Showing posts with label Daily Mail. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Daily Mail. Show all posts

Sunday, 5 October 2014

The Daily Mail Great British Bakeoff Hatchet job on Richard Burr or why it's time to dump the Mail

One of the very first blogs I wrote on this site, back in 2008 ( http://barneteye.blogspot.co.uk/2008/10/why-does-daily-mail-hate-women.html ), was to express my disgust at the Daily Mail for writing an article slagging off singer Kate Nash. Kate and her family are good friends of mine, I sold Kate her first guitar and she even supported the False Dots at the Mill Hill Sports Club before her meteoric rise to fame. You may ask what terrible crime Kate had unleashed on the country to deserve the bile of the Mail? Well as a pretty 21 year old girl, she had a photo with a visible spot. I was disgusted. Many girls have issues with their appearance and articles like that can be so destructive. I had hoped (in vain) that this would be the last time the Mail monstered someone I like for the most ridiculous of reasons. How wrong I was. Yesterday on Twitter, I became aware that they've attacked local builder and master baker Richard Burr.


Great British Bake Off star Richard Burr and his wife Sarah are friends.. Their daughters are students of Jumpup Ballet school http://www.millhillmusiccomplex.co.uk/lessons-tuition/ballet-classes-for-kids-north-london/ which is located at Mill Hill Music Complex (my business) and the whole family are lovely.

So you can imagine my total disgust at the fact that the Daily Mail has done a hatchet job on Richard. It seems that in the Daily Mail's twisted world,  if you are a builder, you shouldn't have gone to a grammar school and you certainly shouldn't run a successful firm. He's accused of being "middle class" and a manager rather than someone who gets his hands dirty. Of course this is all complete rubbish. Like many successful builders, he does some jobs and gets subcontractors to do others.

Anyway, I believe that we should look after our friends and we ask anyone silly enough to buy this horrible rag to consider buying another paper. Apparently the reason the Telegraph wrote a nice article is because they doorknocked all the neighbours, who told them how nice Richard, Sarah and the kids are. There are enough complete B*****tds out there without needing to monster nice people.
I exchanged a few messages with Richards wife Sarah and she is worried that the Mail has started a feeding frenzy in the press. As I mentioned above, the family have young children and it can't be nice to have a national paper poking around for dirt. Neighbours and local shops have been door knocked and  what should be a joyous time has been soured. Is it really the job of National Papers to monster people simply for working hard and being nice? If you read the Daily Mail ask yourself this. Do I really want to buy a paper who stands for the monstoring of people for nothing worse than being intelligent, working hard and living in a nice house? Isn't it about time that we stopped buying rags when they carry on like this?

Sunday, 6 October 2013

My father was a war hero who hated Great Britain as well !

Has the Daily Mail written the longest suicide note in history with its hatchet job on Ed Millibands father? I don't read the paper, I find its coverage to be stilted and completely bereft of wit, whilst being biased and often obnoxious. I have written before about its obnoxious behaviour, the last time, as I recall when it criticised the then teenage sensation, Kate Nash for the having the audicity to have spots.

In the latest spat, the Mail has criticised Ralph Milliband (father of Labour Leader Ed Milliband) for holding left wing views, which in the stilted world of the Daily Mail equate to hating Britian. As far as I can work out from what I know of Mr Milliband, he hated injustice and inequality, which are two totally different things. Mr Milliband arrived in Britain as a refugee and joined the armed forces. Unlike the sanctimonious editor of the Mail, Mr Milliband actually put himself at risk of death to preserve the good things we cherish, such as free speech and democracy. Mr Milliband hoped that victory over fascism would lead to a better world and a better Britain for all of the people who lived here, not just and elite few. 

As the debate has unfolded, my thoughts turned to my own father. Like Mr Milliband, he was not born in Great Britain. He was born in Queensland, Australia. He joined the Army and then joined the Empire Air scheme, which was set up to supply pilots for the RAF. After training my father qualified as a Pilot officer and arrived in Great Britain in 1942 to fly Wellington bombers. He was assigned to 40 squadron and was sent to North Africa to support Montgomery in the desert campaign. Much of 1942/3 was spent living in makeshift airfields in tents. Conditions were primative but as someone raised in the outback of Australia, not too harsh for my father. He joined the airforce as he thought it would be exciting and it would give him the chance to see the world. He was thrilled to see Cairo and the pyramids. He also got a fair share of action. As the campaign would down, he arrived back in England. He'd met my mother and spent some time at Moreton in the Marsh airfield, regularly trekking down to Burnt Oak to take my mother out. 

