Monday, 12 September 2022

๐๐€๐‘๐“๐ˆ๐๐†๐ƒ๐€๐‹๐„ ๐‹๐€๐๐„ ๐€๐๐๐‹๐ˆ๐‚๐€๐“๐ˆ๐Ž๐ ๐…๐Ž๐‘ ๐๐€๐“๐“๐„๐‘๐˜ ๐’๐“๐Ž๐‘๐€๐†๐„ ๐…๐€๐‚๐ˆ๐‹๐ˆ๐“๐˜ - Today is the last day to object to the planning appeal -Please email the planning inspectorate

Please email- your help is needed. The applicant has lodge an appeal with the planning inspectorate

Please Email north1@planninginspectorate.gov.uk quoting  APP/N5090/W/22/3298962 Ref: 20/4241/FUL - stating that you object to the facility and you believe all of the objections and the reasons for the council declining the application are valid.

This application has been PENDING since September 2020. As a reminder, ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜† ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐˜๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€, ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—•๐—ฒ๐—น๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ ๐—ฆ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐— ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—œ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ก๐—ฎ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป.

The plan was rejected by Barnet Council's planning committee, however an appeal has been lodged.
The Mill Hill Preservation Society notes that the applicant has chosen to measure itself against Natural Englandโ€™s Biodiversity Metric 2.0 that was in fact superseded by a more rigorous metric 3.0 in July 2021.
MHPS has written to the Council highlighting this misleading submission and reiterating our previous objections (see our post of 30/9/20). MHPS continues to believe that there is no justification for this as a suitable location for a battery storage system that would be better located alongside an actual renewable energy installation, preferably on a brownfield site. The applicant admitted at the meeting that the main reason for their application was because an installation on a nature reserve is far cheaper and more convenient for them.
------
Note: This message was posted on the Mill Hill Preservation Society Facebook page
The Barnet Eye has been following this story since the news broke. Our most read blog of 2020 was one featuring an impassioned speech by local wildlife expert Samuel Levy. We are pleased that we played a major part in creating awareness and getting objections from local residents. If you havent' seen Samuel's video, please watch it now. This explains why this development should be rejected.

No comments: