. Within a couple of years, he'd been readmitted to the Party. Now of course not all of the Barnet Conservatives are misogynists and when informed by the Barnet Eye, Tory Councillor, Gabriel Rozenberg, who is one of the decent Tories locally kicked up a fuss and had him slung out again, but the fact he was readmitted in the first place speaks volumes. The local Tories, eventually spun the story as an administrative mix up, but Coleman was well known and it defies belief that whoever processed the application didn't know exactly who he was (it's not as though they are inundated with membership requests). With regards to Devra Kay, Brian Coleman has been spreading lies and bile about her on Twitter. It does beg the question of whether he's been readmitted to the Tories, or whether he's doing a freelance hatchet job to help out his friends? Those tweets  caused a stern rebuke from well respected Labour Councillor Ross Houston.




 Coleman had previously insulted women in the public gallery, describing them as "Sad, mad hags".  The leader of the Barnet Tories, complacently said in response

“It was a difficult meeting where feelings ran high but an individual councillor has to be responsible for his or her words.  It is for Cllr Coleman to decide whether he wants to make an apology.”
“If you are a middle aged woman and you turn up to a public meeting should a councillor insult you just because you are a woman?   Hag is clearly a sexist word. I feel disgusted by it. It is just revolting. Would he refer to his mother as a hag? I should think not.”
That Tory Barnet Council, the authority of Great Britains first female PM could allow itself to be so stuck in the past with attitudes to women is beyond belief. One would think that the local Tories would realise that the 50% of voters are female and don't want to be treated as second class citizens. Sadly nothing could be further from the truth. I know of one male Tory councillor who refused to be photographed with his two Tory fellow ward councillors, as he didn't want to be pictured with women. 

Another Barnet Tory with a less than exemplary record is Mill Hill Councillor John Hart. The Barnet Times reported how he publicly mocked a female science teacher from Sri Lanka at a public meeting. The Time said
She said she had been asking a follow-up question at the Hendon Residents' Forum when Cllr Hart started mimicking her accent.
Would Councillor Hart do the same to a 6'5" Fijian Rugby player? I very much doubt it. 

Over the weekend, I was contacted again by Devra Kay. She asked my advice as to what I thought of the recent appalling behaviour by Tory Councillor Hugh Rayner towards her (as Adam Langleben describes here)


She told me that although had tweeted he'd apologised, she had not received his apology. 
Devra sent me the full transcript of her exchange with Councillor Rayner and explained the background to his outburst. She also confided in me that she had felt personally threatened. She was also incensed that the Mayor told veteran Lib Dem Councillor Jack Cohen off for trying to get the Mayor to force Rayner to apologise at the time and simply allowed Hugh Rayner to continue.

Whilst it is a postive sign that Hugh Rayner has publicly acknowledged the fact that he behaved in an awful manner, it shines a torch on the misogynist attitude that has forced Devra Kay to quit as a councillor. I wonder if the Tories see the resignation of a well loved councillor due to their appalling manners and behaviour as a victory? If  a councillor behaves so badly that he realises a public tweet is required, how on earth can the Mayor of Barnet not have been moved to intervene? It is quite frankly appalling.

Devra also told me of the treatment veteran Labour Councillor Agnes Slocombe has been receiving. Agnes clearly has a thick skin to take it, but it is clearly not acceptable. She said
"I have been at so many meetings with Agnes when she has had her hand up to speak before anyone else and keeps it up but is ignored by the Chairman. I have intervened and called out to the Chairman that Cllr Slocombe wants to speak and that she has had her hand up for some time while Agnes says to me that she must be invisible."
The time has come for things to change. With regards to the Mayor's inaction Devra said
 I am bound to compare the behaviour of the Mayor with that of the Speaker of the House of Commons during a recent PMQs when Shadow Foreign Secretary, Emily Thornberry, standing in for the Leader of the Opposition, was shouted down by the government benches. The Speaker intervened conclusively commenting that male members regularly shouted down women members and such behaviour could not be tolerated.  If the Mayor had done his job no ensuing action would be necessary.
The chair of the Conservative Party, Brandon Lewis said a new code of conduct would require people standing for Parliament to "behave responsibly and show respect" to others. I couldn't agree more. It would be good if the same applied to councillors. 
It seems that the Mayor and the Tory group are completely unaware of the Barnet Council Members' Code of Conduct (Paras from members code of conduct)

2(d) Treat others with respect

3(d) Discriminate against people on the grounds of race, gender, disability, religion or belief, sexual orientation and age

3 (e) Bully, intimidate or attempt to intimidate others.

You can hear the exchange between Councillor Rayner and Devra via the link in Adam Langleben's tweet. Do you think Councillor Rayner treated Councillor Kay with respect? Do you think the Conservative Mayor discharged his duty of care towards Councillor Kay to ensure that this code was upheld?

Let me finish with a little aside on my own view of sexism, misogyny and the behaviour of the Barnet Tories.

Many years ago, I had a conversation with my mum now dearly departed). Although my mother was a lifelong socialist, she knew former PM and Finchley MP Margaret Thatcher well through local charity work. Thatcher had even urged my mother to try and stand as a parliamentary candidate. She had told her that as she was intelligent and a hard worker, she'd do well. My mother asked her what it was like being a female MP. Thatcher had told her that Parliament was a boys club and that at times it could be awful, but once she realised that she was more intelligent and hard working than many of her male colleagues, she found she could cope and get things done. She told my mother that not a day went by when she didn't get some sort of (what we would call these days) a sexist comment. Thatcher learned to ignore these and often would turn them around on her tormentors. At the time of this conversation, Thatcher was not PM, she was an MP. No one dreamed that she'd become Prime Minister (I think the conversation was in 1972).

I asked my mother if she'd considered Thatchers suggestion. She told me that she had seriously thought about it. What had swung her mind to dismiss the idea was my father telling her that if someone tormented her in the way Thatcher described, he'd feel honour bound to punch their lights out. My father was a fiery Australian and  he worshipped my mum. She explained that my Father was a gentleman. He always treated women with respect. He believed that anyone who was discourteous, let alone abusive to a woman was a complete pig. My mother told me that she'd only ever heard him swear once, when he hit his thumb with a hammer. This surprised me because in the company of men, he swore like a trooper. I was raised to be respectful to women, most especially ones of an age. I believe that all decent men share this view. I happen to think that men who are abusive or violent towards women are sickening pigs.

On May 3rd, the people of Barnet have the opportunity to vote for councillors to represent them in the council chamber. Would you stand by and let someone abuse your mum or granny and intimidate them, to the point they gave up a job they loved? Would you stand by and let them bully your neighbours or friends mum or granny? When you cast your vote, please bear this in mind. 

Sunday, 25 February 2018

The Tweets of The Week in the London Borough of Barnet - 25/02/2018

So here it is again, the highlights of all the best tweets from our neck of the woods!

1. I love this tweet. Great to see a real working role model inspiring 2nd Edgware Scouts


2. The Police in Colindale have been getting serious with the bad boys!


3. Looking for a good night out this Thurdsay


4. RAF Hendon need some help. Interested?


5. A famous Cricklewood night club was in the news this week!


6. Now we are talking. Off to Golders Green then!


7. Love this from Finchley Horticultural Society.


8. A sad sight in Finchley


9. Rugby isn't just a game played by men with funny shaped balls, you know!


10. Make some noise and don't bother the neighbours!


That's all folkers!

Saturday, 24 February 2018

The Saturday List #166 - Mill Hill's Top Ten Restaurants as voted for by the local diners

Image result for Hudsons mill hill
Mill Hill's favourite restaurant voted for by you!

There are over 30 places to eat in Mill Hill. That does not include the takeaways. I thought I'd commission a poll of Mill Hill residents on the Mill Hill Families facebook page and a couple of other social media sites. The rules were quite simple. I posted the following question and counted up the answers.

"I'm doing a little poll for my blog. If you have eaten in a restaurant in Mill Hill and can recommend it, can you Simply post the name of it below. On Saturday, I'll publish the list. If you've eaten in several and recommend them all, please add all. If you've got any comments it would be good, especially if they are useful to people with dietary requirements such as vegetarian or Kosher. Just interested to see which ones us locals like best. Not looking for bad reviews, please. If they get no votes that will say it all! Thanks and I hope we get some useful feedback. Looking for eat in rather than takeaways"

I was quite surprised by the results. There were a couple of brilliant places to eat that didn't feature at all. My own personal list would look rather different, although I think all of the winners are fine restaurants. In total we had nearly 300 suggestions. The winner was

So here is the list. The winner was clear, getting nearly 30% more votes than the second place. By the way, there are actually eleven in the list. This is because there was a three way tie for the 8th place and it seemed unfair to drop one!

Here is the list

2. BAW
6. Kiyoto
7. Leyla
=8. Zushi

Hudsons is one of the newest additions to the Broadway, so it has clearly made a great impression. Here are a couple of the comments left

Maria - I have eaten at Hudson’s and had s good experience the staff were attentive and the food was great!!

Nicky - Hudson's. Though expensive (especially for vege options) food was tasty and service was impeccable

Natalie - Hudson's great burgers.

So very well done to Hudsons and all of the rest of the great Mill Hill restaurants. Maybe we'll do this again next year and see if it's changed, as it's been fun. There are over 30 places to eat and I think all of them have fans who made the case for their favourite eatery.

Friday, 23 February 2018

#Brexit - Time to nail the lie of the 52%

Image result for Brexit
 
I don't think I'm going to make too many friends with this blog. In fact, I am quite likely to lose a few. It would be far easier to simply sit on my hands and say nothing. What sort of a person does that when the future prosperity of their nation and their childrens future is at risk? Patriotism is often hijacked by the far right, but they are often the least patriotic of people, as they despise many of their fellow countrymen and have no regard to the institutions and wellbeing of the nation. I consider myself a patriot. I would take the same path as my father did in WWII when he volunteered to fly bombers for the RAF because he believed that the Nazi regime of Adolf Hitler was an existential threat to all that was good in the world. Although I consider myself by default a pacifist, I would have no qualms picking up a gun for my country in similar circumstances.

However, the biggest threat to our nation at present does not require anyone to pick up guns. It does however require the bravery to be honest. We are coming up to two years since the nation held a referendum about continued EU membership. Both sides told a pack of lies, produced a whole raft of completely baised statistics and made a whole lot of claims that were shown to be complete rubbish, often even before the ink was dry on the paper. As we approach the second anniversary of the vote, we hear constant invocations by #Brexit fans to "respect the will of the people" and to "accept the view of the 52%, the majority". What no one seems to be saying is that there is no such thing as a 52% majority. Only 72% of the electorate bothered to vote. Of these 37% voted for Brexit and 35% voted for remain. There is not and has never been a majority of the British public voting for #Brexit.

Siren voices in the #Brexit camp doubtless say that "they had the chance to vote" but this is simply a smokescreen erected to preserve the lie. Whilst I don't doubt that most of the 52% wanted to leave, I suspect that some of the lies, such as the £350 million a week for the NHS swayed many. But the 28% who didn't vote are taxpaying citizens and to completely ignore their viewpoint is as undemocratic as to claim that 37% is 52%. the margin of difference between the two camps was thin. As they declined to cast a vote, we can draw no conclusion other than neither side did enough to persuade them that they had conclusively won the argument. All we can say is that the two dodgy campaigns failed to convince them.

Results
Votes %
Leave17,410,74251.89%
Remain16,141,24148.11%
Valid votes33,551,98399.92%
Invalid or blank votes25,3590.08%
Total votes33,577,342100.00%
Registered voters/turnout46,500,00172.21%

In two years since the referendum, we have seen complete chaos in the government. To try and clarify the situation, Theresa May called an election and the result was even more inconclusive.

In short, we are making the most monumental decision in the recent history of the UK, based on the opinion of 37% of the electorate, when it is universally accepted that both sides completely mislead the population of the UK. We refused to give the government a mandate to conduct the negotiations and we are in a situation where the cabinet is utterly split. The 28% who were unable to decide are probably even more disenchanted than befre. Whilst people may say that those that didn't vote disqualified themselves from participating, this is absolute nonsense, because if you are given a binary choice and you know both sides are lying to you and misleading you, how can you honestly expect people who are not sure to choose?

Just under 13 million people who were entitled to vote, for whatever reason didn't. I wonder what the outcome would have been if as well as a Yes/No box on the voting form, there was a "Both sides have lied through their teeth, therefore I can't cast an informed vote". I wonder how many would have ticked that box? As far as I am concerned, the whole Brexit referendum process was completely flawed from start to finish. I am not a supporter of the #Brexit proposition. I believe it will be a complete disaster for the UK. This is not based on the tale that was told by George Osborne and David Cameron in project fear. This is based on the fact that after two years, no one from the Brexit side has been able to come up with a coherent vision for a post #Brexit UK. When they are challenged by reality, they say "German car exporters and French farmers will not allow a situation where the EU denies them access to UK markets". This is absolute nonsense. Should a situation happen where these special interest groups are disadvantaged, the EU will do what the EU always does. It will give them aid in the form of grants and subsidies to shut them up.

Unlike the Brexit supporting right and hard left, I will make a prediction as to exactly how Brexit will look. There will be a carve up, where the large vested interests are protected. The UK banks and the financiers will have free access to markets. In return,  the German car makers and the French farmers will have tariff free trade. The big boys and the multinationals will carry on as they were. Bankers, financiers, German car makers etc will be given special status and the rest of us can go to hell.

As for UK sovereignty, I suspect an absolute nightmare scenario. The EU know that there is a seemingly ever growing nationalist block in the EU who will be looking to see what the UK can get. The EU know that any concessions are petrol on the fire. The UK government knows that it has to be seen to deliver a deal that "returns sovereignty to the UK". What we will end up with is a deal where both sides can say they've won. The UK will have the right to make all its own laws, so long as they are completely aligned with Europe. Where they are not, the UK will have to pay huge amounts of compensation to the EU for the privilege.

Unlike many people who support #Remain, I am happy to admit that the EU is a deeply flawed institution and the bureaucracy that runs it puts its own interests before everything else. Unlike most #Brexit fans, I recognise that this means that post #Brexit the UK will get shafted at every opportunity. No one on either side will ever say this publicly, but if you believe any other scenario, you really need to wake up and smell the coffee.

In short, the people who support Brexit will be screaming betrayal. As the economy unravels, they will scream that it is because the "people were betrayed". These siren voices who's idea of a good deal is to crash out and trade on WTO terms, will say that it is all down to the failure to listen to them. Whilst hard right MP's (such as Hendon MP Matthew Offord) are pushing Theresa May to pull out of negotiations and simply trade on WTO rules and see what deals we can do with the rest of the world, the business world are horrified. If a majority of the FTSE 100 top companies were supporting this idea, maybe I'd take note. However the people who generate wealth in the UK are petrified of such an option. They recognise that such a turn of events would be a disaster for UK business. Whilst Brexiteer MP's want to put their fingers in their ears and shout "La La La", the people who actually have to trade and keep businesses running haven't got a clue what basis the UK will be trading with its biggest partners on. If we crash out on to WTO rules, everything we sell into the EU zone will become 10% more expensive to them. Not only that but everything we buy will also be 10% more expensive. If you are buying  a new Merc that is a huge sum, even a nice French wine costing £10 will cost a pound more.