At the start of 1944, he was transferred back to Foggia in Italy with his squadron and a relentless pattern of missions was undertaken. Targets included ball bearing factories in Germany, shipping in Italy and sites in the Balkans and Romania. In June 1944, he was shot down on the final mission of his 40 operation tour, near Ploesti in Romania, whilst bombing an airfield. The rear gunner in his plane died and the rest of the crew were taken prisoner and ended up in a camp in Bucharest. 68 days later, they lead a mass escape and 128 airmen made contact with partizans in Yugoslavia. They arranged for the US air force to fly in and repatriate them to Italy. That was the end of the active war for my Father. The events scarred him and he had terrible health issues related to what we no call post traumatic stress disorder for much of the 1950's. 

He stayed with the airforce until 1946, then worked as a commercial pilot in the middle east. He thens et up MacMetals crash repair business in Mill Hill and ran the business until he retired. He was a man who was both religious and civic minded. As an active Roman Catholic, he joined the Knights of St Columba, a charitable organisation, the Rotary club and he played Cricket. At one time the firm employed 15 people and he took a patriarchal view of his staff. I still meet ex employees in Mill Hill who speak highly of him and customers who remember the service and the kindness he showed when they were stuck. He died aged 69 in 1987.

In short, he was a man who had made an enormous contribution to his country and his community. As I thought about him, I wondered how he would fare if the Daily Mail chose to do a hatchet job? My father was born in Blackall in the outback of Queensland. He'd not seen snow until he was transported to Boston in the USA in 1942. He'd never even been cold. He hated the British weather. He always claimed it would be death of him and it was. During the long English winters, he would get mildly depressed and curse the cold. His job involved standing in freezing cold workshops for hours on end. he couldn't stand it, but ha dno real choice. He had six children to home and feed.

Whilst my father was a Conservative, he also hated the British class system. As an Aussie, he had a complete disdain for the inbuilt inequality of our society. He would use any chance at all to get one over on the authorities. This started in the airforce and carried on into civilian life. I can remember him getting stopped by the police and pointing out six things on the police car which would constitute a nick. He reminded the officer that Police cars were as covered by the law as his own car. The speeding ticket was quickly forgotten. Through the rotary club and other charity work, he'd often attend charity dinners. To my mothers complete horror, he'd take great delight in stealing sausages from the mayors dinner plate. He had a complete disregard for many aspects of the law. On one occasion, our house was suffering from subsidence. A surveyor advised that this was caused by a neighbours tree. My father suggested that they chopped it down. They refused. He simply waited until they went on holiday and chopped it down himself. When they returned and confronted him, he suggested that the tree fairies had taken it to heaven. 

Another aspect of British society that appalled him was the institutional racism inherent in our society at the time. Although his language was colourful towards various ethnic minorities (as was usual at the time), he would not tolerate any unfairness. He would employ staff based on ability and pay accordingly. He insisted that people were treated with kindness and respect. In the Roman Catholic tradition, I received the name of a saint as my middle name. My Dad chose Martin, after St Martin De Porres, who was the first black saint. My Father suggested that this would always remind me that we are all equal and brothers. 

Towards the end of his life, my Dad bought a boat in Florida. He loved the climate and the lifestyle. He wanted to live on the boat. My sister lives in Florida and he moored up next door to her. My mother hated it. In the end she gave him an ultimatum, me or the boat. He chose my mum. That was the only reason he stayed in England. As a compromise, they'd spend the worst of the winter in Florida and the rest of the year in the UK. In January 1987, they were in Florida when my mothers sister died. They flew back and 24 hours later, my father had an anuerism brought on by the cold. 

When I read about the comments in the Daily Mail, I was reminded of a situation a couple of years ago where a local BNP activist started leaving comments about my Father in comments on various websites. Now this man had never met my father and made comments about his war record (which is available on line), implying he was a coward. How anyone could say that about a man who flew 40 bombing missions in an obsolete aircraft I don't know, but I was infuriated. Had I met the said person in the street, I would not have been responsible for my actions. I was absolutely livid. The purpose of the comments was a cowardly, spiteful attack, designed purely to upset me. I did not take it lying down and when challenged the BNP activist backed down and apologised, accepting that he'd made an error of judgement. 

