Monday, 14 September 2026

Not getting where you want to be in life? Then the first thing you need to do is to change the way you think

 Over the course of my career, I've mentored dozens if not hundreds of people. This was both in my music career and in my IT career. Some of it has been formally, some of it hasn't. But there is one thing I learned very early on. No one achieves their goals if they approach them in  the wrong frame of mind. If you want to achieve anything, you have to believe that you can do it. If you let yourself think that something is beyond your capabilities, then it is. When I have a goal I wish to achieve, no matter how ridiculous, I always ask myself three questions.

 The first is whether there is anyt physical reason why I can't do it. If I can't then I look at what aspect of the aspiration I could do and I adjust my goal to be the best thing I can do which might tick the personal boxes I had. I would have loved to play football for England, but to be honest, I just enjoyed playing. So I found a team with people I liked and I put my heart into it. When I couldn't play 11 a side, I switched to 5-a-side and played until I was 61. It was a massive part of my life. It scratched the itch for me.

 The second question is this. If I can physically do what I aspire to, what is preventing me from doing it. Since I was fourteen I wanted to be in a band which did gigs and made records. What was stopping me when I started wanting to do this? I'd been told I couldn't sing, I couldn't play an instrument and I didn't have an instrument. Then I saw Ian Dury and thought, I can do that. I will never be an Opera singer, but I can write songs that suit my voice. I saved up, bought a guitar, taught myself to play and then put a band together. Strange as it may seem, when we had our first rehearsal, I thought we'd cracked it just by having our first rehearsal. I was in a band. That was what I wanted. It took two years to get it together, but it was worth it.

The third question is this. Will this satisfy my financial objectives, is it a hobby or is it a vocation? If I can do what I want and nothing is preventing me, then am I doing it for fun or am I doing it to make money. Some things are vocational. I have volunteered with several charities. This was neither for money or fun. But it gave me a lot and I recommend it. If, like my football career, it is just a hobby for fun, that doesn't mean you can't take it seriously, but you should set your goals and plans around such things realistically. If you are looking to fulfill a financial aspiration, then you need to plan and make sure that you do the right things to achieve it.

Bear in mind that a financial objective may not necessarily be a new job. It may be a holiday in Australia, or a new car. But whatever it is, you need to plan. If you want a better job, my first advice is always to try and ensure that it is an improvement on the old one. This could be more money, it might be more interesting, it may just be to escape a toxic workspace. Th first thing to do is to ensure that what you are chasing is actually what you want, not just a sideways move that will improve nothing. If you have a job, work out what it is that make you aspire to another job, make a wish list of things that you want the new job to do for you personally. Move for the right reasons.

So we are now at the point where you have satisfied yourself that you can physically do it, there is nothing stopping you and it will satisfy your aspirations, comes the part that is so hard for some people to do. You go for it. The reason I always tell people to ask the three questions is because you then repeat the mantra to yourself "I can do this, there is nothing stopping me and it will deliver my aspirations". I other words, there is nothing to stop you. All you have to do now, is to do your homework and make sure that you have given yourself every possible chance to get it. Do your homework. Be as well informed as you can possibly be about what you are going for. If it is a job, read up on the company, look at the profile of possible colleagues on Linkedin, etc. Look at the technology they use. Anticipate their questions, try and work out the best answers, work out all of the reasons why you are the best person to do the job. If the aspiration is to go to Australia on holiday, work out what sights you want to see, what is the best way to get there and get back, how will you minimise Jetlag, so you get the best value. See what offers there are, as the less you spend on travelling, the more you can spend on fun (unless cash is no object). If you want a new car, so your research there. There are always good deals and bad ones. I always check five or six different options, including whether its cheaper in Birmingham etc. 

But to do all of these things, first you need to make sure that your mindset is one that gives you the permission to succeed in life. Whenever I mentor people, I ask "What is stopping you doing this?". The real answer is almost always "Nothing", but there are excuses. People set out the reasons why they will fail, then they don't try. There is an old mantra that if you fight, you may lose, but if you don't fight you always lose. So beieve you can win and do everything in your power to win. You may still lose, but take on board why you lost, learn the lessons and go again. 

