Wednesday, 15 August 2018

Can you solve the mystery of the Apex Corner Seals?

Many of us pass through Apex corner roundabout every day and never give a thought to the architecture. Apex Corner is one of the busiest road junctions in London, where the A41 and A1 collide. Thousands of cars every day pass by. I've walked and driven pas these shops thousands of times and never given a thought to the architecture. There is a picture of Apex Corner from 1955 on the Francis Frith Website).


I was quite shocked to have my attention drawn to two stone plaques of seals balancing balls on their noses above the shops at Apex Corner by a good friend of this blog Mark Amies.



As regular readers of this blog will know, I am always one for a good mystery. What do the seals signify and why 1958 and 1959? The buildings date from before then, so what monumental event involving seals occurred at Apex corner in 1958 and 1959.

Good friend of this blog, Robert Elms on BBC Radio London has joined in the hunt to find the mystery seals and made the subject one of his notes and queries this morning! I'm hoping the answer will be found between Noon and 12.30pm on his show. Click here to listen

Subsequently, following listeners responses, we have figured the mystery out. The correct name of the Parade is Northway Circus and the seals represent circus animals. Thay part of the parade was built in 1958/9.

Got a local mystery? Let us know and we'll see if we can sort it out

If you can help call Robert on 0800 731 2000 before 12.00 or leave a comment on this page!

**** Update @ 12:10 **** A surveyor has rung up Robert to state that the part of the parade in question was built 1958/9 - closer examination of the picture on Francis Firth backs this up. You can see that the second half of the parade was not built. He suspects that they are simply to commemorate the year of construction and are simply decorative

Tuesday, 14 August 2018

#TravelTuesday I thought Thameslink was bad until I used SNCF!

It may surprise you to learn that I rather enjoy travelling by train. The years of ineptitude by Thameslink have not dimmed this. It is generally my preferred method of travel, when it is a practical option. You can have a drink, you can wander around and around London it is invariably quicker to get in, apart from in the middle of the night. You can read a book or the papers and watch the world go by. As a Manchester City fan living in London, I regularly use the Virgin service from Euston to Manchester and it has been fine. As my wife was at Manchester University, I used to travel up more or less every week to see her on British Rail. I'd take the 16:59 up on Friday and the 06:24 back, which could be done cheaply on a weekend supersaver return. I'd read a book on the way up and sleep on the way back (as would most people). I don't recall having any problems. I'd be in work in Windmill Street by 9.30am.

Thameslink has been a different story. It is definately worse than British Rail, there are no contingency plans for when it goes wrong. When one train is cancelled, they often make sure the next one doesn't stop at your station. If I have the option, I will just go to the pub till it sorts itself out, if it is an evening. If it is a morning, a trip to Burnt Oak is the sensible option and the Northern Line.

Regular readers will know that most years, in the summer I volunteer with HCPT, a charity that takes a group of people with disabilities to Lourdes in France. This year, a friend was getting married on the Saturday, but the group departed on a Friday. I wanted to join the group on the Sunday. The flight options were not feasable and hugely expensive. I thought I'd check out the train. This seemed doable.

I paid 200 Euros for the following journey

11:31 London St-Pancras
14:47 Paris Gare du Nord

Passenger: Roger

Carriage 6, seat 31

15:48 Paris Montparnasse TGV 8591
20:39 Lourdes

Passenger: Roger

Carriage 6, seat 107
London → Lourdes - Sunday, 29 July 2018 €200.00
As you can see, this allowed just over  an hour to connect. I booked the ticket. I then checked how long the connection would take. I was disturbed to see that it was 40 minutes and was worried that this was cutting it a bit fine.

On the day, I turned up and boarded Eurostar with plenty of time to spare. I had breakfast in the station with the Mrs, then she bade me Au Revoir and I boarded the train.


The first wrinkle was that the train departed rather late, nearly 15 minutes after it was scheduled. I started to worry about making my connection. I pinged my wife. She pinged me back a rather worrying message. "Check your emails, there's one from SNCF".

So I did. I was horrified to read it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear customer,


Regarding your travel booking with SNCF on 29/07/2018 on train 8591 from PARIS MONT 1 ET 2 to LOURDES.