In light of this experience, I have a great deal of sympathy for the Milliband family. I don't think "anything goes" just because I disagree with there politics. I am sure all manner of people I don't like have dead uncles, dads, mums and grannies who could be "exposed". The point is that it would be revolting to do such a thing. This blog has campaigned long and hard against One Barnet, but if we published a blog slagging off a dead relative of Barnet Council Leader Richard Cornelius or the MD of Capita, I'd hope we'd be shunned. The case could be made that in certain circumstances, there is a public interest in digging up such stories. Perhaps to show the hypocricy of the owners of the Daily Mail, who attacked a British veteran when their forefathers supported the Nazi movement in print is a case. There was a nasty public spat between the owners of the Mail and the Daily Express a few years back, where the Mail attacked the Express owner for publishing porn mags. The Express responded with a series of exclusive front page stories about the sins of the Rothemere family who own the Mail. The Mail owners suddenly found themselves on the wrong end of the hatchet job and didn't like it. They backed down and have since laid of the Express owners. Sadly the Millibands don't own a national paper, so don't have the means to fight fire with fire. 

It is truly incredible that the Mail newspaper cannot see that their comments were out of order. We don't have to agree with Ed Milliband, we don't have to agree with Ralph Milliband's brand of Marxist politics. I do however think that any decent and honourable human being would do two things. Firstly they would respect the fact that Mr Milliband served in the armed forces and put himself at risk.Secondly we should respect the fact that Mr Milliband had relatives who cared about him. He was not a monster who hurt other people, he was simply an honest man with deeply held views. I didn't agree with many of Lady Thatchers politics, but when she became infirm and then passed away I felt that we should respect her as a mum and a human being and respect her family. If the dead relatives of anyone in public lives become fair game for the national press, purely for spiteful attacks on politicians, then I despair for our society. 

I have always supported a free press and even with the actions of the Daily Mail I have not changed my views. If people want to publish such tripe, then that is one of the costs of living in a free society. More to the point though, every single person who continues to buy the Daily Mail endorses the editorial line of the editor and owner and the refusal to back down. If you want to be thought of as someone who has no respect for their fellow man and who sees politics as a field where anything is justified to achieve an end, by all means buy the Daily Mail. If you don't then give the horrible rag a holiday until the owners see sense and do the decent thing. You don't have to buy it and they won't learn if you simply carry on. Who knows who they may pick on next. 

Thursday, 8 March 2012

Rog T's Cancer blog - Why the Daily Mail should F**k Off

For those of you who are regular readers and have read the previous posts, you can skip this first paragraph.This is the latest installment in my occasional series about how I'm adjusting to living with a big C in my life.  For those of you who aren't, here's a quick summary. I'm 49 years old and I recently had a prostate biopsy following two "slightly high" PSA tests - 2.8 & 4.1. The biopsy took ten tissue samples and one of these showed a "low grade cancer" which gives me a 3+3 on the Gleason scale. I'm now on a program of active monitoring.  In early February, I got the results of the latest PSA test - down to 3.5 and an MRI scan which found absolutely nothing. I've no symptoms and sadly for a few people, if I'm gonna die soon, it won't be from Prostate cancer. Got the picture?


Yesterdays Daily Mail seemed rather keen to start a debate on whether we should be denied treatment if we brought about a requirement for treatment through our own behaviour - There are incontrovertible medical reasons for restricting treatment to obese patients and smokers - doubtless as part of its moralistic right wing agenda. I don't buy the Mail, won't have it in the house, but a friend rang to ask my opinion on the agenda they are persuing. Like most Daily Mail campaigns, it is nasty and mean minded. The most worrying thing is to ask where this "denial of treatment" ends. Should we not treat people with VD, because they weren't careful enough. Should we not treat people with Cancer because they didn't eat their nine portions of veg a day. Should we not treat Downes Syndrome people because their parents should have spared the public purse and had an abortion?