As a final word, I was talking with a young person recently, who was just setting out on the hunt for a job. They said "It's impossible, AI screens everything, so you don't even get to sit before a real person". I said "Have you looked at how and why AI might be screening you CV etc out and how you can make your CV the one it will say is the best".   So I asked AI and we looked at their CV.  This is what AI said

AI screening tools and Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) look for specific gaps, mismatches, and formatting issues to rank or filter out CVs. [1, 2, 3]
Key Factors AI Looks For to Reject CVs
  • Missing Keywords and Hard Skills: Systems scan for exact matches on required skills, certifications, and technical terms listed in the job description. Lacking these core terms lowers your relevance score.
  • Unconventional Formatting: Graphics, columns, tables, headers, footers, or non-standard file types confuse the parser. If the AI cannot read the text, it misses your core experience. 
  • Hard Requirement Gaps: Failing to meet baseline criteria—such as minimum years of experience, specific education levels, or required licensing—triggers an automatic low score or disqualification. 
  • Generic AI Buzzwords: Overused, AI-generated filler phrases (like "results-driven" or "proven track record") lack specific context and are increasingly flagged or down-scored for lacking authentic proof of impact.
  • Poor Work History Relevance: If your most recent role does not clearly demonstrate a direct connection to the target position within the first few lines, the system or stressed human screener moves on.

What was interesting was that in all of these, there was massive scope for improvements. People often do not realise that vocational activities, etc can help. But if you are going for a specific role, make it relevant and make it hit home. If you don't have the basic requirements for a sought after job, then it is unlikely that you will get it, so make sure you are applying for things at the right level. 


Saturday, 12 September 2026

To understand Nigel Farage and Reform, just watch The Producers by Mel Brooks

 Have you ever watched The Producers by Mel Brooks? If you haven't, you should. Mostly because it is a brilliant and hilarious film (I mean the 1967 version, not the awful, turgid remake). The central character is a Spiv like chancer called Max Bialystock, who is a highly unsuccessful chancer, who funds his terrible productions by seducing rich elderly ladies and getting them to fund his terrible productions. His life is transformed when he meets earnest accountant Leo Bloom. Bloom realised that Max has invented the perfect scam by accident. All you need to do is get a bunch of naive people to funnel a shedload of money into a show. Promise them the earth in rewards when it is a hit. You them make a production so awful that it closes on the first night, to terrible reviews. Because the show fails, no one will ask for their money back and you keep the lot. All you need is the worst script, the worst director, the worst actors and the worst director. You hype it up to the maximum, offer small bungs to unbribable critics, knowing they will be disgusted and pan the show, Simple, isn't it? The only real problem will happen if the show is actually a success, despite doing everything wrong.

Today I awoke to the news that Nigel Farage and Reform had received the biggest ever bung for a political party from a crypto-billionaire. I simply couldn't help but be reminded of the Mel Brooks classic. For many years, when Nigel Farage ran UKIP, he had the best job in politics. He was a Euro MP. You get paid a fortune, you have almost unlimited expenses and you don't have to do any work. It is a matter of public record that Farage never thought Leave would win the Referendum. When they did, he realised the gravy train was over and UKIP fell apart. I don't know who the Leo Bloom character was who persuaded him to get involved in the Reform project, but clearly something happened. The scam is different. The carrot isn't a juicy job in the EU Parliament, it is a much bigger pot of cash, as we seem to be continually finding more and more. Unlike Max, it is not rich old ladies who are seduced for cash (although strangely rich old ladies are the core of the Reform support base). For Nigel, it is crypto billionaires, etc that are to be seduced. The carrot is simple, give us a pot of cash and we will deregulate the UK economy, so you can make even more cash. As we have seen, the cash rolls in. I don't know too much about the world of crypto, but what I do know is that it attracts gamblers, who love a punt and when they win convince themselves that it is because they are very clever. Just the type of character that a chancer like Farage sees as ripe for financial seduction and rinsing.