Of course for exporters, we could see the £ crash, which may keep our products competitive, except all of the raw materials they import would be more expensive. One argument that #Brexiteers are using is that the vote was nearly 2 years ago and the economy is doing OK. It hasn't occurred to them that this is because there is no change yet. We have free trade and £ that is lower against the Euro. This is translating into inflation in the High Street. Exporters are benefitting, because they have a lower pound and access to free markets. When the free markets access goes, the game changes.

Of course, we may start doing deals with non EU countries and blocs. There has been speculation that Australia is quite excited about the prospect. As someone who is half Australian, this has some attractions, but to suggest that Australia can in any way make up for EU trade is completely bonkers. As to India and China, they see us as an export market and a small one at that. Whist we have some excellent companies such as Rolls Royce, etc who are world leaders, countries like China are far more interested in building up their capabilities in these areas and don't have a great record on respecting intellectual property rights. I am not sure a free trade deal would be a marvellous idea, until we can be sure that they don't simply use it to build their own market and capabilities.

The Brexit campaign dismisses any and every argument as "project fear". Cameron and Osborne did a huge disservice to the case for Remain with their negative campaigning. No effort was made to make the case for the enormous benefits the EU brings to the UK. No mention of scientific collaboration, the benefits of visa free travel, free trade and the ability to work anywhere in Europe. No mention of the benefit to UK farmers of seasonal EU migrant labour. No mention of the benefits to the UK of EU laws. Harmonisation of standards has meant that we can sell goods across Europe. EU compensation laws mean that if our flight is delayed, we are compensated. EU safety laws mean that we have the lowest level of industrial injuries in history. EU brand protection means that Scottish Whisky sellers are protected against knock off brands calling themselves "Scotch".

After the Referendum, I rejoined the Lib Dems. They are the only party with a sane and rationalt approach to the issue. The Tories are hopelessly split. The cabinet are fighting like Polecats. The Labour Party are simply too cowardly to offer any opposition at all. We have a situation where 37% of the electorate made a bad decision based on dodgy data, having been mislead by both sides. How do we get out of this mess? The first thing I'd suggest is that in the council elections in May, we send the Tory government a strong message that they have lost our support and trust. I would urge everyone tp vote Lib Dem in any Council seat they have a chance of winning. If the Lib Dems do not have a realistic chance, then ask the Tory and Labour candidates where they stand on the issue. In Barnet, there are decent Tories such as Gabriel Rozenberg who are strongly and publicly pro #Remain. There are some who are rabidly anti Brexit such as Daniel Thomas. I would urge you to put your party allegiances to one side and simply cast your votes for the candidates who are onside on this issue. You have three votes, use them wisely,

My preference would be to put the final deal to the vote when and if the Tories ever sort a deal out. I would make voting compulsory, as we make participating in the Census. I would offer four choices.

a) Take the deal on offer and Leave the EU
b) Drop the deal and Remain
c) I don't care, do what you like
d) I don't trust the information you've given me, so I can't vote

This is an important decision, the whole nation needs to participate. I would say that if option d) wins then we should call a general election and start the whole process again.

The Friday Joke - 23/02/2018 - Donald Duck special!

Image result for donald trump donald duck
 
Donald Trump is walking out of the White House and heading toward his limo when an assassin steps forward and aims a gun.
A secret service agent, new on the job, shouts, “Mickey Mouse!”
This startles the would-be assassin, and he is captured.
Later, the secret service agent’s supervisor takes him aside and asks,
“What in the hell made you shout Mickey Mouse?”
Blushing, the agent replies, “I got nervous. I meant to shout, “Donald duck!”

Thursday, 22 February 2018

Barnet - The KFC Council

First the good news.  It appears that the Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurant at Apex Corner is open for business (we listed it as number nine in our list of Mill Hill's best takeaway restaurants).  Sadly, many local branches are shut. The reason? KFC have recently outsourced chicken deliveries to DHL to save money and guess what? The cut price contract hasn't been working and so chicken is not being delivered. This is only the latest in a whole string of high profile failures of contracts that have been outsourced to save money. We've seen Olympic security go pear shaped under G4S. We've seen the East Coast mainline fail three times when franchise companies have failed to make money. I thought I'd see what other outsourcing failures have made the news, so I googled the subject. One of the first examples I came across was an article in the New Statesman. This was entitled "nine spectacular council outsourcing failures". To my complete surprise (cough cough), Barnet Council featured twice in the list! The first, at number 2, was the sorry tale of how Barnet oustoruced care homes to Catalyst. Catalyst found out that they weren't making the profits from the Barnet Taxpayer that they hoped and sued the Council. They won a £10 million payout.

Then at number 4 we have Barnet council again. This details how a spectacular failure hit IT services. Barnet had outsourced IT services to a company called 2E2, which failed. This meant that the council had to hand Capita an "emergency contract" to dig themselves out of the mess.