As I write this, I'm in exruciating pain. I've been having to take breaks from writing it, to lie on the floor. What is causing the pain? I've had a long standing back problem, caused by breaking two ribs when I was sixteen. You may ask how I broke two ribs? When I was sixteen, I went to a party. I met a nice girl there who was my age. I snogged her. Her brother who was eighteen, caught me in the process and with three of his mates, beat seven bells out of me. I broke two ribs in my back and have sporadic periods of back pain ever since. Generally a trip to the Osteopath sorts it out, which is where I am off to tomorrow. So is my injury one which I should have to pay for the treatment for. If I'd been more careful I'd not have got caught. Alcohol played a big part in the whole affair. If I hadn't have drunk so much, I'd probably not have ended up in the situation.

And more seriously, what about my cancer. I asked what diet changes I should make, to reduce the risk of the cancer spreading? Cut out the dairy produce. I used to drink copious amounts of milk, eat eggs all the time and I loved my cheese. Did this make me responsible for "catching cancer?". In the law, ignorance is no defence. I was also overweight. Diet changes and more exercise have seemingly had a good effect so far, with the PSA lower at last check. The only problem is that the exercise has irritated my knees (and possibly my back). So am I to be liable for these as well?

If treatment is to be rationed, who decides why and when. Who decides what is fair? The Daily Mail thinks we need to have a debate. I think the Daily Mail should F*** off

Saturday, 2 April 2011

Naked Lesbians in the bath the Daily Mail !

Of all the places I might want to go to if I was in the mood to look at naked lesbians in the bath, the Daily Mail wouldn't feature too near the top of my list. Imagine my surprise when I noticed whilst perusing an article featuring Theresa Villiers, a link in the sidebar to a picture of two lesbians frolicking in the bath. I must confess that I immediately lost all interest in the Villiers article and clicked the link.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1372491/Coronation-Street-lesbians-Brooke-Vincent-Sacha-Parkinson-bath-sexy-photo-shoot.html

Now as regular readers of this blog will note, the Daily Mail is not renowned for it's support of feminist issues, lesbian adoption rights or just about anything to do with advancing issues to do with women. Why then, does it suddenly stick a picture of two drop dead georgeous actresses frolicking in the bath? Hmm, I wondered. Has the Daily Mail suddenly had a Pauline conversion to the cause on the road to Damascus?

Generally stories in the Mail have a slightly different angle

MELANIE PHILLIPS: A dopey judge, a lesbian teacher and an insidious bid to lower the age of consent

'Sinister' lesbian stalker broke into lawyer's home armed with rope and a knife

How I went from committed lesbian to a happily married mother of four

The general theme is that lesbians are insidious,deranged weirdos, but they can be cured with a good shag if they are really lucky. So does the the two naked lesbians in a bath story represent a sea change in attitudes at the Mail? It doesn't look like it to me. As I read the article, I was rather surprised to find that "the nations two favourite lesbians" don't actually discuss their sexuality at all. In fact it is less than clear from the article whether they are actually lesbians at all.  After all, they are actresses and their job is pretending to be somebody else. They talk about their personal friendship, but make it clear they are mates. There is a big plug for DIVA! magazine, which is a lesbian magazine, where you can read the full article.

So does it matter? Well yes, actually it does. You see, the Daily Mail is the leading bellweather of the right in this country. It forms the opinions of middle England. The one thing which the Daily Mail ruthlessly persues is it's agenda. Articles such as this are no accident. They are a smokescreen and a figleaf for the wider agenda. They are printed soley so they can see "Oh no, of course we are not a buinch of raging homophobes". They are actually quite exploitative. Red blooded heterosexual males such as myself will have a sneaky peek, purely for the titilation value and for a good snigger. I'd hazard a guess that at least 50% of the people who hit on the story, didn't read it, they just had a good letch at the pictures.

So when does the Mail like lesbians? Here's a short list

When they are drop dead geourgeous
When they are pretending to have a romp
When they are celebrities

When are they "less keen"?