We regret to inform you that your train has been cancelled due to production problems.

Find out details about how our services are running on:
  • SNCF.com website under the timetables and live traffic updates section
  • SNCF mobile app
  • By calling +33 892 35 35 35 (cost of international call + fees of your phone operator) or at your original selling point

If you've already changed or cancelled your booking, please disregard this message.

Thank you for your understanding

So I would be turning up in Paris with no connecting train. At least it solved the problem of the connections. On emerging from the tunnel another problem became apparent. This was a very 21st century problem. A subsequent email from Sky Mobile explained
Hi,
 
We're really sorry that you may be experiencing problems trying to use your Sky Mobile service if you're abroad at the moment.
 
There's a technical problem with the roaming network and we are working very hard to get this fixed as soon as possible.
 
We'll let you know when it’s back up and running.
 
To say sorry, we'll be adding 1GB of data into your Sky Piggybank within the next week.
 
If you can connect to local Wi-Fi you'll be able to continue using services such as email, WhatsApp, iMessage and Skype.
 
 
Sky
So I coundn't ring anyone to sort anything. As there was wifi on the train, I spoke to the Mrs, who had spoken to SNCF and they said "Go to information at Gare Du Nord and they will sort it out". I also spoke to the conductor who said "There are power supply problems at MontParnesse, but ther is a train at 17:48 that gets in at 22:38.".

On arrival, I went to Information at Gare Di Nord. I've never had a worse customer experience. I was simply waved away. You would expect an international terminal to have some sort of ability to help but no. I was now totally flummoxed. I decided to go to Montparnasse, and see if they were more helpful. I took  a 30 minute trip across Paris. As the Eurostar had been 25 minutes late into Paris, it is debatable whether I'd have made the train. As it was, I then had to take a ticket and queue for 25 minutes to get help. Lord help me if my train had actually been going shortly. Eventually I was seen and was told that the train was actually going from Gare D'Austerlitz. I was told that I could not reserve a seat and may have to stand for five hours, I was advised that as the train was busy, I could travel the following day, if I preferred. This was not an option. I was advised to get a bus. I opted for a cab. On arrival at Austerlitz, it was chaos. The station is being rebuilt and the information system comprised of one screen. As I had time to spare I grabbed a beer. I thought I'd have a meal on the train. I'd been lead to believe the food was OK on SNCF trains.

As the departure time approached, I was disturbed to see that there was no platform displayed. In broken French, I asked "Excuse Moi, ou est le train pour Tarbes?". The SNCF official sneered at me like an imbecile and pointed at the screen. About 15 minutes after the scheduled time, an announcement had the words Tarbes and Quatorze in it. I made a mad dash for the train. My plan was to sit in the seat I'd been allocated on the previous service and play dumb. This worked. Eentually the train left 30 minutes late. I texted my friends in Lourdes who were collecting me.

At around 8pm, I decided to try and get some food and a beer. On arrival at the buffet, I was informed that it was shut and given a bottle of water. That was that. On th train, no one checked tickets. My French isn't great but there was no real attempt to apologise for the late running, other than operational reasons.

I've never travelled on SNCF or a TGV train previously. I had been anticipating a blog saying how clean, efficient and punctual it was and how Thameslink might learn something. As it turned out, there was no apologies, no attempt to help, no food, no hot drinks and the most appalling customer service I've had in years. At least with Thameslink if you are delayed by over two and a half hours, you get some sort of refund.

You will be pleased to know that my friends were there to collect. They'd saved me some dinner and I had a very pleasant couple of beers. Would I go by SNCF again? Not if I can help it. I've no idea if SNCF have a customer relations team, but if they do, I hope they read this and recognise that they have failed miserably. I am an experienced traveller and have enough French to get by. Lord help anyone who doesn't.