I have personal reasons to be angry at Capita, who now run much of Barnet Councils business. They are responsible for maintaining Hendon Cemetary grounds. My parents and grandparents are buried there. Sadly since Capita took over, the quality of grounds maintenance has massively deteriorated. I made a short video detailing this, driving around showing the neglect.




The influential magazine The Register chronicles a whole list of Capita failures in Barnet. The article notes

"a "lack of strategic support from IT is a significant issue" and that CSG "need to improve their capacity to lead change, bring forward innovation, forward plan for hardware/software/system updates and identify risk."
Other issues ranged from the IT service needing to improve its "advisory function", slow responsiveness of IT strategic advice being a barrier to service delivery, inflexibility and lack of an agile approach around security and hardware. Further, the report highlighted a lack of accurate performance data for IT; a lack of out of hours IT support; insufficient notice given for system upgrades and down times; and poor coverage for WiFi in some of the buildings."
An article in Spendmatters also details the concerns of Barnet Councils auditors, BDO,  in how Barnet Council is managing the contract with Capita. They note

BDO agrees with this diagnosis in their report. However, and unfortunately, this does not seem to be actually happening in Barnet.  BDO talks about contract management and monitoring like this. 
“During the course of 2016/17 we have noted a number of internal audit reports which have raised significant findings in this area. In addition, further concerns have been identified through our own audit work. As such, we have recognised a significant risk to our use of resources [value for money] opinion.”
Worryingly for citizens and taxpayers, the council’s financial reserves are being depleted, and there was an overspend on services of £8.3 in 2016/17. “Savings targets remain significant and achievement of these will be inherently challenging, as evidenced by the overspend in 2016/17
As a result of this mismanagement, Barnet Council is having to make drastic cuts. This is evidenced by a rather amusing tweet from one of our local Conservative Candidates, Laithe Jajeh. Laithe is a decent guy and one of the Tory candidates that I think is a good guy. However, his tweeting has inadvertently highlighted the mess his Council colleagues have made.



You may wonder why this public spirited display by Laithe has highlighted a problem? Well in recent weeks, many public minded citizens such as Laithe have become aware that our streets are getting completely swamped with litter. As a dog owner, I walk around Mill Hill every day and have been increasingly alarmed at full bins in the parks, litter strewn everywhere etc. I hadn't realised that this was the direct result of a policy of cost cutting by Barnet Council. A report on the Barnet Unison website this morning explained why. The council has drastically slashed the budget for street cleaning and cut the hours staff are allowed to spend cleaning streets. I suggest you have a look at this shocking report.

http://www.barnetunison.me.uk/wp/2018/02/20/barnet-residents-dont-blame-our-members-working-for-street-cleansing/

Respected blogger Mr Reasonable has detailed just how much the Capita contract is costing us. The share price of Capita has crashed following the failure of Carillion (another failed outsourcing supplier). Barnet Council has not responded to an FoI request I sent, following the Carillion collapse, asking for details of the contingency plans for Capita, in the event of a Carillion style collapse.

One can only speculate as to why. One thing is clear. The Barnet Council taxpayers are picking up the tab for a whole series of spectacular outsourcing failures. The Barnet bloggers exposed the complete lack of supplier management supervision during the MetPro scandal. It became clear that there is almost no financial control of such contracts. For those not familiar with Metpro, the council was paying an unlicensed security company over the top fees to provide security for council services and vulnerable people. The audit inquiry revealed that the council were paying 30% over the going market rate and hadn't even checked to see if the company was licensed. They were paying VAT on bills to a non VAT registered company and the enquiry found that many of the services they were paying for were unneccesary.

The one difference between Barnet Council and KFC, is that if KFC can't sell you chicken, you can go to Red Rooster at Mill Hill or Nando's at Edgware. If Barnet Council don't clean your street, or want to hike your council tax to pay for failing outsourcing contracts, you have no choice, you are lumbered.

I will finish on a lighter note. Back in 2010, our local Tory MP, Mr Matthew Offord suggested that if he was elected, Mill Hill would become the kind of Town centre where entrepreneurs flock to open businesses. The example he gave was that he'd like to see a Cheese Shop on the Broadway. Eight years later, we have no cheese shop. We suspect that if Offord opened one, he'd use the Barnet Council/KFC business model. I suspect it would operate rather like this.



.

Wednesday, 21 February 2018

The Wednesday Poem #39 - Rock and Roll Rescue

Rock and Roll Rescue

"1-2-3-4 There's no stopping the cretins from hopping"

Those were the words that changed my life,
They gave me a job, they gave me a wife,
Johnny, Dee Dee, Tommy,  Joey,
I saw the light and set my soul free.

Dimly lit, Reality Ballroom,
Sometimes I feel those images calling,
Don't know faces out of place,
Still don't get the human race,

Rock and Roll runs through my blood,
My Fender Strat, my first true love,
It all started with The Ramones,
Turn up the music and Poguemahone


Copyright 2018 - Roger Tichborne




The False Dots
I cannot understate the importance of Rock and Roll music to me. It is a matter of huge pride that I have my name up on the wall of the Roundhouse, as part of the celebrations of the venues history. Until I saw The Ramones back on June 6th 1977, I was something of a lost soul. They inspired me to form The False Dots, a band I've been playing in ever since. I met my wife at False Dots gig back in 1985, at The Three Hammers Pub of all place (and they say romance is dead). Needing a rehearsal space for my band, inspired me to start my studio business. I've dozens of great friends who are musicians, many of whom have played or guested in the band. The number of gigs I've seen is beyond recall (not only due to the alcohol). Music is life affirming and is a friend through thick and thin. When I feel low, I play my guitar. When I am happy I play my guitar. After 39 years and countless gigs I still get a frisson of excitement at both rehearsals and gigs.

The False Dots are playing at The Save London Music 3rd Birthday party on Saturday at The Midland Hotel in Hendon (next to the Thameslink Station). Admission is free, live music from 8.30pm. We'd love you to join us.

Tuesday, 20 February 2018

Lets praise the sensible, hard working councillors of all parties in Barnet Council

Regular readers of this blog may think that I have a low opinion of all the councillors in the Town Hall at Barnet. After all, we've generated over two million views of the blog by writing about them! (Well that and football, cancer, dyslexia, bereavement, poetry and my obsession with making lists). You'd be quite wrong. I actually like most of them. People are often shocked when they launch into a rant about Conservative Council Leader Richard Cornelius and I reply that I think he's a thoroughly decent chap and whenever I chat to him he's never been anything other than friendly, honest and decent. I disagree with many of the polices he's implemented and think he's been badly advised by senior Council officers on many issues, but I don't doubt that he does the best job he can. Some have told me they think he's malicious and evil, but in my experience he's a perfectly ordinary bloke who has done his best to try and keep the show on the road in Barnet Council. I completely disagree with his priorities, the top one of which seems to be keeping council tax down. Personally, I'd rather have what I consider a more honest approach and try and set it at the lowest rate required to deliver services to the most vulnerable. I'd rather that efficiencies were delivered in a way that the human cost of the decisions was lower and people weren't forced to the margins of our society. But having said that, I don't think Richard takes the decisions he takes lightly. I am hoping to stand for council and I am hoping that my input will make a difference. I hope that the council starts to be more open, honest and transparent with resident. I'd like to see every resident get a proper bill from the council, explaining exactly what their council tax is spent on every year. I'd like budget consultations to be held at the neighbour forums.

I'd even be keen to see local referendums on issues that would raise council tax. Lets say, for arguments sake that a £1 a week rise in Council tax would mean we could deliver decent social care for elderly and disabled people, maybe we should give residents the chance to vote on it and approve it. We are not living in the dark ages, we could do this with online voting. For those unable to access this, postal voting could be an excellent backup. It would make the job of the decent, hard working councillors easier. If people understood why they were being asked to contribute a bit more, then I don't think they'd feel like they are being robbed.

Across the political spectrum, I have worked with many councillors on all manner of local issues. Edgware Conservative Councillor Joan Scannell is a member of the Mill Hill Music Festival organising committee. I like Joan a lot and she's spent decades on the council. As with Richard Cornelius, I don't agree with all of her policies, but it would be dishonest to say she has not made a huge contribution to civic life in Barnet. On the Labour side, Councillors such as Alan Schneiderman, Kath McGuirk and Ross Houston (to name a few) are thoroughly decent people. Each works hard for their constituents and I've met at many rallies etc, as well as over a coffee in Cafe Buzz or a beer in the Bohemia. In my work as a blogger, all have assisted in providing useful background information to a whole host of issues we've covered and have worked tirelessly when we've exposed scandals, such as the cancellation of Freedom Passes and the Metpro scandal.

Perhaps the best councillor of all is Lib Dem Jack Cohen, from Childs Hill. You may think I'm biased, but this is pretty much a universally held view across all political persuasions in the Borough. Jack is intelligent, hard working and has an amazing eye for detail. During the period of Labour/Lib Dem administration he was Mayor of Barnet and has been an ever present in the Council chamber since the 1980's. Whenever my mobile phone rings and Jacks number comes up, I know that there will be a topic worthy of discussion. Often Jack starts with "I assume you know all about...." then describes some scandal or issue of note. Usually I haven't got a clue. When I say "No, not aware at all" Jack will simply say "I suggest you have a look at paragraph 3 of page 139 of the report on the council website". Jacks style isn't to tell me what to think. He doesn't tell me what I should write. He simply says "have a look, it's rather interesting". It usually is.

A great example of how Jack works in local politics is when I found out that DB rail were constructing an aggregates Superhub in Cricklewood without planning permission. There had been no public comments and it was clear it was being ushered through by the council on the quiet. I immediately phoned Jack. He was away at the time as his wife was unwell. He was most concerned and said "I'll have a look at the planning request immediately". He then suggested I filmed the works and put up a blog, with a link to the planning permission. I asked what he suggested I put on the blog. Jack replied "Put up the video, a link to the council website and keep it as short as possible, let people make up their own minds about it. The local community will do the rest". Within days of the blog being posted, true to his word, their were hundreds of comments. I discussed the matter with Jack later. He said that the difference between the Lib Dem and the Labour/Conservative approach to local politics was that Lib Dems trust people to make up their own minds and don't try and tell them what to think. He said that he likes to put the facts before people and then let them decide for themselves.  He told me that "We like to put the questions before people, Labour and the Tories like to put the answers". He then added that "once they have made up their mind, we try and deliver what they want".