When they are ordinary people, going about their daily life
When they campaign for equality and fairness
When they express strong political opinions

In short, the Mail is quite happy to exploit sexuality to tittilate its readership, sell papers and as a smokescreen for it's right wing agenda. The article does as much for the rights of lesbians to lead normal lives as the "lezza porn" mags on the top shelf of the newsagents, in fact given the overall agenda of the Mail, it's probably far more harmful to society. Oh, and if you want to know whether the Mail is getting it's message and it's agenda over, read the comments on the article. This is what the ordinary Mail readership had to say. Bear in mind these are two grown up actresses in a posed picture shoot, not axe murderers or puppy stranglers :-

-----------------
Daily Mail Comments :-

These picture shoots will come back and haunt these silly girls. Don't they get enough money in Coronation Street? I can't understand their parents either, I'm sure they wouldn't be comfortable with it, I know I wouldn't.
- Dolly, Northwest, 02/4/2011 09:21

I'm sure with all this stuff 24/7 I'm turning.......good job I'm 59 else I might..!!!! No chance for the 5 year olds though I suspect...when they are asked AT SCHOOL...!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Mrs. B, G.B., 02/4/2011 09:18

This is just one of the many reasons I don`t watch The Street anymore!
- Sandra, Nottingham, 02/4/2011 09:00

oh dear, can they possibly stoop any lower?
- Sheep, UK, 02/4/2011 08:53

Totally inappropriate pictures of pretend lesbians in a lesbian magazine wouldnt have let my daughter pose for these photos they will both regret it in years to come.
- chillipepper, chester, 02/4/2011 08:37

So very very wrong, shame on you Diva Magazine at least use real lesbians - utterly pointless, inappropriate article.
- ****Oscar*****, Oldbury, 02/4/2011 08:25
-----------------
As I sign off, I'll leave you with this thought to ponder. I wonder if  Dolly, who suggested the pictures will come back to haunt them, thinks John Hurt's career was overly damaged by playing Quentin Crisp in "The Naked Civil Servant"?

Thursday, 6 August 2009

Stiletto's & the TUC & the Daily Mail


Reports in the papers today that the TUC want to ban high heeled shoes in the workplace according to an article in the Daily Mail. Bonkers you shout, the Tory party's finest looker, Nadine Dorries comes out firmly on the side of the stiletto brigade, on the grounds that she's 5'3" and no one would see her.

As with all Daily Mail stories, there's more to it than the headlines. Firstly, some members have proposed a motion. This is rather different from actually adopting the policy. If the Tories had adopted every proposal they'd had at their conference, then we'd still have the birch !

Like many issues with clothing, it amazes me that we get so worked up about what other people wear. The Mail is pro stiletto as they believe in a womans right to express themselves. Is this the same Daily Mail which criticised popstar Kate Nash for having a spot on her face? Is it the same Daily Mail that rants about Muslim women in Burka's?

Personally, as someone who runs a business, I really couldn't care less whether a female member of staff wore stiletto's a Burka or both, so long as they did their job. The only stipulation is that they are happy wearing it and are not being compelled (by husband, boss or anyone else).

I'll just say this. Who do you think has done more for the rights of women in the workplace. The Daily Mail or the TUC?

Tuesday, 21 July 2009

A Rubbish Story from the Daily Mail

This blog doesn't like the Daily Mail. Today they were up to one of their favourite tricks, putting a scary headline on a Non Story. To save you the bother of wasting your precious time, here's a summary.

The headline "Council Snoopers sift through your rubbish bin to see if you are wealthy or poor"

The actual story. Some councils are doing a survey of what sort of rubbish people are putting out so that they can improve the service.

The outraged Tory quote :

Jeremy Kite (Ed Note: is that rhyming slang), Tory leader of Dartford in Kent, said: 'I do not believe it is right.'

What actually happened.

Waste was dumped into a big pile and sorted into 66 different categories, which included ten types of paper and card, 11 types of plastic, five sorts of glass, six kinds of textiles and a miscellaneous category that included disposable nappies, carpet and sanitary waste.
The Link - if you have 5 minutes of your life to waste

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1201044/Council-snoopers-sift-rubbish-bins-youre-wealthy-poor.html

Sunday, 5 July 2009

Mill Hill - The best place in the world to live (on a day like today)

This is the blog I nearly didn't write. I sort of thought about it, then decided that it didn't need saying. Then I read this entry on Rachel Joyce's blog. She's the Tory candidate for West Harrow. I realised that sometimes you HAVE TO say things. Rachel read THIS ARTICLE on the Daily Mail website and for someone who is quite sensible, got her knickers in a real twist.

Now I firmly believe that the Mail writes articles for people who like to draw the curtains, have their tea and biscuits and tut about what a terrible place this is. If they actually got out a bit more, they would realise that, sure there are faults, but we live in a fantastic country and we've never had a better standard of living. This isn't a party political broadcast, this would probably be true, whether Tory, Lib-Dem's or Labour had run the show. There is a recession, some people are struggling, but unlike the 1930's people are not on the breadline. Children do not die because they can't afford medical care. There is a great "5 minute interview" with Tony Benn - he says that the national health service is the biggest positive change that this country ever introduced. I agree.

So what inspired me so much? Well, firstly I had a lie in till 9.30. That is always pleasant. Our local church had arranged an outdoor mass, followed by a picnic, fancy dress parade and football tournament at a local Primary school - St Vincents.

This was really well attended. There were contributions from the Nigerian and Phillipino communities, who have a strong local presence. Whilst researching my blog, I read many nasty things concerning the Nigerian community, often on far right websites. When was the last time you read what a great bunch of people they are? Well as I watched the sea of colourful clothes bopping around as they sang various hymns, I thought to myself "You know what, this is great". One of the most promenant Nigerian members of our parish was the lady who's son died in the 7/7 bombing and who made such a moving and emotional statement on the news. Mrs Marie Fatayi-Williams is an inspiration to everyone with a heart and soul. Read This Guardian report with her words. As we relaxed in the sun, viewing the panoramic vista of London as a backdrop, I thought to myself, "Where else in the world does this happen?" there was no stress, tension or suspicion. Just people who want to be part of a community getting together.

After we had our picnic, we had the football tournament. First up it was the boys. It was played in a great atmosphere. This was followed by the dads, but as there were quite a few boys who wanted to play as well, we stretched the rules to over 12. It was a real fun game, final scoreline 3-3 with yours truly scoring with a fine shot. I spent much of the game marking and extremely skillfull mum! When football is played for fun, as it was, it is the greatest game in the world. My son's best friend won the raffle and we brought home a crate of wine for his folks to collect along with their boy.

In what seems to be an ever more regular occurance a few people approached me to tell me how much they loved their blog. One regular reader told me that a car driven by someone with a very strong resemblence to a certain well known politician, usually spotted in taxi's had nearly run him over on a pelican crossing. Apparently the naughty chap was talking on his mobile at the time. I assured him that as he used to be responsible for Community Safety it simply must have been a case of mistaken identity. We know that he's very into ensuring the safety of pedestrians.

Anyway, I digress. Having finished the game, I realised that I didn't have my wallet. I'd left it unattended on a rug whilst I'd played football for an hour. I scampered back. There it was. We had been sitting next to the main steps, so probably 200 people had walked past it. I've never lost faith in my fellow man and this reaffirmed my trust in the ordinary citizens of Mill Hill.

At this point we came home and settled down to watch the Mens final at Wimbledon. This is surely the greatest of the Tennis tournaments. It was a truly epic battle which Federer battle through to win. Say what you like, but there are some things we still do best and the mens final is one of them. I sat back to enjoy my cup of tea, thought shall I write a blog about what a great day I've had and how I love my home town? I thought "No, what's the point". Then I noticed the Rachel Joyce/Daily Mail story as I had a quick browse.

This litany of gloom and doom enraged me. Why do these people never, ever have a good word to say. Why do they always bang on about what a terrible place we live in? I've been all around the world - USA, USSR, China, all over Europe, Africa, Asia & Australia. I've loved them all, but nowhere beats a hot sunny day in Mill Hill playing football against the United Nations of the Sacred Heart parish.

You may think I bang on about Mike Freer, Brian Coleman, Barnet Council et all because I'm a left wing looney. I do it because I love this town and I care passionately about it. It's the best place in the world, with the green belt and the great transport links. I want it to stay like that.

Friday, 27 February 2009

Daily Mail Blows a Gasket over Romeo and Julian

Are you Straight - Will this image turn you gay?


It seems the Daily Mail has blown a gasket over a school putting on a version of Romeo and Juliet with a gay slant -

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1156534/Wherefore-art-thou-Julian-School-performs-Romeo-Julian-celebrate-gay-history-month.html


"Political Madness gone mad" they shriek. We all know that the Daily Mail is shall we say, a bit reactionary, but hang on. Do they actually know the story of Romeo and Juliet? Forbidden Love ends in tragedy. Apparently the pupils themselves put on the play to counteract bullying. Does the Mail support homophobic bullying? My Dad, who was a rather- Heterosexual ex Air Force Pilot made me watch "The Naked Civil Servant" - The Life Story of Quenten Crisp in the 1970's. Why? Because it had good reviews and he thought it would teach me something about a side of life which I knew nothing. Did it turn me gay? No. A mate of mine who swings that way told me that when he came out, his brother insisted he watch some hard core porn to cure him. Did it work? No

The Mail are clearly unaware of the message of Shakespeares play. That if you fall in love with someone you shouldn't have, you are in for a hard time. If you get offended by that you are an idiot.

At the Top of this page I've put a picture of Lenny Henry playing Juliet for Comic relief. Will it turn a straight man gay? I've put a picture of Debbie Harry at the bottom of the page. Does it for me, but will it turn a gay man straight? In the wonderful world of the Daily Mail, it probably will.

Are you Gay - Will this image straighten you out?

Friday, 20 February 2009

The Boris Johnson Guide to Sex Education


Boris Legs it from 13 year old Fathers for Justice Dad !!!!

So we've all seen the news this week about the 13 year old Dad. What really shocked me wasn't that a 13 year old could become a dad, but on reading the article, he stated that he'd been in a relationship for 2 years - since he was 11. I was reminded of this typically uninformed piece of Daily Mail nonsense http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1039287/Children-young-11-lessons-condom-says-government-report.html complaining that children as young as 11 were being given sex education lessons. Now I've got a 13 and an 11 year old daughter so this is all pretty relevant to me. If someone asks me what I think my daughters should be told about sex, I'd give the answer "What they need to know to protect them from harm". What does this mean practically? Well it means that they need to be told about things that as a Dad I'd rather they didn't know about. I don't want either of my daughters to start embarking on sexual relationships any time soon. If, however they decide they are going to, in this day and age I'd want them to be safe. This means knowing about contraception, STD's and plenty of other things which Daddies don't like thinking about in the context of their daughters. In a school, they have to be told before they actually need the information. If you wait until they are all emotionally mature enough, then I'm afraid it's too late.

So what has all of this got to do with Boris Johnson and London? Well he's the mayor of this fine city. He has appointed James Cleverly as his ambassador for young people. I follow James Cleverly's blog
- as Tory blogs go, it is OK, but for a Young Person's mayor where is the bit about sex education for youngsters. I checked the GLA website - nothing there either. It seems that Boris and his ambassador have nothing to say on this issue WHATSOEVER. Why is this a disgrace and a scandal? Well first, a lack of sex education can result in Children being exposed to diseases. Secondly it exposes them to the risk of pregnancy. Thirdly it exposes them to risk of exploitation.

Tonight as I write this there are prostitues working in this city who are below the age of consent. Tonight there will be youngsters below the age of consent getting STD's and there will be youngsters getting pregnant. Do't believe me? Check these graphs on the Poverty website - http://www.poverty.org.uk/24/index.shtml - London has the third highest rate in the country. What didn't surprise me is the link to poverty. The teenage pregnancy/poverty link is a cancer which eats away at the heart of society. As for prostitution, this is the very best way to contract an STD. Many Holllywood movies sell the image that having sex with a prostitute is a right of passage for young men. The reality is far removed. It is exploitative of women and is one of the main conduits of VD in the UK (and globally). Often these are then passed on to unsuspecting partners. I'd make sure that every young man was graphically made aware of this risk.

Boris is in a position to address this issue. How can a young persons ambassador such as James Cleverly have nothing to say? If I were doing his job, this would be the no 1 priority I set.

So how would I combat it. Well I'd have a look and see which country and which city had the most successful policy. Then I'd steal their policies and ideas. If you check Wikipedia they have a chart of teenage birth/Abortion rates - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teenage_pregnancy - The lowest - the Netherlands which has what we may call a liberal approach. The highest - The good old USA.

Per 1,000 women aged 15 - 19
Country ↓ birth rate ↓ abortion rate ↓ Combined rate ↓
Netherlands 7.7 3.9 11.6
United Kingdom 29.6 21.3 50.9
United States 55.6 30.2 85.8

I find this shocking. In this country the problem with sex is we all bury our head in the sand. Boris & his mates are too scared of the Daily Mail and it's fellow travellers to be honest with us. It is cowardly and it is unforgivable.