Monday, 13 August 2018

Barnet Council and Capita - The Marriage made in Hell

This morning, Barnet Council has once more been in the National Press. It wasn't meant to be like this. Back in May 2006, the Tories were lead to a massive victory in Barnet Council by Brian Salinger. His manifesto promised competent local government, low council taxes and good services. Salinger was a competent administrator and a sensible council leader. What he wasn't was a good politician. Immediately after the elections, the then Councillor Brian Coleman lead a palace coup and the Tories replaced Salinger with hard right Thatcherite Mike Freer. As a Thatcherite, Freer believed that there is no such thing as society and that public services should be provided by private contractors. The first I heard of this was in 2008. looking back on my blog archive, there are a whole raft of blogs on the subject (when it was called 'Future Shape").

Back then, this was the only blog in Barnet. There was all manner of sniping and ludicrous comments from people associated with Freer. They dismissed this blog and my opinions as the rantings of an idiot. It hadn't occurred to Freer or his cronies that I had  a skill that I sometimes wondered at the time was unique in Barnet politics. I was reading the documents. It is all very well calling people names, however I was simply providing detailed analysis of their own documents. It took a few years, but eventually the penny dropped. These days the Barnet Tories never comment on my blog and privately most admit to me that I was right all along about Capita. One blog from this period that stands out is the one from Wednesday 18th December 2008. I wrote the following

"I looked up the word zombie on the cambridge on-line dictionary.
zombie Show phoneticsnoun [C]1 INFORMAL DISAPPROVING a person who lacks energy, seems to act without thinking and is not aware of what is happening around them:He just sat in front of the TV all day like a zombie.
2 a dead person who is believed, in some Caribbean religions, to have been brought back to life by magic
Both definitions brought to mind the "Future Shape" scheme. Remove all personal resoponsibility from staff, employ the lowest common denominator. If Zombies 'R' US tendered for the contract ("They're dead, they don't want to be paid") they'd win hands down. They may do a rubbish job, but hey they're cheap.
Barnet has experience of Outsourced contracts. Fremantle, Sodexho (meals on wheels). Does it bode well? Now I'm all for a bit of efficiency and lower tax bills (who isn't).   It's just that Barnet has a history of not implementing schemes very well."
So nearly ten years later and five years into what Future Shape morphed into, was this a fair description? I said then "It's just that Barnet has a history of not implementing schemes very well. " My worry in 2008 was that with Barnets track record of managing external suppliers, they simply didn't have the skill set to make this work.

Over the years since then, the Barnet bloggers have built up their strength. In 2009, John Dix AKA Mr Reasonable joined the scene. John has a very different style of blogging to me. John is very much a facts and figures man. Someone once commented to me, in a rather sneering fashion that 'The Barnet Eye is The Sun of Barnet blogs and Mr Reasonable is the Financial Times". Although I loathe and detest The Sun, in many ways it is a fair comparison. Like the Sun, I cover a whole range of subjects, football, music, news and just about anything else that tickles my fancy. I try and write in a way that is engaging. John concentrates on detail and making sure that facts and figures are central. John rarely blogs off topic. I blog because I enjoy it, I suspect John does it out of civil duty.  What the comment perhaps missed is that we are both 100% serious about the subject. I put a huge amount of work into researching the blogs on the subject. Unlike our councillors, I read the papers that the council publishes. I am sometimes shocked that the questions asked by myself and other bloggers result in quite astonished looks on the faces of councillors on the committees. They are supposed to read the papers, so they should know what is being questioned, but time and again they don't. The questions are published before the meeting, and they don't even seem to read them in advance. They certainly don't read the officers responses, as often they are truly appalling and I can't believe anyone who read them would.

Last month John published a whole series of blogs on the subject of why the Capita Contract isn't working and why we are being ripped off. 



Whilst there are many things I anticipated about Mike Freer's grand scheme that I thought would be a disaster, some things I completely failed to see on the horizon. Perhaps the biggest one would be that Capita itself was a sham and that it would expose Barnet taxpayers to huge risk. It should have been clear to all. In 2013, the Barnet Eye held "Capita Week", This was a whole week of blogs dedicated to the failures of Capita.

Here are the stories

Capita Week - Capita blamed in schools' data loss


The Friday Joke - 21/12/2012 (link to Richard Cornelius taking about One Barnet on the Sunday Politics show).


It is worth watching the Sunday Politics show again that is included in the clip. 



