Showing posts with label sheltered housing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sheltered housing. Show all posts

Saturday, 4 February 2012

Update on Guest Blog - Sheltered housing ?... Ha ha. dont make me laugh.

From Barnet Sheltered Housing Victim 

 


editorial note : This is a follow up to a guest blog from earlier this week - http://barneteye.blogspot.com/2012/02/guest-blog-sheltered-housing-ha-ha-dont.html - detailing problems with the new "on call warden system", which replaced on site wardens in sheltered housing.   
 
Thought I would keep you informed of latest...

 
I understand that a investigation is taking place,and certain people have been called in to explain,
 
A letter has been received  from Assist (the company that manages the callout system), saying that they listened to the recordings of the calls and that they agree that procedure was not followed,
 
Cllr. Alison Moore has been in touch to confirm that this confirms many of her fears about the new service.
 
Will things change for the better for those that need it ?.....I do hope so.!
I have heard through the grapevine they are about to ....
But you know the Council ... a lot better then me ...
That's why Blogs like the Barnet Eye are very much needed..
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Barnet Sheltered Housing Victim is a friend of the Barnet Eye blog and lives in local "sheltered housing". Guest Blogs are always welcome. We also welcome updates on issues which affect our community.

Thursday, 2 February 2012

Guest Blog - Sheltered housing ?... Ha ha. dont make me laugh.

Guest blog by Barnet Sheltered Housing Victim
Hi Roger
Thought you might like to hear how the New Sheltered housing  Scheme is getting along.
Its been a year since we were informed in a meeting that big changes are coming with the promise of further meetings to keep us informed.
Well we have had a total of Zero meetings, not bloody one.No health and safety checks  around the scheme. I have had No smoke detector checks, No Pull cord checks. So I decided as a reasonable fit septuagenarian to sign a waver,so the part time warden does not have to call on me, not that anyone knew what time of day they were coming or how long they would be on site, like I said not too bad for me as a reasonable fit person, but for others a problem. Still we have the assist (lifeline) just pull the cord, and help will wing its way too you, No problem right ?sort off.
I live in a block of flats at Prospect Place.Last night 1st Feb at 22:00 hrs., after hearing a commotion down stairs, upon opening my front door a very ill elderly neighbour,had locked herself of out home, wearing no slippers and dressed in her night clothes, so we took her to the premises common room which is heated.
One of us then went back indoors to call assist by pulling the emergency cord, that's what's its for, isn't it? After what seemed ages, they answered, they were asked for an emergency warden to be sent, so they would get the spare set of keys, we were informed there were no longer any wardens, and that the elderly woman should not have gone out, with out her keys, and that we should call the ambulance service / Police / fire brigade, after a few choice words, informing them they had better do something about it, they said they would try, but it could take a while.
After about 15 mins. they called me back, saying according to our records she has a Key safe fitted to the street door, once again we had to point out that we do not or want to know the number, as they are for carers / meals on wheels to use, not next door neighbours.
In the end they contacted the mobile warden, and after half hour or so, she was safely back in doors.
We thought Assist had residents details including next of kin contact details, medical details,... maybe not. Sadly, all these cuts will end up with a preventable death, but why worry about that, we are only old people and we only pay £20 per week for the lifeline.
As for me, I have recoverd my front door keys from the temp warden and as I said signed a waver, because I would rather pass away, then have to rely on this bumbling local authority, which has self interest at heart.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Barnet Sheltered Housing Victim is a resident of Barnet Council Sheltered Housing accomodation and a good friend of this blog. They wrote this account so that the people of Barnet can understand exactly what the abolition of the Sheltered Housing On Site Warden scheme means to them and their neighbours. This budget cut policy predated the Coalition government and the budget cuts imposed as a result. It saved the council approx £400,000 per annum. 

To submit a guest blog, please click on the link in the sidebar

Monday, 19 December 2011

Pensioners make fighting fund for solicitor to stop cuts to sheltered housing & care homes


 Barnet Eye Guest Blogger Linda Edwards requested that the Barnet Eye post this Notice. We are happy to oblige. There is also a short message from Linda after the press release text
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solicitor Yvonne Hossack who helped the disabled and elderly by preventing the closure of 80 care homes was refused legal aid to prevent the removal of Sheltered Housing Wardens from Sheltered Housing Schemes. 

Yvonne fought a high profile legal battle to prevent Barnet and Portsmouth Council removing Wardens from their boroughs.   If removed it would leave the elderly and most vulnerable at risk.   In December 2009 Barnet and Portsmouth City Council had dropped their appeals against a high court Judges decision giving Yvonne and the elderly a great victory.   
 
Earlier this year the Legal Services Commission made the decision to block Yvonne’s application for a legal aid contract, because of a minor typo error on the form.
The Commission saw the error and blocked the application stating that it would be unfair on everyone who had filled in the form correctly if they were to allow Yvonne to amend it.   What the Commission didn't tell Yvonne was that 795 other firms had also made mistakes, but they had been allowed to correct their mistakes and had subsequently been given legal aid contracts.

Is there a conspiracy to stop Yvonne helping the elderly?

Is David Cameron deliberately trying to prevent his policies and council policies from being challenged in court?

David Young the chair of the UK Pensioners strategy committee said
“We know what Cameron’s trying to do; we may be old but we’re not stupid.  We’re calling upon the elderly, the young and the disabled across the United Kingdom to support a fighting fund, which was set up to help Yvonne continue her legal battles to save  sheltered housing and care homes for pensioners and for our children who will need them in the future.   Considering the efforts and sacrifices she has made for us I think it is absolutely vital that we support her in any way we can. ”

Please make a donation for the fighting fund to
‘Hossacks Equality Law Principles’

HSBC BANK PLC: Sort code 40 32 04
Account number: 41580663

Or send postal orders or cheques payable to
‘Hossacks Equality Law Principles’ to

Mrs Mary Clarke-Bake, Treasurer of Hossacks Equality Law Principles
          8 York Street, Market Harborough LeicestershireLE16 7PF

For more information telephone:  Norman Adams 078 439 302 19
Email: ntactnorman@googlemail.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Message from Linda Edwards,

As a recent guest blogger on barneteye (concerned carer), I would appreciate any support for this campaign.  Yvonne Hossacks has been the one person who used her legal expertise and deep sense of injustice, to work with the system to make necessary changes for vulnerable people.  For all the people that she has helped, including people in sheltered housing and care homes, supported living and living alone, thank you for all you have done for us all, including my daughter.  Your input and involvement has been greatly instrumental in finding resolutions for my daughter and making changes for her quality of life and for many people all over UK.  Your involvement has been invaluable in making a huge difference to how my daughter has “been heard” by LBB Adult Social Care and Health.  If only Yvonne's support, skills and expertise wasn't needed!  It shouldn't be if the "Care System" that has been set up to work on behalf of vulnerable people had not betrayed us!