I first started having my suspicions when I saw the team he has built. The Tories got absolutely mullered at the last election. The one thing that was clear was that the public hated them. So what would be the most logical thing to do if you were doing a Producers style scam? You'd recruit the most bonkers Tories that you could find, the ones that people either turn off the telly because they are so horrible, or keep it on, because they enjoy watching a car crash. People who were absolutely associated with the failure of the last Tory government. Farage recruited former Home Secretary Suella Braverman. It is the job of the Home Secretary to keep the country safe, so Farage picked someone who had completely failed to do so, and who has no self awareness at all. He recruited Nadine Dorries, who was most famous as culture secretary for giving interviews when completely plastered. He recruited Robert Jenryck, a fomer Justice Secretary who again had a record of total failure. Other key figures are rather strange. Zia Yusuf is the Home Affairs spokesman. Despite being a practising Muslim, he is best known for criticising other Muslims. He has seemingly fallen out with many of his colleagues and also has aspirations to be leader. I speak to many Reform supporters and when I ask them who else in Reform, other than Farage, would they trust with the top job, I am invariably met with silence, or the name of someone I've never heard of. Most are deeply uncomfortable with the dodgy Tories that have been recruited. 

Then we move on  to the script. Max chose a script called "Springtime for Hitler" written by an unreformed Nazi, on the basis that it was the absolute worst one he could find. I won't mention what might be seen as another parallel here. Just that the script was chosen because it was awful. Whcih brings us to Reform policies. Reform are riding high in the polls, but this is not based on actual policies, but on the basis that they are anti immigration and a belief that they will 'do something'. Whenever Reform actually make a policy announcement, it invariably is pulled apart within a couple of days and is never mentioned again. A great example is Nigel Farage's commitment to deploy the Royal Navy in the channel to "stop the boats". There were three major problems with this, The biggest is that we simply don't have the capacity to do this. The very Tories who Farage is so keen to recruit shrank the Navy to a point where it can barely perform its basic defence functions. The second problem is that when you board refugees onto a naval ship, they become our problem. British warships are simply not allowed to sail into French ports and dock without permission. The third problem is that the global situation as it stands at the moment, means that the Royal Navy is not set up for this sort of work, large, relatively slow warships are not designed to intercept small boats and decant people in the middle of the sea from them. We would need a whole fleet of new, fast boats that are purposely designed for the task and we'd need to properly train and fund the whole thing. I know that many Reform supporters would love this, but it is not a trivial undertaking. 

As for Farage's economic policies, this is what he is proposing

  • Public Spending Reductions: Proposes roughly £80 billion to £150 billion in spending reductions across public services, government waste, and administration.
  • Welfare Reform: Aims to slash welfare spending by targeting disability benefits, including removing Personal Independence Payments (PIP) for mild or non-major anxiety, requiring in-person third-party reassessments, and restricting welfare access primarily to British citizens. 
  • Net Zero Scrapping: Plans to abandon net-zero carbon emission targets and subsidies to save billions, though critics argue this creates economic risks and lost revenues. 
  • As you can see, there is virtually nothing that is properly thought out and costed. How many times have we heard Labour and Tories state that they will "cut waste and administration". If it was that easy, it would have been done years ago. When they say they will cut public services, is this librarys, bin collections, street lighting? 

    As for Welfare Reform, whilst targetting disability benefits may sound attractive and we are bombarded with stories of people who are on the take, with no real disability, such broad brush strokes usually end uop hitting decent, honest people who tell the truth and missing those who know how to play the system. I believe that if it would work, the Tories (lead by the likes of Boris, Braverman and Jenryck) would have done it.

    Scrapping Net Zero targets sounds attractive to many. I would agree with many that the whole implementation of the Net Zero agenda has been botched. Given that we have coal and gas reserves, I think it is insanity to import these, when we still have a requirement for them for the country to work. Shipping coal from abroad usually in large,  diesel powered ships adds more carbon to the atmosphere. We should have a proper policy to phase these out, but using our own supplies. We should be doing things like updating planning laws to require all new homes to be energy efficient, have solar panels, batteries etc. We should have sane and sensible transport policies, with long term improvements to public transport and infrastructure. But this isn't what Reform are proposing. They are proposing a sudden jibe in government policy that will throw everything into chaos in planning and infratstructure spending, 

    What does all of this actualluy mean? Well you have a bunch of undeliverable policies, presented by a bunch of largely discredited clowns. What could possibly go right? Well the punch line of The Producers was "We picked the wrong play, the wrong actors, the wrong director, how did it all go right?". Springtime for Hitler was a massive hit, so they blew up the Theatre and all went to jail.

    And therein lies the conundrum. Millions in the UK are totally disillusioned with the mainstream UK political parties. Many feel that they are not being listened to. Many feel that the people who live in the UK are treated badly by our own government, whilst the red carpet is rolled out to immigrants. Simply addressing these fears by saying "All of this is just dog whistle politics stirring up a bunch of racists" is not the way that you win arguments. What has actually happened in the last 10 years is people have become bolder about saying things that had become socially unacceptable. I actually agree that millions of people in the UK, mostly those at the bottom of the pile, get an absolutely raw deal. The estates where the Union Jacks went up, where the is no jobs and little prosperity, have been let down for decades. Everyone knows this and no one is interested, the perception is that there are no votes in it. This is the bedrock of the Reform support. If one good thing comes out of the rise of Reform is that maybe politicians will be forced to address this. If they don't we may yet have the nightmare scenario, that I beleive Farage dreads, where he becomes PM. I think he has seen the film and knows the ending.

    The election will not be decided in wealthy areas such as Camden and Hampstead. It will be decided across the country in places like Derbyshire, former red wall seats. There was a council by-election this week and it is quite sobering. I don't know the area, but clearly the Andy Burnham bounce has passed them by


    My view is that Farage wants to do well enough to keep the cash rolling in, whilst making sure that this is not enough to actually win. The crypto bosses must be kept believing and pouring the cash in, it must be credible. It is pretty clear to me that the donation came because Reform are plunging in the polls. Farage clearly said "We need this now or we are f**k*d" and it worked. Whilst £36 million sounds a lot, consider this. It costs 91p for a second class letter. This won't even cover  a second class mailout to the 48 million registered UK voters. Parties like Labour and The Tories have a well organised team of local activists to deliver these for free. Where Reform have been found wanting is in on the ground organisation. I genuinely don't think donations from crypto billionaires deals with this. What it does do though, is make sure that Nigel Farage won't be short of beer, fags and expensive plonk for a very long time.

    The big tragedy of this is that there are millions of very disenchanted people in the UK who have been taken in by all this. They have hopes and aspirations. They think that these very rich, career politicans care for them. I believe that nothing could be further from the truth. The bottom line is that Reform is not properly run. This is not just my view, right wing super pundit Tim Montgomerie said the same thing earlier this week, after resigning from Reform. 


    Where do I think it will all end for Reform? I suspect there is a clue in the final scene of the Producers.



    Friday, 11 September 2026

    Friday Fun and Friday Music 11th September

    As ever, we start with the Friday joke.  

    And on to the music round up.


    FRIDAY 11th 


    Saturday 12th

    Sunday 13th

    Thursday, 10 September 2026

    Rock and Roll Stories #75 - My fool proof plan to make the False Dots the worlds best band

    Back in early 1978, myself and my then best mate Pete decided we were going to form the best band in the world. We had a few problems, we couldn't play, we couldn't read music, we had no instruments, we didn't know anyone who could play, we knew nothing about song writing. But inspired by Mark Perry's Sniffin Glue fanzine, who put three chords on the cover and said "now form a band", we were inspired. We decided that Pet would play bass and sing and I would play guitar. We started saving up to buy instruments, we then sat around working out what sort of a band we would be. The answer was simple. We would be a punk rock band. Punk was sweeping everything before it. We would be the best Punk Rock band ever. How? well we would look at what all of the other bands that we liked did, choose all of the best bits and then, because we were self proclaimed misunderstood genius's we'd make the best band in the world. Whilst we saved up to buy instruments, we started writing a manifesto, because every band needs one, don't they. In May, Pete quit school when he turned 15 and got a job as a trainee butcher at Dewhursts. He bought a bass guitar. I persuaded my sister to lend me her Les Paul Columbus copy. I saved up cash from my paper round and bought a FAL 50 watt amp. It was the cheapest amp in the shop and we could both plug into it and make a horrible noise. We didn't even know how to tune a guitar, but luckily my brother Laurie helped us. He lent us his pitch pipes. The problem was I couldn't hear whether it was in tune or not. But we persisted and practised. We also started writing songs. The first song we wrote was Wrong, which we reworked and put on our last album. It is a 45 second blast of Punk Rock anger, written by two 16 year olds who were angry. It was based on our 'manifesto'. The lyrics "Do you consider yourself a thinking person, or an object for others to manipulate, nobodies immortal, no one's irreplaceable, you're wrong". We ditched its shortly after our first rehearsal, but it sounded strangely current, so we rehashed it.