Richard Cornelius states that they were "only outsourcing things that were easy like back office services" in the clip. Having recently attended council meetings where we've heard that Council audits have missed statutory deadlines, unpopular local development applications have been passed by default as the Capita run planning department have not processed the paperwork and as John Dix has demonstrated, the schemes have not saved money.

One of the points we made to Capita at the time was that they would be under constant scrutinty from bloggers and that everything would be exposed. We warned Capita that this would be very bad for their share price. They didn't listen. I have no doubt that their shareholders are ruing the day they set up shop in Barnet.


As you can see, Capita's shareprice has tumbled. In short the One Barnet contracts are a marriage made in Hell. Every cock up that Capita makes is exposed. Journalists such as Aditya Chakrobortty at the Guardian watch the Barnet blogs like hawks, as they know we have broken numerous stories on the failings of Capita in Barnet.

This is why we are running the #KickOutCapita campaign. When you are in a marriage from hell, the best way forward is an amicable divorce. The sooner the better. Here is a video we made to support this campaign.



There is no earthly reason for either side to continue the charade, so lets end it ASAP. 

Sunday, 12 August 2018

The Tweets of The Week in the London Borough of Barnet

It's that time of week so here we go again. Don't forget to follow any tweeters who tickle your fancy

1. Fancy doing your bit for the community? Why not join the Mill Hill Litter Pickers next Saturday


2. A very big shout out to Mark Amies, who brought this excellent collection to my attention and inspired yesterdays incredibly popular Saturday list

3. If like me you went to St Vincents School, this is a rather special image. If you didn't it's still quite a nice bit of local history


4. Some of us rather miss this


5. Fancy a bit of volunteering for a national gem


6. A date for your diary if you are fond of grdening


7. This looked fun, don't miss the next one!!


8. This is the sort of tweet I like. Next time I'm in East Finchley will probably try and comply!


9. Fancy some great Jazz this week


10. And finally, the Mill Hill Hall of Fame welcomes Madness!



That's all folks

Saturday, 11 August 2018

The Saturday List #183 - Ten excellent Mill Hill Photo collections

Over the years, I've found a whole series of excellent collections of pictures of Mill Hill past and present. I've used some of them from time to time in blogs etc. I thought it was high time I collated them all in one blog. So here they are, I do hope you enjoy them. Click through for the links.

Rising Sun 1910 (Pres Soc)
1. The Mill Hill Preservation Society old Mill Hill collection.
We start with the Pres Soc's old Mill Hill collection - http://www.mhps.org.uk/oimages.asp

2. The Preservation Society also have a nice collection of contemporary images. There is a nice picture of the NIMR before its demolition in this collection
http://www.mhps.org.uk/images.asp


3. The third and last selection from the Preservation Society is a collection of old maps. These are fascinating.
http://www.mhps.org.uk/maps.asp

4. I recently came across an amazing set of collections by David Smith. Here are my pics. You can get these framed at www.memoriespictures.co.uk who are based in Brent Street, Hendon. This business are well worth a plug! (no they haven't paid for it, we support local businesses). The first of Davids collections is of Mill Hill Broadway (click on imnage)


MIll Hill Broadway













.
5. The second of Davids collections is a Mill Hill wide selection (click on image)















6. The third of our pics from David's collections is one of Motor Garages. Although these are across North West London, there are plenty of Mill Hill shots. As my family were in the motor trade (my brother still runs a welding business in Bunns Lane), I find these really interesting. I used to regularly visit most of these sites with my Dad.















7. Another site with a good selection of historical pictures is Francis Frith.
https://www.francisfrith.com/mill-hill/photos


8. Another great source of pictures is the Barnet Council Borough archive.
https://boroughphotos.org/barnet/category/place/mill-hill/

Route of Disused railway
9. Many Mill Hill people are fascinated by the disused railway line between Mill Hill East and Edgware. The most comprehensive collection of maps and pictures of the Mill Hill The Hale section are at the Disused Stations website.
http://www.disused-stations.org.uk/m/mill_hill_hale/




NIMR in its heyday
10. Our final collection is on the Britain from Above website. Although there is not a "Mill Hill collection", you can search on Mill Hill. Although not all pictures are from the Mill Hill in Barnet, the ones that are make it worth the trouble! I especially like the pictures of the Medical Research on page three of these piccies.


https://britainfromabove.org.uk/en/search?keywords=%22mill%20hill%22&country=global&year=all

I hope you've found these collections as interesting as I did.
///

Friday, 10 August 2018

Barnet Consultation 2024 - Make your views known and have your say

Barnet Council hae launched a consultation asking residents what they want the Borough to look like in 2024.  It is important that residents have their say. Here is what the council say about the consultation.

We want your views to help us develop our corporate plan for 2019-2024, which will set out our priorities for the next five years and how we will use our resources.

What we want to achieve
Our proposed focus is on three main outcomes which are set out below. This doesn’t aim to capture all that the council does, rather it provides a framework to guide us.
Click on the image below to read more about the outcomes and the priorities we have set for each outcome.


Barnet are proposing to focus on three main outcomes and ask whether you agree or disagree with these. I agreed strongly

Outcome 1: A pleasant, well maintained borough that we protect and invest in




Outcome 2: Our residents live happy, healthy, independent lives with the most vulnerable protected




Outcome 3: Safe and strong communities where people get along well 
 




Overall, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the main outcomes we are proposing to focus on for the next five years?

They then ask for comments. I added mine. I'd be interested to know if you agreed.

Although I agree with all of these objectives, I believe that Outcome three should be reworded to say "A safe and strong community where people get along"

They then ask questions about outcome 1. Asking residents to rate whether they agree with these objectives

1. Maintaining our environment by investing in efficient street cleaning services and weekly bin collections

2. Improving roads, pavements and transport connections 

3. Looking after our parks, protecting our green spaces and improving air quality 

4. Ensuring decent quality housing that buyers and renters can afford, prioritising Barnet residents  

5. Investing in community facilities to support a growing population, such as schools and leisure centres 

6. Delivering on our major regeneration schemes including Brent Cross Cricklewood which will deliver 27,000 jobs and 7,500 new homes 

I agreed with all apart from no 6. which I strongly disagreed with as I do not believe it will help achieve the overall objective. I am of the opinion that this has been snuck in to give the councils discredited scheme a figleaf of respectibility. Whilst I agree that something needs to be done with Brent Cross, the current scheme is poor on how it will address transport issues. Cycling, better public transport (including a better solution for the Brent Cross end of the West London Orbital rail scheme)    
For option 2 they ask.

1. Improving services for children and young people, and ensuring the needs of children are considered in everything we do 

2. Ensuring we have good schools and enough school places so all children have access to a great education 

3. Integrating health and social care, including support for those with mental health problems and complex needs 

4. Supporting our older and vulnerable residents to remain independent and have a good quality of life 

5. Encouraging residents to live well and take care of their health 

6. Helping people into work and better paid employment
    
I agreed strongly with all apart from 5. I left the following comment.

It is unclear to me what  "encouraging residents to live well and take care of their health means". In its classic usage "living well" means being over indulgent. I would suggest rewording this to say "encouraging residents to make healthy lifestyle choices including eating healthy diets and taking regular exercise". This policy should be backed with positive strategies for walking and cycling


For outcome 3, the following statements were made and asked for feedback on

1. Creating a safer community 

2. Tackling anti-social behaviour including crime that affects our environment, for example fly-tipping, graffiti, littering and dog fouling 

3. Celebrating our diverse communities and taking a zero-tolerance approach to hate crime 

4. Ensuring we are a family friendly borough 

5. Focusing on the strengths of the community and what they can do to help themselves and each other 

6. Supporting local businesses to thrive 

I agreed strongly with all apart from 5, which I strongly disagreed with. I stated

"I disagree strongly with "Focusing on the strengths of the community and what they can do to help themselves and each other" the priority should be to address the weaknesses in our community and to assist the weakest, most vulnerable and most at risk to lead safe and fullfilled lives. I also believe that it is a mistake to make no mention of the role of local arts and culture in helping to achieve these aspirations. "     

 They then ask

9. Please select the five priority areas that you feel are the most important: (Please tick five options only)

X -
X - 
X -
X -
X -


My response

"The council should prioritise the areas where it can make the most difference and direct its resources to those most in need. Whilst most of the priorities are worthy, the council should prioritise doing its job. Things like "improving air quality" is a prerequisited for "Encouraging residents to live well and take care of their health". Similarly "tackling anti social behaviour" is a prerequisite for "creating a safer community". It does not seem to me that this list is well thought through or the choices offered particularly logically organised."