There are different approaches and different ways of doing things. We have a council election in May. I am convinced that most of the candidates on all sides are doing so for the right reasons. People always ask me whether I think Councillors are getting backhanders or are "in the pockets of developers". I don't think any are getting bungs (maybe I'm naive). I do think that some are too close to various vested commercial interests, but this is a tiny minority. I don't think any cross the line, but I suspect that some walk far too close to it for comfort. It is a shame because that casts a shadow over the majority who are decent, hard working and honest.

Whoever you are considering voting for, all I ask is that you do a bit of homework and give it a bit of thought. If you have a sitting councillor who you know is honest, decent and hardworking, then they deserve your vote. If you think they've not met those aspirations, I urge you to ignore your tribal loyalty and consider a better candidate for your neighbourhood. If you know of a candidate who is 100% committed to your area and is a hard worker, a decent person and honest, then give them some consideration. In each ward, there are three candidates. Give each due consideration. If  one is a bad egg, then chose someone else, who you think will do better. It is the only way we can improve our local area. With huge threats to green belt, council finances and services, it really is the most important decision you will make this year

Monday, 19 February 2018

Barnet Conservatives Deputy Leader doesn't seem to know his own councils policy on car usage

There is an air quality crisis in the London Borough of Barnet. This is not a matter of opinion. It is not a subject of political debate (although the solutions certainly are). It is not a matter of debate as to whether people are dying because of this. It is accepted on all sides. It is not a matter of debate that the already overloaded NHS is being put under strain by the number of people being treated for asthma and other lung disorders related to pollution. It is not a matter of debate, it is agreed across the political spectrum that in London, car usage is the main cause of this pollution. All responsible councillors in Barnet (and across London) have been working on local strategies to address this issue. The Barnet Eye supports the efforts of all councillors of any party who seek to address this crisis with solutions that will end the misery that is being caused. (If you read this blog to the end, you may understand why).

Barnet Council is no exception. Are you aware of the Barnet Council official policy on clean air? If you are not, I suggest you have a look at it.


This policy is meant to combat the issues related to poor air quality in the Borough.

Actions have been identified under six broad topics:
 Reduce emissions from developments and buildings: emissions from
buildings account for about 15% of the NOX emissions across London and so
have a significant impact upon overall NO2 concentrations;
 Localised solutions to improve the environment of local neighbourhoods
through a combination of measures;
 Improve public health and raise awareness of the causes of air pollution:
increasing awareness can drive behavioural change to lower emissions as
well as to reduce exposure to air pollution;
 Delivery servicing and freight: vehicles delivering goods and services are
usually light and heavy duty diesel-fuelled vehicles with high primary NO2
emissions;
 Reducing emissions from Council fleet vehicles The Council fleet includes
light and heavy duty diesel-fuelled vehicles such as mini buses and refuse
collection vehicles with high primary NO2 emissions. Tackling the Council’s
own fleet means leading by example; and
 Incentivise walking, cycling and cleaner transport: road transport is the main source of air pollution in London. A change to walking, cycling and ultralow emission vehicles (such as electric) needs to be incentivised as far as possible.

I have highlighted the sixth of these actions as this is absolutely key. It states in unambiguous language that "Road transport is the main source of air pollution in London". The Mayor of London has produced a report stating that poor air quality could be causing nearly 10,000 deaths per year in London. Clearly Barnet Council has rightly recognised that such a death toll is socially unacceptable.

The council is currently looking to regenerate North Finchley. The document that they have produced could not be clearer that a modal shift away from driving and non essential car journeys is desirable. Here are the relevant sections in the councils own report -  North Finchley Baseline Report - Oct 2017 

2.27 The Draft Mayor's Transport Strategy published in June 2017 builds on the established sustainable transport agenda for London further strengthening commitments to sustainable transport mode transfer away from the private car. The ‘Healthy Streets’ initiative seeks to support the creation of appealing streets and street networks to encourage walking and cycling and public transport use,
and minimise the health problems associated with car use.
2.28 Sustainable mode-based transport is seen as the means to unlock growth in a positive way to the
benefit of everyone. Along with walking and cycling, in Outer London the vision is for public
transport to provide for better travel over distances too long to walk or cycle and reduce the number
of vehicles on London’s streets. The stated transport principles of this Good Growth are stated as:
 Good access to public transport
 High-density, mixed-use developments
 People choose to walk and cycle
 Car-free and car-lite places
 Inclusive, accessible design
 Carbon-free travel
 Efficient freight


Another opportunity identified in the report states
 Improve the town centre setting and environment for non-car users

The policy also states that the following is one of the main objectives.

O 3. Improve walkability across the town centre by reducing car dominance

And just to re-emphasise, they identify the following threat

T 4 Traffic dominance & car parking as a blight on pedestrian experience

In short, the council has an identified objective of reducing unnecessary car journeys, as a way of reducing risk to residents and improving quality of life. One might reasonably conclude that the Council has decided that unnecesary short car journeys are in many ways socially unacceptable, where there is no medical need or specific purpose (deliveries or collections of large bulky goods etc), given  their contribution to the health crisis being caused by air pollution.