Linda Edwards
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Guest Blogs are always welcome at the Barnet Eye. We also publish press releases concerning matters of interest to Barnet Residents. See email link in side bar

Tuesday, 11 January 2011

Guest Blog : Spotlight on Homelessness in London by Hildagarde

Rules are made to be broken. Generally guest blogs get no alteration / editorial comment on the Barnet Eye, but I am going to make an exception this time. The reason? Because the issue is too important. This blog is written by a good friend of the Barnet Eye who wishes to remain anonymous. I am also posting a link to a charity link for another good friend of the Barnet Eye, one who is also getting up of his backside to do someting for the homeless. This friend is the Dave Hill from the Guardian, who features the Barnet Eye as a Top London Blog. Maybe you are reading this blog as a result of the Guardian link. Anyway please read this blog and if it inspires you, sponsor Dave in his marathon run, proceeds of which are being donated to Shelter.

Here's Dave's Link

http://uk.virginmoneygiving.com/fundraiser-web/fundraiser/showFundraiserProfilePage.action?userUrl=DaveHillGuardian

Many people in Mill Hill also support The Passage, a homeless charity in Victoria. This is one of the Parish Charities for the Sacred heart Church in Mill Hill Broadway. It is dedicated to helping the hard core homeless in London.

http://www.passage.org.uk/


And here's Hildagardes guest blog, unaltered and unedited (not her real name). This explains what the problems are like and why councils are failing vulnerable people

Guest blog by Hildagarde,


Problems facing homeless people             

 This Christmas as in previous years I have volunteered at a homeless shelter for women. There are a number of things wrong with this, firstly there are apparently no homeless women in London – so if that is the case how is it that every year we are full. This is in part down to the way that the count for the homeless is done. When they count, if there are less than 10 homeless people in any particular area, that figure does not have to be recorded. Only if the number of homeless exceeds 10 in an area is that number recorded. Also when they do the count they stick to main roads and areas – homeless women are vulnerable and therefore tend to avoid busy areas and stay in the shadows – the areas that the authorities do not or will not go – so it is therefore not surprising that the statistics relating to the homeless are wrong and the there are not enough services being offered for them.
So, regardless of the lack of services and the chronic under recording of homeless numbers, when they finally get to see a housing officer they are treated badly. This year one of the women staying at the hostel where I worked is in a wheelchair as she was diagnosed with having MS last August. She went to the housing people in Essex – they said they would provide her with emergency temporary housing. When she arrived at the designated address, the room was on the first floor, the bathroom and toilet were on the second floor – there was no lift, chair lift or any electronic means of travel between the floors in the building. After trying to live there for a number of days she went back to the housing office and explained that this was not suitable accommodation for someone in a wheelchair and that she couldn’t go back. The council then turned round and said that as she had deliberately made herself homeless they were not required to re-house her. Surely a little bit of joined up thinking wouldn’t have gone amiss here. Anyone could see that this lady was in a wheelchair. Even if there were no ground floor rooms available at the time, could an able bodied person not be moved to facilitate a disabled woman who was homeless? The council appear to do the bare minimum to abide by the law!!

On another occasion a woman and her 77 year old mother, again homeless and staying in the shelter where I was working, were subject to appalling treatment. The housing officer of the charity had arranged an appointment for them to see the housing officer in Bedfordshire. They were given train tickets to Bedford and duly attended at the appointed time only to be told by the housing officer that she didn’t think they were eligible to be housed. The housing advice person from the charity was contacted – she in turn then explained to the housing officer in Bedford that they were entitled. Reluctantly they were given emergency accommodation for one night and told to return the next day when the Bedford housing officer would see if she thought they were eligible. The next day they returned – a few more calls were made and they were finally given a place to stay. These are homeless people, most of whom live hand to mouth, and they were given an unfurnished one bedroom flat which was damp with the wall paper peeling off the wall – but they were just glad to have a roof over their heads. The charity I worked for did arrange a loan for them for some furniture as they had none but can you really say that giving someone a flat with no furniture and expecting a 77 year old woman to sleep on the floor is what this society considers to be fair treatment of the elderly? They were not told how long they would have the flat for so were unable to make any firm plans to get their lives back on track. There is however a happy ending to this story. Thanks to friends they have they have now moved to a nicer part of town, paying less rent than the council wanted them to pay and the daughter has secured a permanent job. But none of this was as a result of help they have received through the local authority– this is through private individuals helping and stepping in where the council failed. To a large extent the charity was the prime mover in giving this lady  back enough self confidence to get a job and in her own words treated her like a normal human being!!

But regardless of this happy ending – how can other people expect to get their life back together if they are not given any indication of how long they would might hold on to the accommodation? What happens when the temporary period expires? There is too much uncertainty around getting people off the street and giving them the time and space to get their lives back together. How can anyone plan for the future if they don’t know how long they will be living in a place?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Barnet Eye is always pleased to publish guest blogs. These can be submitted using my email address in the sidebar. They are published unedited/unaltered and without comment (usually).

Thursday, 21 October 2010

The three types of Tory Councillors in Barnet

Last night I attended the Barnet Council Cabinet meeting. I realised that if you want to get on in the Tory Party in Barnet you have to be one of three types of people. These are :-

A) People who are very rude. We saw several fine examples of this last night. Top Cat for rudeness was Lynne Hillan. Sheltered housing resident David Young, who launched a legal battle with Barnet Council last year and got the decision to scrap sheltered housing wardens declared illegal by the High Court cam down to ask a question. Given that Lynne Hillan was the architect of the policy, which was declared illegal, having indulged in a lengthy legal battle against Mr Young who is 78 and should be enjoying his retirement, you would think Hillan would have a) Apologised to him for persuing an illegal policy. B) Extended him a modicum of courtesy, given that he'd given up his evening to participate in the democratic process. She didn't even give him the time of day. As Mr Young tried to ask a question, Lynne Hillan continually butted in and told him to hurry up. After two minutes and 36 seconds, she finally said "Have you actually got a question", to which Mr Young replied "How stupid are your Councillors". As Mr Young walked away he commented "Don't you realise that some of the residents have told me they will commit suicide if the wardens go". At this Lynne Hillan rolled her eyes. She was ably supported in the rudeness stakes by Brian Coleman, who managed to insult the local papers such as the Press and the Edgware Times. He was also rather rude to Councillor Dean Cohen, who was trying to be helpful in suggesting ways Barnet could improve it's response to bad weather (but I'll forgive him that).

