Monday, 7 March 2011

The role of the Police at Barnet Town Hall

I emailed one of our local senior police officers to convey my frustrations and concern about the way public order arrangements were made for the recent Barnet Council meeting. His response certainly cleared up a couple of misapprehensions I had about their role and responsibility. I thought I'd share a few comments with you (with his permission).

our role is explicit in that we were present to prevent crime and to prevent a breach of the peace. Not to control how the meeting is run, or who gets to be where or to deal with safety issues. I'm not normally one for drawing lines in the sand but those are strictly a matter for the chair of the meeting and his agents. In this case the LA. (clearly, we would advise, but there is no obligation for advice to be heeded and the decision is always that of the premises. This is the same principle in football stadia/concert venues etc). We could be asked to assist in removing a person from the premises, but it would have to be at the request of the chair and when that person had behaved in a disorderly way etc.

It can lead to some confusion in that people expect the police to lead, but as I say, we confine ourselves to preventing crime and preventing breaches of the peace. Happily there was no crime and a breach of the peace must include violence or damage to property (or likelyhood of) to empower us to intervene. Shouting is not enough to cause a breach of the peace

Sunday, 6 March 2011

Urgent News : Latest water update from Veolia - 16:30 - service back in two hours

Message added 16:15 (Next update 18:00)
The repair team are currently cutting out the broken piece of main to replace with the new, We anticipate supplies to be restored within 2 hours.
Thank you for your patience.

https://central.veoliawater.co.uk/where-we-are-working.aspx?wID=692

Message added: 14:30 (Next update 16:30)
Our repair team are still carrying out repairs to the broken main, we have arranged for bottled water to be delivered to Mill Hill at the following locations: Wise Lane, Marsh Lane and Broadway. This should arrive onsite apprx 16:30.
We would like to thank you for your continued patience and apologise for the inconvenience caused.

Message added 11.40 (Next update 14:30)
Our actions to close in valves on the main to restore water to properties has caused our Mill Hill booster that supplies pressure to the area to drop and cause further no waters to the NW7 area. Unfortunately we have no ETA for supplies to be restored in the Mill Hill area. This has also caused no waters to North Finchley N12.
Edgware customers should now have some supply back at reduced pressure, this will be back to full pressure once the burst has been repaired..
We apologise for the inconvenience caused and thank you for your patience through out this incident.

Urgent News - Sunday 13:23 : No water in Mill Hill, NW7 due to Veolia Water

Updated 14:20 - Now on BBC website - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-12659705 - **ends

I awoke this morning to find no water pressure in our taps.

It turns out that a burst water main on the Edgware Way has taken out supplies to Mill Hill NW7.

You can check the status here :-

http://central.veoliawater.co.uk/customer-zone.aspx?tab=3

This is what it said at 1pm. The website asks for a postcode. I put my Mill Hill one in and it said that there were no reported problems. I then tried HA8  postcode (Edgware) and it said this. Seems that even though Mill Hill is affected, their  system can't deal with it. Anyway as you can see no imminent restoration of supply. Sadly nothing on Barnet Council Website at present for concerned residents or on the Edgware Times news site. Just as well you looked here

--------------------------------------
Message added 11.40 (Next update 14:30)


Our actions to close in valves on the main to restore water to properties has caused our Mill Hill booster that supplies pressure to the area to drop and cause further no waters to the NW7 area. Unfortunately we have no ETA for supplies to be restored in the Mill Hill area.

Edgware customers should now have some supply back at reduced pressure, this will be back to full pressure once the burst has been repaired..

We apologise for the inconvenience caused and thank you for your patience through out this incident.

Message added 10:00 (Next update 12:00)

Our repair team are onsite and carrying out repairs.

Water has been diverted from other areas to restore the majority of properties affected, customers may experience reduced pressure whilst the works are carried out..

We anticipate all supplies to be restored within 2 hours.

Thank you for your patience.

If you live in the above area, and are experiencing water supply issues there is a burst on Edgware Way junction with Broadhurst Avenue.

Our technician is currently onsite investigating, Please be aware this is a very severe burst and affecting a number of properties in HA8 and NW7 areas.


Please try to refrain from calling as we are experiencing a large volume of calls.

We apologise for the inconvenience and aim to restore the supply to normal as soon as possible.

This message was added at 8.10am and will be updated at 10:00.

No soup for David Cameron at the CST Dinner?