 They then ask

We have set out below how we intend to deliver both our statutory duties and ambitions for Barnet within our financial constraints. We want to ensure that the tax payers money goes as far as it can.

A FAIR DEAL
  • Standing up for Barnet so it gets its fair share of resources including police and general funding
  • Effective management of resources and contracts to ensure we can keep Council Tax low and provide value for money for the tax payer
  • Focusing resources to deliver targeted extra support at those who need it most, while continuing to deliver priority universal services. 

MAXIMISING OPPORTUNITY
  • Taking a commercial approach to generating income and looking for new opportunities to generate revenue from our estate
  • Making use of evolving technology and innovation to help us achieve better outcomes and become more efficient
  • Capitalising on opportunities from responsible growth and development to increase income and boost the local economy. 

SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
  • Working with residents and the community to share responsibility to ensure Barnet thrives
  • Providing early intervention and prevention services so residents can live independently for as long as possible
  • Collaborating locally with health and the police to achieve better outcomes for Barnet. 

EFFICIENT AND EFFECTIVE COUNCIL 
  • Reviewing the way that the council works and delivers services to make best use of resources, including strong financial management
  • Providing customers with the assistance they need at the first point of contact and greater access to online services and support
  • Ensuring that residents are treated equally, with understanding and respect, and all have access to quality services.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the approach we have set out under each of the following? (Please tick one option on each line)

Question Title

* 11. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the approach we have set out under each of the following? (Please tick one option on each line)


 They then ask you to state whether you agree with these objectives.

1. A fair deal




2. Shared responsibility




3. Maximising opportunity




4. Efficient and effective council

I disagreed strongly with 1 and 3 for the following reasons.

"A Fair deal. I disagree with the definition of a Fair Deal as explained. The "standing up for Barnet" is confrontational language, of a type that has damaged the relationship between Barnet and the Mayor of London. The aspiration for Council tax should be to set it at the correct level to deliver services, whilst making sure money is not wasted and services are properly managed. The Council should not be seeking to "Maximise Opportunities" to charge residents stealth taxes, which is what this is saying."

There then followed a whole series of questions about where you live, your sexuality and your health.

I strongly urge you to complete this questionaire. It is important that we participate in our community and ensure the Council that they know what our priorities are. 


,

Thursday, 9 August 2018

The Big Boris vs Ken Rematch - Who is the bigger racist?

What is it about the former Mayors of London? In a parallel universe, we'd be comparing their mayoral records, not their record on racist outbursts. I personally believe both did a good job as Mayors, especially intheir first terms.

Ken brought in congestion charging, Oysert Cards and won the Olympics. Boris brought in Boris Bikes and bikelanes, Buses and delivered Kens promise of the best ever Olympics. Ken gave one of the finest speeches in our history after the 7/7 bombings. He spoke of bringing communities together. Boris never gave such a fine speech as Mayor, but we should be thankful he didn't' have to.