B) People who are very spineless. Into this category falls Deputy Leader Andrew Harper, Councillor Robert Ramsbottom and Councillor Melvin Cohen. Harper and Ramsbottom both asked reasonable and sensible questions. Both got nonsensical answers and said "Thank you councillor Rajput for such a marvellous answer" or words to that effect. Ramsbottom asked "Are we going down the same road again" Rajput said "No of course not" and then went on to actually detail why we were. Yvonne Hossacks, who is the countries leading lawyer on sheltered housing, must have been laughing her head off (she was there with David Young). Harper asked an even more sensible question "Is it sensible to spend huge amounts on legal fees for these quite small savings" or words to that effect. Rajput responded "Yes of course it is, because, it is". As for Melvin Cohen. If Brian Coleman had talked to my son, in the manner Coleman spoke to Dean Cohen, I'd have probably stuck a ball point pen in his eye and said "Oops sorry Brian, my pen slipped" or at least said "Can it, knobhead, that's my boy !". Of course Melvin C is a gutless spineless lackey, so he just sat there grinning as pooe little Deano got squashed.

C) Completely useless. This brings us back to Dean Cohen. He was presenting a report about the chaos in Barnet when the Snow hit in January. Councillor Dean Cohen spoke for 5 minutes and 31 seconds on the subject. Guess how many times he said "er" or "erm" in that time as he read his prepared speech. Well I counted 46 times, including several "er, erm, er's". I'm sure big daddy Melvy sent him to the finest school, so where did it all go wrong. Having not allowed Mr Young, who spoke clearly and eloquently 30 seconds without interruption, Hillan was quite happy to let ineffectual Dean ramble on seemingly forever. In all my years (apart from injury time in the Manchester Derby last year) has 5 minutes and 31 seconds seemed so long. When he finally finished, Brian Coleman wiped the floor with him. Whilst I may not like Brian Coleman, I can understand why he would be so angry, wasting 5 mins and 31 seconds of valuable sponging time listening to him. Another one of the useless squad, Joanna Tambourides gave a fine cameo performance as Councillor Rajput spouted waffle about introducing a "menu of charged services" for adults with care needs. She asked Councillor Rajput "How much will these services cost". Now given that she's a Cabinet member and she'd read all of the papers, it was patently obvious that no one has a clue. Rajput replied "as affordable as possible". She responded "Marvellous, Marvellous". She must be easily impressed.

As I left, Yvonne Hossacks was waiting for a cab in reception with David Young. I passed on some information they had missed. I asked a couple of questions about the strategy she might employ and pointed out what I thought was a couple of major weaknesses in the approach Barnet are adopting. She smiled the smile of a cat watching as the mouse emerges from it's hole. In a perfect world, David Young wouldn't need to go to war with a useless and uncaring council. I was given some information, which I am not going to publish here, but yet again Barnet will lose. To use a football analogy, they are using a Ryman League legal team to take on the Premiership champions. Hossacks is an expert in her field. If I was Jeff Lustig, Barnets in house legal chief, I'd take Hillan and Harper into a quiet room and say "Just drop the whole scheme quietly, otherwise we'll lose again and look ridiculous". I spoke this morning to a Tory Councillor about the plan. He agreed with me that Barnet should just stop digging. He told me a shocking fact. The £300,000 savings that were quoted are entirely bogus. The new scheme will cost even more.

Oh yes, he also told me rather proudly that I'd like Barnet Councils new website. They are spending £50,000 on a redesign, to make it more funky. So there we go. Who loses in OneBarnet - The elderly, the disabled and the disadvantaged. Who wins - Committee chairmen (54% rise), Legal briefs, Consultants and website designers.

As I left the meeting I saw Councillor John Hart sitting there. I gave him a friendly smile. He smiled back and shook his head.

Wednesday, 20 October 2010

The Day Barnet Council sold out its pensioners

Have you ever been for a pint in Northumberland? or Barnsley? or Thurgoland? If like me you have, you've probably been rather surprised at how much change you got back when you handed over a tenner. What has this got to do with Barnet Council. Well Councillor Sachin Rajput tonight announced that £163.75 is a fair living wage for a UK pensioner. This is the Uk wide figure, deemed the UK fair living wage for someone above pensionable age. Mr Rajput announced at the Barnet Cabinet meeting that this would be the basis for all charging calculations with regards to payment for services.

Planet Earth calling Councillor Rajput (and the rest of the Tories). In case you hadn't noticed, Barnet is one of the most expensive places to live on Planet Earth, let alone the UK. Whilst £165.75 might get you a decent lifestyle in the places listed above, it wouldn't get you a decent dinner at some of Councillor Brian Colemans favourite restaurants in Barnet. Barnet Council have decided that everyone should pay for services if they can afford them. Fair enough I hear you say. Is it fair enough if you use the UK average as your basis for calculation, if you live in the 4th most expensive Borough in the Country.

Sadly, it seems that common sense has completely bypassed our councillors. Councillor Rajput announced that 3% of the elderly population required 63% of the budget. This must be wrong, he exclaimed !!! Well think about it for a second. If 3% need constant supervision, 17% need some help and 80% need none at all, then of course 3% will use up 63% of the budget. I remember my own father. He died aged 69 of a heart attack. In his entire life, he never received a penny in benefits, other than an old age pension, which he'd spent a lifetime paying in to.  My Mother never claimed a penny either, until she had a stroke aged 75 and needed help to live independently. The difference between an able bodied pensioner and one with age related issues is huge. 64% of Barnet pensioners need no intervention whatsoever. This is a figure Rajput neglected to inform his cabinet colleagues of. Being over 65 doesn't mean you need a care plan. Being infirm does.

What Rajput and the rest of the dim Tories seem to have ignored is that the frailer you get, the more it costs. As they sat there, self righteously pontificating, I was struck by a vision of them all in 20 years time, senile, incontinent and unloved. Who knows when such tragedy strikes.  I saw my mother changed from a proud, independent, self reliant woman to a totally dependent wreck, in the course of a few minutes by a stroke. I used to think I'd never wish that on anyone. I hate myself for saying it, but as I watched Lynne Hillan (the woman who moved her mother to a location where the wardens were being retained, just before announcing the warden cuts) pontificating on the issue, I said a silent prayer for some poetic justice.

I simply couldn't believe just how rude Lynne Hillan was to David Young, the man who stopped the destruction of Sheltered housing warden service with a court case. She should have apologised to Mr Young, for ruining his elder years, instead when Mr Young exercised  his constitutional right to ask a question and Ms Hillan treated him like an idiot. Even before he started she insulted him "Keep your supplimental question short". According to the timetable, 1/2 and hour was allocated for public questions. There were four questions and they took 14 minutes in total. Hillan thought this too long and refused to answer Mr Silverman or Mr Young in any proper manner.

There is one question I have for Lynne Hillan. How can you look in the mirror on the day you sold out the pensioners of Barnet.

Saturday, 11 September 2010

Did you know that Leader of Barnet Council, Lynne Hillan is legally your mother?

Barnet Council are debating their corporate parenting strategy at the Council meeting on Tuesday. This document describes how the council will intervene in the lives of people who for whatever reason. Click on this link and select the report 5.1.1 -
http://committeepapers.barnet.gov.uk/democracy/meetings/meetingdetail.asp?meetingid=6154 -

This document was up for discussion at the cabinet meeting on Tuesday. I was interested to see what the cabinet had to say about such an important document. What questions were asked? Absolutely none. The whole of the cabinet just stared vacuously into space. What is the purpose of this strategy? If you read section 3.1 you will see this :-

So there you go. The overriding priority of this paper is to spend less money on young people in care. In short, this is short term penny pinching. Just in case you weren't quite sure
This shows the mentality of the cabinet. Just in case any of these dunderheads have failed to grasp what I'm trying to say. If you can turn around the life of a troubled teenager, by spending a few thousand pounds when they are school age, then you will save a lifetime of welfare dependency.

You might wonder what motivates me to write blogs at such a  rate? It is my anger that these people are so self serving when so much needs to be done. Don't get me wrong. I'm no saint. I'm pretty well off, I am a lazy, self indulgent, greedy and arrogant punk rock guitarist. My one redeeming feature is I have a little compassion for people less well off and there are plenty of those in Barnet.

Which brings us back to the Barnet Council Corporate parenting strategy. What sort of person considers themselves fit to be a corporate parent? Let us consider what Barnet Council are doing with it's assets? They are flogging them off like there is no tomorrow. They are using the financial management methods of Crackheads to address their financial ineptitude. The bonkers schemes are coming thick and fast, the latest one being the plan to flog off Burnt Oak Market. What about how they look after those they have a duty of care to? The Sheltered housing  tenants? The council has spent tens of thousands of pounds on failed legal challenges, trying to cut them loose. A delegation of Councillors were recently told the following on a visit to a sheltered housing location (this is from a paper on the council website where they are trying to reintroduce the cuts, strangely the term Sheltered Housing or cuts isn't in the title - http://committeepapers.barnet.gov.uk/democracy/reports/reportdetail.asp?ReportID=9576).


So there you have it. They've admitted that they didn't even bother talking to residents. What about residents of Barnet Homes, their ALMO to manage housing stock - they've been cut loose by the privatisation of maintenance to Connaught PLC, who have gone bust. What about the staff who used to be employed by the council and who transferred to Connaught PLC - summiraly sacked by conference call on Thursday. Whilst some councils have re-employed them and are taking the function in house, Barnet will not, for purely ideological reasons. Tenants stuffed, employees stuffed - by their corporate parents.

When it comes down to I don't believe that Barnet Council are fit to be "Corporate Parents". If I was asked to describe their behaviour, I'd call them "Corporate Crackheads". Maybe we should bring in compulsory drug testing to see if there is more to their profligate behaviour than meets the eye? I wouldn't trust Lynne Hillan to run a whelk stall, let alone be the corporate mum to the disadvanteged of Barnet. Maybe Lynne would care to tell us why she thinks she's so well qualified to be the "corporate mother of Barnet"? Maybe her kids could write a guest blog for the Barnet Eye - "My mum would be a great corporate mum because.....". When it comes down to it, being a corporate parent, means taking responsibility for those who you have a duty of care to look after. Would she treat her biological mother, like the elderly in Sheltered Housing? We all know she moved her to a home where the warden was being retained before the cuts were announced.

I have this advice to anyone who has an issue with people for whom Barnet Council have a duty of care. Write to Lynne Hillan and ask this. "You are their corporate Mother. Would you allow your biological children/parents/grandparents to be treated in this manner". Simple Question - Simple answer really

Wednesday, 12 May 2010

Where's Arthur Scargill when you need him?

Whenever I am faced with a situation which my brain can't really comprehend, I find myself having a reoccurring dream. When I wake up I see things with clarity. Having spent five months campaigning for a Lib Dem victory, only to see them deliver a Conservative government, I went to bed rather early and rather confused last night. I awoke this morning, seeing the brave new world with stark clarity.

Firstly, let me tell you about my dream. As regular readers may know, in the late 1960's I used to star in TV commercials. One of these was made in 1969 for Galaxy chocolate and was filmed at Queens Ice rink. In my dream, I'm back at the Ice rink awaiting filming. I am discussing the future (I was 7 at the time) with my first love (a young girl who was also in the commercial). We were discussing the forthcoming decade - the 1970's. We talk about how they will be great, how England will hold the world cup for ever and how the Beatles will rule the world of music forever. All of a sudden I realise that it's 2010 (or whenever). England haven't had a whiff of the world cup, the Beatles split, it all went wrong in the 1970's. In a panic, I realise that it actually all worked out alright and the world kept spinning. For some reason, I awake knowing what needs to be done.

So what needs to be done. 40 years on, what lessons can we learn? Well let me tell you the first lesson that anyone who works in the public sector should learn. Join a Union and get active. My mind turns to Arthur Scargill. Most people remember him for losing the war against Margaret Thatcher in the 1980's miners strike. Most people forget that he was the leading activist when they beat the Tory government of Ted Heath in the early 1970's. Scargill was a great activist but a lousy leader. He was the man who invented "flying pickets". I wouldn't advocate his style of leadership in the 1980's, but we desperately need his style of activism from the early 1970's.What the public service unions need now is a whole host of tireless activists to organise opposition to the forthcoming cuts at local level. I know we need to address the issues of public debt. I just don't believe that the way to do this is to slash services to the vulnerable. Don't expect any help from the Labour party. I believe that in an act of supreme cowardice and dereliction of  duty, they failed to engage the Lib Dems and other minor parties in a coalition to protect the weakest. I believe that for reasons of political expediency, they want the Tories to spend a few years weilding the knife. They lack the balls to do it themselves. Whatever the Tory-Lib Dem government does, they do it with Labour collusion.