David Cameron recently attended the CST Dinner to voice his support for CST and the Jewish community in the fight against antisemitism and extremism. Local Hendon MP Matthew Offord was also due to attend this event.
Matthew tweeted "Will be attending the CST dinner after the Terrorism motion later tonight" at lunchtime
The dinner starts at 6.30pm and runs through till about 10pm. According to Hansard, the debate Matthew mentioned finished at 8.30pm. So it seems that sadly Matthew wasn't around when the starters were served. 


I do hope that with Matthew detained in the House, the Prime Minister was able to get his soup.

What's the difference between a Cuban Student and a Tory Councillor

It's Saturday night and my beloved is away with eledest daughter who is competing in the British Swimming Championships in Manchester. As a result I've been doing what any self respecting half Australian, half Irish drunkard does in such a situation. I've been sitting in a state of melancholy.

My thoughts turned to my visit to Minsk in the USSR in 1987. I asked some student friends who were studying English to take me to a "real workingmens bar". They said "We can take you to the beer bar, but it's a bit rough". I said "Great". I cannot possibly describe it.It was like a large cattle shed. There was no ladies loo, the gents had only a urinal that was a sheet of corrigated iron draining into a bit of guttering (imagine the worst bogs at a football ground in the 1970's times ten). The only option was beer. There was only one brand on sale and only one size of glass. The bar was full of people who looked like extras from a low budget horror film. Apart from the 5 or 6 students with me, everyone else was aged 40 or above. It was packed but strangely quiet. People went their to drink cheap beer and forget their problems. There was a bit of a stir. One elderly Russian guy called me a fascist when he heard I was British. I retorted that the British were fighting Nazi's when they had the Molotov - Von Ribbentrop pact and so he had no right to say such a thing. My student friends were worried that it would turn nasty, but the guy laughed and said "That was the Government. All Governments are corrupt" and was fine after that.

As the beers went down, suddenly the atmosphere changed. A group of young black men appeared in the bar. Sadly that was the moment I found that socialist paradises contain as many racists as anywhere else. My Russian student friends became rather upset. They started telling the drunken, working class oldsters that they were letting Russia down with their racist behaviour. I was intrigued by the new group and engaged them in conversation. It transpired that they were Cuban students at the same college as my friends. They spoke good English and were friendly. I was intrigued about Cuba and also intrigued about their view of the USSR. I wa fairly shocked by their responses. Every question I asked was met with a stock response from the "How to be a good Cuban Communist" guidebook. I probed deeper. I said "Look, in the UK, even people who love Margaret Thatcher (then Prime Minister), criticise her, surely there must be something about President Castro you don't like". They replied "No, we love everything about him. To us he is like superman. The reason British people criticise Thatcher is because she is no good".

I was quite upset. Whilst I could understand them not wishing to run down their president, they were intelligent young men, they'd had a few beers and so I'd expected a slightly less stilted conversation. A couple of days later, I was discussing this with my Russian friends (who were always pretty open about their own opinion of the Government). I explained that I was saddened that the Cubans had been so uptight. One of my friends replied "You have never lived in a dicatatorship. You don't understand". I didn't have a clue what he meant. He explained "Imagine you are a Cuban Student in the USSR. You go with your friends into a beer bar, to get away from prying eyes. All of a sudden a person who claims they are British starts talking to you, buying you drinks and asking you to run down your President. That is a great way to get shot!". I replied that surely they could see I was genuinely British. My friends replied "Do you think Agent provocateurs go around telling everyone what they are".

I was thinking of this and I suddenly realised that these poor sad, terrified Cubans reminded me of our Tory backbench councillors in Barnet. There are easily enough of them to get Hillan out. Eighteen of them voted for Mark Shooter in the Council Election. Only 8 need to vote with the opposition for the Tories to lose their majority. All 18 know Hillan is a disaster. If they had said "Get rid of her, get a competent person to replace her, or we'll bring her down in the full council chamber" en mass, she'd have gone and they wouldn't have suffered all of the embarrassments since last June. Sadly, like our Cuban students, they are too scared to even think about it. Whilst the Cubans feared a bullet in the head, the worst that will happen to our Tories if they did what I said is, erm, um, erm, they'd get a new leader who wasn't incompetent. Why don't they realise that they can only be whipped if less than 8 of them act together.

I've asked what the worst consequences of defying a whip are :-

Loss of lucrative Committee Chairmanships
A telling off from John Marshall (chief Whip)
Deselection at the next election

Given that none of this would happen if Hillan went, it's clearly a load of old cobblers. How do I know? Brian Coleman did the same thing to former Leader Brian Salenger and he wasn't deselected. In fact he was promoted (which is why he lead the palace coup). I feel sorry for our local Tories when the sun comes out. They must see their own shadow and get scared to death.

Saturday, 5 March 2011

Metpro Rapid Repsonse - Leaflet delivered in Mill Hill

Those present at the Council Meeting on Tuesday night might be interested to see that they too can have that level of security for their home. MetPro rapid response have been delivering this leaflet all over Mill Hill to capitalise on the great publicity they got at the Council Meeting on Saturday. If you want an action response team at your door in 1-2 minutes, armed with Ballistic body armour, handcuffs, personal defence sprays (I don't  think they mean Lynx deodourant) and dogs, this could be just the service for you. They are endorsed by Barnet Council so the must be good ! (click on images for more readable format)


Interestingly their leaflet states they are not a security company. Their employees are ex-military, are trained to use necessary force and they can even dial 999 for you if necessary. If you think it sounds like a marvellous service the number is on the leaflet. If like me, you actually think Mill Hill is a nice, quiet and relatively safe place, you probably won't. Just for the avoindance of doubt, they haven't paid the Barnet Eye to stick their leaflet on here. It is brought to you as part of our public broadcasting of all interesting developments in Mill Hill.

Friday, 4 March 2011

Barnet Council - Delusional Deputy Doesn't Do Democracy

So what sort of a "consultant" do you get for £17,000 a month if you are Barnet Council?

Well, you get one like Mr Andrew T. Ravers. Mr Ravers is the bloke who runs the Council when the Six Million Dollar man (assuming the current CEO Mr Nick "Yer Hubcaps" Walkley works for 20 years for Barnet Council on his current £200,000 a year salary) is off on a well earned holiday.

Today Mr Ravers sent an email to his staff, telling everyone what a marvellous job him and his colleagues had done - full story here - http://barnetfutureshape.blogspot.com/2011/03/barnet-ceos-weekly-broadcast.html - here is just one sentence -
The people putting together BBC London’s ‘council cuts’ coverage must have been thinking they had chosen the wrong place to send their political editor.

Even more disturbing he goes on :-
Understandably there were some protests but these never got out of hand and the democratic process was able to take place with residents present in the public gallery.
Ok, Mr Ravers - who pays your wages? That's right - we do, the residents. Sure residents were present in the public gallery, but that is far from the whole story.  The Hendon Times reported

There were angry scenes as several people were stopped from entering the gallery during the debate on this year’s budget at Hendon Town Hall last night.
Although police had given the green-light for people to go in the council’s private security contractors blocked their entry, in a bid to prevent further disruption.

In actual fact Mr Ravers comments are an insult to the people of Barnet. Nobody intended to "disrupt the proceedings". As detailed by this blog and all of the other Barnet Blogs, all we asked residents to do was video the proceedings for posterity. Council Leader Lynne Hillan stated that this was banned. We ascertained that the ban was illegal and so we video'd the meeting. I was one of many residents completely excluded from the meeting, many others were put in a side room, with a dodgy audio feed and no video at all.

Barnet residents are not stupid. There was never any talk of "stopping the council setting a legal budget". Despite many people disagreeing with the cuts, the whole emphasis of the campaign has been about trying to get the council to cut waste rather than front line services. As far as this blog is concerned, Mr Andrew T. Ravers is a big part of the problem. His "fees" of £17,000 a month would pay the entire wage bill for all ten lollipop patrols at schools in three months.

Whilst Mr Ravers clearly thinks the evening was a success, the fact the BBC sent their political editor is a victory for the anti cuts campaign. My blog stats tell me that three times as many people looked at my blog this Wednesday, compared to the same day last week. Same again Thursday. The local press have yet again given the council awful press. Mr Ravers comments are completely deluded. There was never any prospect of the Town Hall burning. The over the top security was a panicked and desperate overreaction (also a rather expensive one). It has  highlighted many further questions regarding how Barnet arranges it's security.

Mr Ravers reminds me of "comical Ali" in Bahgdad, claiming Saddam had beaten off the Americans as tanks rolled into town. What really annoys me though is the fact that I am paying for this deluded buffoon to make these pronouncements. Even more annoying is the fact that yet again, when there is important business, a Barnet Council boss is on holiday. Setting the budget is the most important meeting of the year. With the Tory government cuts, it is even more important this year. How on earth can Walkley justify a holiday this of all weeks.

Let me sum up the people running Barnet Council for you

The Leader Lynne Hillan - This week she pronounced in the press that the security arrangements were nothing to do with her.

The CEO of Barnet Council, Nick Walkley - On holiday

The new Deputy Mayor - Top priority collecting left over cakes and biscuits from the buffet.

The Deputy CEO - Mr Andrew Travers - thinks a meeting where many members of the public were excluded and those that got in were outraged was a resounding success.

Lord Help us all


A free advert for Barnet Council courtesy of the Barnet Eye


I spotted this advert in the Barnet Press Today. I am affronted. As I'm a fat old bloke of nearly 50, surely a bit of Hip Hop, Locking, Popping and Waaking would do me no end of good. Sadly as I'm not 14 - 24 and I'm a bloke, Barnet Council think it's OK to discriminate against me. Don't they employ equal opportunities officers to ensure that this course is available to fat old blokes like me.  Surely that is what councils are meant to do?

I am gutted, they're shutting all of the museums for us old codgers, taking our sheltered housing wardens away and closing all of the libraries. I wouldn't mind so much if they gave us free hip hop lessons, but oh no, we are to old, fat and male for that.

Actually enough of the Daily Mail ranting. I actually think that this is just the type of thing Councils should organise for young people. I think it should be free for those that would otherwise be excluded. It does however show the complete lack of a coherent policy towards provision of activities for citizens of the Borough. I've no idea why amongst all of the cuts, Hip Hop lessons for 14-24 Women is such a High priority. It just reinforces my view that the Tories in Barnet have stuck all of the ideas for such services in a hat, pulled out a few and if they are questioned as to why they have decimated Youth Services they will say "Well look at the Marvellous Hip Hop Lessons for young women we introduced this year". Maybe someone can explain this to me

Thursday, 3 March 2011

The Man who sold the World

Oh No, not me I never lost control. You're face to face with the man who sold the world.

As I saw the video of old chubbychops Brian Coleman in action at Hendon Town Hall on Tuesday evening, I contemplated making a video of the old David Bowie song with Coleman on. The sad truth is that until May 2006, we had a vaguely sensible Conservative Council. Then Brian Coleman orchestrated the putsch which deposed Councillor Brian Salinger as Leader and selected Mike Freer. I was no fan of Salinger, but I had no idea of what Freer was like. He was unknown and introduced as a "hard Thatcherite". Freer wanted to make a name for himself. As such he started the "Future Shape" project. The idea is simple Thatcherism. Privatise everything. Just have a few people doing the things required by law.

Now what many people don't realise about Thatcherite Privatisation was that it was never about saving money for the taxpayer. It is about the destruction of the power of the Unions. By fragmenting services, it becomes harder to take effective action. Staff know that if they work for a private supplier and they strike, they are far more likely to lose their job and be thrown onto the dole. As private companies exist to make money for shareholders, a profit must be turned. Whilst this is referred to as efficiency, it usually means paying staff less. Whilst public services often have a degree of spare capacity, this is not always the case in private companies. Whilst it results in cheaper operation, when someone is ill, it means jobs don't get done. If a private company runs a sandwich bar and a member of staff is ill, a queue forms at lunchtime and people go elsewhere. If a community care worker is ill and can't work, if there is no spare capacity, someone gets left without care. Often agency workers will be brought in to cover who are not familair with the needs of the people they care for and are solely motivated to collect the cash and go.

A sensible Council, wishing to embark on a program of privatisation would look for services which are not delivering, analyse why and if a private supplier could be demonstrated to perform the service better, give them the contract. What haas happened in Barnet is that they want the whole shooting match privatised. This has created a mad rush, with corners cut. The Council's own auditors Grant Thornton issued a damning report highlighting the fact that no proper project plan existed and no effective controls were in place.

The crazy thing about the whole project is the fact that it is demonstrably a vanity project for the local Tories. A sensible pragmatic Tory would seek to "cherry pick" projects to ensure that successful outcomes were achieved, each building on the success of the previous ones. A methodology for implementing outsourcing would be developed based on real world problems. Expertise and skills would be developed and as each department was picked off, they would be able to cite past success.

What they have done is go big bang. As the wheels are coming off and the Unions find more and more holes. Sadly for the Tories, this lack of proper planning is likely to ultimately destroy the whole case. Legal challenges will follow and rather than making a sensible business case, they will end up destroying forever the concept of flogging off services. Anyone who has read any of Dexter Whitlock's analysis of the Future Shape / One Barnet model would have to conclude that it is rapidly becoming a replay of General Custers last stand.