I suspect that for both, the Mayoralty will prove to be the pinnacle of their respective careers. There is a bitter symmetry in that for both, they both had energetic and productive first terms but fairly nondescript second terms. In Ken's case possibly because he thought he had a job for life. Boris had bored of the job once the second term was secured, yearning for a return to Parliament. Ken also revealed his achiles heel during his second term. Ken has an issue with Jewish people and an obsession with Adolf Hitler. His run in with a Jewish Evening Standard journalist, comparing him to a concentration camp guard,  showed us a side that even Ken's most ardent supporters found hard to forgive. Had Ken just apologised and put it down to being tired and harrassed, it may have been forgivem and he may even have beaten Boris. As it was, every utterance simply underlined the fact that Ken has a blind spot about racism when it comes to the Jewish community. Many on the left have a dislike of Israel and sympathy for the Palestinian movement, but Ken seemed to have a far deeper problem. His pronouncements became ever more bizzare. His departure from the Labour party was a result of his statement that "Hitler was a zionist before he went mad" on the Vanessa Feltz (a Jewish presenter on BBC London) show. His argument was that because Hitler wanted to kick German Jews out and that Palestine was where Zionists wanted a homeland, this in some way meant that he was sympthetic to the cause of Zionism. The argument simply does not stand up to historical analysis. Hitler was anti Jewish when he wrote Mein Kampf, passed discriminatory laws almost immediately on his ascendence to power and simply saw Zionist aspiration of a Jewish homeland as a convenient way to achieve his aim of a Germany without Jews. It is rather like claiming that the KKK were anti racist because they liked the idea of people keeping black slaves ( I once heard a member of the organisation claim that the KKK were not racists for this very reason, claiming the lot of black people was better off under slavery. Clearly utter nonsense, but the same sort of argument).

Ken never really seemed to care about the damage he was causing to the wider Labour party. Just about every debate about whether Labour are anti semitic sooner or later ends up talking about Ken and at that point it really becomes clear that the Labour party has failed to address the issue.

Boris at least had the good grace to wait till he'd left the London stage to, in Ken's words, "go mad". It is 100% clear that there are problems in the Tory party with Islamaphobia. In the Borough of Barnet, a councillor was suspended from the party for making Islamaphobic tweets and trolling the Muslim Council. Boris has never been PC. Before he ran for Mayor, he'd referred to black people as "smiling Piccaninies". His recent comments are however a completely different scale of racism. Until recently Boris was Foreign Secretary. For those who have managed to aoid the scandal, He wrote in an article that women in Burqa's resemble letter boxes and look like bank robbers. Like many of the actions of Boris, there is a very deliberate method in his madness. The article was, on the face of it, opposing the Danish legal ban on Burqas in public places. Bear in mind that Boris is not a media innocent, he is a journalist of many years. His pro burqa premise was simply cover for his highly inflammatory comments.

I doubt too many British people support the forcing of women to wear veils. But to state that they "look like Bank robbers" is a huge insult and completely innacurate.  I'd not be surprised if there were more robberies by people wearing Boris masks than Burqa's, if you want a stereotype for a bank robber, it would be a sheepskin coat and a beaten up Jag. Boris is clearly implying that there is something with an undertone of lawlessness about a clothing item that is chosen largely by poor Muslim women from third world countries. Boris words plant seeds of hatred. If you have any doubts about what Boris was up to, read the "friends, Romans, Countrymen" speech by Mark Anthony in Julius Ceaser by William Shakespeare. Anthony uses a speech, supposedly to bury Ceaser and all that he stood for, to rouse a rabble in his name. Boris has used the exact same tactic against the Muslim community to perfection.

I have no dount at all that Boris, like Ken will deny that he's being racist. I have no doubt at all that Boris and Ken will both back up their behaiour with all manner of dodgy self justifications. I have no doubt at all, that an ever dwindling band of die hard loyalists will buy the crap they are spouting and use all manner of arguments to justify the behaviour of their hero's. I also hae no dount that the vast majority of their respective parties are horrified by their behaviour. The Labour Party has done itself huge damage by it's inaction in relation towards Ken. The Tories will make the same mistake if they tolerate such horrible Islamaphobic comments. Be in no doubt that Boris comments are classic Islamaphobia and rabble rousing. Racists of low intelligence will see what Boris said as being a green light to abuse law abiding muslim women in traditional clothing. Just as Ken's comments sparked a whole swathe of anti semitic comments on Social Media, Boris risks the same.

I asked who is the biggest racist of the two. Personally, I'd call it a draw. If the Tory party wants to do itself a favour, I'd advise them to not make the mistake the Labour party made. Send out a strong message that such comments are not tolerable. Withdraw the Tory whip from Boris. If they do that, then they will put Labour to shame. My view is that there is no place in public life for the sort of comments that both Ken and Boris have made.