We are now entering a phase where things will be harsh. Don't expect any favours from the politicians, because you won't get any. Here's my advice :-

* Join a Trades Union if you can
* Join a Residents association if you can
* Stop buying crap newspapers which are full of lies and owned by foreign moguls who only care about their own profits
* Get out on the streets and protest against the cuts when they come
* Support local people who organise local campaigns against policies which hurt local people

When I see senior politicians getting the bus rather than the chauffer driven limo, then I'll believe in new politics. Until that day, I'll just do what I can as best I can to stand shoulder to shoulder with those people who are trying to help the most vulnerable members of our society. Lets remind ourselves that people like solicitor Yvonne Hossacks and resident David Young stopped the Tory plans to abolish Sheltered Housing. It was a failure of local politicians such as me to kick them out which may have negated this good work. I apologise for that failure, but now more than ever it is vital we support people like David and Yvonne. I believe that the Tory plans for Barnet can still be stopped, it will just be far, far harder. The time for navel gazing has gone. What is done is done. We now have to start organising our opposition to this brave new world, both in Barnet and nationally.

Wednesday, 5 May 2010

Canvassing in Mill Hill - Concerns for the elderly Jewish residents

On Saturday I was on the Lib Dem stall in Mill Hill Broadway. One conversation has stuck in my memory. One guy came up and introduced himself as a reader of the Barnet Eye. Like many people who read the blog and enjoy it, he doesn't agree with my political outlook. I asked him "Will you be voting for me?". He replied "I've always voted Conservative. I will be voting for David Cameron, but locally I will be voting for you". I enquired why. He said "It is simple, you wrote a blog eleven months ago highlighting the risk that the warden cuts pose to the elderly Jewish residents of sheltered housing". In this blog I raised the issue that Barnet has the highest number of Jewish residents in sheltered housing of any London Borough. He fully agreed that the removal of wardens left the frail and elderly in a position of vulnerability. Many of these elderly tenants suffered at the hands of the Nazis. They lost family and friends. Sadly there are plenty of people who see them as "fair game". An on site warden can keep an eye out and will see if there are undesirables lurking.  They are on hand if a resident has a concern. The gentleman I spoke to said "I think all elderly residents deserve safety and security. As Jewish residents are particularly threatened, it makes the issue even more important". He went on to remind me that  people who defile gravestones clearly have no morals.

He told me that whatever reservations he had about the Lib Dems were insignificant when it came to protecting the old and frail members of his family. He also told me that he'd drawn the attention of his friends and family to the blog on many occasions.  I was intrigued. I checked my stats and sure enough, this particular page has had a massive number of hits.

If this issue concerns you, please read the blog I posted eleven months ago

http://barneteye.blogspot.com/2009/06/time-for-barnets-jewish-community-to.html

Now let me just make one point about this blog. When this was posted, I wasn't a member of the Liberal Democrat party. I had no intention whatsoever of standing for council. I was just campaigning against the cuts. I joined the party and have stood, only because I was asked to, by people such as the guy I spoke to on Saturday. People who want a council that stands up for it's vulnerable.

Barnet Council Elections - Lets go viral and save the Wardens

This is the first real internet election. We all have email now. If you live in Barnet and want to stop Barnet Council terrorising elderly and vulnerable people, please email this message to everyone you know. The Barnet Conservatives in the Town hall plan to scrap all onsite wardens. The only way they can be stopped is to vote for candidates who oppose this policy. Regardless of how you vote in the general election, please vote for a candidate committed to preserving wardens for our sheltered housing tenants.

Wednesday, 21 April 2010

Sheltered Housing - more than just a political football

Yesterday I visited Moreton Close in Mill Hill. This is what we used to call sheltered housing. I had a cup of tea and a chat with the residents. Barnet Council got rid of their onsite warden 2 years ago. How does the new system work. Not very well. Recently the travelling warden who also looks after Derby House in Hendon was called at 7am. They turned up at 10.30am. When you are vulnerable and need assistance that is a hell of a long time to wait. The residents were keen to know the Lib Dems position on wardens. I explained we would keep them. I asked what they thought of the parties. They told me they were disgusted by the behaviour of MP's and the expenses scandal.

I asked what they thought of the Council. There was barely concealed outrage at the way the Council has behaved. Then I got a surprise. I asked what they thought of our local MP. They were outraged. It seems that two people had turned up from the local Labour party at 8.45pm on a recent evening. They had gained access to the building, circumventing the entryphone system and had started banging on doors. As residents never get people banging on doors at this time, it scared the life out of the residents. They were livid. They asked me to pass on the message to all parties and all canvassers that residents do not appreciate late night calls in this manner. They were happy to chat and pleased that someone was taking an interest. I was pleased to have a rather nice cup of tea on my travels.

There is a lesson for all of us in here. Sheltered housing is more than a political football. It is a fundamental lynchpin of peoples lives. In all the excitement of Nick Cleggs fine performance in the debate, lets not forget who we are doing this for and why we are doing it.

Saturday, 27 March 2010

David Cameron upsets Hendon Blue Rinse brigade

There was a story in yesterdays Evening Standard which made me chuckle. It seems that the President of the Hendon Conservative Party Mrs Elizabeth Sparrow, aged 70 was featured in the famous 1979 "Labour isn't working" Poster campaign when she responded to a call to party activists to turn up at a location to be photo's as part of a "queue of people". She wasn't told that the queue she was going to be photo'd in was a "dole queue" and she would be depicted as a "benefit scrounger" on posters up and down the land (Amusingly, if you look closely at the picture, they are a "dole queue" all dressed up in their Sunday best, not a hoodie in sight - no 1979 punks, skinheads, goths or rastas). Now that David Cameron has rehired Maurice Saatchi, creator of the original poster in a last desperate attempt to revive his flagging campaign, Mrs Sparrow can keep silent no longer. She told the Evening Standard that she did not like “distasteful” electioneering. She said: “It's all spin, and in a way that's what advertising is.”

No doubt we'll soon be seeing truthful election leaflets from Mrs Sparrows association, detailing how the Barnet Tories lost millions in Iceland, how their candidate presided over a the Aerodrome Road fiasco which cost Barnet Taxpayers £11 Million and how they are abolishing sheltered Housing wardens against the wishes of 85% of the elderly and vulnerable people they consulted. Mrs Sparrow is always welcome to write a guest blog here telling us the truth about what a cock up her party have presided over in Barnet.

Wednesday, 24 March 2010

The Important questions for the Barnet Council elections in May - Number 1

Here at the Barnet Eye, we don't believe in telling people how to vote. We believe in giving you the evidence. What you do with that evidence is up to you. Between now and the 6th of May we are going to run a daily series of important questions. Every one of these questions can be influenced by the way you vote on May 6th.  With each of the questions, I'll give a brief summary of the positions of the three main parties in Barnet.