The sad truth is that it has cost millions in consultants fees. On Tuesday Barnet implemented  a program of vicious cuts to front line services in the Budget. Rather oddly, they could have avoided all of this if they'd cancelled Future Shape and worked with the in house teams for greater efficiency. There would still have been cuts, but many of these could be directed to the layers of management which have been developed to handle the Easy Council model. There are many services which could have been made had council workers on salaries over £75,000 pa had a 5% salary cut and those on over £120,000 had a 10% cut. This would most definately saved enough to save the Lollipop service and sheltered housing wardens.

Barnet Council have adopted a bizarre stance on the whole issue. Councillors are being whipped in scrutiny committees. They have taken to declaring this at the start of the session. What this means is that they are forbidden from demanding further work on projects they no to be defective. It is completely crazy. If they see something needs fixing, they are not allowed to say. What could be more bonkers than shutting people up who are on your side and are trying to make your schemes work properly.

In Mrs Angry's blog about the Council meeting on Tuesday, the final paragraph explained why we are in the mess. Councillor Barry Evangeli had been elected as Deputy Mayor at the fractuous meeting. Amid all the scenes of Security guards manhandling residents, police, Councillors and Officials disagreeing over who could do what, Mr Evangeli emerged beaming with joy. He was chuffed. Why? He'd managed to snaffle a load of cakes, which had been left over from the buffet. If ever Brian Coleman falls under a bus, it seems we have a ready made replacement (note : it's the bit before the Weds update). The Tories in Barnet may "Sell the World" - you and I will have to pay the price.

Guest Blog - Rupert Murdoch gets green light totake over Sky TV

Guest Post by Allan Grote,

The Government has decided that Rupert Murdoch can gain control of one of Britain's largest news corporations.  Let's flood our politicians with tens of thousands of messages telling them we want Murdoch’s hands off our democracy: You can send a message to help stop this by clicking here -

http://www.avaaz.org/en/stop_rupert_murdoch_uk/?cl=968449309&v=8532





Murdoch has used his vast media empire to push war in Iraq, elect George W Bush, and block global action on climate change, and if he wins this week in Britain he will use his networks here to undermine all the issues that we care about. He has manipulated US, British and Australian democracy for years, but now he wants more complete control. In the US, most of the likely Republican presidential candidates are actually paid employees of Murdoch! When his Fox News Network was shunned by Barack Obama as a mere propaganda mouthpiece, it spawned the far right "tea party"and broadcast constant, often hate-filled attacks against Obama and his healthcare and peace agenda -- resulting in a huge win for Republicans in the 2010 congressional elections.

Murdoch media staff have trampled laws and standards when gathering news. Several News Corporation executives approved phone hacking and, when a formal investigation began, they had regular secret meetings with senior police officers who then failed to investigate the full extent of the scandal. Our government should punish such an organisation, not allow it monopoly powers over our media. But if Rupert Murdoch is allowed to buy all of BSkyB this week, he will soon own half of our newspapers and television. This should not be allowed in any democracy.

We can turn the tide on this powerful threat to our democracy. In the end the News of the World phone hacking scandal forced David Cameron’s communications director to resign. And a mass outcry from Canadian Avaaz members recently prevented a Murdoch-style TV network from getting taxpayer funding and stopped the Canadian government from removing the journalistic standards that would prevent this new network from spreading lies to the public. The fight against Murdoch has just begun, but already we've begun to win. Let's do the same in Britain! Click below to send an urgent message and send this on to everyone:

Across the Arab world and beyond, people are coming together in common cause across all boundaries. Murdoch's power is the ability to divide. His networks spew fear and misinformation, dividing left from right, citizens from foreigners, muslim from western, immigrants from non-immigrants, etc. Murdoch knows that democracy must be divided before it can be conquered. This week, let's show him what unity looks like.

Sources:

Murdoch close to deal with regulators over Sky
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a40fc482-4060-11e0-9140-00144feabdc0.html#ixzz1FHWHwqJE

If Murdoch gets BSkyB, it will be a victory for monopoly capitalism
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/feb/27/rupert-murdoch-bskyb-monopolies

'News of World' bosses dined with Met chief
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/news-of-world-bosses-dined-with-met-chief-2222814.html

Who is Rupert Murdoch?
http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2004/07/b122948.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allan Grote is a local environmental activist. Guest blogs are always welcome at the Barnet Eye. Just send via the link in the sidebar