    We hooked up with Dave The Drummer and had our first proper rehearsal on Feb 14th 1979. In some ways, this was our greatest ever achievement. We had gone from nothing to actually playing our own music, albeit very badly, in a year. We were a band. Were we the best band in the world, which is what we set out to be? One of our mates asked Pete this very question, after our first shambolic rehearsal. Pete was very eloquent and his reply was brilliant "That's a really subjective question, because everyone will have a different opinion". Our mate persisted "So do you think you are the best band in the world". Pete replied "Well it is definitely the best band I've ever played with, it was a real blast, so on those terms yes".  Our mate thought he had Pete "So you think you are musically better than ELO?". We burst out laughing. Pete replied "As I can't stand ELO and I'd hate to play their music, of course I do, but as I said, everyone has their own opinion and until everyone has heard our music, they can't judge". I then butted in "on the 5th of June 1976, I'd never heard of The Ramones. On the 6th June, I had seen them and new they were the best band in the world, until you see a band you don't know".The False Dots next gig!

    I was reminded of this last night. Tom our trumpet player told me that after our gig on Saturday at the York Rise Street Party, someone asked him whether The False Dots were better than his favourite band (The Cat Empire). Toms reply "not quite". When Tom told us, I said "You should have said 'we are working on it' ". The truth is we are. Until I stop playing, that will be my ambition. I love playing my music to people, I love recording it, I love writing songs, I love rehearsing. We have a great mix of personalities in the band and although there are plenty of the bands that do something or other better than us, we have a  very unique energy and vibe. The band have had a lot of members and a lot of different personalities. I think the current one is the best iteration of all. We have definitely got the best songs. I'd love former members Venessa Sagoe and Connie Abbe to do a couple of numbers with us. They were very special singers. We have always been a pretty good live band, but we are far more fun than we've ever been. 

    Oddly, though despite all the changes, all the swings of musical direction, we have had a remarkable consistency of ethos and the plan has always to be the best band we could possibly be, part of that is to play songs that resonate with an audience. We mostly, but not exclusively do original material. hen we gig, strangers invariably come up and tell us that they really like the lyrics and what we want to say. The covers we do, we do for a reason. We started covering "Thats Entertainment" by the Jam, after Rick Buckler, the Jam's drummer passed way. The reason? Our drummer Rambo was inspired to drum by him and Keith Moon (our song Rambo's Rampage nods to Keith Moon and The Who). 

    I've always believed that for a band to be the best band, they need to be invested in their music and believe in it. But they must also be comfortable around each other and have a  laugh. A band is a gang. We are now past the age of hanging around on street corners, but we chat and have a laugh and hang out sometimes. If there was a poll as to what the best band in the world is, I guess it would probably be someone like The Rolling Stones,  U2 or Radiohead. Whilst playing on those stages would be great, I'd hate to play under the constraints they play under. We have a beer and a chat with our fans after, we play new numbers and no one complains that we didn't do ten songs written in 1979. What was the plan? Write the best songs we possibly could, rehearse them properly so we could play them well and engage with the audience. Structure our sets so that we entertained everyone and had a good mix of material. Record the best numbers we had, that had got a decent audience reaction and then do it all again. 

    We genuinely get a kick out of it. Best band? For me yes. The plan has worked. All I have to is convince the other 6 billion citizens of this planet.