Question No 1.
Barnet Council are currently trying to abolish the warden service for sheltered housing residents. This policy was first introduced when current Council Leader Lynne Hillan held the responsibilty for the social serviceses portfolio. The policy will save the Council approx £400,000 (less than the cost of the salaries of three senior council officials). They will replace the existing on site wardens with a service provided by telephone, where wardens will drive from site to site on request. For every four on site wardens, they will replace them with one mobile warden. In the consultation for the change, over 85% of the residents strongly opposed the changes. The residents have taken the Council to court and had the changes declared illegal. The Council are now trying to reintroduce the changes. Do you believe that stripping the elderly and vulnerable of the security of their on site wardens is a policy you agree with or not?

Barnet Conservatives : Strongly committed to abolishing the Warden Service

Barnet Lib Dems : Strongly committed to retaining the Warden Service

Barnet Labour : Strongly comitted to retaining the Warden Service
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REMEMBER  - WHETHER THIS CHANGE HAPPENS IS DOWN TO HOW YOU VOTE ON MAY 6TH

A pledge to the pensioners of Barnet

The pensioners and tenants who live in Sheltered Housing were out protesting at the headquarters of the three main political parties on Monday. It is a scandal and a disgrace that these folk, who have paid their dues to society many times over, need to fight a protracted campaign, when they should be sitting safely and comfortably at home. The policy of scrapping wardens for the the elderly and vulnerable was the brainchild of Councillor Lynne Hillan. She used to have the social services brief. The council had hoped that they would have implemented it by now, but they botched it up. The pensioners fought back, launched a legal challenge and it turned out that the Council hadn't even done the basic groundwork to check whether the policy was legal or not. The High Court squashed the Councils decision.

How did the rest of the local Tory group react to this fiasco? Their social services policy had landed them in court, they'd lost and they all looked like a bunch of plums. Their beloved Social services chief, Lynne Hillan had proven to be useless and incompetent. Well they sat down and decided to promote her. She's now the leader of the Council. In a free election of Tory Councillors, they decided that the person who had made the lives of the Boroughs pensioners a misery, the person who'd landed the Council in court, costing tens of thousands of pounds, was the best person to lead their group. Councillor Lynne Hillan has done all of this to save less than half a million pounds. In the recently passed budget, she's allowed for a sum TEN TIMES BIGGER to fight legal challenges for her policies. It seems her mantra is "STUFF THE PENSIONERS, WE'VE GOT TO LOOK AFTER THE LAWYERS".

In Mill Hill, we have Tory Councillor John Hart who told the Guardian the following, during an interview :-
With council tenants, and I'll admit I am putting it crudely, it has been a lot of 'my arse needs wiping, and somebody from the council can come and do it for me.
Mr Hart seems to resent the fact the infirm and the disabled have to rely on Council services to perform these tasks. This statement was the most crass, repulsive thing I think I've ever heard said by any politician. What made it especially upsetting for me on a personal level was that less than two years ago, my dear father in law died. He was 89 at the time. He'd become very infirm and for the last year of his life, he relied on a team of carers from the council to wash, dress, bath and clean him. He lived at home with my mother in law, but she could only manage helped by a team of young, fit carers who visited twice a day. He was one of the people John Hart was talking about, who needed a carer to wipe his arse. He didn't like it, but he was stuck. Was it right for Hart to stigmatise him?

I urge the pensioners of Barnet to throw out on their arses the likes of Hillan and Hart and all of the other heartless Tories who care nothing for the vulnerable, who care nothing for the residents of sheltered housing. The Barnet Lib Dems have made a solemn pledge to the pensioners and the vulnerable of Barnet. If we take control of the Council on May 6th, we will immediately scrap all plans to destroy the Sheltered Housing Service and the wardens. We will guarantee that this will not be cut as long as we have any say in it's running.

I have a special reason to want to defend and preserve the Sheltered Housing service. My cousin who is the same age as me, lives in Sheltered Housing in Barnet. She's independent but needs a bit of help. The picture at the top of this page was taken last year in Gavarnie in France, I took her their on holiday - she's the good looking one on the horse !

Tuesday, 9 February 2010

Another Barnet Council Hypocrite

There is an interesting new press release on Barnet Councils website - Councillor Daniel Thomas, Cabinet Member for Environment and Transport, said:
"Encouraging our youngsters to get to and from school using healthy and sustainable forms of transport is a great idea for so many reasons. It teaches the importance of keeping fit and healthy from a younger age while helping to reduce the level of carbon emissions from cars."
Forgive me while I foam at the mouth with rage. One of the Borough of Barnets largest schools is Mill Hill County High School. Many of the children who attend the school live at Poets Corner in Mill Hill. If you look at the map (click on it to enlarge) The school is shown at the top towards the left. Poets Corner is the block of roads towards the bottom right. As you can see, children have to cross Lawrence Street to get to the school. There is no safe crossing on this road.  During the rush hour, when children are crossing, it is a dangerous scrum of traffic, where they cross to access the quickest route via Uphill Road. I've held meetings with Conservative Councillors and the Highways department, but they say "no one has been killed, so it's not a priority". They also said "No children are crossing". Durr, why do you think that is? Because no sane parent would let them. The route is also used by children passing the other way from West of Lawrence Street to Goodwyn School, St Pauls C of E and St Vincents Primary Schools as well as Mill Hill Public. It's all very well for the likes of Councillor Daniel Thomas to urge parents to abandon the car, but they won't spend a penny to make such a move safe.

Now you may be surprised to know that the person who tipped me off about this ridiculous press release wasn't complaining about how the Council can come out with this, when their policies are completely the opposite of what they say. No they were quite rightly drawing attention to the crass hypocricy of a member of Barnet Council claiming they want to get people out of cars, when their own policy is to force the Wardens who look after the elderly of the Borough to have to drive from location to location. As you may know, the High Court declared this policy illegal. Leader of Barnet Council, Lynne Hillan hasn't given up and she's starting the consultation again.

Why is it great for Lynne Hillan to strip sheltered housing residents of their wardens and force them to drive from site to site, but terrible for parents to drive their children to school, when no safe corridor exists. There is a pattern in all of this. Safety - be it that of Children crossing roads, or the elderly in Sheltered housing - it is the least of the Barnet Councils priorities. Car Journeys are great when it is a warden saving the Council money, but awful when it's a normal resident.