The council also has a specific policy regarding the "school run" and getting children (and parents) out of cars. You can find the full details of this policy here. This is the summary (I suppose it is worth pointing out that the current administration has been setting policy for 15 of the last 20 years, however they seem to have started to see sense)

Over the last 20 years the number of children walking to school has fallen dramatically, while the number of car journeys to school has increased, adding to traffic congestion and pollution.
It is recommended that children take 15,000 steps a day, so walking to school can contribute to this, as well as giving opportunities to develop road safety skills and a chance to talk and socialise with families and friends.
Schools are encouraged to develop a School Travel Plan (STP) which outlines a package of initiatives that promotes sustainable forms of transport such as walking and cycling while reducing car use.


You may have concluded that the current adminstration running the council understands the health and lifestyle problems posed by the current patterns of car usage in the Borough. It appears that you would be wrong. The Deputy Leader of the Council and a series of Tory Councillors have spent the last day monstering Anne Clarke, who is hoping to get elected as a councillor in May, for a tweet supporting the councils policy of trying to get people to dump the car for short journeys, where people are able bodied. Here is what the Deputy Leader said.


Interestingly the poll he refers to does not mention people driving to Golders Green. I am mystified as to where this reference came from. Another Tory Councillor who jumped on the bandwagon, ignoring their own administrations policy was Councillor Gabriel Rozenberg, who is taking an ever more hawkish and right wing stance on social issues.


Yet another Barnet Tory Councillor also jumped on the bandwagon, defending the School run for short trips, when his own council policy is clearly to discourage such short trips.

Just to show how nasty and dishonest these chaps are being, here is Anne Clarkes poll.


As you can clearly see, Clarke states that if someone is not able to work, then she has no issue with a car ride. It is also 100% clear that Rohit Grover is distorting what she was saying for party political ends. It doesn't surprise me that when such distorted tweets are clearly encouraging people to vote in a politically charged manner that Tory activists will jump on the bandwagon and rig a small twitter poll. They probably think it is a "jolly good jape".

It is clear that these three rather well to do chaps, who represent the richest wards in the Borough are not in touch with the poorer urban areas of Barnet such as Cricklewood, where Anne Clarke lives. Are they too lazy to read their own administrations policy on car usage and air quality? They clearly think that seeing thousands of Londoners dying due to poor air quality generated by car fumes is 100% socially acceptable, their tweets leave us in no doubts on that. I am particularly surprised that Rohit Grover has tweeted in support of short, unncessary car journeys to drop children off at schools, when the council is clearly working to discourage it.

Barnet Council Pollution Map
Sadly, until community leaders such as these councillors start having the courage to say "Having thousands of Londoners dying due to poor air quality is simply not socially acceptable. We all have to take personal responsibility and make a conscious effort to walk or cycle where it is feasable, especially for short journeys". Lets be clear. Saying this does not demonise anyone, it simply means that we accept that adults should take responsibility for their actions.

It is not socially acceptable to smoke in public spaces anymore. No one demonises tobacco smokers, we simply required them to modify their behaviour, so there was less impact on the rest of us.

Five years ago, a friend of mine died from an Asthma attack. His condition was brought on by pollution. The pollution map of Barnet shows just how serious this is for many people in the most densely populated parts of the Borough (Mill Hill Broadway bus station was measured as having one of the highest pollution levels of anywhere in Western Europe, so it is close to my heart, especially as many children pick up school busses their every day).

As far as Daniel Thomas, Rohit Grover and Gabriel Rozenberg are concerned, such people are just sad statistics generated by people indulging in perfectly socially acceptable behaviour. Sadly I can remember seeing his small granddaughter distraught as the box disappeared in the crematoria. Maybe one of these councillors would care to nip around and explain to her that this completely unnecessary death, which could have easily be avoided if councils in London took air quality seriously, was in their opinion completely fine, because we don't want people to feel bad about driving around the corner to get a bottle of Moet whatever is their tipple of choice.

Sunday, 18 February 2018

The Tweets of The Week in The London Borough of Barnet - 18/02/2018

It's Sunday so it's time for the Tweets of The Week again.

Don't forget to follow any Tweeters who tickle your fancy.

1. Want to help put together the next edition of Mill Hill Today? Here's your chance


2.David Ardetti wonders what happened to plans for a Cycle Superhighway in the London Borough of Barnet. So do we!


3.Nice Tweet from the Mill Hill Historical Society


4. An interesting picture of Cricklewoods Masonic lodge, which gathers in the Crown Hotel. Clearly not such a secret society these days!


5. And whilst in that neck of the woods, here are some nice pics of Childs Hill by Andrew Roberts


6.Great historical tweet here, from IncludeOurStreetsN12 - I remember Mann Egerton well. My father used to collect spares for car repairs from their service counter.


7.This however breaks my heart


8. Until this is sorted, we will have to keep including Mark Amies Tweets


9. More urban decay in Mill Hill


10.But there is some great music being made!



That's all folks!