For those of you hoping to see "The Boris Johnson Guide to Sex Education" - the big scandal is that no such thing exists and their is no policy that I can see to address this - this is picture is the nearest thing I've seen to Boris trying to improve sex education in London!
The Boris Johnson Sex Education Initiative

Saturday, 6 December 2008

Are the Daily Mail Still Nazi sympathisers?

Sometimes I read something so crass and repulsive that words fail me. I spotted this item in the Daily Mail
Hitler was the perfect boss: Former maid breaks her silence on the 'charming' dictator


It was well known in the 1930's that the Rothemere family, who owned the Mail were Nazi sympathisers, but I honestly thought they had seen the error of their ways. It doesn't surprise me that a naive young girl could be taken in by this monster who was responsible for the deaths of tens of millions. What does surprise me is that The Daily Mail prints an article trying to humanise such a monster. The world needs to be reminded about the consequences of this man and his policies. We need to be shown what happens when people follow the path of hate. An attempt, such as this, to portray him as a "very nice man" is totally repulsive to me. As to his interpersonal skills with young women. All of the women with whom he was romantically linked committed suicide. The man was an evil monster. End of Story.

Shame on the Mail for printing this. I hope people see their true colours, especially their Jewish readers.

Monday, 13 October 2008

Why does the Daily Mail hate women?

Sometimes I read something and I just have to respond. Some things are just so completely out of order that they cannot be let pass without comment. There are many things I dislike, but pretty near the top of the list is the Daily Mail. There are many things I don't like about the Daily Mail, but the way it portrays women is disgusting.

I can remember spending an evening discussing the awful rag with sadly missed cousin, film director Midge MacKenzie. The highlight of Midge's career was the BBC drama "Shoulder to Shoulder" about the suffragette movement. Midge was a self made woman, who started her life sharing a bed with my mum (her auntie) in a run down Oldham slum. She was sent to Dublin during the war, to escape the bombings and started her career as a secretary in an advertising agency. By the time I was old enough to appreciate her she was an established director and amongst other things set up the Sheffield Film festival. Midge had a great intellect and a way of seeing things as they were. That is one reason why Director John Huston chose her to make the last documentary about his life.

Over a bottle of wine a few years ago, I happened to mention my dislike of the Daily Mail. She spent the next hour explaining how disgusting the paper was and how it had done more damage to women and their self esteem than everything else put together. She explained how the Mail's agenda was aimed at keeping women suppressed and concerned about their appearance, rather than their rights and their careers. Midge explained that the Mail had a systematic editorial policy of ridiculing anyone who didn't confirm to their view of a perfect woman (ie a stay at home mum lovingly kowtowing to their husband).

I'd fogotten this conversation until just now. I got an email from my sister with a clip from the Mail concerning Kate Nash. Now my sister has lived in Florida for the last 30 years. She's married to an eminent retired doctor, once responsible for the emergency health care provision for the US senate. A couple of years ago, whilst visiting, she came with her husband to watch a gig I was promoting for MacMillan Cancer relief. The support act was a then unknown Kate Nash. Kate is the daughter of one of my best friends. She put on a storming show at the Mill Hill Jazz Club, donating all her fees to charity. Within a few months she was number 1.

My sister has followed Kate's career from afar and sent me a clip from todays Daily Mail online entitled "Spotty Kate Nash Braves the Cameras". This disgusting little story shows a blown up picture of Kate's face with a spot on it. The audacity of the girl.

Well I'm sorry Daily Mail, 21 year old girls get spots. It is normal. To put a story like that in you paper just shows what a bunch of lowlifes you are. What message are you sending to girls? Don't go out unless you are perfect. What will my 13 year old daughter think if she has acne? She'll think she's disgusting. She'll feel undermined. She'll feel worried. To be honest, this story makes me sick.

Well Kate, we're four square behind you. It would make more than a few spots before you were anything other than fantastic. You have talent, unlike the cowardly Daily Mail reporter who didn't even have the guts to put his name on his masterpiece.

I'm sorry to say that I had almost forgotten my conversation with my amazing inspirational cousin. I just wish the thing that made me recall it was something more inspiring than that horrible little story in the awful rag.