Monday, 1 February 2010

Sheltered Housing update : Barnet Council Cabinet review

Barnet Council is discussing the High Court decision to overturn its heartless policy of abolishing sheltered housing wardens on Wednesday 3rd Feb (CLICK HERE for the full report). There are a couple of rather interesting snippets
Now given that many residents of Sheltered Housing are disabled (that is why you need wardens), are you as shocked as I was that "due regard" hadn't been given to the "disability discrimination act 1995". How did the conversation go? Did Lynne Hillan say "As we are getting rid of wardens who look after the disabled, it is unlikely that the disability act applies to us". It isn't that hard to figure out that they have to follow the law, is it?

The next section which caught my eye was this one :-
The first bullet point is the one which shocks me most. This clearly states that the Council has no training program at present to train their staff to do "equality impact assessments". If like me you've followed this whole sorry saga from day one, it now becomes clear how all this mess happened. It happened because the council hasn't got a clue what it's doing and no one has been properly trained.

Consider this. Barnet Council spent £23,000 on fighting a high court case, when they hadn't bothered to train their staff to do the job. They also launched a case against Yvonne Hossacks, the lawyer representing the tenants. The cost of this hasn't been disclosed. In other words tens of thousands of pounds have been spent on cases, which were doomed to fail.

At the cabinet meeting where Barnet Council approved the policy, I asked whether a risk assessment had been performed on the impact of the decision. The then Tory Council Leader said "Yes". I asked a follow up question "How long is this". He replied "3 paragraphs". That was for every site, every scenario and every tenant. It was clear to me that they didn't know what they were doing. As the Leader gave his response, there was hysterical laughter from the public gallery. The cabinet, to a man, looked horrified.

Council Leader Lynne Hillan was the architect of this policy. How can she justify trying to implement sucha  change, without even having properly trained staff. It is clear from reading these papers that the Council plan to abolish the Wardens just as soon as they can. Lets just review the story so far

Those who think it's a good idea :-

The 33 Conservative Councillors who voted for the policy, led by Lynne Hillan and Andrew Harper
The Lawyers who have taken Barnets cash to fight hopeless cases

Those who think it's a bad :-
The residents of Sheltere Housing who overwhelmingly opposed the plans in the consultation document (over 85%)
All of the Labour and Lib-Dem councillors on Barnet Council
All of the groups representing the Elderly and disabled in Barnet
The High Court
This blog and everyone I've spoken to about the issue (including many elderly staunch Conservatives)

Get yourself up to the Town Hall on Wednesday to oppose this policy.

Saturday, 30 January 2010

Tony Blair and Lynne Hillan - two sides of the same coin

Ask yourself this. Tony Blair led Labour to three election victories. Which of these policies were in his manifesto? :-

Capital punishment
Unlimited detention of suspects without trial or judicial process
Circumvention of international law

Regardless of whether you agree with these policies or not, they were all introduced under Tony Blair. You see under the British mandate in Iraq all of these things have happened. Whatever you think of the invasion, whatever you think of Tony Blair, all of these things have happened in Iraq. We were part of the coalition which deposed Saddam Hussein, we wrote the new rulebook and constitution. We did the same thing in Germany at the end of WWII. Even this week, Chemical Ali was hung. We put together the new Iraqi constitution. We are responsible. You may think he deserved it. That isn't the argument. The point is that we deposed a government, imposed a new one and allowed things to happen there, which we banned long ago in this country.

The problem with Tony Blair is that he didn't think "the law" applied to him and his little adventures. He totally believes he was right, so the law didn't matter. Having read the comments by the Leader of Barnet Council, Lynne Hillan, with regards to national law applying to local authorities, sadly it seems she's afflicted with the same syndrome. She's lobbying to make an incoming Conservative Government let Council Leaders make up their own laws.

It seems to me that the most dangerous disease on the planet is "Leaderitis". This is where you decide that because you are leader, you know best. The unfortunate symptoms range from invading Iraq, to scrapping sheltered housing wardens. The most unfortunate effect is that people suffer. Other people.

Friday, 29 January 2010

Rejoice, Rejoice - Barnet Council drops sheltered housing appeal

The Hendon Times reports that Barnet Council Leader, Lynne Hillan, author of the Sheltered Housing warden cuts, today announced that the Council has abandoned its plans for an appeal. Furthermore, the full cost of wardens will be met by the Council.

I cannot tell you how pleased I am for the elderly and disabled of Barnet. Hats off to David Young, who launched the appeal. On the night of the Cabinet meeting where Barnets Tory Council decided to scrap the wardens, I trudged dejectedly outside, after the decision had been announced. I bumped into Mr Young and his solicitor. They informed me that they were launching the court case and gave me a copy of the letter they had served on Barnet Council informing them of the intention to launch a judicial review. I promised Mr Young that I would place that letter on the blog that night.I pledged to do everything I could for the campaign. I was given renewed hope by Mr Young, that all was not lost.

That letter is the most downloaded item on this blog. Mr Young has set a shining example to all of us as to what you can achieve if you are prepared to fight. Whilst Mr Young deserves all of the credit, there was a huge campaign across Barnet. We marched through the Council Leaders ward, bringing traffic to a halt. We held rallys at Council Meetings. We wrote blogs, letters to the local paper and left comments.

Make no mistake though, the reason Lynne Hillan has dropped the appeal is because there is an election this year and she knows it will damage her bedrock support. She has killed the issue, for this years budget. If you read the article carefully, you will see that she quite clearly indicates that she's planning to try it on again in future.

Pensioners in the twighlight of their lives such as Mr Young, should not have to launch court cases against their own council. When you put your vote in a box, to elect a new council in May, be sure that if you select a Conservative Councillor, you will be voting for Warden cuts, more court cases, due to botched policies, more slapdash management, more potholes in the road, where budgets are cut. If you think Mr Young has had enough aggravation, give Hillan and her cronies a wide berth when you vote.

Tonight, I'm taking my wife and children out to celebrate. We'll toast David Young and his feistyness. I am over the moon for him and all of the other residents in Barnet.

Thursday, 28 January 2010

Barnet Council is full of Grit

I thought that any Barnet Residents may be interested to see what Barnet Council spends your Council Tax on. Here is a video they made explaining what a marvellous job they did gritting roads and footpaths during the recent bad weather. Strangely all of this seemed to completely bypass my road and many in Mill Hill.


As you may recall the Leader of Barnet Council, Lynne Hillan and her Deputy, Andrew Harper were on holiday during the worst of the bad weather when the grit ran out. I suppose that they watched this from their luxury hotels in the sun and thought "We're doing a fine job". Strange how they can find the money to make videos saying what a marvellous job they've done, but they can't find the cash to pay for Sheltered Housing wardens for the elderly

Sunday, 24 January 2010

"Friends, Romans, Conservatives, lend me your votes"

When I started writing a blog, I didn't have any agenda. I didn't think to myself "if I do this, then in two years time I'll be doing that". For those of you who have followed the blog since the days of the Hendon Times blog, will know that what started as a bit of a rant about what I perceived to be mismanagement and Stalinist tendencies within the ruling Conservative elite in Barnet Council, has grown, like a large snowball being rolled down a hill. There were things that I probably could have predicted, if I'd thought about it. I'd probably have predicted that if I felt like this, then a few other people would. What I would never have predicted was just how many real Conservatives in Barnet agree with me. As the blog evolved and I started to research the things I write, two things became crystal clear. One was a deeply personal issue and one was a far wider issue, affecting the whole of Barnet.

On the personal level, it became clear to me that I couldn't, in good conscience, remain a member of the Labour party. I'd belonged to the party for many years, but how could I support a party that had launched an illegal war, based on lies, in Iraq? How could I rant, day after day, about the local Tories telling us porkies and mismanaging us, when Blair and Brown had done such a thing, leading to tens of thousands of deaths of innocent Iraqi civilians. When Bush and Blair abandoned the UN route, they had stuck two fingers up at international law. When it became clear that Parliament had been mislead, I realised that a line had been crossed. I examined my conscience and found myself and Labour had to go our seperate ways. I have huge respect for some of our local Labour Councillors, such as Julie Johnson. It is the top level of Mandelson, Brown, Johnson, Blair who have shown themselves to be unfit to run the Country. It's not just Iraq. The privatisation of the Post Office, the destruction of our pensions, the retention of the rail franchises such as First Capital Connect, the abolition of the 10p tax rate, the bailout of the big banks, with no safeguard against massive bonuses. I could go on. Nobne of these policies I can in any way agree with.

That was the private issue. Then there was the wider issue. I've lived in Mill Hill all of my life (give or take a year or two in my teens & early twenties). I love the area and I want to make sure that my three children and their children have an even better life than I have had in the area. I care passionately about the green space, preserved by green belt legislation.  I care about our schools. These are the biggest guarantee of our future. I care about our local small businesses. I run a small business, a music facilities company. My father started a local crash repair business in 1946 called Mac Metals in Bunns Lane Works. He ran it until he retired in 1984, selling it to his foreman. My brother runs a Welding Company and a storage business, which lets low cost space for small businesses. Another brother and sister are trustees of a trust which owns a small industrial estate in Mill Hill which provides local businesses with premises at relatively low rents.  Whilst many such sites have been sold and redeveloped for huge profits in residential housing, we believe in the small business ethic. We look for long term investment, rather than short term gain. When my Father died in 1987, my mother considered selling the site. We persuaded her to retain it and set up the trust. As a result, the asset is far greater now. Had she flogged it and invested the money in the Stock market, who knows how it would work out, but it provided an income and a far better investment. It's all about planning long term, rather than short term. Then there is the issue of family. I believe that families are the bedrock of society. I don't just mean Mum, Dad & two kids. I mean the wider family. We have lost the ethic of the wider family. At Christmas, I went to Sandhurst for a get together organised by my Cousins. It was great  to see cousins. old and young. What we need to do as a society, is realise teh huge debt we owe the older members of our families. That is why I passionately oppose Barnet Councils policy of abolishing Sheltered housing wardens. My own mum had a stroke when she was 75 years old and became dependent. For 8 years, myself and my brothers and sisters organised our lives around my mothers care. One sister spent 2 days a week with my mother, coming down from Northampton. Another delayed a move from Edgware to Essex for several years. In the course of this experience, we saw first hand the misery caused by the outsourcing of the meals on wheels to Sodexho. The stress caused by this cock up nearly killed her. This is why I think David Young is so admirable to fight Barnet Council through the courts. Does Council Leader Lynne Hillan care? No, she moved her own mother to a location where wardens were being retained, shortly before the policy was publicly announced.

So what has all of this got to do with the price of fish? Well, when I did a blog saying I'd resigned from the Labour party, local Lib Dem boss Jack Cohen rang me up and asked if I'd like to join the Lib Dems. I'd spoken to Jack a few times to get info about several council issues and found him to be a good guy. I laughed at the idea, until a couple of days later. I was having a beer with a friend, who is a staunch Tory. I mentioned the conversation with Jack Cohen and he said something which really shocked me. "Rog, you should join and stand for the Council. Did you know that Andrew Reid has become a local Conservative Officer?". He then went on to tell me that if I stood, many local Tories who have become totally disillusioned with Barnet Council, would vote for me. He explained "You understand business, you are a strong family man, you care about the green belt and you are honest" He went on to point out that I'd helped many local businesses with rates appeals, done much fund raising for local charities and organised all sorts of local events. I asked him if my political views would put people off locally. "Rog, you would never stand for policies which hurt local business, attacked families and pensioners and you're honest. You are more of a Tory than most of the lot in the local party". Whilst that's not a platform I'm standing on for the Lib Dems, this conversation was pivotal. If you've read this blog over the years, you'll know all about my views on everything. Local Politics, football, punk rock, wasabi almonds.... There isn't any politician in the country who you could find out more about their views. There's 853 blogs on this site. Have a look.

Barnet urgently needs change. When the Tories took over, residents paid far less in Council tax than neighbouring Brent and it was well below the national average. Now it is higher than Brent and higher than the National average. Given that the Tories have always said low council tax is their priority, they are failures. As if that wasn't bad enough, they collect more in parking fees than any other Council. You'd think with such high tax and parking fees, they'd be providing good services, but no. They are cutting services to the most vulnerable. Who benefits. Well check how the allowances for senior councillors has shot up. Check how senior Council officers have been kept in line with big pay rises. Some senior officers have even had tellies installed in their offices. Some officers have been sent to the South of France for property conferences.

This isn't all about me though. This can only be changed if, throughout the Borough, people reject the failed regime of Lynne Hillan.If you want lower taxes, better management, then the Lib Dems offer the only realistic chance of getting it in Barnet. This isn't an idle boast. There is a big difference between myself and Council Leader Lynne Hillan. We've both run small businesses. Hers went broke, mine has gone from strength to strength for over 30 years. All of the Lib Dem candidates I've talked to in Barnet have track records of success. They are people who want change for the better. If you are a Tory living in Barnet and you aren't happy with what Barnet Council are up to, lend us your votes at the next council election. Give us a chance to show what proper management can achieve. Let us show you that budget cuts don't have to hit those least able to cope.

If you are sceptical, read this blog. It tells you all you need to know as to why Barnet needs radicle reform. If you don't believe me, then read Don't Call Me Dave at Not The Barnet Times. He used to be a bigwig in the Chipping Barnet Tory party until he saw whats going on.